The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 752 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cendyn 表现出色 在 响应支持团队 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.7/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Special offers & discounts and Multi-currency.
Profitroom 表现出色 在 ease of use and onboarding 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Gift Vouchers and Room substitutions.
基于 HTR 上 752 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 151 | 601 |
在分析了 752 条经验证的评价后,Cendyn 用户最看重其 响应支持团队, 易于使用, 动态定价,而 Profitroom 用户则强调 预订引擎和集成, customer support and response time, 新手引导和易用性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
响应支持团队
▾
|
+
预订引擎和集成
▾
|
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
Customer Support and Response Time
▾
|
|
+
动态定价
▾
|
+
新手引导和易用性
▾
|
|
+
与 PMS/CMS/CRM 集成
▾
|
+
定制和品牌推广
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订引擎定制
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
语言和货币支持
▾
|
|
−
接口连接问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #17 25 条评价 | #3 176 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #12 59 条评价 | #3 323 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 27 条评价 | #2 54 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 28 条评价 | #4 21 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 84 条评价 | #2 227 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 64 条评价 | #3 217 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 41 条评价 | #3 137 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 15 条评价 | #2 81 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 108 条评价 | #9 26 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #18 9 条评价 | #1 491 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #18 7 条评价 | #13 13 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #19 2 条评价 | #10 5 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine is critical for your hotel’s revenue and guest experience. Both Cendyn Booking Engine and Profitroom Booking Engine 360 aim to enhance direct bookings and streamline operations, but their strengths differ. Cendyn offers deep integration with extensive features, while Profitroom emphasizes ease of use and marketing automation. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s needs and growth plans?
Both products target increasing direct bookings and improving operational efficiency. Cendyn’s platform is highly flexible, offering numerous integrations and unique features like multi-currency and ADA compliance, but it has fewer recent reviews—only one in the last six months—limiting current data confidence. Profitroom, with over 500 reviews and 21 recent ones, provides a more current picture of hotel satisfaction and performance. Given the volume and recency of reviews, Profitroom’s platform appears more reliable and up-to-date for decision-making.
If your hotel values a highly customizable platform with multi-currency, multi-lingual support, and integration with numerous PMS and CRM systems, Cendyn is a fitting choice. It’s well-suited for larger or more complex properties that need extensive merchandising features and cross-property capabilities. Conversely, if you prioritize a user-friendly interface, excellent marketing tools, and a focus on increasing direct bookings through engaging websites and automation, Profitroom is the clear winner. It’s especially suitable for mid-sized hotels aiming to grow direct revenues quickly.
Cendyn scores a solid 4.36 out of 5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its flexibility but noting some connectivity and reporting challenges. Many users report a learning curve and occasional interface issues, especially with photo uploads and customization. Profitroom outperforms with a 4.73 rating, praised for its intuitive, visually appealing interface and straightforward onboarding process. Hotels report that staff adopt Profitroom quickly, and it simplifies day-to-day management. Edge: Profitroom.
Cendyn offers 39 features, including multi-currency, ADA compliance, and form autofill, catering to complex, multi-property needs. Profitroom includes 43 features, emphasizing upselling, dynamic pricing, and marketing automation, with unique tools like A/B testing and customizable exit modals. Profitroom’s broader array of marketing and conversion features gives it an edge, especially for hotels focused on direct revenue growth. Edge: Profitroom.
Cendyn boasts a support rating of 4.56/5, with reviewers citing helpful staff but mentioning recent downtime issues and support responsiveness concerns. Profitroom maintains a support rating of 4.6/5, with many users praising its helpful, responsive team and smooth onboarding. Both are well-rated, but Profitroom’s recent reviews show consistent satisfaction with support quality. Edge: Profitroom.
Cendyn’s platform is integrated with 116 verified partners, including major PMS and channel managers like SiteMinder and TrustYou, making it highly flexible for complex hotel ecosystems. Profitroom, with 66 verified partners, still covers essential integrations but fewer than Cendyn. Shared integrations include key players like SiteMinder and TrustYou, but Cendyn’s broader network offers more options for hotels with diverse tech stacks. Edge: Cendyn.
Profitroom’s reviews are notably more recent, with 21 reviews in the last six months and a rating of 4.76/5, reflecting high current satisfaction. Cendyn, with only one recent review, has a rating of 4.38/5, and older reviews suggest satisfaction but less current data. For hotelier trust and satisfaction, Profitroom’s higher and more recent ratings make it the more reliable choice today.
Cendyn’s pricing starts at a base of $400 per month, with no trial or freemium options, making it potentially more cost-effective for larger properties needing extensive features. Profitroom’s base price is $600 per month, also without a trial, but it includes a broader suite of marketing and booking tools, which may justify the higher cost for hotels seeking growth. Exact ROI depends on your hotel’s size and feature needs.
Cendyn’s platform is best suited for large, complex hotels or groups needing extensive integrations, multi-currency support, and detailed merchandising tools. Its broad feature set and integration network make it a versatile choice for big operators with diverse needs. However, it has fewer recent reviews, which impacts confidence in current performance.
Profitroom excels in delivering a user-friendly experience, marketing automation, and conversion-focused features. Its recent reviews and higher overall score suggest it’s better suited for hotels aiming to grow direct bookings quickly with a platform that staff can adopt effortlessly. It’s a more current, hotel-friendly choice.
If your hotel needs advanced integrations, multi-property support, and detailed merchandising, Cendyn remains a strong contender. But if your focus is on ease of use, marketing, and rapid growth, Profitroom is the superior option, backed by more recent, positive feedback.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cendyn Booking Engine 和 Profitroom Booking Engine 360 共享 34 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 费率计划比较 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 9 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Pegasus CRS has ensured that our direct booking channels remain competitive at all times. We create and update all our rate plans first in the CRS and then we distribute these to o..."
"We love how keen Profitroom are to adopt feedback. We needed an ‘out of the box’ solution so ultimately chose Profitroom as they’re always evolving the system to our changing indus..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We chose to cooperate with Profitroom because you are absolutely the best in Poland, and there is no other company that matches your technological prowess. Indeed, working with you..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队因其快速有效的帮助而获得一致好评。许多用户注意到,他们的疑问得到了快速解决,并且团队愿意定制并帮助解决技术难题,这对于保持酒店不间断运营至关重... 支持团队因其快速有效的帮助而获得一致好评。许多用户注意到,他们的疑问得到了快速解决,并且团队愿意定制并帮助解决技术难题,这对于保持酒店不间断运营至关重要。
许多用户都对 Pegasus CRS 及其预订引擎的易用性赞不绝口。界面被描述为用户友好型,允许快速更新规则、费率和限制。酒店经营者指出,它对新员工和经验丰富的员... 许多用户都对 Pegasus CRS 及其预订引擎的易用性赞不绝口。界面被描述为用户友好型,允许快速更新规则、费率和限制。酒店经营者指出,它对新员工和经验丰富的员工来说都很直观,可加快入职和日常运营。
动态定价功能经常被提及为 Pegasus CRS 的一大优势。酒店经营者强调其能够灵活地快速实施不同的价格计划和促销活动,这有助于迅速响应市场需求并通过更好的定价... 动态定价功能经常被提及为 Pegasus CRS 的一大优势。酒店经营者强调其能够灵活地快速实施不同的价格计划和促销活动,这有助于迅速响应市场需求并通过更好的定价策略优化收入。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Pegasus 预订引擎提供高水平的定制,使酒店能够将预订流程与品牌保持一致。不过,一些用户建议进一步改进定制选项,特别是关于支付网关和其他增强功能的集成。
虽然详细的报告工具受到赞赏,但一些用户认为报告功能可以增强。具体要求包括更多可自定义的报告、更好的深入选项以及改进的整体可用性,以帮助酒店经营者做出更... 虽然详细的报告工具受到赞赏,但一些用户认为报告功能可以增强。具体要求包括更多可自定义的报告、更好的深入选项以及改进的整体可用性,以帮助酒店经营者做出更明智的决策。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Profitroom预订引擎的集成能力普遍受到好评,能够提升与其他系统(如PMS和RMS)的用户体验。然而,一些评论指出,这些集成的无缝性和配置过程仍有改进空间,表明... Profitroom预订引擎的集成能力普遍受到好评,能够提升与其他系统(如PMS和RMS)的用户体验。然而,一些评论指出,这些集成的无缝性和配置过程仍有改进空间,表明需要加快实施速度并增强端到端的系统连接性。
While users generally find Profitroom's customer support team helpful and resourceful, there are recurring mentions of delays in response times, parti... While users generally find Profitroom's customer support team helpful and resourceful, there are recurring mentions of delays in response times, particularly concerning ticket resolutions. Some users have suggested the need for an improved phone support line and faster issue resolution to enhance the user experience.
该平台的注册流程和易用性经常受到好评。客户认为该系统直观易懂,有助于酒店不同员工快速上手。有效的培训资源也进一步促进了系统的顺利过渡和易用性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Profitroom 的报告和分析功能褒贬不一。用户赞赏其为决策和营销活动提供的洞察,但他们也希望获得更高级、更易用的报告功能,并建议改进报告的自定义和即时性。
Profitroom 以其多语言和多币种支持而闻名,尤其适合服务国际用户。这一特性增强了平台的易用性,使其成为拥有多元化客户群体的酒店的理想选择。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cendyn Booking Engine 和 Profitroom Booking Engine 360 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cendyn Booking Engine 提供 116 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Profitroom Booking Engine 360 提供 66 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Profitroom Booking Engine 360 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cendyn Booking Engine:否。Profitroom Booking Engine 360:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cendyn 的 HT Score 为 74,Profitroom 的为 95。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问