The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 162 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Bnovo (Биново) 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Multi-currency and Multi-lingual.
Preno 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Ancillary revenue tracking and Mobile App.
基于 HTR 上 162 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 2 | 160 |
在分析了 162 条经验证的评价后,Bnovo (Биново) 用户最看重其 ,而 Preno 用户则强调 user-friendly interface, 客户支持, channel management。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
移动应用程序
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #55 1 条评价 | #13 80 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #32 15 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #51 0 条评价 | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #39 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #70 1 条评价 | #14 65 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #70 0 条评价 | #12 53 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #21 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #8 26 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #27 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #39 2 条评价 | #25 13 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #20 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #13 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Bnovo PMS by Bnovo and Preno hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and your operational priorities. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Your decision should reflect whether you value extensive integrations and modern features or prefer a more localized, simple platform. Which product will better support your hotel’s growth and daily operations?
Bnovo PMS and Preno serve similar core functions—booking management, guest handling, and room availability—but their approaches differ. Bnovo, with its focus on connectivity, offers numerous integrations with OTAs and channel managers, especially in Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Middle East, yet it suffers from very low review volume and recent feedback. Preno, on the other hand, boasts a high user satisfaction score from recent reviews, with a robust feature set and a broad international presence.
Bnovo’s reviews highlight issues like server crashes, poor support, and a confusing interface, which raise concerns about stability and usability. Preno’s recent reviews praise its intuitive interface, responsive support, and consistent upgrades, making it the more reliable choice based on current data. Do these differences matter most for your hotel’s scale and operational complexity?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-use PMS with strong support and a growing feature set, Preno is the clear winner. It’s particularly suitable for boutique hotels, motels, and properties seeking a cloud-based system that integrates well with accounting and channel management tools.
If your hotel requires multi-lingual support, multi-currency capabilities, and extensive connectivity with sales channels in Europe, Asia Pacific, or the Middle East, Bnovo might initially seem appealing. However, its limited recent reviews and low overall ratings mean it’s less proven in delivering a smooth experience. For most hoteliers, Preno’s proven track record makes it the safer choice.
Preno’s ease of use ratings stand at 4.78/5, with recent reviews praising its intuitive design, straightforward setup, and helpful onboarding. Users describe Preno as “brilliant,” “simple,” and “easy to navigate,” with support staff praised for responsiveness. The mobile app is also noted as a helpful tool, especially for housekeepers and managers on the move.
Bnovo, rated 3/5 on ease of use, receives complaints about a confusing interface and a difficult mobile experience. Support is also rated poorly, with reviews citing slow responses and technical issues. Given these ratings and recent review sentiments, Edge: Preno.
Preno offers a broader feature set with 13 unique features, including automated night audit, ancillary revenue tracking, real-time reporting, transactional emails, GDPR and PCI compliance, and a native mobile app. These features support advanced revenue management, automation, and compliance.
Bnovo features only 2 exclusive functionalities: multi-currency and multi-lingual support. While these are valuable in international markets, they are less impactful for day-to-day operations. Preno’s extensive feature list and recent upgrades provide a clear edge.
Reviews reveal a stark difference: Bnovo’s customer support scores just 1.25/5, with users describing it as “very bad,” “poor,” and “not able to fix issues quickly.” Support delays and lack of responsiveness are common complaints.
Preno’s support ratings are outstanding at 4.8/5, with reviews emphasizing “brilliant,” “responsive,” and “helpful” service. Clients appreciate the onboarding process and ongoing support, making it a critical factor for smooth daily operations. Edge: Preno.
Preno boasts 17 verified integrations, including popular tools like Xero, SiteMinder, TrustYou, and Revinate. Its extensive partner network simplifies connection with accounting, channel management, and review platforms, fostering more efficient workflows.
Bnovo has only 2 verified integration partners, compare.me and Aiosell Technologies. The limited connectivity reduces flexibility and may hinder your ability to automate or optimize operations. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s recent reviews, especially from boutique and motels, consistently rate it around 4.72/5, with many users calling it “brilliant” and “very user-friendly.” Its 144 reviews over the last six months reflect a strong and recent user base, with a 95% likelihood to recommend.
Bnovo’s ratings are low—2.25/5—based on only 2 reviews, both from the same source. Its older reviews cite technical issues and support problems, which diminish confidence. Clearly, Preno holds the higher rating and more recent positive feedback.
Bnovo does not publish pricing details, suggesting a customized quote, which may be a barrier for smaller properties. Preno charges a flat $800 monthly fee, with no trial or implementation fees reported, for a transparent and predictable cost structure.
The lack of transparent pricing from Bnovo makes budgeting uncertain, while Preno’s straightforward $800/month fee simplifies decision-making. For most hotels, Preno offers better clarity on cost.
Not ideal if your hotel prioritizes user experience, responsive support, or quick setup, as Bnovo’s recent feedback indicates significant usability and stability challenges.
Not ideal if your hotel requires multi-lingual support, multi-currency capabilities, or extensive channel management options not currently offered by Preno.
Preno’s core difference lies in its proven, high-rated user experience, extensive features, and broad integration options. It’s built for hotels that value simplicity, support, and automation, especially in boutique, motel, and small hotel segments.
Choose Preno if you want a system with recent positive reviews, strong customer support, and an active feature development roadmap. Its high user satisfaction, ease of use, and integration ecosystem make it the more dependable option.
Bnovo, despite its extensive connectivity and multi-lingual capabilities, struggles with stability, poor support, and limited recent feedback. It may suit large, multi-channel hotels with dedicated technical staff in specific regions but is less suitable for properties prioritizing user experience and reliable support.
In summary, for most hotels seeking a modern, well-supported PMS, Preno remains the stronger, more reliable choice.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Bnovo PMS 和 Preno 共享 17 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 3 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
支持团队通常因其响应迅速、乐于助人而备受赞誉,尽管一些评论指出,他们可能会出现延迟,尤其是在周末或繁忙时段。响应速度和与支持人员的直接联系至关重要。
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Preno 的报告功能褒贬不一,一些用户对其易用性感到满意,而另一些用户则希望获得更深入的分析,以便做出更明智的战略决策。一些用户表示需要定制报告功能。
尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出... 尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出差的管理人员而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Bnovo PMS 和 Preno 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Bnovo PMS 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Preno 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Preno 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 3.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Bnovo PMS:否。Preno:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Bnovo (Биново) 的 HT Score 为 0,Preno 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问