The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | bookeasy |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 34 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 64 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #8 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | bookeasy |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #15 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #15 28 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #16 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #16 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | bookeasy |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #24 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #25 11 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #4 79 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #2 17 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine can significantly impact your hotel's revenue, operational efficiency, and guest experience. Both Bookeasy and Exely aim to streamline bookings, but they serve different needs and user bases. Bookeasy, with zero recent reviews and a score of 0/5, appears to lack current support and proven performance, while Exely, with 144 reviews and a score of approximately 93 out of 100, demonstrates a strong market presence and positive user sentiment. Which one truly aligns with your hotel’s goals?
In this comparison, we’ll analyze each product’s strengths and weaknesses across ease of use, features, support, integrations, market presence, and suitability for different hotel types. Our aim is to help you make a confident, informed decision based on current data and hotel operator feedback.
Bookeasy is marketed as a destination management system, primarily designed for tourism operators managing multiple types of reservations like tours, activities, and events. Its core strengths—inventory management and customer communication—are tailored for organizations needing broad operational tools, not necessarily a hotel-focused booking engine.
Exely, on the other hand, is specifically built for hotels seeking to boost direct bookings and improve online engagement. Its user interface and marketing features aim to convert website visitors into guests, directly impacting revenue. Given its recent high review count and market presence, Exely’s established reputation suggests it’s better suited for hotels prioritizing booking conversion and direct revenue.
Are you looking for a comprehensive operational tool or a dedicated booking engine that maximizes direct online reservations? The answer could guide your choice.
If your hotel needs a modern, feature-rich booking engine that emphasizes direct online reservations, go with Exely. Its 144 reviews in the last six months and high NPS score of 9.73/10 show strong current user satisfaction. Plus, with a user-friendly interface rated 4.91/5, Exely simplifies daily management, and its marketing tools help increase conversions.
If your team requires a destination management system capable of handling multiple activity types, tours, or events, then Bookeasy might seem suitable. However, its zero recent reviews and 0/5 ratings suggest a lack of current support and ongoing development, making it a risky choice for hotels focused on online booking efficiency.
In summary, for hotels aiming to grow direct bookings and streamline digital operations, Exely clearly outperforms. For niche tourism operations, the decision might differ, but for pure hotel use, Exely holds the edge.
Exely’s interface is highly rated at 4.91/5, with many users praising its intuitive dashboard, fast operation, and straightforward booking process. Customers highlight its ease of onboarding, noting that staff can adopt it quickly, and management of rates, availability, and reservations is smooth.
Bookeasy, by contrast, scores 0/5 in ease of use and offers little recent feedback to confirm its user experience quality. Its interface and onboarding process are not well-documented or supported today, raising concerns about staff adoption and operational efficiency.
Edge: Exely.
Exely boasts 29 unique features, including mobile responsiveness, multi-room bookings, multi-lingual support, flexible date options, booking abandonment recapture, and extensive integrations with payment gateways like PayPal, Stripe, and others. It also offers advanced marketing tools such as special offers, discounts, and automated emails, making it a versatile platform for revenue growth.
Bookeasy provides no exclusive features and no shared features with Exely. Its limited feature set suggests it’s not designed for modern hotel booking needs, lacking the automation, customization, and marketing capabilities that drive online conversions.
Edge: Exely.
Exely’s customer support is rated at 4.96/5, with reviews emphasizing rapid response times and proactive assistance. Users appreciate the seller’s responsiveness, clarity, and willingness to implement improvements, which enhances overall satisfaction.
Bookeasy has no recent reviews or ratings, indicating it may lack current support or active user engagement. Without verified support data, it’s difficult to recommend it confidently for ongoing operational needs.
Edge: Exely.
Exely offers 8 verified integrations, including major property management systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and third-party platforms such as Booking.com and TripAdvisor. These integrations streamline operations and improve data consistency across channels.
Bookeasy has just 1 verified partner and offers no additional integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other essential systems. This restricts scalability and flexibility for hotels needing comprehensive operational connectivity.
Edge: Exely.
Exely’s recent reviews reveal a high level of satisfaction, with an NPS score of 9.73/10 and 98% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers across segments like boutique, city center, and resorts praise its ease of use, marketing features, and support responsiveness.
Bookeasy, with no recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, offers no current user feedback or ratings to consider. Its lack of recent validation makes it difficult to assess its true performance.
Edge: Exely.
Exely’s pricing is $200 per month, with no free trial or tiered plans, offering a straightforward subscription model. The lack of a free version or flexible plans suggests it’s best for hotels willing to invest in a comprehensive solution.
Bookeasy does not disclose specific pricing or trial information, and its absence of recent reviews and support indicates it might not be actively marketed or priced competitively today. This makes it a less transparent choice.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in their target functions: Bookeasy is a comprehensive destination management system, while Exely is a dedicated hotel booking engine optimized for direct online bookings. If your goal is to increase reservations and revenue through your website, Exely clearly dominates.
Choose Exely if you value a modern, feature-rich platform with high user satisfaction, quick onboarding, and strong support. Its integrations, marketing tools, and proven performance make it the smarter choice for most hotels today.
Opt for Bookeasy only if your operational needs extend beyond traditional hotel bookings into broader tourism management, and if you can accept its current lack of recent support and reviews. For hotel-specific booking growth, Exely offers a decisive advantage.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 | bookeasy |
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Exely 的支持团队因其响应迅速、提供详尽的帮助和清晰的解决方案而广受好评。然而,新用户提到需要培训资料来更好地使用高级功能。
Exely substantially increases direct bookings, aiding hotels like Jimbaran Bay Beach Resort, and reducing OTA dependencies. Hotels report significant... Exely substantially increases direct bookings, aiding hotels like Jimbaran Bay Beach Resort, and reducing OTA dependencies. Hotels report significant sales growth, citing simplified operations, increased guest control, and promotional features.
该平台直观且条理清晰的界面被认为是其主要优势,提升了导航体验和用户体验。一些评论建议增加更现代化、可定制化的界面,以增强用户参与度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users often call for advanced reporting and detailed analytics, seeking comprehensive insights for better performance tracking. While some find existi... Users often call for advanced reporting and detailed analytics, seeking comprehensive insights for better performance tracking. While some find existing features satisfactory, many desire deeper filtering and customization options.
用户评论普遍反映,预订小部件和网站设计需要更多自定义选项。用户反映设计灵活性不足,这可能会影响品牌独特性和对顾客的吸引力。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。bookeasy 和 Exely Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。bookeasy 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Exely Booking Engine 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
bookeasy:否。Exely Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。bookeasy 的 HT Score 为 0,Exely 的为 93。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案