The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 530 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Preno 表现出色 在 user-friendly interface 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Native Email Marketing.
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Tablet/Kiosk Check-in and Lobby Kiosk.
基于 HTR 上 530 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $800/mo | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 160 | 370 |
在分析了 530 条经验证的评价后,Preno 用户最看重其 user-friendly interface, 客户支持, channel management,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
+
Dynamic Pricing
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
移动应用程序
▾
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
−
费率和收益管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #13 80 条评价 | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #32 15 条评价 | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #46 1 条评价 | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #39 0 条评价 | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #14 65 条评价 | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 53 条评价 | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #21 17 条评价 | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #8 26 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #27 7 条评价 | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #25 13 条评价 | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #20 3 条评价 | #21 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | #13 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Preno by Preno and Stayntouch by Stayntouch hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and growth plans. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and scalability. If your hotel is looking for a system with a broader feature set and extensive third-party integrations, one might stand out. Conversely, if you prioritize ease of use and rapid onboarding, the other could be more suitable. Which platform aligns best with your core priorities?
Preno and Stayntouch both serve property management needs, but they approach the market differently. Preno, with its simple, intuitive interface and a focus on boutique hotels and motels, aims to reduce admin burdens and improve guest experience. Stayntouch, with its advanced multi-property management and mobile-first design, targets larger operations and chains seeking scalability. How do your hotel’s size and complexity influence your choice?
Preno offers a streamlined, user-friendly platform built from the ground up for small to mid-sized hotels, especially boutiques and motels. Its core strength lies in its simplicity, with a focus on reducing staff training time and improving daily operational efficiency. The platform's 144 reviews, predominantly recent, support its reputation for ease of use, with a 4.73/5 rating. Hoteliers highlight Preno’s effective integrations with tools like Xero and SiteMinder, making it ideal for properties prioritizing straightforward management.
Stayntouch, on the other hand, is more comprehensive, boasting 317 reviews, with more recent feedback emphasizing its robust multi-property capabilities and extensive third-party integrations. Its 4.56/5 rating reflects broad satisfaction across diverse hotel segments, especially larger chains and properties with complex needs. Its standout features include contactless check-in, guest messaging, and mobile management, suited for hotels aiming for operational scalability and modern guest experiences.
Both platforms excel at operational efficiency, but Preno's recent reviews show a slight edge in user satisfaction for smaller hotels. Would your hotel benefit more from a simple, focused solution or a more feature-rich, scalable system?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-implement PMS with excellent support and integration with common tools like Xero, Preno is the clear choice. It’s ideal for boutique hotels, motels, or properties with a smaller staff that values simplicity and rapid onboarding. Its 4.78/5 ease of use rating and positive reviews about support responsiveness make it suitable for properties seeking an uncomplicated solution.
If your hotel requires advanced features like multi-property management, online check-in, guest messaging, and comprehensive automation, Stayntouch is more appropriate. Its extensive third-party integrations, scalability, and mobile-centric design suit larger or growing hotel groups that want to deliver a seamless guest experience while managing multiple locations efficiently. With a 4.7/5 ease of use rating and high satisfaction in multi-property scenarios, Stayntouch is the better fit for complex operations.
In short, choose Preno for simplicity and quick deployment; opt for Stayntouch if you need a feature-rich platform ready to scale.
Preno’s interface, with a 4.78/5 usability rating, is frequently praised for its clarity and minimal learning curve. Users report that staff can quickly adopt the system, reducing training costs, and its onboarding score of 4.68/5 confirms a smooth setup process. Customer quotes emphasize its thoughtful layout and ease of operation, making it well-suited for small teams or properties with limited tech experience.
Stayntouch’s 4.7/5 ease of use rating reflects its intuitive screens and mobile-first design. Users point out that onboarding is efficient, with many noting they learned the system quickly thanks to thorough training. Its cloud-based, accessible interface supports staff working remotely or on-the-go, which is critical for larger properties with dispersed teams.
Edge: Preno.
Preno offers 3 unique features not found in Stayntouch, including a guest CRM, native email marketing, and EPoS. These features enhance guest engagement and streamline operational tasks like point-of-sale transactions, adding value for boutique and independent hotels seeking personalized service.
Stayntouch boasts 22 features exclusive to its platform, such as multi-lingual support, integrated ID and passport scanners, task management, online check-in/out, guest app, and shift planning. These functionalities are tailored for larger hotels or chains managing multiple properties, enabling automation and contactless guest services.
Given the larger feature set, Edge: Stayntouch.
Preno’s customer support is rated at 4.8/5, with reviews highlighting fast, helpful responses and smooth onboarding. Hoteliers appreciate support staff’s responsiveness, with testimonials about support being “brilliant” during transitions, especially for boutique hotels needing tailored assistance.
Stayntouch’s support score is slightly lower at 4.68/5, but reviews still commend the team’s friendliness and thorough training. Many users value the ongoing support and positive interactions, though some mention occasional delays in resolving complex issues during rapid growth phases.
Edge: Preno.
Stayntouch far surpasses Preno in integrations, with 188 verified partners compared to Preno’s 17. Both share 13 common partners, including Xero and SiteMinder. Stayntouch’s extensive ecosystem includes integrations with RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and Zaplox, among others, facilitating seamless connectivity with revenue management, contactless check-in, and distribution systems.
Preno’s fewer integrations may limit connectivity with some third-party tools, but its core partnerships still support essential functions like channel management and accounting.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s 4.56/5 rating is based on 317 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its multi-property management, ease of use, and mobile features. Hoteliers in larger hotels and chains tend to rate it higher, appreciating its scalability and integration capabilities.
Preno’s higher overall rating of 4.73/5 stems from 144 reviews, mostly from boutique and motel operators. Recent reviews highlight its simplicity, support, and ease of onboarding, especially appreciated by smaller properties.
Edge: Preno.
Both products are priced at $800 per month, with no additional implementation or licensing fees, making them comparable in cost. Neither offers a freemium model or flexible pricing tiers, so your decision should consider features and support rather than price.
Not ideal if your hotel has complex multi-property management needs or requires extensive automation and guest-facing apps.
Not suitable if your hotel prefers minimal tech or has very limited operational complexity.
Preno is a simple, highly-rated property management system suited for small to mid-sized hotels focused on ease of use and support. Its core strengths lie in intuitive design, strong integrations with accounting and channel management tools, and excellent customer service.
Stayntouch excels in managing complex, multi-property portfolios with a broad feature set, including mobile check-in, guest messaging, and extensive third-party integrations. Its platform is ideal for larger hotel groups seeking automation, scalability, and a seamless guest experience.
If your hotel is a boutique or independent property needing straightforward management, Preno is the better choice. For hotel chains or properties with growth ambitions and a need for advanced features, Stayntouch is the more suitable option.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Preno 和 Stayntouch 共享 27 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 13 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
支持团队通常因其响应迅速、乐于助人而备受赞誉,尽管一些评论指出,他们可能会出现延迟,尤其是在周末或繁忙时段。响应速度和与支持人员的直接联系至关重要。
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Preno 的报告功能褒贬不一,一些用户对其易用性感到满意,而另一些用户则希望获得更深入的分析,以便做出更明智的战略决策。一些用户表示需要定制报告功能。
尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出... 尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出差的管理人员而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Preno 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Preno 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 187 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Preno 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Preno:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Preno 的 HT Score 为 80,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问