The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | CENTROTEL |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 150 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 41 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #16 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | CENTROTEL |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #9 86 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #13 37 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #12 33 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #7 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | CENTROTEL |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #1 229 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #29 6 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #26 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #25 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel’s growth, operational efficiency, and guest experience. Your team needs a platform that can streamline reservations, support multiple channels, and provide reliable support. Both CENTROTEL and innRoad aim to address these needs, but their approaches and maturity differ significantly. With innRoad’s extensive review base and recent positive feedback, it’s clear which product offers more confidence and proven performance.
CENTROTEL, despite its promising AI-driven telecommunication management features, has zero reviews and no recent data to support its effectiveness as a booking engine. innRoad, on the other hand, boasts over 200 reviews with recent activity and a high 4.68/5 overall rating, including an 8.71/10 NPS score from current users. This discrepancy indicates innRoad’s platform is actively used and trusted by hoteliers.
While CENTROTEL aims to optimize communication infrastructure, it lacks the specific booking and reservation management features that your team needs daily. innRoad’s focus on increasing direct bookings, simplifying operations, and integrating with multiple systems directly benefits your hotel’s bottom line. Are you willing to rely on a platform with no recent reviews or proven track record?
If your hotel needs a well-established, user-friendly booking engine that has proven its value, innRoad is the clear choice. It suits small to mid-sized hotels, boutique properties, and resorts seeking to boost direct bookings and streamline operations. If, however, your focus is on telecom management or integrated communication solutions, CENTROTEL’s niche might appeal, but it’s not proven as a booking engine.
innRoad’s extensive review footprint, recent customer feedback, and higher ratings make it the safer, more dependable option for hotels prioritizing booking growth and operational clarity. For a hotel looking for a proven solution to boost bookings and simplify management, innRoad should be your decision.
innRoad scores 4.44/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward reservation management. Users highlight how quickly new staff adapt and how the tape chart and color coding streamline daily operations. Support from innRoad’s team is described as responsive and helpful, contributing to a smoother onboarding process.
CENTROTEL, however, has no user ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability. The lack of feedback suggests it’s untested in live hotel environments. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad offers 54 unique features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, channel management, property management, group booking, integrated payment processing, guest communication via SMS, and more. Many of these features directly support increasing bookings and operational efficiency, with customizable rates, add-ons, and automation tools.
CENTROTEL does not list any features beyond its communication management scope, making it uncompetitive in the booking engine space. innRoad’s feature set is comprehensive and tailored to hoteliers’ needs. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s reviews consistently praise its 24/7 support and knowledgeable staff, with many users citing quick resolutions and helpful onboarding. The platform’s recent reviews include quotes about “excellent customer service” and “support that truly cares,” indicating a support team that’s engaged and responsive.
CENTROTEL, lacking recent reviews, provides no data about support quality. The absence of feedback suggests untested support performance. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad integrates with 34 verified partners, including popular booking platforms, payment systems, and other property management tools like QuickBooks, Revinate, and Facebook conversions. This extensive network helps streamline your operations across multiple channels and systems.
CENTROTEL has no listed integrations or verified partners, limiting its utility in a multi-channel environment. For hotels relying on multiple systems, innRoad’s ecosystem is a clear advantage. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s recent reviews and ratings overwhelmingly favor it, with a 4.68/5 overall rating and an 88% likelihood to recommend, based on active users. Hotels of varying sizes, from small inns to resorts, report increased bookings, higher revenues, and smoother operations.
CENTROTEL, with no reviews or recent data, cannot be rated. The lack of feedback suggests it’s untested in live hotel environments. Edge: innRoad.
Pricing information for CENTROTEL is unavailable, indicating it may not have a clear or transparent pricing model. innRoad’s pricing is also not listed explicitly, but given its no-contract, no-hidden-fee structure and widespread adoption, it’s likely transparent and aligned with industry standards.
Without clear pricing, your investment decision hinges on value and proven effectiveness. innRoad’s affordability is supported by its extensive feature set and customer satisfaction, making it the safer choice.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in their focus: innRoad is a dedicated, proven booking engine with extensive features, reviews, and integrations. CENTROTEL appears to be a telecom-focused platform with no recent data or reviews to support its effectiveness as a hotel booking solution.
Choose innRoad if you want a platform with a track record of increasing bookings, simplifying operations, and supporting your growth. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and active customer base make it the clear choice.
CENTROTEL might be suitable if your hotel’s primary need is telecom management, but for booking and revenue growth, innRoad remains the more reliable option. For any hotel aiming to boost direct bookings and streamline its reservation process, innRoad should be your pick.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持服务通常因响应迅速、知识渊博、及时解决问题而受到称赞。然而,也有人提到响应速度慢,以及与英语不流利的支持人员沟通不畅,这可能会让用户感到沮丧。
用户经常提到 InnRoad 提供的高度定制和灵活性,特别是在房间外观、计费功能和报告方面。这使酒店能够根据其特定需求定制软件,从而提高运营效率和客人满意度。
预订仪表板和综合报告功能因其提供可操作见解和简化数据管理的能力而备受瞩目。这些工具可帮助酒店经理跟踪入住率、收入和其他关键绩效指标,从而更轻松地做出明... 预订仪表板和综合报告功能因其提供可操作见解和简化数据管理的能力而备受瞩目。这些工具可帮助酒店经理跟踪入住率、收入和其他关键绩效指标,从而更轻松地做出明智的决策并提高整体酒店绩效。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户对该系统管理费率和付款(包括费率变更和分期付款)的能力表示赞赏。然而,有些人认为这些功能复杂且耗时,这表明需要更精简的流程来提高效率和客户满意度。
一些用户报告称,用户界面出现故障且加载速度缓慢,这可能会扰乱日常操作。系统冻结和功能错误等问题表明需要增强稳定性和速度。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CENTROTEL 和 innRoad Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。CENTROTEL 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad Booking Engine 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CENTROTEL:否。innRoad Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CENTROTEL 的 HT Score 为 0,innRoad 的为 34。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问