The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,308 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Casablanca 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise.
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
基于 HTR 上 1,308 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 66 | 1,242 |
在分析了 1,308 条经验证的评价后,Casablanca 用户最看重其 支持质量, 用户友好性, 持续改进,而 Cloudbeds 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持质量
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
+
一体化生态系统
▾
|
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
额外费用
▾
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
−
收益管理和收入优化
▾
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #21 44 条评价 | #1 592 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #34 14 条评价 | #4 212 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 42 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #13 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #42 11 条评价 | #2 473 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #36 8 条评价 | #4 228 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #37 6 条评价 | #6 116 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #33 5 条评价 | #2 93 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #55 2 条评价 | #2 435 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #13 62 条评价 | #7 163 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #3 226 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #7 11 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and revenue. Casablanca and Cloudbeds are two prominent options, each with unique strengths and weaknesses, but which one truly fits your hotel’s needs?
Casablanca's PMS emphasizes comprehensive control with a focus on multi-property management and automation, primarily serving smaller or mid-sized hotels in Europe. Cloudbeds, meanwhile, touts an extensive global presence, integrating a broad suite of features designed for scalability and ease of use across diverse hospitality segments.
Are you seeking a system with more recent reviews and a larger user base? Cloudbeds, with over 1,070 reviews and a 4.63/5 overall score, takes that lead over Casablanca’s 60 reviews at a 0/5 rating. This data suggests Cloudbeds is the more proven and trusted solution at present.
Casablanca offers a centralized, all-in-one platform with a focus on automating hotel management processes from reservations to invoicing. However, its limited review count and outdated overall rating (0/5 by users) cast doubt on its current reliability and market confidence.
Cloudbeds, with a near-perfect review score (4.63/5) and a high likelihood to recommend (91%), clearly demonstrates its standing among hoteliers worldwide. It excels in operational automation, guest management, and integration, making it a more dependable choice.
While Casablanca touts on-premise options and specialized tools, Cloudbeds provides a broader suite of digital features supported by a global network. Do you want a system backed by a large, active user community? The choice leans toward Cloudbeds.
If your hotel needs a flexible, easy-to-use platform that supports multi-property management, real-time reservations, and extensive integrations, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. Its comprehensive ecosystem simplifies operations, enhances revenue management, and improves guest experiences, especially for independent, boutique, and small chain hotels.
If your hotel prioritizes on-premise solutions or specific niche features like wellness planning, Casablanca may appeal—though its limited recent reviews and lack of clarity on current support diminish its appeal. For most hoteliers, Cloudbeds’ proven scalability, extensive integrations (190 partners), and strong user feedback make it the more compelling choice.
Cloudbeds is highly rated for its user interface (4.61/5), with many users praising its intuitive design, simple reservation workflows, and mobile accessibility. Support responsiveness and onboarding are rated slightly lower but still strong (4.45/5), with users reporting quick, helpful assistance.
Casablanca’s ease of use is less clear due to its very low overall rating and minimal recent reviews, making it difficult to assess current user experience. The limited review data suggests potential usability issues or less frequent updates.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers a robust feature set with 25 unique functionalities not found in Casablanca, including integrated channel management, revenue management, online checkout, automated reminders, and employee messaging. Its 2-way real-time integrations and extensive marketplace enable high customization and scalability.
Casablanca provides only one exclusive feature—on-premise deployment—limiting its appeal for modern, cloud-based operations. Its feature count is minimal (just 1 unique feature), which restricts its ability to support evolving hotel needs.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Casablanca’s reviews highlight exceptional support (4.82/5), with many praising its rapid, competent, and friendly assistance, even during weekends. Its strong support reputation is reinforced by comments like “great support and competent solutions,” which are a significant advantage for smaller hotels needing reliable help.
Cloudbeds’ support score (4.41/5) remains high, but some recent reviews mention delays or the need for more comprehensive onboarding. While responsive, it lacks the same level of praise and consistency seen in Casablanca.
Edge: Casablanca.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified integrations, including notable partners like SiteMinder, Stripe, and QuickBooks, supporting extensive automation and third-party connectivity. Its marketplace allows properties to easily add features and customize their setup.
Casablanca has 46 verified partners, primarily focused on Europe, with some notable integrations like Profitroom and Smart Host. Its smaller partner network limits flexibility and scope for scaling.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ recent review count (81 in the last 6 months) and high satisfaction scores (91% likelihood to recommend) suggest broad, current confidence among users. Its property segments—boutique hotels, hostels, independent properties—rate it highly, often citing ease of use and revenue growth.
Casablanca’s reviews are sparse, and its overall rating is 0/5, indicating very poor recent user feedback. The lack of current reviews makes it difficult to trust its ongoing performance.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Casablanca does not publish pricing details, which often indicates a bespoke quote and possibly higher costs suited for larger operations. This lack of transparency can be a barrier for smaller hotels.
Cloudbeds charges a base fee of $600 monthly, with no setup or implementation fees publicly disclosed. Its predictable pricing model makes it easier to evaluate and plan for ongoing costs.
Not ideal if you need a cloud-based, scalable system with recent user feedback or extensive third-party integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel requires highly specialized niche features or prefers on-premise deployment.
The core difference is that Cloudbeds is a widely adopted, cloud-based platform favored for its comprehensive features, ease of use, and strong support network. Casablanca, with its limited recent reviews and lower ratings, appears to lack the same ongoing reliability and market confidence.
If you prioritize a proven, scalable PMS with broad integrations and positive user feedback, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its extensive features, global presence, and continuous improvements make it suitable for most hotels seeking operational efficiency and growth.
However, if your hotel operates solely in Europe, prefers an on-premise setup, or needs niche features, Casablanca might still appeal—though it’s increasingly difficult to justify given current data.
In summary, choose Cloudbeds if you want a modern, flexible, and trusted PMS with a proven track record. Opt for Casablanca only if you have specific regional needs or niche requirements that align with its offerings, understanding its limited recent support and reviews.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 和 Cloudbeds PMS 共享 39 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 无限频道(无需额外费用) |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 14 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 9 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"In the last two years, we have intensively worked with the hotelsoftware and analyzed all processes down to the smallest detail and, based on this, implemented the appropriate resu..."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了卡萨布兰卡的出色支持,指出其响应时间快、员工能力强、友好。用户对即使在周末和节假日也能提供支持表示赞赏,这让许多酒店经营者感到放心,他... 许多评论都强调了卡萨布兰卡的出色支持,指出其响应时间快、员工能力强、友好。用户对即使在周末和节假日也能提供支持表示赞赏,这让许多酒店经营者感到放心,他们可以获得持续可靠的帮助。
评论一致称赞 Casablanca 易于使用且直观的界面,让经验丰富的员工和新员工都能快速上手。一些用户指出,随着软件的发展,它有时会对新手用户变得有点复杂。
用户对 Casablanca 不断添加新功能并根据客户反馈改进其可用性表示赞赏。不过,一些人指出,他们希望新功能的实施时间更加透明,并有时间表。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户普遍担心的是更新和新界面带来的额外成本,这对规模较小的酒店来说可能是个问题。尽管人们对该软件的功能普遍满意,但这一方面被认为是缺点。
许多用户强调卡萨布兰卡的收益管理和动态定价工具对于增加收入至关重要。收益价格、图形预订路线和追加销售机会等功能有助于提高财务业绩。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 和 Cloudbeds PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 提供 46 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS):否。Cloudbeds PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Casablanca 的 HT Score 为 68,Cloudbeds 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问