The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 723 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Clock 表现出色 在 功能丰富 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Guest profiles.
ThinkReservations 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
基于 HTR 上 723 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 328 | 395 |
在分析了 723 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 功能丰富, 响应式支持和定期更新, 易于培训使用,而 ThinkReservations 用户则强调 客户支持, 数据和报告, 与 ota 集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
功能丰富
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
响应式支持和定期更新
▾
|
+
数据和报告
▾
|
|
+
易于培训使用
▾
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
+
自动追加销售
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误消息
▾
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | #4 145 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | #9 25 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | #6 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | #5 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | #7 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | #7 70 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | #7 24 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | #11 8 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | #1 386 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | #57 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | #32 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | #17 2 条评价 | #32 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Clock PMS and ThinkReservations PMS hinges on what your hotel needs most. Both systems aim to streamline operations, improve guest experiences, and boost revenue, but they approach these goals differently. Clock PMS, with its extensive feature set and broader integration network, is often favored by larger, more complex properties. ThinkReservations, known for its simplicity and focus on small to mid-sized hotels, emphasizes ease of use and rapid deployment. Which aligns better with your hotel’s operational priorities?
The core difference lies in their scope and target market. Clock PMS offers more advanced tools like integrated CRS, revenue management, and in-depth guest CRM, making it suitable for hotels with diverse needs and higher complexity. ThinkReservations emphasizes straightforward reservation management, automation, and channel connectivity, ideal for small properties seeking efficiency. Both are highly rated, but the one with more recent reviews and a larger user base—ThinkReservations—is generally the more reliable choice today.
Clock PMS is a robust, all-in-one platform with 251 reviews and a higher number of recent reviews, giving it a slight edge in confidence. Its feature set includes integrated CRS, revenue management, guest profiles, multi-currency, and guest CRM—making it ideal for properties with complex needs or multiple revenue streams. Its market presence spans globally, including North America, Europe, and Asia, giving it a broad reach.
ThinkReservations, with 356 reviews and a slightly higher recent review count, is tailored for small-to-mid-sized hotels, B&Bs, and vacation rentals. It offers essential features like online booking, integrated channels such as Expedia and Airbnb, and automated messaging. If your hotel requires detailed revenue management or extensive customization, Clock is the stronger choice; if you prioritize simplicity, faster onboarding, and reliable OTA connectivity, ThinkReservations stands out.
Clock PMS boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.78/5 and positive reviews praising its straightforward interface and quick staff onboarding. However, its extensive feature set can sometimes make navigation seem overwhelming, especially for smaller teams or less tech-savvy staff. Recent reviews indicate some users experience slow reporting and cryptic error messages, which can hinder usability.
ThinkReservations scores slightly higher in ease of use at 4.82/5, with reviewers emphasizing its intuitive interface, quick setup, and minimal training time. Its simplified design reduces the learning curve for staff, which is crucial for small teams managing multiple roles. Given the recent reviews and higher user satisfaction ratings, edge: ThinkReservations.
Clock PMS offers 38 core features, with 20 unique to its platform, including integrated CRS, revenue management, guest profiles, multi-lingual support, gift vouchers, integrated ID scanner, automated space optimization, and a guest app—highlighting its all-in-one design. It also provides advanced guest communication tools and automation, making it suitable for larger properties or those seeking comprehensive control.
ThinkReservations includes 38 features as well but only one feature—guest communication via SMS—is unique to its platform. Its strengths lie in OTA integration, automated messaging, online booking, and upselling tools, supporting streamlined operations for small hotels and B&Bs. While Clock’s feature depth favors larger, complex properties, edge: Clock PMS for its extensive, specialized functionalities.
Clock PMS is praised for its responsive, proactive customer service, with a 4.75/5 support rating. Users report quick response times and helpful assistance, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, though some have noted occasional delays or cryptic error messages. Recent reviews confirm ongoing responsiveness, critical during busy periods.
ThinkReservations scores slightly higher at 4.82/5, with reviewers citing excellent, accessible support and seamless onboarding. Many users describe the support team as knowledgeable and quick to respond, making the platform easier to adopt and troubleshoot. Edge: ThinkReservations, given its consistently high support ratings and recent positive feedback.
ThinkReservations enjoys a higher overall rating of 4.88/5 from 356 reviews, compared to Clock’s 4.8/5 from 251 reviews—both excellent scores. Recent reviews favor ThinkReservations, with hotel segments like B&Bs, small inns, and boutique hotels rating it higher for ease of use and support quality. Larger properties using Clock often praise its advanced features but note some complexity.
Clock’s top-rated segments include independent hotels (4.83/5) and city-center hotels (4.84/5), but it has fewer recent reviews, making its data slightly less current. Hoteliers in small properties or those emphasizing simplicity tend to rate ThinkReservations higher. Edge: ThinkReservations for recent, higher hotel ratings across diverse segments.
Clock PMS costs $600 monthly, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise-grade features. ThinkReservations is priced at $500 per month, also without a trial, making it slightly more affordable for small properties. Both platforms operate on flat monthly rates with no setup fees, but Clock’s higher price aligns with its broader feature set.
If budget is a concern, ThinkReservations offers a slightly lower entry point, especially given its targeted simplicity. However, larger hotels or those needing extensive automation and integrations may justify Clock’s higher cost. No free trial is available for either, so consider their value propositions carefully.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with minimal staff, or prioritizes quick setup and ease of use. Smaller B&Bs or hotels with straightforward needs may find Clock’s extensive features overwhelming or unnecessary.
Not ideal if your hotel requires complex revenue management, integrated POS, or advanced guest CRM features. Larger, more complex properties or those with specific operational needs might find ThinkReservations lacking.
Clock PMS is a comprehensive property management system with a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and global reach. It excels in large, complex properties that need detailed controls, automation, and customization, helping boost operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Its high review count and recent feedback confirm its reliability, but its complexity may require dedicated staff for optimal use.
ThinkReservations offers a straightforward, highly rated platform tailored for small to mid-sized hotels and B&Bs. Its focus on ease of use, OTA connectivity, and automation helps reduce manual work and increase revenue, especially for properties with limited staffing. Recent reviews show stronger support ratings and higher hotel satisfaction, making it the more reliable choice today.
If your hotel is large, complex, and needs advanced features, Clock PMS should be your choice. Conversely, if simplicity, fast onboarding, and excellent support are priorities, ThinkReservations is the better fit. Both systems are proven, but current data favors ThinkReservations for most small to mid-sized properties seeking efficiency and reliability.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Clock PMS 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享 38 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 礼品券和预付体验 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 访客通信(短信) |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 9 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 14 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
尽管许多人已经认为它很优秀,但一些评论表示希望在周末提供额外支持,以便更好地处理紧急询问。
ThinkReservations 通过数字注册、夜间审计以及轻松管理预订和入住流程来帮助简化运营,使员工能够更加专注于与客人的互动。
该系统提供全面的数据和报告功能,使酒店经营者能够就定价、客人满意度和战略规划做出明智的决策。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论强调了定价结构的问题,包括对渠道经理费用的不满以及 ThinkMessenger 等功能的高价格。
强制的两步验证对于一些用户来说是一个令人沮丧的地方,他们觉得它很麻烦并且希望降低安全设置。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ThinkReservations PMS 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。ThinkReservations PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84,ThinkReservations 的为 89。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问