The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 572 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
BookingCenter 表现出色 .
RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Post-stay emails and Pre-stay emails.
基于 HTR 上 572 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 572 |
在分析了 572 条经验证的评价后,BookingCenter 用户最看重其 ,而 RoomRaccoon 用户则强调 易用性, 客户服务, 持续改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
|
|
+
集成与自动化
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
关键问题
▾
|
|
|
−
定价问题
▾
|
|
|
−
访客数据库透明度
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 214 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #8 50 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 18 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #8 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #3 245 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #4 149 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #5 70 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #3 72 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #14 11 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 445 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #8 9 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #17 3 条评价 |
Choosing between BookingCenter by BookingCenter and RoomRaccoon HMS by RoomRaccoon hinges on understanding what each software offers and how your hotel’s needs align. Both aim to simplify hotel management, but they diverge significantly in scope, features, and user feedback. BookingCenter provides a traditional desktop-based PMS with integrated GDS and distribution, while RoomRaccoon is a cloud-based, modular system praised for its user-friendliness and extensive integrations. Which aligns better with your operational priorities?
BookingCenter has a long-standing presence in the hospitality software landscape, offering desktop and web-based PMS with built-in central reservation and global distribution. Its review score is nonexistent, but the lack of recent reviews and low overall rating suggest limited current user confidence. In contrast, RoomRaccoon boasts over 480 recent reviews, averaging 4.95/5, with a recent review count of 8 out of 484, indicating active, modern user engagement and high satisfaction. Given the more recent reviews and higher ratings, RoomRaccoon offers clearer insights into current usability and support. Do these differences matter based on your hotel’s size and growth goals?
If your hotel prioritizes a cloud-based platform with intuitive design, extensive integrations, and automation tools, RoomRaccoon is the recommended choice. It suits small to medium hotels, B&Bs, and boutique properties seeking scalable, user-friendly management with strong guest communication features. Conversely, BookingCenter may appeal if your team prefers a desktop or hybrid PMS with built-in GDS and limited focus on automation or advanced integrations, but its minimal recent reviews weaken confidence.
If you need a system that integrates channel management, payments, and guest communications in one place, RoomRaccoon’s comprehensive features and positive user feedback make it more reliable. For a hotel seeking a simple, traditional PMS with minimal modern automation, BookingCenter might suffice, but limited recent data hampers confidence. For most hotels looking to grow and operate efficiently, RoomRaccoon is the safer bet.
RoomRaccoon scores a 4.87/5 for ease of use, supported by reviews praising its intuitive, user-friendly interface that reduces training time. Users frequently mention how quickly staff adapt and how the system simplifies daily operations. BookingCenter, with a 0/5 ease rating, lacks recent user feedback, suggesting it may not be as straightforward or modern in design. The older, desktop-centric nature of BookingCenter likely makes onboarding and staff adoption more cumbersome.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon offers over 57 features, including special offers, automated emails, loyalty programs, multi-currency support, revenue management, online check-in, digital registration, integrated payment terminals, and advanced automation like automated night audits. BookingCenter has no unique features explicitly listed and appears more limited in its current capabilities. The breadth and depth of RoomRaccoon’s functionalities, especially automation and guest engagement tools, are unmatched.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s support scores 4.74/5, with reviews highlighting prompt, friendly, and knowledgeable support staff. Users appreciate how the company adapts quickly to feedback, even noting patience and ongoing assistance. In contrast, BookingCenter has no recent review data, making it difficult to assess support quality. The lack of recent feedback on BookingCenter suggests limited support visibility or engagement currently.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon integrates with 88 verified partners, including popular OTAs, payment providers, and booking platforms, with over 300 integrations overall. It covers a wide range of systems like Sage, Becurious, and FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access, providing extensive operational flexibility. BookingCenter only connects with 2 verified partners, including Airbnb, which limits its integration scope.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
With over 484 recent reviews, RoomRaccoon’s average rating of 4.95/5 far surpasses the nonexistent or outdated data for BookingCenter. Hoteliers across various segments—especially boutique hotels and B&Bs—rate RoomRaccoon highly, citing ease of use, automation, and support. The recent positive reviews—such as one hotel increasing RevPAR by 60%—indicate strong user satisfaction. BookingCenter’s lack of recent reviews leaves its reputation uncertain.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
BookingCenter’s pricing is not publicly available, and it does not offer a free trial or clear pricing structure, which can be a barrier for small hotels. RoomRaccoon charges a base fee of $1,000 per month with no implementation fees or trial, providing transparent, predictable billing. The higher upfront cost might be justified by its extensive features and support, especially for properties seeking growth.
The core difference is that BookingCenter remains a traditional PMS option with limited modern features, while RoomRaccoon offers a comprehensive, cloud-based system that actively improves hotel operations and guest engagement. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive feature set make it the clear leader today.
Choose RoomRaccoon if you want an easy-to-use platform with automation, integrations, and a proven track record of enhancing revenue and guest experience. It’s especially suitable for independent hoteliers and boutique hotels aiming to scale efficiently.
Opt for BookingCenter only if you prefer a legacy desktop-based system with GDS and limited automation, and your hotel’s needs are minimal or aligned with traditional management workflows. Its current lack of recent feedback makes it a riskier choice.
In summation, for most modern hoteliers looking to streamline operations and grow, RoomRaccoon is the more reliable, future-proof option.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,BookingCenter 和 RoomRaccoon HMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 自动报告 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 45 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户称赞 RoomRaccoon 具有用户友好的界面和直观的设计,这减少了培训时间,并能顺利融入日常操作,从而提高了整体效率。
虽然一些用户称赞支持团队的响应速度和专业水平,但另一些用户则批评售后服务和响应效率不足,这表明客户服务质量存在不一致之处。
用户赞赏 RoomRaccoon 的持续发展,包括 AI 的增强,这些都有助于提高销售和运营功能,展现了其对长期适应性的承诺。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
多篇评论指出,售后支持不力、技术问题悬而未决等关键问题严重影响了用户满意度和对系统的信任度。
一些用户,尤其是那些经营季节性业务的用户,认为该系统的定价过高,这影响了他们的决策,尽管他们认为该系统包含的功能很有价值。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。BookingCenter 和 RoomRaccoon HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。BookingCenter 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomRaccoon HMS 提供 88 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
BookingCenter:否。RoomRaccoon HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。BookingCenter 的 HT Score 为 0,RoomRaccoon 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案