The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,414 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
BookingCenter 表现出色 .
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
基于 HTR 上 1,414 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 1,414 |
在分析了 1,414 条经验证的评价后,BookingCenter 用户最看重其 ,而 Cloudbeds 用户则强调 intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
|
|
−
货币兑换和金融业务
▾
|
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 675 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 235 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 51 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 546 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #3 245 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 145 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #2 96 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #2 532 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #4 166 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #3 201 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #3 13 条评价 |
When choosing a hotel management platform, your goal is to find a solution that simplifies operations, enhances guest experiences, and offers reliable support. BookingCenter by BookingCenter and Cloudbeds HMS by Cloudbeds both aim to meet these needs but diverge significantly in scope, features, and market presence. While BookingCenter claims to streamline property and distribution management, Cloudbeds provides a more integrated, feature-rich platform backed by a larger user base and more recent reviews. Which aligns better with your hotel’s growth plans?
BookingCenter has been around since 2000, focusing on desktop and web-based property management with integrated GDS and OTA channels. However, it has zero reviews and a 0/5 overall rating, making its current credibility questionable. Conversely, Cloudbeds, founded in 2012, boasts 1,219 recent reviews (76 in the last six months), a 4.62/5 rating, and a 91% likelihood to recommend. Its customer satisfaction scores—ease of use, support, and value—far outperform BookingCenter, indicating a more reliable and user-approved solution.
The core difference is that BookingCenter offers a standalone PMS and channel management setup, while Cloudbeds delivers a comprehensive, all-in-one hospitality platform with extensive integrations. With limited data on BookingCenter, can you confidently rely on its capabilities? Cloudbeds’ recent reviews suggest it’s the clearer choice for hotels seeking proven performance and ongoing support.
If your hotel needs a straightforward PMS with basic reservation and distribution features, BookingCenter might seem suitable—especially if you’re an independent property that prefers desktop management. Yet, with no recent reviews or active user feedback, it’s hard to confirm its current effectiveness or support quality.
If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich platform that unifies operations, distribution, revenue management, and guest engagement, Cloudbeds is the obvious winner. Its 1,219 reviews and 4.62/5 rating reflect high satisfaction across diverse hotel types, from boutique to large resorts, making it the better choice for growth-oriented hotels seeking reliability and ongoing innovation.
BookingCenter’s usability is impossible to evaluate due to zero reviews and no recent customer feedback, leaving its interface and onboarding experience unverified. In contrast, Cloudbeds enjoys a 4.58/5 ease-of-use rating, with users praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding (rated 4.41/5), and minimal training requirements.
Recent reviews highlight that staff find Cloudbeds’ system straightforward, with many noting that even non-technical team members adapt quickly. Edge: Cloudbeds.
BookingCenter provides core PMS functions, central reservation, and GDS integration, but offers no detailed feature count or recent user insights. Cloudbeds, on the other hand, boasts 90 unique features, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, 2-way real-time integrations, multi-lingual support, revenue management, automated reporting, online check-in, guest messaging, and more.
While BookingCenter appears limited in scope, Cloudbeds delivers a broad suite capable of handling complex operations for diverse property types. Edge: Cloudbeds.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for BookingCenter support, leaving its service quality unverified. Cloudbeds, with a 4.38/5 customer support rating, receives frequent praise for its responsive, friendly, and helpful assistance—users describe their support as “excellent” and “quick to respond,” highlighting its reliability.
Given the recent positive feedback, Cloudbeds’ support system is clearly stronger and more dependable. Edge: Cloudbeds.
BookingCenter’s integration count is limited to just 2 verified partners, including Airbnb, with only one shared partner. Cloudbeds outpaces this dramatically, with 190 verified integrations, including Airbnb, and unique partners like AdsHotel, Trevo, and Umi Digital.
This extensive integration ecosystem enables smoother operations and reduces manual work for your team. Edge: Cloudbeds.
BookingCenter lacks recent reviews, ratings, or hotel segment data, rendering comparison impossible. Cloudbeds, however, is highly rated across hotel segments, with a 4.54/5 score from independent hotels, 4.63/5 from boutique hotels, and a 4.17/5 from smaller independent properties.
Recent reviews consistently praise Cloudbeds’ ease of use, reliability, and support. Its high ratings across varied hotel types demonstrate broad satisfaction, reinforcing its status as a trusted solution. Edge: Cloudbeds.
BookingCenter does not publicly disclose pricing or offer a trial, indicating either custom quotes or limited transparency. Cloudbeds charges a starting price of $500 per month, with no free tier or trial, but many users see it as offering good value given its extensive features.
If budget predictability and transparency matter, Cloudbeds’ clear pricing helps inform decision-making. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Not ideal if you want a platform with modern features, broad integrations, or scalable growth options. Limited user feedback makes it risky for properties aiming to expand or modernize.
Not ideal if your property is very small with minimal tech needs or if you prefer traditional desktop-only software without cloud features.
Cloudbeds is a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with proven user satisfaction, extensive features, and a vast ecosystem of integrations. It is suitable for hotels seeking to automate, scale, and enhance guest experiences, demonstrated by its high ratings and recent positive reviews.
BookingCenter may appeal to very small properties or those with minimal tech needs, but its lack of recent reviews and limited features make it a less reliable choice for most hotels aiming for growth or modernization. For a proven, feature-rich, and well-supported solution, Cloudbeds is the clear winner.
This detailed comparison aims to guide your decision-making process by aligning your hotel’s needs with the strengths of each platform. Based on current data, Cloudbeds emerges as the more reliable and versatile choice for modern hospitality operations.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,BookingCenter 和 Cloudbeds HMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 78 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
人们注意到货币转换的准确性存在问题,尤其是在多币种交易中。用户反映存在一些差异,影响了对账流程。改进货币转换配置可以简化财务管理。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。BookingCenter 和 Cloudbeds HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。BookingCenter 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Cloudbeds HMS 提供 189 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
BookingCenter:否。Cloudbeds HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。BookingCenter 的 HT Score 为 0,Cloudbeds 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问