The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 132 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 221 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 130 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 62 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 222 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #1 269 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #1 190 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 86 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #2 52 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 224 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #1 19 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #1 247 条评价 |
Choosing the right guest app is critical for modern hoteliers aiming to enhance guest experiences, streamline operations, and boost revenue. Both BGuest by BGuest and Duve App aim to address these needs, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and user feedback. Your team needs clarity on which platform aligns better with your property’s scale, technological needs, and growth plans.
BGuest is a guest engagement tool with a minimal online presence and no recent reviews, whereas Duve boasts a substantial review base, high scores, and active regional deployment. Do you want a proven, widely adopted solution, or are you willing to explore a less documented platform?
BGuest positions itself as a guest engagement platform designed to shorten the distance between hotels and guests, emphasizing basic PMS integration for check-in, check-out, and digital directories. Its presence is limited: no verified integrations, no reviews from recent users, and no clear regional footprint. Meanwhile, Duve offers a full suite of 23 features, including mobile guest messaging, contactless check-in, upselling, and integrations with 65 partners across 54 countries.
While BGuest claims to connect with PMS systems, its lack of verified partners and absence of recent customer feedback make its effectiveness uncertain. Conversely, Duve’s recent reviews highlight a 95% likelihood of recommendation, with many success stories from large chains and boutique hotels alike.
Do you prefer an untested platform with minimal market presence or a product with proven results, extensive integrations, and active client feedback? The evidence favors Duve.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, multi-functional guest engagement platform capable of supporting large-scale operations, Duve is the clear choice. Its wide-ranging features—guest messaging, upselling, digital check-in, multilingual support, and integrations—are proven through nearly 500 recent reviews and multiple awards.
If your hotel only requires simple guest communication tools and minimal integration, and you’re comfortable with a less documented vendor, BGuest could suffice. However, given the lack of recent reviews, BGuest's suitability for active, growth-oriented hotels is questionable.
For hotels seeking a scalable, feature-rich solution with a track record of boosting guest satisfaction and revenue, Duve stands out. If simplicity and minimal features are enough, BGuest might be considered, but the risk of limited support and uncertain effectiveness is higher.
Duve’s UI scores nearly perfect at 4.73/5, with users describing it as straightforward and easy to manage, even for staff training. The onboarding experience is rated 4.67/5, backed by recent reviews praising its user-friendly setup and quick deployment.
BGuest, on the other hand, scores zero in ease of use, with no recent reviews or ratings available to gauge staff or guest experience. Feedback from Duve users highlights a seamless experience that improves staff efficiency and guest satisfaction.
Edge: Duve.
Duve offers 23 features, including mobile-friendly interfaces, WhatsApp integration, automated replies, secure data protection, guest profiles, and in-app payments. Its features support multiple operational aspects, from digital check-in to guest surveys, and are backed by recent, positive user feedback.
BGuest’s feature set appears limited to basic check-in, check-out, digital directories, and PMS connectivity, with no unique features or recent updates. It has no verified integrations or advanced functionalities.
Edge: Duve.
Duve’s support scores 4.65/5, with reviews praising their responsiveness and helpful assistance. Recent reviews note that Duve’s customer service effectively resolves issues, and onboarding is smooth.
BGuest scores zero in support and onboarding, with no recent reviews or feedback to assess their responsiveness. Given the detailed praise for Duve’s support, it clearly leads in this area.
Edge: Duve.
Duve boasts 65 verified partners, including PMS, door lock, and revenue management integrations, supporting extensive third-party connectivity. Shared integrations are nonexistent, but Duve’s broad ecosystem enables more seamless workflows.
BGuest reports no verified integrations, limiting its capacity to connect with other hotel systems. This restricts automation and operational efficiency for hotels with complex tech stacks.
Edge: Duve.
Duve’s recent reviews reflect an average rating of 4.75/5, with properties ranging from luxury to boutique and vacation rentals. Many users emphasize improved guest satisfaction, operational efficiency, and revenue boosts, especially in large or chain properties.
BGuest has no recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or property-specific ratings. The absence of recent feedback suggests limited market traction or support.
Edge: Duve.
BGuest’s pricing details are unavailable; it does not offer a freemium model or trial. Its costs and licensing structure remain opaque, which complicates budgeting decisions.
Duve charges a clear base price of $900 per month with no free tier or trial, which many users find justified by its extensive features and proven ROI. Its pricing aligns with enterprise-level platforms, especially for larger operations.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Duve offers a comprehensive, highly-rated platform with extensive features, integrations, and recent customer success stories. BGuest, by contrast, remains a little-known, minimally-reviewed product with limited data on its effectiveness and support.
If your hotel prioritizes operational efficiency, revenue growth, and guest satisfaction, Duve is the logical choice. Its large user base, recent positive reviews, and proven ROI make it the safer, more reliable option.
Choose Duve if you want a scalable, feature-rich guest app that can support your property’s growth and deliver measurable results. Opt for BGuest only if your needs are extremely basic, and you’re willing to accept the uncertainties associated with limited recent feedback and integrations.
This comparison underscores that Duve’s active, extensive user base and recent, high ratings make it the clear leader for hotels seeking a reliable, feature-packed guest app. Its proven track record of boosting revenue, simplifying operations, and elevating guest experiences makes it the recommended platform for most hoteliers today.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Duve was a game changer for our customer service. I knew the platform would help us connect with guests but I was amazed at how cleverly simple it all is, even guests who are not v..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"While scaling up and growing in terms of more hotel rooms and more hotels in different countries we found it difficult to communicate with our guests in a very personal way. Duve f..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了Duve的用户友好界面,无论是员工还是客人都能轻松上手和管理。用户导航和体验方面的改进是一些可以进一步完善的小建议。
该应用程序的多语言功能和简化的服务请求流程等丰富特性提升了宾客体验,有助于提高宾客入住期间的满意度。便捷的即时通讯和服务也为此做出了重要贡献。
支持团队因其响应迅速且乐于助人而广受好评。然而,一些批评指出存在延迟或问题未得到彻底解决的情况,表明服务一致性方面仍有提升空间。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users appreciate Duve's customizability, especially in handling different guest needs and branding. However, they suggest improvements in template fle... Users appreciate Duve's customizability, especially in handling different guest needs and branding. However, they suggest improvements in template flexibility and options to match specific guest types.
Duve能够与PMS和其他酒店管理系统集成,通过同步宾客数据和减轻管理负担来提高效率。然而,用户希望实现更深层次的集成,以简化日益复杂的操作。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。BGuest 和 Duve App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。BGuest 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Duve App 提供 65 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Duve App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
BGuest:否。Duve App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。BGuest 的 HT Score 为 0,Duve 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问