The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 66 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Casablanca 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Online Check-in and Guest App.
Lodgable 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 66 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 66 | 0 |
在分析了 66 条经验证的评价后,Casablanca 用户最看重其 支持质量, 用户友好性, 持续改进,而 Lodgable 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Lodgable |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持质量
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
|
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
|
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
额外费用
▾
|
|
|
−
收益管理和收入优化
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Lodgable |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #21 44 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #34 14 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Lodgable |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #42 11 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #36 8 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #37 6 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #33 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Lodgable |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #55 2 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #13 62 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can make or break your hotel's daily operations, guest experience, and revenue potential. Casablanca’s PMS stands out with a significant number of recent, positive reviews and a high user rating, while Lodgable remains largely unreviewed and without recent customer feedback. Both aim to streamline property management, but their features and market presence diverge sharply. Are you ready to focus on a proven, well-supported solution?
Casablanca offers a comprehensive, all-in-one PMS with over 60 verified features, including channel management, online check-in, guest messaging, and detailed reporting. Its user base spans various hotel types, from boutique hotels to resorts, with a strong presence in Europe and multiple integrations, making it suitable for hotels seeking extensive automation and customization.
Lodgable, by contrast, is a simpler platform primarily designed for vacation rentals and small property portfolios. It emphasizes automation of bookings and listings management, with an easy-to-use interface but lacks extensive integrations or detailed features. Without recent reviews, Lodgable's ability to meet evolving hotel needs remains uncertain.
Given the current data, Casablanca's feature set and recent positive customer experiences position it as the more reliable choice—especially if you value a system with proven support and scalability. Will you prioritize a broad feature set or a straightforward rental management tool?
If your hotel needs a versatile, feature-rich PMS capable of handling multi-property operations, extensive guest communication, and revenue management, Casablanca is the clear pick. Its large user base and high customer support ratings (4.82/5) reflect reliability and ongoing development, especially valuable for mid-sized to large hotels.
On the other hand, if your focus is solely on managing vacation rentals or small-scale properties with minimal integration needs, Lodgable may seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews and limited feature documentation, it lacks the proven track record and support that Casablanca offers. For most hotels, Casablanca’s comprehensive capabilities outweigh Lodgable’s simplicity.
Casablanca boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.8/5, supported by recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Customers highlight that even complex operational tasks are manageable thanks to its user-friendly design and solid onboarding support.
Lodgable, with no available recent reviews or user ratings, cannot be confidently assessed for usability. Its interface is described as simple in marketing materials, but without current user feedback, it’s uncertain whether it can handle complex hotel needs efficiently.
Edge: Casablanca.
Casablanca offers over 40 unique features, including a channel manager, online check-in, guest app, integrated ID scanner, guest messaging, task management, real-time reporting, and a booking engine. These features support a fully digitalized hotel operation, from guest pre-arrival to post-stay engagement.
Lodgable, by comparison, does not publicly list specific features or integrations. Its core strength seems to lie in basic booking and listing management tools, lacking the extensive suite Casablanca provides.
Edge: Casablanca.
Casablanca’s support ratings are exceptional at 4.82/5, with numerous reviews describing quick, friendly, and competent assistance. Customers mention that support is available 365 days a year, with many reporting fast resolutions to technical issues and ongoing system updates.
Lodgable’s customer support remains unreviewed and unverified publicly. Without recent user feedback, it’s impossible to assess whether their support is as responsive or effective as Casablanca’s.
Edge: Casablanca.
Casablanca integrates with 46 verified partners, including major booking portals, revenue management tools, and local service providers like SiteMinder, Profitroom, and Betterspace. These integrations enable seamless operations across multiple systems, reducing manual data entry and errors.
Lodgable currently has no publicly verified integrations, limiting its connectivity options. For hotels seeking a connected ecosystem, Casablanca’s extensive partner network is a clear advantage.
Edge: Casablanca.
Casablanca’s recent reviews and high NPS score (9.87/10) reflect a strong user endorsement, especially from hotels in Europe and resort segments. Its 60 reviews in the last six months show active customer engagement and satisfaction, with 98% likelihood to recommend.
Lodgable lacks recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. Its absence from recent feedback suggests limited market presence or adoption among hoteliers.
Edge: Casablanca.
Pricing details for Casablanca are not publicly available, but no-trial or freemium options suggest a paid subscription with possible tiered pricing based on features or property count. Lodgable’s pricing is also undisclosed, with no free trial or clear fee structure noted.
Without transparent pricing, your decision may hinge on evaluating the value Casablanca offers through its extensive features and support, versus the potential simplicity of Lodgable.
Not ideal if your hotel is small with minimal tech needs or if you prefer a low-cost, simplified rental management system.
Not ideal if you need comprehensive hotel operations management, advanced integrations, or multi-property scalability.
Casablanca stands out as a proven, feature-packed PMS with a large user base, recent positive reviews, and high customer satisfaction. Its extensive integrations and support make it suitable for mid-sized to large hotels seeking automation and scalability.
Lodgable, while potentially attractive for small-scale vacation rentals, lacks recent reviews and detailed features. Its limited market presence makes it a less reliable choice for hotels looking for proven technology.
Choose Casablanca if you need a reliable, versatile PMS backed by active users and a broad feature set. Opt for Lodgable only if your operations are simple and your priority is minimal management tools, though the lack of recent feedback is a concern.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Lodgable |
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 和 Lodgable 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Lodgable |
|---|---|---|
| 数字注册 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 28 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the last two years, we have intensively worked with the hotelsoftware and analyzed all processes down to the smallest detail and, based on this, implemented the appropriate resu..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了卡萨布兰卡的出色支持,指出其响应时间快、员工能力强、友好。用户对即使在周末和节假日也能提供支持表示赞赏,这让许多酒店经营者感到放心,他... 许多评论都强调了卡萨布兰卡的出色支持,指出其响应时间快、员工能力强、友好。用户对即使在周末和节假日也能提供支持表示赞赏,这让许多酒店经营者感到放心,他们可以获得持续可靠的帮助。
评论一致称赞 Casablanca 易于使用且直观的界面,让经验丰富的员工和新员工都能快速上手。一些用户指出,随着软件的发展,它有时会对新手用户变得有点复杂。
用户对 Casablanca 不断添加新功能并根据客户反馈改进其可用性表示赞赏。不过,一些人指出,他们希望新功能的实施时间更加透明,并有时间表。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户普遍担心的是更新和新界面带来的额外成本,这对规模较小的酒店来说可能是个问题。尽管人们对该软件的功能普遍满意,但这一方面被认为是缺点。
许多用户强调卡萨布兰卡的收益管理和动态定价工具对于增加收入至关重要。收益价格、图形预订路线和追加销售机会等功能有助于提高财务业绩。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 和 Lodgable 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 提供 46 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Lodgable 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS):否。Lodgable:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Casablanca 的 HT Score 为 68,Lodgable 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问