The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 280 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 易于使用, 增加收入, 客户服务,而 Exely 用户则强调 支持与培训, direct booking enhancement, 用户友好界面。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
支持与培训
▾
|
|
+
增加收入
▾
|
+
Direct Booking Enhancement
▾
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
高级报告和分析
▾
|
+
移动优化
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
−
复杂性和可用性问题
▾
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
−
功能实现滞后
▾
|
−
Seamless Integration
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | #15 34 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | #11 64 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | #22 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | #8 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | #15 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | #15 28 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | #16 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | #16 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | #24 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | #25 11 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | #4 79 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | #2 17 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine can dramatically impact your hotel's revenue, guest experience, and operational efficiency. Both Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine and Exely Booking Engine aim to improve direct bookings and streamline management, but they differ significantly in market presence, features, and user feedback. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, segment, and specific needs.
Amadeus is a well-established player with a broad global footprint and more extensive integrations, while Exely offers a streamlined, user-friendly experience with more recent positive reviews. Which aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
Both products address the core need to boost direct bookings and improve guest engagement. However, Amadeus’s iHotelier® is a mature platform with a long history of serving large hotel chains and complex operations, often praised for its advanced features and broad integration network. Exely, on the other hand, is newer but has gained praise for its ease of use and quick setup, making it appealing for independent hotels and smaller chains.
While Amadeus’s platform offers a rich feature set—including loyalty programs, ADA compliance, and A/B testing—its complexity can be a drawback for hotels seeking quick deployment. Conversely, Exely’s simple interface and faster onboarding have earned recent high ratings, but it currently has fewer integrations and features. Are you looking for a mature solution with extensive capabilities or a flexible solution that’s easier to implement?
If your hotel is part of a large chain or operates in multiple regions across continents, Amadeus’s extensive market presence and 104 verified integrations make it the logical choice. Its proven track record in high-end and city-center hotels, along with features like loyalty program integration and advanced analytics, are ideal if you need sophisticated tools.
If your hotel is an independent property or small chain prioritizing simplicity, fast deployment, and high user ratings, Exely is the better option. Its recent reviews highlight a 4.91/5 ease-of-use rating and a 98% likelihood to recommend, making it a strong fit for properties seeking quick results and responsive support. Which profile best describes your hotel?
Ease of use is critical for staff adoption and operational efficiency. Amadeus’s platform scores 4.25/5 and has a dedicated onboarding process, but some users report that its interface can be complex and difficult to navigate, especially for less tech-savvy team members. Customer support has mixed reviews, with some expressing frustration over slow responses.
Exely, however, boasts a 4.91/5 ease-of-use rating, with recent reviews praising its intuitive dashboard and quick onboarding. Users say Exely’s interface is straightforward, making daily management and rate adjustments simple. Support responsiveness is also a highlight. Edge: Exely.
Amadeus offers 36 features, including unique ones like loyalty program integration, ADA compliance, Google Analytics tracking, and A/B testing, catering to hotels with complex revenue strategies. It also boasts advanced modules like wedding and corporate booking support.
Exely provides 29 features, focusing on core booking functions, fast channel management, and marketing tools such as automatic guest re-engagement and promotional incentives. Its features are more streamlined but lack some of Amadeus’s advanced capabilities.
Given the broader feature set in Amadeus, it edges out for hotels needing extensive functionality, especially in revenue management and guest personalization. Edge: Amadeus.
Customer support can determine how smoothly your team implements and uses the platform. Amadeus’s support ratings sit at 3.22/5, with reviews citing slow responses and inconsistent assistance. Some users appreciated their dedicated account managers but noted support can lag during critical periods.
Exely scores an outstanding 4.96/5, with reviews highlighting rapid responses and proactive problem-solving. Customers consistently mention that Exely’s team is approachable and helpful, often going beyond expectations. Edge: Exely.
Amadeus’s network includes 104 verified partners, covering a wide array of PMS, GDS, and marketing solutions, including Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and IDeaS. This allows for seamless integration across multiple hotel systems and advanced revenue strategies.
Exely’s integration count is just 8, with notable partners like Booking.com and Clock. While these cover essential channels, the limited partner ecosystem can restrict customization and automation.
If broad, proven integrations are a priority, Amadeus is the clear winner. Edge: Amadeus.
Reviews in the last six months show Exely’s user base is more satisfied, with a 92.67/100 HTR Score and a 98% likelihood to recommend. Recent feedback praises its user-friendly interface and excellent support, especially from independent hotels and small chains.
Amadeus’s ratings are slightly lower overall, with a 72.20 HTR Score and an 87% likelihood to recommend. Its reviews focus on robust features but also mention complexity and support issues, with some long-term users appreciating the broad capabilities.
For current satisfaction levels, Exely holds the edge. Edge: Exely.
Amadeus does not publish transparent pricing; it typically offers custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. It’s known for being premium-priced, aligning with its enterprise feature set.
Exely charges a straightforward $200/month fee, with no implementation or setup fees listed. Its transparent pricing, combined with positive ROI from increased direct bookings, makes it attractive for small to medium properties.
If cost transparency and affordability are key, Exely clearly wins.
Not ideal if you prefer quick setup or have limited technical staff, as Amadeus’s platform can be complex.
Not ideal if you need comprehensive integrations or advanced features like loyalty programs or extensive analytics.
Amadeus offers a comprehensive, feature-rich booking engine with broad market reach and extensive integrations, making it suited for larger hotels or chains with complex needs. Its strengths include advanced revenue tools, loyalty integrations, and support for diverse property types.
Exely excels in ease of use, rapid onboarding, and high customer satisfaction, especially among independent and smaller properties. Its affordability and responsiveness make it appealing for hotels seeking quick wins and straightforward management.
If your hotel needs a mature, scalable platform with advanced capabilities, Amadeus is the clear choice. For properties valuing simplicity, quick deployment, and high recent satisfaction, Exely is the better fit.
This detailed comparison should help you determine which booking engine aligns best with your hotel’s size, segment, and operational priorities.
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Exely 的支持团队因其响应迅速、提供详尽的帮助和清晰的解决方案而广受好评。然而,新用户提到需要培训资料来更好地使用高级功能。
Exely substantially increases direct bookings, aiding hotels like Jimbaran Bay Beach Resort, and reducing OTA dependencies. Hotels report significant... Exely substantially increases direct bookings, aiding hotels like Jimbaran Bay Beach Resort, and reducing OTA dependencies. Hotels report significant sales growth, citing simplified operations, increased guest control, and promotional features.
该平台直观且条理清晰的界面被认为是其主要优势,提升了导航体验和用户体验。一些评论建议增加更现代化、可定制化的界面,以增强用户参与度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users often call for advanced reporting and detailed analytics, seeking comprehensive insights for better performance tracking. While some find existi... Users often call for advanced reporting and detailed analytics, seeking comprehensive insights for better performance tracking. While some find existing features satisfactory, many desire deeper filtering and customization options.
用户评论普遍反映,预订小部件和网站设计需要更多自定义选项。用户反映设计灵活性不足,这可能会影响品牌独特性和对顾客的吸引力。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Exely Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Exely Booking Engine 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。Exely Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,Exely 的为 93。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案