The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | H-Hotels |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 66 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 36 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 33 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | H-Hotels |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 96 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #1 67 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #1 53 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 13 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | H-Hotels |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #1 115 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 26 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #5 4 条评价 |
Choosing between BYS by H-Hotels and Cendyn CRS depends on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both aim to streamline reservations and improve revenue but diverge significantly in their features, support, and market presence. BYS is a nascent product with zero reviews and minimal data, while Cendyn CRS has a robust review base and extensive functionality. Given the data, the decision becomes clear: which product truly serves your hotel better?
BYS by H-Hotels is a new player with no user reviews or ratings, making it difficult to gauge real-world performance. In contrast, Cendyn CRS boasts over 136 reviews with a high overall rating of 4.47/5 and a recent review count of 2 in the last six months, making its reputation more reliable. While BYS is marketed as a hotel reservation solution, Cendyn offers a comprehensive, cloud-native platform with over 21 unique features that support multi-property management, dynamic pricing, and extensive integrations.
Both products aim to centralize reservations, but Cendyn’s broad feature set and proven market presence suggest it’s more suited for hotels seeking a robust, scalable system. BYS, on the other hand, remains untested at scale and lacks verified integrations or customer support data. Are you comfortable trialing an unreviewed solution, or do you prefer a platform with a proven track record?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, proven central reservation system that integrates with multiple distribution channels, Cendyn CRS is the clear choice. Its extensive features—including booking engine, channel management, metasearch connectivity, and dynamic pricing—support a wide array of operational needs. If you're a hotelier in search of a scalable, secure platform with a track record of customer satisfaction, Cendyn’s high review scores and recent positive feedback make it the logical pick.
If, however, your hotel is a small operation or startup with limited budget and risk appetite, BYS might seem appealing because of the lack of upfront costs and minimal implementation requirements. Yet, the absence of reviews and verified integrations raises questions about its reliability and future support. Are you prepared to accept an untested platform, or do you prefer a system with proven results and extensive partner support?
Based on available data, Cendyn CRS scores a 4.34/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive booking engine and straightforward rate management. Customers note that its user-friendly interfaces and clear workflows help staff adopt the platform quickly, with onboarding ratings around 4.26/5. Support team responsiveness and consistent software updates further ease daily operations.
No data exists on BYS’s usability or onboarding experience, which leaves uncertainty about how your team will adapt to it. In contrast, Cendyn’s established reputation and positive feedback suggest a smoother, more reliable user experience. Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn offers 21 unique features, including a booking engine, channel management, metasearch, dynamic pricing, and multi-property management, making it a comprehensive solution. BYS, by comparison, appears to have zero verified features, leaving it uncertain whether it can meet complex operational demands.
The abundance of features in Cendyn directly supports revenue growth, operational efficiency, and channel distribution, which BYS cannot claim without additional information. For hotels seeking a feature-rich platform that covers all reservations and distribution needs, Cendyn leads decisively. Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn’s support ratings stand at 4.54/5, with reviews highlighting its responsiveness, professional staff, and proactive support. Customers appreciate that their support teams resolve issues promptly and provide ongoing assistance, critical for minimizing disruptions.
There is no public information or reviews on BYS’s customer support, which increases risk if issues arise. Given the importance of reliable support in reservation systems, Cendyn’s proven support reputation makes it the stronger choice. Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn’s platform connects with over 116 verified partners, including key PMS, CMS, and channel management systems like Priority Software, Visual Matrix PMS, and RoomRaccoon. These integrations enable seamless data flow across your property management, booking engine, and distribution channels.
Conversely, BYS has no verified partners or integrations listed, raising concerns about operational compatibility and future scalability. For hotels prioritizing connectivity and a broad ecosystem of partners, Cendyn’s extensive integrations give it a clear advantage. Edge: Cendyn.
Since BYS has no reviews, it cannot be rated by hoteliers, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Cendyn, with 136 reviews and a 4.47/5 overall score, enjoys high praise from users across various hotel segments, including independent and branded hotels.
Recent reviews emphasize Cendyn’s ease of use, support quality, and revenue-boosting features. Its consistent positive feedback and high ratings confirm it as the preferred choice among hoteliers. Edge: Cendyn.
BYS by H-Hotels does not publicly disclose pricing information, which could mean a custom quote or uncertain costs. Cendyn charges a base price of $700 per month, with no free tier or trial, but this fee includes access to its extensive feature set and integrations.
If your budget is a primary concern, the lack of transparent pricing for BYS complicates decision-making. However, given Cendyn’s well-defined pricing structure and the features included, it offers predictable value for investment. Edge: Cendyn.
Given its lack of features and support data, BYS is best for very small hotels or those testing reservation solutions.
Cendyn’s broad capabilities make it suitable for complex, growing hotel portfolios.
Cendyn CRS is a proven, feature-packed platform with a large user base and high customer satisfaction, making it the clearer choice for most hotels. Its extensive integrations, proven support, and broad feature set support operational growth and revenue optimization.
If your hotel values reliability, comprehensive tools, and proven market presence, Cendyn is the right pick. BYS, lacking reviews and features, might suit very small or experimental hotels, but it’s risky for serious operations. When choosing for growth and stability, Cendyn wins decisively.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Pegasus CRS has ensured that our direct booking channels remain competitive at all times. We create and update all our rate plans first in the CRS and then we distribute these to o..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队的及时性和有效性经常受到称赞。用户对快速的响应时间和解决问题的专业帮助表示赞赏,这提高了他们对系统的整体体验。
Pegasus 的预订引擎因其简单性和用户友好性而备受赞誉,无论是对酒店员工还是客人而言都是如此。用户非常欣赏它创建价格计划、管理预订和浏览系统是多么简单,这... Pegasus 的预订引擎因其简单性和用户友好性而备受赞誉,无论是对酒店员工还是客人而言都是如此。用户非常欣赏它创建价格计划、管理预订和浏览系统是多么简单,这大大简化了预订流程。
许多评论都指出,Pegasus 在处理价格方案配置方面非常有效,它提供了广泛的可定制性,以满足不同酒店的需求。这包括从现有方案中得出价格并进行批量更新,从而改... 许多评论都指出,Pegasus 在处理价格方案配置方面非常有效,它提供了广泛的可定制性,以满足不同酒店的需求。这包括从现有方案中得出价格并进行批量更新,从而改善收益管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户认为,预订引擎和价格管理功能的某些方面可以通过进一步定制来改善。建议包括布局设计更加灵活,以及无需大量支持干预即可集成个性化修改的能力。
一些评论强调了界面问题,尤其是像 SiteMinder 这样的集成系统。用户提到需要定期刷新,偶尔会出现连接中断,这会导致费率和库存管理不一致。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。BYS 和 Cendyn CRS 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。BYS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Cendyn CRS 提供 116 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cendyn CRS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
BYS:否。Cendyn CRS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。H-Hotels 的 HT Score 为 0,Cendyn 的为 88。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问