项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 1,373 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Casablanca 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise.
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 培训、易用性和入职 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的住宿设施 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
基于 HTR 上 1,373 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 联系销售 | 起价 $600/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 66 | 1,307 |
在分析了 1,373 条经验证的评价后,Casablanca 用户最看重其 支持质量, 用户友好性, 持续改进,而 Cloudbeds 用户则强调 培训、易用性和入职, 支持响应能力和人工协助, 日历和预订可见性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持质量
▾
|
+
培训、易用性和入职
▾
|
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
+
支持响应能力和人工协助
▾
|
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
+
日历和预订可见性
▾
|
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
+
报告与分析
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
额外费用
▾
|
−
账单、发票和账单处理
▾
|
|
−
收益管理和收入优化
▾
|
−
移动应用限制
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #21 44 条评价 | #1 592 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #34 14 条评价 | #4 212 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 42 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #13 4 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #42 11 条评价 | #2 473 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #36 8 条评价 | #4 228 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #37 6 条评价 | #6 116 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #33 5 条评价 | #2 93 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #55 2 条评价 | #2 435 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #13 62 条评价 | #7 163 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #3 226 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #7 11 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and revenue. Casablanca and Cloudbeds are two prominent options, each with unique strengths and weaknesses, but which one truly fits your hotel’s needs?
Casablanca's PMS emphasizes comprehensive control with a focus on multi-property management and automation, primarily serving smaller or mid-sized hotels in Europe. Cloudbeds, meanwhile, touts an extensive global presence, integrating a broad suite of features designed for scalability and ease of use across diverse hospitality segments.
Are you seeking a system with more recent reviews and a larger user base? Cloudbeds, with over 1,070 reviews and a 4.63/5 overall score, takes that lead over Casablanca’s 60 reviews at a 0/5 rating. This data suggests Cloudbeds is the more proven and trusted solution at present.
Casablanca offers a centralized, all-in-one platform with a focus on automating hotel management processes from reservations to invoicing. However, its limited review count and outdated overall rating (0/5 by users) cast doubt on its current reliability and market confidence.
Cloudbeds, with a near-perfect review score (4.63/5) and a high likelihood to recommend (91%), clearly demonstrates its standing among hoteliers worldwide. It excels in operational automation, guest management, and integration, making it a more dependable choice.
While Casablanca touts on-premise options and specialized tools, Cloudbeds provides a broader suite of digital features supported by a global network. Do you want a system backed by a large, active user community? The choice leans toward Cloudbeds.
If your hotel needs a flexible, easy-to-use platform that supports multi-property management, real-time reservations, and extensive integrations, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. Its comprehensive ecosystem simplifies operations, enhances revenue management, and improves guest experiences, especially for independent, boutique, and small chain hotels.
If your hotel prioritizes on-premise solutions or specific niche features like wellness planning, Casablanca may appeal—though its limited recent reviews and lack of clarity on current support diminish its appeal. For most hoteliers, Cloudbeds’ proven scalability, extensive integrations (190 partners), and strong user feedback make it the more compelling choice.
Cloudbeds is highly rated for its user interface (4.61/5), with many users praising its intuitive design, simple reservation workflows, and mobile accessibility. Support responsiveness and onboarding are rated slightly lower but still strong (4.45/5), with users reporting quick, helpful assistance.
Casablanca’s ease of use is less clear due to its very low overall rating and minimal recent reviews, making it difficult to assess current user experience. The limited review data suggests potential usability issues or less frequent updates.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers a robust feature set with 25 unique functionalities not found in Casablanca, including integrated channel management, revenue management, online checkout, automated reminders, and employee messaging. Its 2-way real-time integrations and extensive marketplace enable high customization and scalability.
Casablanca provides only one exclusive feature—on-premise deployment—limiting its appeal for modern, cloud-based operations. Its feature count is minimal (just 1 unique feature), which restricts its ability to support evolving hotel needs.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Casablanca’s reviews highlight exceptional support (4.82/5), with many praising its rapid, competent, and friendly assistance, even during weekends. Its strong support reputation is reinforced by comments like “great support and competent solutions,” which are a significant advantage for smaller hotels needing reliable help.
Cloudbeds’ support score (4.41/5) remains high, but some recent reviews mention delays or the need for more comprehensive onboarding. While responsive, it lacks the same level of praise and consistency seen in Casablanca.
Edge: Casablanca.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified integrations, including notable partners like SiteMinder, Stripe, and QuickBooks, supporting extensive automation and third-party connectivity. Its marketplace allows properties to easily add features and customize their setup.
Casablanca has 46 verified partners, primarily focused on Europe, with some notable integrations like Profitroom and Smart Host. Its smaller partner network limits flexibility and scope for scaling.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ recent review count (81 in the last 6 months) and high satisfaction scores (91% likelihood to recommend) suggest broad, current confidence among users. Its property segments—boutique hotels, hostels, independent properties—rate it highly, often citing ease of use and revenue growth.
Casablanca’s reviews are sparse, and its overall rating is 0/5, indicating very poor recent user feedback. The lack of current reviews makes it difficult to trust its ongoing performance.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Casablanca does not publish pricing details, which often indicates a bespoke quote and possibly higher costs suited for larger operations. This lack of transparency can be a barrier for smaller hotels.
Cloudbeds charges a base fee of $600 monthly, with no setup or implementation fees publicly disclosed. Its predictable pricing model makes it easier to evaluate and plan for ongoing costs.
Not ideal if you need a cloud-based, scalable system with recent user feedback or extensive third-party integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel requires highly specialized niche features or prefers on-premise deployment.
The core difference is that Cloudbeds is a widely adopted, cloud-based platform favored for its comprehensive features, ease of use, and strong support network. Casablanca, with its limited recent reviews and lower ratings, appears to lack the same ongoing reliability and market confidence.
If you prioritize a proven, scalable PMS with broad integrations and positive user feedback, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its extensive features, global presence, and continuous improvements make it suitable for most hotels seeking operational efficiency and growth.
However, if your hotel operates solely in Europe, prefers an on-premise setup, or needs niche features, Casablanca might still appeal—though it’s increasingly difficult to justify given current data.
In summary, choose Cloudbeds if you want a modern, flexible, and trusted PMS with a proven track record. Opt for Casablanca only if you have specific regional needs or niche requirements that align with its offerings, understanding its limited recent support and reviews.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | — | 起价 $600/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 9 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"In the last two years, we have intensively worked with the hotelsoftware and analyzed all processes down to the smallest detail and, based on this, implemented the appropriate resu..."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了卡萨布兰卡的出色支持,指出其响应时间快、员工能力强、友好。用户对即使在周末和节假日也能提供支持表示赞赏,这让许多酒店经营者感到放心,他... 许多评论都强调了卡萨布兰卡的出色支持,指出其响应时间快、员工能力强、友好。用户对即使在周末和节假日也能提供支持表示赞赏,这让许多酒店经营者感到放心,他们可以获得持续可靠的帮助。
评论一致称赞 Casablanca 易于使用且直观的界面,让经验丰富的员工和新员工都能快速上手。一些用户指出,随着软件的发展,它有时会对新手用户变得有点复杂。
用户对 Casablanca 不断添加新功能并根据客户反馈改进其可用性表示赞赏。不过,一些人指出,他们希望新功能的实施时间更加透明,并有时间表。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户普遍担心的是更新和新界面带来的额外成本,这对规模较小的酒店来说可能是个问题。尽管人们对该软件的功能普遍满意,但这一方面被认为是缺点。
许多用户强调卡萨布兰卡的收益管理和动态定价工具对于增加收入至关重要。收益价格、图形预订路线和追加销售机会等功能有助于提高财务业绩。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 常被描述为直观且易于学习,这减少了新员工的培训时间,并帮助酒店快速采用系统。评论者也重视教程、大学资源和入职帮助,尽管一些人要求重新培训或获... Cloudbeds 常被描述为直观且易于学习,这减少了新员工的培训时间,并帮助酒店快速采用系统。评论者也重视教程、大学资源和入职帮助,尽管一些人要求重新培训或获得更深入的高级功能指导。
支持是一个主要主题,许多用户赞扬在能够联系到人工时获得的快速帮助和知识丰富的客服。最常见的抱怨是依赖聊天机器人/电子邮件工作流程以及缓慢的升级处理,这... 支持是一个主要主题,许多用户赞扬在能够联系到人工时获得的快速帮助和知识丰富的客服。最常见的抱怨是依赖聊天机器人/电子邮件工作流程以及缓慢的升级处理,这对于可能影响客人体验和收入的紧急前台问题来说是有问题的。
用户反复表示 Cloudbeds 的日历是产品中最清晰的部分,为前台团队提供快速查看入住情况、房型、预订状态和每日预订的功能。它帮助酒店更高效地管理入住、退房、... 用户反复表示 Cloudbeds 的日历是产品中最清晰的部分,为前台团队提供快速查看入住情况、房型、预订状态和每日预订的功能。它帮助酒店更高效地管理入住、退房、拆分住宿和房间变更,减少繁忙操作中的错误。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
审阅者经常提到发票模板、收据、账单审核以及集中式客人账单对于日常运营和客人退房的帮助。同时,添加额外项目的账单流程可能操作繁琐,一些用户希望在Cloudbed... 审阅者经常提到发票模板、收据、账单审核以及集中式客人账单对于日常运营和客人退房的帮助。同时,添加额外项目的账单流程可能操作繁琐,一些用户希望在Cloudbeds中拥有更强的税务、货币和会计处理功能,而不是使用单独的系统。
一个常见的批评是移动应用缺乏足够的操作深度,无法满足移动工作人员的需求。评论者希望在应用中直接进行预订创建、可用性管理、通知、日历访问等操作,而无需切... 一个常见的批评是移动应用缺乏足够的操作深度,无法满足移动工作人员的需求。评论者希望在应用中直接进行预订创建、可用性管理、通知、日历访问等操作,而无需切换到电子邮件或桌面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 和 Cloudbeds PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 提供 48 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Cloudbeds PMS 提供 199 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS):否。Cloudbeds PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Casablanca 的 HT Score 为 68,Cloudbeds 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐