Clock PMS vs. Noovy PMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 353 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 353 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Clock 表现出色 在 功能丰富 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Guest App.

Noovy 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Clock PMS 与 Noovy PMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 353 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
84
71
推荐可能性
95%
99%
易用性
4.8/5
4.9/5
客户支持
4.8/5
4.9/5
性价比
4.7/5
5.0/5
起始价格 From $600/mo From $600/mo
经验证的评价 328 25

Clock PMS 与 Noovy PMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 353 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 功能丰富, 运营效率, 响应式支持和定期更新,而 Noovy 用户则强调 易于使用, 客户服务, 自动付款处理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Clock Clock Noovy Noovy
优点
+ 功能丰富
+ 易于使用
+ 运营效率
+ 客户服务
+ 响应式支持和定期更新
+ 自动付款处理
+ 易于培训使用
+ 直接 OTA 集成
缺点
错误消息
设计
报告功能
报告工具
翻译问题

Clock 对比 Noovy:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Clock Clock Noovy Noovy
小型(10-24 间客房) #11 117 条评价 #39 11 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #7 157 条评价 #38 12 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #17 9 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #11 5 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Clock Clock Noovy Noovy
精品酒店 #8 165 条评价 #38 14 条评价
豪华酒店 #11 80 条评价 #54 2 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #8 62 条评价 #52 2 条评价
长住酒店 #9 27 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Clock Clock Noovy Noovy
北美 #17 30 条评价
欧洲 #3 228 条评价 #22 23 条评价
亚太 #11 13 条评价
中东 #17 2 条评价 #16 2 条评价

The Decision

Choosing the right Property Management System (PMS) can elevate your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and profitability. Clock PMS and Noovy PMS both aim to streamline hotel workflows, but they differ significantly in features, user base, and recent review momentum. Clock offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with over 250 reviews, most recent in the last six months, giving it a data confidence edge. Noovy, while newer with fewer reviews, specializes in automation and affordability. How do these differences impact your decision?

Is Clock PMS or Noovy PMS Better for Hotels?

Both Clock PMS and Noovy PMS solve core hotel management needs—reservations, rates, invoicing, and guest communication. Clock’s extensive suite includes over 50 features such as guest profiles, multi-currency handling, and integrations with payment and activity booking tools, making it suitable for hotels seeking a full-service platform. Noovy emphasizes ease and automation, with features like direct OTA integrations, automated payments, and a simple onboarding process, ideal for hotels prioritizing quick deployment and minimal training.

Clock’s larger review count (251 reviews) and recent feedback (6 reviews in the last six months) provide more current insights, suggesting a more tested and stable product. Noovy’s reviews (19 total, none in the last six months) reflect a newer but rapidly growing platform focused on automation and cost-efficiency. Do you prefer a robust, all-in-one system or a streamlined, automation-focused solution?

Clock PMS vs Noovy PMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel requires a comprehensive platform that covers reservations, front desk, invoicing, housekeeping, guest messaging, and extensive integrations, Clock PMS is the clear choice. Its broad feature set and proven scalability suit mid-to-large hotels or those with complex operations seeking centralized control. Conversely, Noovy PMS fits smaller hotels or independent properties that want straightforward automation, fast onboarding, and low-cost operations, especially if they value direct OTA integration and automated payments.

Clock’s review score of 4.8/5 from 251 reviews outweighs Noovy’s perfect 5/5 but from only 19 reviews, which are less recent. If your hotel needs proven robustness and a feature-rich environment, go with Clock. If ease of use and automation are your priorities, Noovy is a compelling option.

Is Clock PMS or Noovy PMS Easier to Use?

Clock PMS’s UI is praised for its ease of training, with a 4.78/5 ease rating and positive feedback on onboarding. Users highlight that new staff find Clock intuitive, reducing training time, and the platform’s automation helps streamline daily tasks. However, some reviews note that its extensive features can be overwhelming initially and that report generation can be slow, with occasional cryptic error messages.

Noovy PMS scores slightly higher for ease of use at 4.84/5, with users often describing it as fast, friendly, and simple. Its onboarding is quick, and automation simplifies daily workflows, reducing manual input. Its intuitive interface and direct OTA integrations reduce learning curves, especially for smaller teams.

Edge: Noovy.

Which Has Better Features: Clock or Noovy?

Clock PMS boasts 47 shared features plus 11 unique functionalities like guest profiles, multi-currency, gift vouchers, and a guest app—covering reservations, rates, invoicing, event management, and even restaurant POS. It emphasizes automation, multi-lingual support, and detailed analytics, making it suitable for hotels with diverse operational needs.

Noovy offers fewer features (only 40 verified partners), but it excels in automation, with unique features like direct OTA integration, automated payments, and messaging. Its focus on simplicity and automation helps hotels reduce manual work and errors.

In terms of feature count, Clock’s broader suite provides more options for complex operations, but Noovy’s automation tools deliver efficiency for smaller properties.

Edge: Clock.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Clock or Noovy?

Clock PMS is rated 4.75/5 for support, with users praising its responsive, helpful team and regular updates that introduce new features and improvements. Review quotes mention quick assistance and a proactive approach, though some note occasional delays in support response times.

Noovy PMS slightly edges out with a 4.89/5 rating, with users calling its support “friendly,” “reliable,” and “quick to respond.” Its 24/7 support and clear communication make onboarding and troubleshooting smoother, especially for smaller hotels.

Edge: Noovy.

Which Has More Integrations: Clock or Noovy?

Clock PMS integrates with 111 verified partners, including industry giants like SiteMinder, Revinate, and RateGain. It also offers numerous exclusive integrations such as hotel-specific tools like Curacity, Lybra Tech, and Profitroom, making it highly adaptable for hotels seeking comprehensive connectivity.

Noovy PMS has 40 verified partners, with notable integrations like Omnibees, Shiji Group, and Oaky. It shares some common partners with Clock, like Bookboost and RevControl, but its smaller ecosystem might limit integration options for hotels with complex tech stacks.

Edge: Clock.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Clock or Noovy?

Clock PMS’s overall rating of 4.8/5 from 251 reviews reflects a strong, stable user base, especially among boutique and city center hotels. Recent reviews praise its comprehensive features and ease of onboarding, with hotel segments like independent properties rating it at 4.83/5.

Noovy, rated a perfect 5/5 from 19 reviews, boasts high satisfaction among boutique and small hotels, especially in Europe and North America. Its recent reviews highlight automation and customer support, but the limited number of reviews makes it less statistically significant.

Edge: Clock.

How Much Do Clock PMS and Noovy PMS Cost?

Both Clock PMS and Noovy PMS are priced at $600 per month, with no implementation fees, free trials, or hidden charges. This flat rate simplifies budgeting but may be high for very small properties or those with fewer rooms.

Pricing for both is transparent, but Clock’s value comes from its extensive feature set, while Noovy’s affordability and automation focus appeal to budget-conscious hotels seeking quick wins.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Clock PMS?

  • Hotels that need a full-featured management system covering reservations, invoicing, guest messaging, and operations.
  • Properties with complex needs, such as event management, restaurant POS, or multi-property setups.
  • Hotels looking for extensive integrations with third-party systems and advanced automation.
  • Teams that want detailed analytics and customizable workflows.
  • Not ideal if: your property is very small or prefers simple, low-cost solutions with minimal features.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Noovy PMS?

  • Small to medium-sized independent hotels seeking quick deployment and straightforward automation.
  • Hotels that prioritize OTA direct integrations, automated payments, and guest messaging.
  • Properties aiming to reduce manual work and errors through automation.
  • Teams that want a user-friendly interface with minimal training.
  • Not ideal if: your property requires extensive customization or complex operational features not currently supported.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Clock PMS stands out as a robust, feature-rich platform suited for hotels with complex operations, requiring extensive integrations and detailed control. Its large, recent review base (251 reviews in the last 6 months) provides confidence in its stability and ongoing development. Its higher overall score (84.04 HTR Score) reflects broad industry acceptance.

Noovy PMS, with fewer but highly positive reviews and a focus on automation and simplicity, caters to smaller hotels or independents that need quick setup and effective tools. Its support and ease of use make it a strong contender for properties prioritizing automation and cost-efficiency.

If your hotel values a well-rounded, scalable system with proven stability, Clock is the clear choice. For properties that want a straightforward, automation-centric solution at a lower price, Noovy is worth considering.

In conclusion, choose Clock if you need depth, integrations, and scalability. Opt for Noovy if your primary goal is automation, simplicity, and cost savings. Your decision should align with your property’s size, complexity, and operational priorities.

Clock PMS 和 Noovy PMS 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Clock Clock Noovy Noovy
Starting Price From $600/mo From $600/mo

Clock PMS 有哪些 Noovy PMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Clock PMS 和 Noovy PMS 共享 47 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Clock Clock Noovy Noovy
EPoS
多币种
多种语言
客人资料
礼品券和预付体验
礼品卡
访客通信(短信)

实际成果:Clock 对比 Noovy(按业务目标)

我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
Clock Events Hotels WICC 大型
+ WICC Hotel & Congress Centre implemented Clock to support both hotel stays and conference operations on a single, reliable platform, helping the team run daily operations smoothly with consistent, uninterrupted workflows.
+ �s cloud-based platform, the hotel now has a scalable solution that can adapt to new operational needs and technology developments over time. Clock
+ �s built-in Events Management module is part of its all-in-one platform, allowing WICC to manage both - stays and events within one unified environment.

"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."

Deveny van Laar
Deveny van Laar
Sales & Reserveringen
Noovy Noovy

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

提高运营效率
Clock Elegancia Hotels Paris 中型
+ Centralized Control and Full Portfolio Visibility.
+ Clock provides Elegancia Hotels with a single, unified platform to manage all properties, giving leadership complete visibility across the portfolio. This centralisation improves coordination between teams, supports more informed decision-making, and ensures consistent operational standards across all hotels, while still allowing each property to be monitored effectively at group level.
+ Fully Connected Technology Ecosystem

"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."

Matthieu Abbo
Matthieu Abbo
Directeur - Hôtellerie
Noovy Noovy

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

改善宾客体验
Clock Hotel Mitland 小型
+ The team now runs guest communication, service requests, and daily operations through a single all-in-one platform, improving efficiency and consistency across the hotel. Clock acts as a central platform that connects all guest interactions and services across the hotel.
+ Shorter check-in and service response times
+ Fewer interruptions at the front desk

"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"

Noovy Noovy

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Clock 对比 Noovy:总结

Clock
Clock
4.8/5 来自 328 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

功能丰富 75% 正面

Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。

运营效率 75% 正面

该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。

响应式支持和定期更新 100% 正面

用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

错误消息 100% 负面

用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。

报告功能 100% 负面

报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。

排名更高的方面

中型(25-74 间客房) #7 vs #38
小型(10-24 间客房) #11 vs #39
超小型(少于 10 间客房) #26 vs #46
住宿加早餐与客栈 #13 vs #51

独特功能

EPoS 客人资料 多币种 多种语言 礼品券和预付体验
4.8/5 易用性 4.8/5 客户支持 111 个集成
访问官网
Noovy
Noovy
5.0/5 来自 25 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

易于使用 94% 正面

许多评论称赞该系统的易用性,指出其用户友好的设计和直观的界面可以快速培训新员工并减少操作错误。

客户服务 100% 正面

优质的客户服务经常被提及,用户欣赏快速的响应和有效的解决方案,这有助于对产品的整体满意度。

自动付款处理 64% 正面

该系统支持自动付款请求和处理,大大简化了计费流程并降低了错误率。此功能还因其在处理不可退款预订方面的效率而受到好评。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

设计 62% 负面

用户很欣赏该软件的功能,但注意到其设计略显过时,但预计重新设计将解决这个问题。

报告工具 43% 负面

该软件提供强大的报告工具,可以深入了解酒店运营的各个方面,帮助做出更好的管理决策。

独特功能

访客通信(短信)
4.8/5 易用性 4.9/5 客户支持 40 个集成
查看资料

关于 Clock PMS 与 Noovy PMS 的常见问题

Clock PMS 能否替代 Noovy PMS?

这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 Noovy PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Noovy PMS 提供 40 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Noovy PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Clock PMS 或 Noovy PMS 是否提供免费方案?

Clock PMS:否。Noovy PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Clock PMS 和 Noovy PMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84,Noovy 的为 71。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息