BookingCenter vs. Cloudbeds HMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 October 24, 2026  ·  已分析 1,566 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 1,566 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:

BookingCenter 表现出色 .

Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

BookingCenter 与 Cloudbeds HMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 1,566 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
100
推荐可能性
0%
91%
易用性
0.0/5
4.6/5
客户支持
0.0/5
4.4/5
性价比
0.0/5
4.4/5
起始价格 联系销售 起价 $500/月
经验证的评价 0 1,566

BookingCenter 与 Cloudbeds HMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 1,566 条经验证的评价后,BookingCenter 用户最看重其 ,而 Cloudbeds 用户则强调 日历和预订概览, 报告与分析, 渠道管理和ota分销。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

BookingCenter BookingCenter Cloudbeds Cloudbeds
优点
+ 日历和预订概览 ▾
+ 报告与分析 ▾
+ 渠道管理和OTA分销 ▾
+ 客人数据与CRM ▾
缺点
− 支持响应速度和联系方式 ▾
− 移动应用限制 ▾
− 支付处理与账单管理 ▾

BookingCenter 对比 Cloudbeds:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 BookingCenter BookingCenter Cloudbeds Cloudbeds
小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ — #1 793 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ — #1 249 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ — #1 55 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ — #5 5 条评价

按酒店类型

细分市场 BookingCenter BookingCenter Cloudbeds Cloudbeds
精品酒店 ▾ — #1 635 条评价
豪华酒店 ▾ — #3 260 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ — #2 153 条评价
长住酒店 ▾ — #2 102 条评价

按区域

细分市场 BookingCenter BookingCenter Cloudbeds Cloudbeds
北美 ▾ — #2 570 条评价
欧洲 ▾ — #4 173 条评价
亚太 ▾ — #3 315 条评价
中东 ▾ — #4 14 条评价

The Decision

When choosing a hotel management platform, your goal is to find a solution that simplifies operations, enhances guest experiences, and offers reliable support. BookingCenter by BookingCenter and Cloudbeds HMS by Cloudbeds both aim to meet these needs but diverge significantly in scope, features, and market presence. While BookingCenter claims to streamline property and distribution management, Cloudbeds provides a more integrated, feature-rich platform backed by a larger user base and more recent reviews. Which aligns better with your hotel’s growth plans?

Is BookingCenter or Cloudbeds Better for Hotels?

BookingCenter has been around since 2000, focusing on desktop and web-based property management with integrated GDS and OTA channels. However, it has zero reviews and a 0/5 overall rating, making its current credibility questionable. Conversely, Cloudbeds, founded in 2012, boasts 1,219 recent reviews (76 in the last six months), a 4.62/5 rating, and a 91% likelihood to recommend. Its customer satisfaction scores—ease of use, support, and value—far outperform BookingCenter, indicating a more reliable and user-approved solution.

The core difference is that BookingCenter offers a standalone PMS and channel management setup, while Cloudbeds delivers a comprehensive, all-in-one hospitality platform with extensive integrations. With limited data on BookingCenter, can you confidently rely on its capabilities? Cloudbeds’ recent reviews suggest it’s the clearer choice for hotels seeking proven performance and ongoing support.

BookingCenter vs Cloudbeds: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a straightforward PMS with basic reservation and distribution features, BookingCenter might seem suitable—especially if you’re an independent property that prefers desktop management. Yet, with no recent reviews or active user feedback, it’s hard to confirm its current effectiveness or support quality.

If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich platform that unifies operations, distribution, revenue management, and guest engagement, Cloudbeds is the obvious winner. Its 1,219 reviews and 4.62/5 rating reflect high satisfaction across diverse hotel types, from boutique to large resorts, making it the better choice for growth-oriented hotels seeking reliability and ongoing innovation.

Is BookingCenter or Cloudbeds Easier to Use?

BookingCenter’s usability is impossible to evaluate due to zero reviews and no recent customer feedback, leaving its interface and onboarding experience unverified. In contrast, Cloudbeds enjoys a 4.58/5 ease-of-use rating, with users praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding (rated 4.41/5), and minimal training requirements.

Recent reviews highlight that staff find Cloudbeds’ system straightforward, with many noting that even non-technical team members adapt quickly. Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has Better Features: BookingCenter or Cloudbeds?

BookingCenter provides core PMS functions, central reservation, and GDS integration, but offers no detailed feature count or recent user insights. Cloudbeds, on the other hand, boasts 90 unique features, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, 2-way real-time integrations, multi-lingual support, revenue management, automated reporting, online check-in, guest messaging, and more.

While BookingCenter appears limited in scope, Cloudbeds delivers a broad suite capable of handling complex operations for diverse property types. Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has Better Customer Support: BookingCenter or Cloudbeds?

There are no recent reviews or ratings for BookingCenter support, leaving its service quality unverified. Cloudbeds, with a 4.38/5 customer support rating, receives frequent praise for its responsive, friendly, and helpful assistance—users describe their support as “excellent” and “quick to respond,” highlighting its reliability.

Given the recent positive feedback, Cloudbeds’ support system is clearly stronger and more dependable. Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has More Integrations: BookingCenter or Cloudbeds?

BookingCenter’s integration count is limited to just 2 verified partners, including Airbnb, with only one shared partner. Cloudbeds outpaces this dramatically, with 190 verified integrations, including Airbnb, and unique partners like AdsHotel, Trevo, and Umi Digital.

This extensive integration ecosystem enables smoother operations and reduces manual work for your team. Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: BookingCenter or Cloudbeds?

BookingCenter lacks recent reviews, ratings, or hotel segment data, rendering comparison impossible. Cloudbeds, however, is highly rated across hotel segments, with a 4.54/5 score from independent hotels, 4.63/5 from boutique hotels, and a 4.17/5 from smaller independent properties.

Recent reviews consistently praise Cloudbeds’ ease of use, reliability, and support. Its high ratings across varied hotel types demonstrate broad satisfaction, reinforcing its status as a trusted solution. Edge: Cloudbeds.

How Much Do BookingCenter and Cloudbeds Cost?

BookingCenter does not publicly disclose pricing or offer a trial, indicating either custom quotes or limited transparency. Cloudbeds charges a starting price of $500 per month, with no free tier or trial, but many users see it as offering good value given its extensive features.

If budget predictability and transparency matter, Cloudbeds’ clear pricing helps inform decision-making. Edge: Cloudbeds.

What Type of Hotel Should Use BookingCenter?

  • Hotels that operate on a small scale and prefer desktop or web-based PMS.
  • Properties focused solely on reservation and basic distribution without needing extensive automation.
  • Independent hotels with limited budgets seeking a simple management system.
  • Teams that prioritize traditional PMS functions over modern integrations or automation.

Not ideal if you want a platform with modern features, broad integrations, or scalable growth options. Limited user feedback makes it risky for properties aiming to expand or modernize.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Cloudbeds?

  • Hotels of all sizes looking for an all-in-one platform that combines PMS, reservations, revenue management, and distribution.
  • Properties seeking integration with numerous external tools, from POS to revenue management.
  • Hotels prioritizing ease of use, quick onboarding, and robust customer support.
  • Teams that want scalable solutions that evolve with their property’s needs.

Not ideal if your property is very small with minimal tech needs or if you prefer traditional desktop-only software without cloud features.

Cloudbeds vs BookingCenter: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Cloudbeds is a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with proven user satisfaction, extensive features, and a vast ecosystem of integrations. It is suitable for hotels seeking to automate, scale, and enhance guest experiences, demonstrated by its high ratings and recent positive reviews.

BookingCenter may appeal to very small properties or those with minimal tech needs, but its lack of recent reviews and limited features make it a less reliable choice for most hotels aiming for growth or modernization. For a proven, feature-rich, and well-supported solution, Cloudbeds is the clear winner.


This detailed comparison aims to guide your decision-making process by aligning your hotel’s needs with the strengths of each platform. Based on current data, Cloudbeds emerges as the more reliable and versatile choice for modern hospitality operations.

BookingCenter 和 Cloudbeds HMS 的价格是多少?

酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。

BookingCenter BookingCenter Cloudbeds Cloudbeds
起始价格 — 起价 $500/月

功能对比:BookingCenter 与 Cloudbeds HMS

这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。

功能 BookingCenter BookingCenter Cloudbeds Cloudbeds
▾ 会计与金融
0%
86%
多币种
礼品卡
直接计费
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
自动化夜间审计
付款请求
▾ 营销与电子商务
0%
91%
原生电子邮件营销
团体预订引擎
网站开发
预订引擎
频道管理员
礼品卡
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
宾客沟通(短信)
原生电子邮件营销
宾客资料
客户关系管理
▾ 管理和配置
0%
100%
多种语言
多币种
集中用户和角色管理
▾ 用户管理
0%
84%
原生电子邮件营销
客人反馈管理
礼品卡
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
宾客资料
集中消息传递
▾ 前台
0%
93%
客人反馈管理
家政
物业管理系统
自动化夜间审计
移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本)
移动应用程序
日历视图
任务管理
自动提醒
宾客资料
平板电脑/自助值机
付款请求
集中消息传递
自动空间优化
▾ 群组管理
0%
100%
组功能
自动空间优化
▾ 宾客体验
0%
80%
客人反馈管理
礼品卡
集成身份证和护照扫描仪
数字注册
访客应用程序
网上值机
网上结账
宾客留言
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
平板电脑/自助值机
▾ 家政
0%
89%
家政
自动空间优化
客房服务手机应用程序
实时状态更新
自动分配
实时报告
轮班规划
员工信息
网上结账
▾ 付款
0%
84%
多币种
礼品卡
付款请求
直接计费
自动提醒
集成支付终端和读卡器
▾ 预订管理
0%
92%
评分购物模块
物业管理系统
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
礼品卡
频道管理员
综合 CRS
拖放式磁带图
费率管理
自动空间优化
自动分配
基于规则的房间分配
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
▾ 收入管理
0%
88%
评分购物模块
收益管理模块
定价情报
频道管理员
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
自定义费率
辅助收入跟踪
基本定价
▾ 税务与合规
0%
100%
符合 PCI 标准
符合 GDPR 规定
SOC2投诉
税务配置
▾ 支持与培训
0%
100%
全天候在线支持
▾ 食品与饮料
0%
100%
销售点

实际成果:BookingCenter 对比 Cloudbeds(按业务目标)

我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
BookingCenter BookingCenter

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Cloudbeds Himmapana Villas 中型
+ Growth in direct bookings: the combination of a strong social media presence and an effective online booking and payment system has led to a significant increase in direct bookings.
+ Operational efficiency: the adoption of a simple yet effective hotel management system has streamlined day-to-day operations, efficiently handling over 2,000 bookings annually, including special guest requests.
+ Remote management flexibility: the use of a cloud-based platform allows for the convenient remote management of the property, enabling operations to be handled effectively both on-site and during travel.

"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."

Thomas K. Petersen
Thomas K. Petersen
Managing Partner
提高运营效率
BookingCenter BookingCenter

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Cloudbeds Flor Parks 小型
+ 17% increase in online reviews
+ 11% of monthly bookings from Google Free Listings
+ Fully integrated booking engine & channel manager

"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."

VM
Victor Menor
Operations Manager
改善宾客体验
BookingCenter BookingCenter

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Cloudbeds The Pad Silverthorne 小型
+ 60% direct bookings in year one
+ 95% guest rating with 1000+ reviews
+ High OTA click-through rates, with lower cancellation rates

"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."

Kevin Bowen
Kevin Bowen
Director of Operations

BookingCenter 对比 Cloudbeds:总结

BookingCenter
BookingCenter
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 2 个集成
查看资料
Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds
4.6/5 来自 1,566 条评价

酒店经营者喜爱的方面

日历和预订概览 76% 正面

用户通常称赞Cloudbeds提供清晰的集中式日历视图,显示入住率、房态和即将到来的预订。它帮助前台和预订团队更快地处理预订、办理入住手续,并规划当天的工作,... 用户通常称赞Cloudbeds提供清晰的集中式日历视图,显示入住率、房态和即将到来的预订。它帮助前台和预订团队更快地处理预订、办理入住手续,并规划当天的工作,减少手动核查。

报告与分析 66% 正面

评审者经常使用 Cloudbeds 进行业务报告,特别是收入、入住率和绩效分析。他们重视数据集中在一个平台,但许多用户希望拥有更具可定制性、现代化的仪表盘式报告... 评审者经常使用 Cloudbeds 进行业务报告,特别是收入、入住率和绩效分析。他们重视数据集中在一个平台,但许多用户希望拥有更具可定制性、现代化的仪表盘式报告,更快的下载速度,以及更强的财务/会计视图。

渠道管理和OTA分销 80% 正面

许多评论者强调,Cloudbeds实现OTA管理的集中化,确保房态和价格更新在各渠道同步,减少手动操作。多人提到这带来了错误减少、超售减少以及多渠道控制更便捷的直... 许多评论者强调,Cloudbeds实现OTA管理的集中化,确保房态和价格更新在各渠道同步,减少手动操作。多人提到这带来了错误减少、超售减少以及多渠道控制更便捷的直接运营优势。

酒店经营者提出异议的方面

支持响应速度和联系方式 46% 负面

支持通常被描述为一旦联系就很有帮助且知识丰富,但许多评价指出对于紧急运营问题,响应时间可能较慢。买家经常要求除聊天外,还能通过电话或视频获得支持,尤其... 支持通常被描述为一旦联系就很有帮助且知识丰富,但许多评价指出对于紧急运营问题,响应时间可能较慢。买家经常要求除聊天外,还能通过电话或视频获得支持,尤其是在影响现场入住或支付的问题时。

移动应用限制 89% 负面

一个反复出现的负面主题是,移动应用通常被视为只读的辅助工具,而不是完整的操作工具。用户反复请求能够在移动端创建或编辑预订、关闭房间、接收推送通知,以及... 一个反复出现的负面主题是,移动应用通常被视为只读的辅助工具,而不是完整的操作工具。用户反复请求能够在移动端创建或编辑预订、关闭房间、接收推送通知,以及执行更多日常工作流程,而无需切换到网页版。

独特功能

PMS 连接性 分析仪表板 库存管理 2路实时集成 集中的用户和角色管理
4.6/5 易用性 4.4/5 客户支持 205 个集成
访问官网

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Cloudbeds 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
易用性 Cloudbeds 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
客户支持 Cloudbeds 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)
性价比 Cloudbeds 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)
上手体验 Cloudbeds 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)

关于 BookingCenter 与 Cloudbeds HMS 的常见问题

BookingCenter 能否替代 Cloudbeds HMS?

这取决于您的需求。BookingCenter 和 Cloudbeds HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。BookingCenter 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Cloudbeds HMS 提供 205 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Cloudbeds HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

BookingCenter 或 Cloudbeds HMS 是否提供免费方案?

BookingCenter:否。Cloudbeds HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 BookingCenter 和 Cloudbeds HMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。BookingCenter 的 HT Score 为 0,Cloudbeds 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取您的免费人工智能分析师报告

根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐

Ghostel icon
受到以下企业信赖
footer image 1 footer image 2 footer image 3 footer image 4 footer image 5 footer image 6 footer image 7

让我们查找您的酒店信息