项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 83 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Clock 在ease of use and accessibility方面表现出色,并拥有家政以及客人反馈管理等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 83 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 联系销售 | 起价 $600/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 83 |
在分析了 83 条经验证的评价后,BookingCenter 用户最看重其 ,而 Clock 用户则强调 ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, 客户服务与支持。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务与支持
▾
|
|
|
+
集成与连接
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
移动和用户界面
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #20 23 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 28 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 6 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 6 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #19 33 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #19 17 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #14 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #15 11 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #18 12 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #8 47 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #13 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #11 2 条评价 |
BookingCenter and Clock HMS target different scales and operational complexities in hotel management. BookingCenter offers a desktop and web-based PMS combined with Central Reservation Services and Global Distribution, aiming to help independent properties and groups streamline property and distribution management in one system. Clock HMS, by contrast, provides a comprehensive cloud-based HMS with extensive operational modules, advanced booking engine, and integrations, supporting a wide range of hotel segments with dynamic workflows.
Both systems address core hotel needs: managing reservations, front desk operations, and distribution channels. However, Clock HMS excels with a broad feature set and integrations that support diverse workflows and larger properties, while BookingCenter’s offering lacks recent user reviews and feature transparency, limiting confidence in its applicability. Hotels seeking an all-in-one modern HMS with operational depth will find Clock HMS more suited, whereas BookingCenter remains an opaque option with minimal review evidence.
If you operate a small independent hotel or a group seeking a desktop-based PMS with built-in GDS and OTA channel management, BookingCenter might seem relevant given its combined property and distribution approach, though this is not strongly supported by user reviews or feature data. Conversely, if you run a boutique, city center, or resort property in any of 25 countries across multiple continents, Clock HMS is a proven choice, supported by 83 reviews with a 4.8/5 overall rating and a 96% likelihood to recommend.
Data from 83 Clock HMS reviews spread across boutique hotels (23%), city center hotels (8%), and resorts (4%) confirm strong user satisfaction in these segments. BookingCenter has no publicly available reviews or rating data, making it difficult to assess operational fit. Hotels requiring a cloud-based, fully integrated HMS with comprehensive modules and multi-device access should choose Clock HMS based on extensive evidence. For niche desktop or legacy system users, BookingCenter could be considered but with caution due to limited market presence and review data.
Clock HMS holds a 4.8/5 ease of use rating across 83 reviews, with users consistently noting its intuitive interface, especially for training new staff quickly and supporting multiple devices. Reviewers highlight the system’s visual calendar and floor plan views as aiding front desk workflows and reducing errors. BookingCenter lacks published ease of use data and user feedback, preventing a direct user-experience comparison.
Onboarding ratings also favor Clock HMS at 4.7/5 from the same review pool, with reviews citing faster staff adoption due to the system’s workflow alignment with daily hotel operations. Despite no direct data on BookingCenter’s onboarding experience, Clock HMS's cloud access and mobile-friendly design suggest a smoother implementation for modern hotel teams.
Edge: Even.
Clock HMS offers 49 unique hotel-specific features, including a booking engine, multi-currency support, channel manager, POS, housekeeping module, guest feedback management, online check-in/out, guest messaging, integrated ID scanning, and revenue reports like RevPAR and ADR. These features impact operational workflows by automating booking flows, improving guest communication, enhancing housekeeping efficiency, and enabling revenue management. For example, the housekeeping mobile app and real-time status updates reduce room turnaround times and improve coordination between housekeeping and front desk teams.
BookingCenter offers no unique features listed and does not document any shared features on current data. Without feature transparency or user feedback, BookingCenter’s operational benefits cannot be verified or compared.
Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock HMS has a 4.8/5 customer support rating from 83 reviews and a 4.7/5 onboarding rating. Reviewers praise Clock’s support team as fast, responsive, and proactive, though some note occasional incorrect guidance requiring escalation. One review states, “The best feature about CLOCK is the team behind; they listen to their customers and constantly improve their software.” BookingCenter has no available review data for customer support or onboarding, making any comparison impossible.
Edge: Even.
Clock HMS supports 109 verified integration partners, including major OTAs, revenue management tools (HQ revenue), keyless access systems (FLEXIPASS), and channel managers like Bookboost. These integrations make it suitable for hotels seeking comprehensive connectivity to distribution and operational ecosystems across diverse regions. BookingCenter lists only 2 verified partners, with Airbnb as a unique integration and Aven Hospitality as shared.
The breadth of Clock’s integrations enables features such as automated booking imports, payment automation, and advanced revenue analytics, crucial for hotels managing multiple distribution channels and ancillary services. BookingCenter’s limited integration footprint restricts operational flexibility and scalability.
Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock HMS has 83 verified reviews with an overall rating of 4.8/5, spanning multiple hotel segments and geographies. Segment ratings include 4.9/5 for boutique hotels (34 reviews), resorts (21 reviews), city center hotels (23 reviews), and luxury hotels (17 reviews). The last six months include 4 reviews, though fewer than 10 precludes a last-six-months rating calculation; still, recent reviews maintain high satisfaction.
BookingCenter has no verified reviews or ratings on Hotel Tech Report, providing no basis for rating comparison. This absence suggests minimal market traction or unverified performance.
Edge: Even.
BookingCenter does not publish pricing information, nor does it offer a free trial or freemium model. No implementation fees or monthly pricing details are disclosed.
Clock HMS charges a base price of $600.00, with no monthly flat or per-room pricing disclosed. It also lacks a free trial but requires no implementation fees. While both vendors lack transparent pricing models, Clock HMS’s published base price provides a concrete starting point for budgeting, whereas BookingCenter’s pricing remains undefined.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
BookingCenter focuses on a desktop and web-based PMS combined with Global Distribution Services, targeting independent properties and groups that want to manage reservations and distribution in one system. However, it lacks user reviews, transparent pricing, feature disclosure, and integration depth, limiting its appeal and verifiability.
Clock HMS is a cloud-based, full-featured hotel management system with 49 unique hotel-relevant features and a wide integration ecosystem spanning 109 verified partners. Its 4.8/5 rating across 83 reviews in diverse hotel segments confirms its operational effectiveness and user satisfaction. Clock excels in multi-device accessibility, guest communications, housekeeping management, and revenue reporting.
Choose BookingCenter only if you require a traditional desktop and web PMS integrated with GDS and OTA channels, and you accept minimal market validation. Choose Clock HMS if you want a modern, comprehensive HMS with broad feature coverage, extensive integrations, and proven performance across boutique, city center, and resort hotels globally.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | — | 起价 $600/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 家政 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用程序 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 家政 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 客房服务手机应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班规划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放式磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 定价情报 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| SOC2投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 全天候在线支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| 销售点 |
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导... Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导和复杂功能支持。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分... 尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分用户认为现有报告功能不足,且难以从中获取全面的洞察。
用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态... 用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态运营和营销策略。
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。BookingCenter 和 Clock HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。BookingCenter 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Clock HMS 提供 109 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
BookingCenter:否。Clock HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。BookingCenter 的 HT Score 为 0,Clock 的为 81。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐