The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 877 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 功能丰富, 运营效率, 响应式支持和定期更新,而 HOTELTIME 用户则强调 user interface and learning curve, 技术支援, reporting and analytics。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
功能丰富
▾
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
+
技术支援
▾
|
|
+
响应式支持和定期更新
▾
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
+
易于培训使用
▾
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误消息
▾
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
−
移动优化
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | #5 219 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | #3 238 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | #2 46 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | #8 7 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | #5 239 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | #3 241 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | #4 143 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | #4 49 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | #52 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | #2 384 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | #5 111 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #17 2 条评价 | #1 21 条评价 |
Your hotel is evaluating two leading property management systems: Clock PMS by Clock and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME. Both aim to streamline operations, improve guest experiences, and boost revenue, but they diverge in features, market presence, and user reviews. With Clock’s recent surge in review count and updated feedback, it’s important to assess which system truly meets your specific needs.
Are you looking for a system with a broader regional footprint and more recent customer insights, or one with a more extensive feature set and established global presence? Let’s compare these two contenders head-to-head.
Clock PMS and HotelTime PMS both address core hotel management challenges—reservations, invoicing, front desk, and guest communication. Clock’s reviews emphasize its comprehensive, all-in-one platform that handles reservations, rates, invoicing, online check-in, guest messaging, and more, making it ideal for busy properties needing automation and efficiency.
HotelTime, on the other hand, offers a wide-ranging, modular platform with integrations spanning reservations, POS, spa, and channel management, especially favored by larger resorts and multi-property groups. But with more recent reviews, Clock’s 251 reviews (only 6 in last 6 months) and a solid 4.8/5 rating suggest it’s gaining momentum and customer confidence.
Do you prioritize a newer, highly-rated platform with recent feedback, or a more established system with a broad feature array? The choice hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and regional focus.
If your hotel needs a flexible, all-in-one cloud-based system designed for high operational volume, Clock PMS is the better fit. Its recent review count and high NPS (9.47/5) showcase a satisfied customer base, especially among boutique and independent properties looking for ease and automation.
Conversely, if your resort or group requires extensive integrations, a modular approach, and support across multiple departments like spa or F&B, HotelTime’s 650+ properties globally and 4.83/5 rating make it ideal. HotelTime’s strength lies in its scalability and a strong support infrastructure for larger, multi-location properties.
In summary, choose Clock if operational simplicity, recent positive reviews, and automation matter most. Opt for HotelTime if you need a broad, integrated system with proven scalability.
Clock PMS boasts a 4.78/5 rating for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding—highlighted by reviews noting simple staff training and straightforward operations. The platform’s recent reviews emphasize its user-friendly design, especially for new employees.
HotelTime’s usability also scores well at 4.66/5, with many users appreciating its clear layout and comprehensive reporting. However, some mention initial complexity due to its modular setup, which can require more training upfront.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock offers nine features exclusive to its platform, including multi-currency, guest app, automated assignments, and SOC2 compliance—features that enhance automation and global reach. HotelTime, however, has only two unique features—guest CRM and spa & wellness modules—focusing more on operational integrations.
While HotelTime is praised for its extensive modules, Clock’s additional capabilities around automation, guest engagement, and multi-lingual interfaces give it a broader functional scope. It’s a more feature-rich option for hotels seeking advanced automation.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock’s support scores a 4.75/5, with recent reviews highlighting its prompt, helpful responses, and ongoing system updates. Users commend its dedicated team for quick troubleshooting and proactive communication.
HotelTime support also scores well at 4.73/5, with clients emphasizing their satisfaction with the responsiveness and ongoing assistance, especially during onboarding. However, some reviews suggest that extended support hours could further improve experience.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS boasts 111 verified partners, with 31 shared integrations with HotelTime, including Profitroom, RevControl, and GuestRevu. Its larger partner network facilitates extensive customization and third-party connectivity.
HotelTime’s 58 verified integrations include popular systems like STAAH, AeroGuest, and Zingle, focusing on hospitality-specific modules such as POS and spa. Its integrations are well-regarded but less extensive than Clock’s.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock’s recent reviews (27 in the last 6 months) emphasize its ease of use and operational efficiency, with an overall rating of 4.8/5 and a 95% likelihood to recommend. Boutique and independent hotels particularly appreciate its simplicity and automation.
HotelTime’s higher overall rating of 4.83/5 is supported by a broader user base (433 reviews), including resorts and large properties, with many praising its comprehensive modules. Its newer reviews are less frequent, but satisfaction remains high.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Both Clock and HotelTime offer a flat base price of $600 per month, with no upfront implementation fees or freemium options. Additional costs may arise from third-party integrations or customizations, but basic pricing is comparable.
Since exact pricing details beyond the base fee are similar, your decision should focus on value derived from features, support, and fit.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on spa, POS, or extensive resort-specific modules, as those are limited.
Not ideal if your hotel is a small boutique with basic needs and prefers a simplified system.
Clock PMS excels as a streamlined, easy-to-use platform favored by independent and boutique hotels. Its recent review count and high ratings indicate growing confidence among users who value automation, support, and operational efficiency.
HotelTime offers a broad, modular PMS with extensive integrations, making it suitable for resorts, large groups, and multi-property management. Its longstanding global presence and comprehensive feature set make it a dependable choice for complex operations.
If your hotel prioritizes recent customer feedback, ease of use, and automation, Clock PMS is the better option. For hotels needing extensive modules and a scalable platform for larger operations, HotelTime remains a strong candidate.
In conclusion, for most properties seeking agility, current positive reviews, and a high satisfaction rate, Clock PMS is the recommended choice. If you require a feature-rich, scalable system with a proven track record in resort and group management, HotelTime remains a solid contender.
我们分析了 14 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
虽然支持团队的响应速度和乐于助人的态度值得赞赏,但一些评论指出,延长技术支持时间将进一步提升用户体验,确保随时都能获得帮助,特别是对于国际用户而言。
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 HotelTime PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HotelTime PMS 提供 58 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。HotelTime PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84,HOTELTIME 的为 92。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问