The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 27 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Bnovo (Биново) 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 EPoS.
Noovy 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Ancillary revenue tracking.
基于 HTR 上 27 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 2 | 25 |
在分析了 27 条经验证的评价后,Bnovo (Биново) 用户最看重其 ,而 Noovy 用户则强调 易于使用, 客户服务, 自动付款处理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
自动付款处理
▾
|
|
|
+
直接 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
设计
▾
|
|
|
−
报告工具
▾
|
|
|
−
翻译问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #55 1 条评价 | #39 11 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #38 12 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #51 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #70 1 条评价 | #38 14 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #70 0 条评价 | #54 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #52 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 欧洲 ▾ | #39 2 条评价 | #22 23 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #16 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Bnovo PMS and Noovy PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both systems aim to streamline operations, but they differ significantly in features, support, and user feedback. Bnovo offers a traditional, regionally focused PMS with limited reviews and a smaller user base, whereas Noovy provides a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and recent positive reviews. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
Both products address core property management challenges—booking, guest communication, and channel connectivity—and aim to improve efficiency. Bnovo's core strengths lie in its established presence and connectivity options in Europe and Asia, while Noovy emphasizes ease of use, automation, and an all-in-one approach. As both systems target similar pain points, your choice should be based on support quality, ease of adoption, and feature depth.
Are you willing to prioritize a system with a larger, more recent review footprint and higher user satisfaction? Or do you prefer a solution rooted in regional connectivity with a narrower but potentially more tailored feature set? Let’s examine both options closely.
Bnovo PMS, founded in 2012 and servicing over 3,000 properties mainly in Europe, Russia, and Asia, offers a cloud-based platform with a focus on connectivity and automation. However, its review score of 2.25/5 from only 2 reviews indicates limited recent feedback, and support scores are notably low at 1.25/5.
Noovy, established in 2017 and supporting hotels across seven countries, boasts a 5/5 review rating from 18 recent reviews, with a customer support score of 4.89/5. Its broad feature set, including automation, digital registration, and guest communication tools, is highly valued by users.
Given the limited recent reviews and low support ratings for Bnovo, it’s difficult to recommend it over Noovy, which shows a clear edge in user satisfaction and recent engagement. Would you prefer a system with proven, current support and positive user feedback? Or are regional connectors and a smaller footprint sufficient for your needs?
If your hotel operates primarily in Europe, Russia, or Asia, and your team needs a straightforward, connectivity-focused PMS, Bnovo could be a consideration. It’s suitable for motels and villas, especially if your staff can handle its interface and support limitations.
If, however, your hotel values automation, extensive integrations, modern features like online check-in/out, guest messaging, and an easy onboarding process, Noovy is the stronger choice. Its user-friendly platform and highly positive recent reviews make it ideal for boutique, city-center, and budget hotels seeking a comprehensive solution.
In summary, choose Bnovo if your needs are regional and basic, and your team is prepared to navigate support challenges. Opt for Noovy if you prioritize ease of use, automation, and a well-supported platform.
Bnovo’s interface receives mixed feedback, with some reviews citing a "disgusting interface" and server crashes, though others find the personal room layout understandable. Its user rating of 3/5 suggests usability issues and a steep learning curve, compounded by support rated at just 1.25/5.
In contrast, Noovy’s interface scores 4.84/5, with reviews emphasizing its ease of use, quick setup, and intuitive design. Users note that staff adoption is rapid and that the platform simplifies operations, saving time and reducing errors.
Edge: Noovy.
Bnovo offers 19 features, including connectors and capacity management, but lacks advanced automation tools. Notably, it includes only one feature unique to it, EPoS.
Noovy boasts 30 features, covering automation (night audit, task management, automated reminders), guest communication (SMS, email, ID scanning), online check-in/out, housekeeper app, and real-time reporting. It also integrates a payment terminal, guest messaging, and online registration, providing a more complete operational suite.
Edge: Noovy.
Support ratings reveal a stark difference: Bnovo’s support scores a mere 1.25/5, with reviews describing it as "very bad" and "catastrophic" during system crashes. Customers report slow, unhelpful assistance, hampering operational reliability.
Noovy, however, scores 4.89/5, with users praising its "friendly," "reliable," and "fast" support. Multiple reviews describe support as "excellent," with responsiveness and problem resolution clearly superior.
Edge: Noovy.
Bnovo’s integration ecosystem is limited, with only 2 verified partners, including comparison.me and Aiosell Technologies. This restricts seamless connectivity with third-party tools.
Noovy excels with 40 verified integrations, including popular platforms like Omnibees, Bookboost, RevControl, and GuestRevu. Its extensive partner network enables hotels to connect with a wide range of OTAs, revenue tools, and guest engagement platforms.
Edge: Noovy.
Bnovo’s review ratings are low, with an overall score of 2.25/5 based on only 2 reviews, and recent feedback is unavailable. Many users lament poor support and system crashes.
Noovy enjoys a 5/5 rating from 18 reviews, with recent feedback praising its usability, automation, and support. Hotels of various segments, especially boutique and city hotels, find it highly effective and easy to adopt.
Edge: Noovy.
Bnovo does not publicly list pricing, likely offering customized quotes or a premium plan. Its lack of transparent costs makes budgeting uncertain.
Noovy charges €5 (~$5.50) per room per month, with no additional implementation fees, making it an affordable, predictable investment. Its straightforward pricing aligns with its all-in-one, cloud-based model.
Edge: Noovy.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Bnovo is a regional, connectivity-focused PMS with limited features and support, suitable for small properties in specific markets. Its low review ratings and support issues suggest it’s better suited for hotels with technical expertise and regional needs.
Noovy offers a modern, feature-rich platform with a broad integration ecosystem, excellent support, and high user satisfaction. It is ideal for hotels seeking automation, guest engagement, and a scalable system that is easy to implement.
If your priority is current user satisfaction, automation, and support, Noovy is the clear choice. For regional, connectivity-only needs with a willingness to manage support challenges, Bnovo could suffice, though it remains a less proven option overall.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Bnovo PMS 和 Noovy PMS 共享 18 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 19 项功能存在差异。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论称赞该系统的易用性,指出其用户友好的设计和直观的界面可以快速培训新员工并减少操作错误。
优质的客户服务经常被提及,用户欣赏快速的响应和有效的解决方案,这有助于对产品的整体满意度。
该系统支持自动付款请求和处理,大大简化了计费流程并降低了错误率。此功能还因其在处理不可退款预订方面的效率而受到好评。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户很欣赏该软件的功能,但注意到其设计略显过时,但预计重新设计将解决这个问题。
该软件提供强大的报告工具,可以深入了解酒店运营的各个方面,帮助做出更好的管理决策。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Bnovo PMS 和 Noovy PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Bnovo PMS 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Noovy PMS 提供 40 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Noovy PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 3.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Bnovo PMS:否。Noovy PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Bnovo (Биново) 的 HT Score 为 0,Noovy 的为 71。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案