The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #48 0 条评价 | #6 124 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #12 6 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 7 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #44 0 条评价 | #6 79 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #8 39 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #7 38 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #5 52 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #30 0 条评价 | #9 56 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #13 16 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #11 6 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #13 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel management software means balancing features, ease of use, support, and cost. Beds24 and RMS both aim to streamline your operations, but they serve different hotel types and business sizes.
Beds24 offers a broad, flexible platform suited for small to mid-sized properties, especially vacation rentals and B&Bs. RMS, on the other hand, caters to a wider range of property types, with more advanced automation and integration features, favored by larger, multi-property groups.
Which product better fits your hotel’s operational complexity and growth plans?
Both Beds24 and RMS help manage reservations, synchronize listings, and process payments, but they diverge in scope and depth. Beds24, founded in 2006, provides a multi-property platform with an emphasis on channel management, direct bookings, and automation. RMS, established in 1983, delivers a comprehensive, scalable solution with a well-rounded set of features designed for larger or expanding portfolios.
Beds24 boasts an easy-to-set-up, cost-effective system favored by small hotels, B&Bs, and vacation rentals. RMS appeals to hotels seeking a unified, enterprise-level system, with robust automation, more integrations, and extensive customization options.
Can your property benefit from RMS’s deeper feature set or is Beds24’s straightforward approach sufficient?
If your hotel needs a flexible, budget-friendly platform primarily for vacation rentals, B&Bs, or small hotels, go with Beds24. Its channel management, automated workflows, and direct booking tools make it ideal for properties that rely heavily on OTAs and online bookings.
If your hotel requires a full-scale management system with advanced revenue management, POS, CRS, and guest CRM capabilities, RMS is the stronger choice. Its extensive integrations and support for multi-property management suit mid-sized to large hotels, resorts, or chains looking to streamline complex operations.
For boutique hotels or independent properties with simple needs, Beds24 suffices. Large portfolios or hotels seeking automation and scalability should lean toward RMS.
Beds24’s interface has a reputation for being functional but not particularly intuitive, with a steep learning curve that may challenge staff during onboarding. Its user ratings are low, and recent reviews highlight difficulties with system quirks and performance lag.
RMS, rated at 4.3/5 with over 224 recent reviews, wins on ease of use. Hotels praise its intuitive dashboard, quick onboarding (average 4.14/5), and helpful support staff. RMS’s user-friendly design reduces staff training time and enhances daily productivity.
Edge: RMS.
RMS offers 43 unique features, including a channel manager, EPoS, revenue management, guest CRM, online booking engine, automated night audit, and group management. Its integrated CRS and native email marketing streamline complex hotel operations.
Beds24 provides 31 features, with key offerings like its drag-and-drop tapechart and core PMS functionalities. However, it lacks many advanced features present in RMS, such as revenue management modules or native POS integrations.
Edge: RMS.
RMS’s customer support earns a 4.52/5 rating, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Hoteliers appreciate the personalized onboarding and ongoing assistance, highlighting its online 24/7 support.
Beds24, with a 0/5 rating, has no recent reviews or support feedback available, indicating limited or unverified support quality. Several users mention difficulties with performance and bugs that could benefit from better assistance.
Edge: RMS.
RMS connects with 112 verified partners, including Criton, Sage, STR, and Unifocus, covering PMS, CRS, revenue management, and POS systems. Its extensive partner network enables customized workflows across multiple hotel functions.
Beds24 offers 19 verified integrations, such as Airbnb, Vrbo, Booking.com, and Expedia, mainly focusing on channel management and booking portals. While sufficient for small-scale operations, RMS’s broader integration options support more complex hotel ecosystems.
Edge: RMS.
RMS’s overall rating of 4.56/5, based on 224 recent reviews, reflects high satisfaction, especially among hotels managing multiple properties. Its users commend its automation, reporting, and support, with one reviewer noting, “It was the easiest onboarding process I’ve had of any system.”
Beds24’s rating, at 0/5, is unverified due to no recent reviews, making it difficult to assess user satisfaction. The lack of recent feedback suggests lower confidence in its current performance.
Edge: RMS.
Beds24 charges a flat fee of $100 per month, with no free trial or implementation fees, making it an affordable option for small hotels. RMS’s base price is $700 per month, reflecting its broader feature set and enterprise focus, with no trial offer available.
While RMS’s higher cost might be justified for larger operations, Beds24’s lower price point appeals to smaller properties and startups.
RMS stands out for its comprehensive feature set, ease of use, and recent positive reviews, making it the better choice for most mid-sized and large hotels. Its extensive integrations and support are tailored to streamline complex hotel operations and improve profitability.
Beds24 offers a cost-effective, straightforward platform ideal for small-scale properties, vacation rentals, or hotels with limited operational needs. Its channel management and automation capabilities make it suitable for properties prioritizing budget and simplicity.
For hotels seeking a reliable, supported, and scalable system, RMS is the clear winner. Smaller properties or those with tight budgets should consider Beds24 as a practical, no-frills alternative.
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队的响应速度和问题解决能力备受好评。客户高度赞赏他们积极主动地解决问题以及在系统操作方面提供的帮助。
RMS Cloud 以其用户友好的界面而著称,简化了操作流程,缩短了员工培训时间。这种简化对于高效运营至关重要,尤其是在快节奏的工作环境中。
RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users apprec... RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users appreciate its role in enabling real-time coordination among various departments, thereby enhancing efficiency and guest experience.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
许多用户称赞该平台的自定义功能,允许他们调整入住流程和其他操作,以更好地满足自身需求。然而,一些评论指出,自定义报告功能需要改进。
尽管 RMS Cloud 提供多种报告,但用户反映报告自定义和访问某些设置方面存在困难。如果能改进这方面,就能简化生成可用于决策的实用信息的过程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Beds24 和 RMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Beds24 提供 19 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RMS 提供 112 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Beds24:否。RMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Beds24 的 HT Score 为 0,RMS 的为 87。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问