The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #17 25 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #12 59 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 27 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 28 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 84 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 64 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 41 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 15 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 108 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #18 9 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #18 7 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #19 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing a booking engine for your hotel involves weighing features, usability, support, and overall value. Both Cendyn Booking Engine and GraceSoft offer solutions tailored to different hotel types, but the differences in their market presence, reviews, and capabilities are significant. While GraceSoft’s platform appears more accessible for smaller operations, Cendyn’s more extensive feature set and proven track record make it the stronger choice for hotels aiming to maximize direct bookings and revenue. Which product aligns best with your hotel’s goals?
Both products aim to increase direct bookings and streamline reservations, but they serve very different hotel segments. Cendyn offers a suite of advanced features, including urgency messaging and multi-language support, designed for larger or more complex properties. GraceSoft provides a straightforward, easy-to-use interface suited for smaller vacation rentals or boutique hotels. Do you need a comprehensive platform with deep integrations, or a simple, effective solution for a smaller operation?
Cendyn’s platform boasts 39 unique features, from automated emails to advanced analytics, whereas GraceSoft’s platform lacks detailed feature listings. Cendyn’s recent reviews highlight its reliability, with a high NPS score of 8.77/5 and 124 reviews, while GraceSoft’s reviews are nonexistent. Is your hotel prepared to invest in a feature-rich system that can scale with your growth, or do you prefer a more lightweight, easy-to-manage solution?
If your hotel needs robust marketing tools, extensive integrations, and sophisticated revenue management, Cendyn is the clear choice, especially given its 116 verified partners and presence in 21 countries. Its higher customer support rating (4.56/5) and recent reviews reinforce its reliability for larger or multi-property hotels.
If your hotel operates in a niche market, such as vacation rentals or boutique properties, and prioritizes ease of use over extensive features, GraceSoft might suffice. However, with no recent reviews or detailed feature set, it’s less proven in the current market. For most hotels seeking to grow and compete effectively, Cendyn’s extensive capabilities and proven track record make it the more suitable option.
Cendyn’s ease of use scores a strong 4.36/5, supported by positive reviews highlighting its intuitive dashboard, user-friendly management tools, and straightforward onboarding process. Reviewers praise its simple management of rates, rules, and content, making staff adoption smoother. Support responsiveness further eases implementation challenges.
GraceSoft’s interface is described as intuitive and easy to operate, but without recent reviews or detailed user feedback, it’s difficult to assess how well it performs in real-world hotel operations. Given Cendyn’s higher ratings and recent review activity, it clearly maintains a better reputation for usability.
Edge: Cendyn
Cendyn’s platform offers 39 unique features including pre-stay and post-stay emails, booking abandonment recapture, multi-currency, multi-lingual support, loyalty program integrations, and social media booking options. Its advanced features enable targeted marketing, revenue optimization, and multi-property management—capabilities absent in GraceSoft.
GraceSoft provides basic booking and reservation management suited for small operations, but without detailed feature listings or recent updates, it appears limited compared to Cendyn. For properties needing sophisticated tools and marketing automation, Cendyn’s feature set is a decisive advantage.
Edge: Cendyn
Cendyn’s support team is rated 4.56/5, with reviews describing them as responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful—crucial for resolving issues quickly. Clients appreciate the proactive assistance, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting.
GraceSoft’s support ratings and reviews are unavailable, making it difficult to assess their responsiveness or effectiveness. Given the importance of reliable support in booking engine deployment, Cendyn’s proven support infrastructure is a significant plus.
Edge: Cendyn
Cendyn’s platform integrates with 116 verified partners, including major PMS, CMS, and CRS providers like Priority Software, Visual Matrix PMS, and HotelTime. This extensive network allows seamless operation across various hotel systems and enhances connectivity with third-party tools.
GraceSoft’s claimed integration count is just one verified partner, limiting its interoperability and adaptability. For hotels seeking a flexible, interconnected platform, Cendyn’s broader integration ecosystem is clearly superior.
Edge: Cendyn
Cendyn’s recent reviews and high ratings (4.38/5 overall, 4.36/5 ease of use, and 4.56/5 customer support) reflect strong market confidence, especially among boutique, independent, and resort hotels. The recent review count of 124 and a likelihood to recommend of 88% indicate solid customer satisfaction.
GraceSoft lacks recent reviews and any publicly available ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. With more recent positive feedback, Cendyn is the clearly preferred choice among hotelier users.
Edge: Cendyn
Cendyn pricing starts at $400 per month with no free tier or trial, offering a transparent flat fee. GraceSoft’s pricing details are unavailable, leaving potential buyers uncertain about costs.
While Cendyn’s pricing is straightforward, the absence of GraceSoft’s pricing details suggests it might target smaller operations or offer custom quotes. For larger hotels or those seeking an established platform, Cendyn’s clear pricing structure provides confidence.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, has minimal online presence, or prefers a basic booking system with limited features.
Not ideal if you need multi-property management, advanced marketing automation, or extensive integrations.
Cendyn offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform suited for larger, growth-focused hotels aiming to maximize direct bookings and streamline operations. Its extensive integrations, proven support, and recent positive reviews reinforce its position as the preferred choice for most hotels seeking a scalable solution.
GraceSoft provides a simple, potentially cost-effective alternative for small properties or vacation rentals that require basic reservation management. However, without recent reviews or extensive feature documentation, its long-term viability and ability to support growth are uncertain.
For most hotels, especially those planning to expand or improve digital marketing efforts, Cendyn’s platform delivers more value. If your priority is ease of use for a small operation with minimal complexity, GraceSoft may suffice—but with reservations about its market presence and support.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Pegasus CRS has ensured that our direct booking channels remain competitive at all times. We create and update all our rate plans first in the CRS and then we distribute these to o..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队因其快速有效的帮助而获得一致好评。许多用户注意到,他们的疑问得到了快速解决,并且团队愿意定制并帮助解决技术难题,这对于保持酒店不间断运营至关重... 支持团队因其快速有效的帮助而获得一致好评。许多用户注意到,他们的疑问得到了快速解决,并且团队愿意定制并帮助解决技术难题,这对于保持酒店不间断运营至关重要。
许多用户都对 Pegasus CRS 及其预订引擎的易用性赞不绝口。界面被描述为用户友好型,允许快速更新规则、费率和限制。酒店经营者指出,它对新员工和经验丰富的员... 许多用户都对 Pegasus CRS 及其预订引擎的易用性赞不绝口。界面被描述为用户友好型,允许快速更新规则、费率和限制。酒店经营者指出,它对新员工和经验丰富的员工来说都很直观,可加快入职和日常运营。
动态定价功能经常被提及为 Pegasus CRS 的一大优势。酒店经营者强调其能够灵活地快速实施不同的价格计划和促销活动,这有助于迅速响应市场需求并通过更好的定价... 动态定价功能经常被提及为 Pegasus CRS 的一大优势。酒店经营者强调其能够灵活地快速实施不同的价格计划和促销活动,这有助于迅速响应市场需求并通过更好的定价策略优化收入。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Pegasus 预订引擎提供高水平的定制,使酒店能够将预订流程与品牌保持一致。不过,一些用户建议进一步改进定制选项,特别是关于支付网关和其他增强功能的集成。
虽然详细的报告工具受到赞赏,但一些用户认为报告功能可以增强。具体要求包括更多可自定义的报告、更好的深入选项以及改进的整体可用性,以帮助酒店经营者做出更... 虽然详细的报告工具受到赞赏,但一些用户认为报告功能可以增强。具体要求包括更多可自定义的报告、更好的深入选项以及改进的整体可用性,以帮助酒店经营者做出更明智的决策。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cendyn Booking Engine 和 Gracesoft Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cendyn Booking Engine 提供 118 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Gracesoft Booking Engine 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cendyn Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cendyn Booking Engine:否。Gracesoft Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cendyn 的 HT Score 为 73,GraceSoft 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案