The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 328 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Bookinglayer 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Clock 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
基于 HTR 上 328 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 328 |
在分析了 328 条经验证的评价后,Bookinglayer 用户最看重其 ,而 Clock 用户则强调 ease of use and intuitive design, 预订和客房管理, 集成与自动化。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Intuitive Design
▾
|
|
|
+
预订和客房管理
▾
|
|
|
+
集成与自动化
▾
|
|
|
+
培训和入职
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
功能更新和可用性
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
连接性和同步性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 117 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 157 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #17 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #8 165 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #11 80 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #8 62 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #9 27 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #17 30 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 228 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #11 13 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #17 2 条评价 |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs a solution that streamlines operations, enhances guest experiences, and offers reliable support. Bookinglayer and Clock PMS both serve this purpose but differ significantly in scope, user experience, and market presence. Bookinglayer caters mainly to adventure and activity-focused businesses, while Clock PMS targets a broader hotel segment with extensive features. Which system aligns best with your property’s needs?
Both Bookinglayer and Clock PMS aim to improve operational efficiency, but their core functions and strengths diverge. Bookinglayer specializes in integrating bookings for activities and accommodation, making it ideal for adventure travel, wellness retreats, or companies combining multiple booking types. Clock PMS, meanwhile, offers a comprehensive, all-in-one hotel management platform with reservations, guest messaging, housekeeping, and more.
Bookinglayer’s review count is nonexistent, and its overall rating is zero, indicating extremely limited recent user feedback. In contrast, Clock PMS has 251 reviews over the past six months, with an impressive 4.8-star rating, and a 95% likelihood to recommend, making it the more proven choice. Are you comfortable with a solution that has an untested track record, or do you prefer one with recent, high-quality feedback?
If your hotel primarily manages traditional accommodations and wants an all-encompassing, user-friendly system, Clock PMS clearly fits better. Its high ratings across ease of use, support, and features—such as online check-in, guest messaging, and revenue management—make it suitable for hotels seeking efficiency and guest satisfaction.
Conversely, Bookinglayer might appeal if your business combines activity bookings with lodging, and you require a flexible platform to handle complex packages and customer communication. However, with no recent reviews or a proven track record, it’s riskier for hotels looking for dependable, ongoing support.
For most hotels seeking a reliable, well-rated PMS, Clock PMS is the safer, more proven choice. If your operations are more niche or activity-centric, Bookinglayer could be worth exploring, but only if you’re prepared for limited user feedback.
Clock PMS has received a 4.78/5 rating for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick staff onboarding, and minimal errors. Users mention that the system simplifies training and daily operations, reducing time spent on administrative tasks.
Bookinglayer, however, offers no ratings or recent reviews, making its usability assessment difficult. Given the absence of recent feedback, it's impossible to confirm whether it matches Clock’s ease of adoption. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS provides a broad suite of 39 features, including integrated CRS, revenue management, guest profiles, automated night audits, and guest apps—all built into its core offering. Its extensive integrations with other systems and automation tools support diverse hotel operations.
Bookinglayer offers only 19 shared features with Clock and adds one unique feature: SMS guest communication. It lacks many advanced functionalities like revenue management, dynamic calendars, or integrated payment terminals present in Clock. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS’s 4.75/5 support rating is backed by recent reviews emphasizing quick, responsive, and proactive assistance. Users mention that regular updates and support responsiveness help ensure smooth operations.
Bookinglayer provides no recent support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to evaluate support quality. Without recent user feedback or a track record of support performance, Clock PMS maintains the clear advantage. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS boasts 111 verified integrations, including popular tools like Curacity, Hotel Investor Apps, and FLEXIPASS. Its open API and no connection fees enable seamless third-party tool integration, supporting extensive customization.
Bookinglayer, on the other hand, has only one verified partner, Cloudbeds, limiting its capacity for integration. For hotels relying on multiple tools, Clock PMS’s extensive partner network offers greater flexibility. Edge: Clock PMS.
Given Bookinglayer’s lack of recent reviews and a rating of zero, it cannot be rated by hoteliers at this time. Clock PMS’s 4.8/5 average rating, based on 251 recent reviews, reflects consistent satisfaction across different hotel types.
Hotels of all sizes and segments, from boutique to large resorts, rate Clock highly, citing ease of use, support, and feature richness. The recent review volume and high scores confirm Clock’s strong reputation. Edge: Clock PMS.
Both systems are priced at a base rate of $600.00, with no mention of additional implementation, monthly fees, or trial periods. As no further pricing details are available, cost appears comparable, making value and features the differentiating factors.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is scale and proven performance. Clock PMS offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform backed by a large user base and recent, positive reviews, making it suitable for hotels seeking to streamline all operations.
Choose Clock PMS if your hotel needs a reliable, easy-to-use PMS with extensive functionality, automation, and proven support. Its high review volume and recent ratings make it the clear leader for most properties.
Bookinglayer might suit niche operators with specific activity-booking needs and a willingness to accept limited recent feedback. Its flexibility for combining activities and accommodation can work if your operations are specialized, but it carries more risk due to the lack of recent validation.
In summary, for most hotels, Clock PMS is the recommended choice. Its proven track record, extensive features, and high user satisfaction make it the safer, more effective solution. Bookinglayer remains an option for niche markets but should be approached cautiously without recent user feedback.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $600/mo |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many users are impressed with Clock PMS+ for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which simplifies the training process for new employees... Many users are impressed with Clock PMS+ for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which simplifies the training process for new employees and enhances operational efficiency. The software's straightforward navigation and learnability make it ideal for fast-paced environments.
评论者经常提到,Clock PMS+ 提供了高效的预订和客房管理工具。它将预订、客房管理和宾客沟通等各种运营环节整合到一个平台上,从而节省时间并减少错误。
用户非常欣赏 Clock PMS+ 的广泛集成和自动化功能,它可以与其他系统无缝连接,节省重复性任务的时间,并增强日常运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论者表示,他们在适应新功能更新方面遇到了一些挑战,他们认为,虽然这些改进是有益的,但有时会影响用户体验。因此,他们呼吁制定更平滑的过渡流程来更好... 一些评论者表示,他们在适应新功能更新方面遇到了一些挑战,他们认为,虽然这些改进是有益的,但有时会影响用户体验。因此,他们呼吁制定更平滑的过渡流程来更好地适应这些更新。
一些用户指出,虽然 Clock PMS+ 提供了全面的报告,但在数据收集和呈现方式方面仍有改进的空间,这可以增强收入管理和战略规划。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Bookinglayer 和 Clock PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Bookinglayer 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Clock PMS 提供 111 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Bookinglayer:否。Clock PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Bookinglayer 的 HT Score 为 0,Clock 的为 87。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案