The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 117 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 157 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #17 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #8 165 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #11 80 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #8 62 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #9 27 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #17 30 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 228 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #11 13 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #17 2 条评价 |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is a critical decision for your hotel, impacting daily operations, guest experience, and revenue. While Acantech’s Chr365 aims to provide a foundational solution, Clock PMS offers a full suite of features designed to handle the complexities of modern hospitality. With more recent reviews and a significantly larger user base, Clock PMS stands out as the more tested and trusted choice for most hotels today.
Both products aim to streamline operations, but their scope and maturity differ markedly. Are you seeking a simple management tool or a comprehensive, feature-rich platform capable of supporting growth and innovation? This comparison will help clarify which system better fits your hotel’s needs.
Chr365 by Acantech is marketed as a foundational property management system, but it has no recent reviews or substantial user feedback to validate its capabilities. In contrast, Clock PMS boasts over 250 recent reviews, with a 4.8-star rating and an NPS of 9.47/10, indicating high user satisfaction.
Clock PMS provides an extensive feature set, including reservations, rates, invoicing, front desk, housekeeping, guest messaging, booking engine, and more—all in a single platform. Chr365’s lack of recent reviews and data points makes it difficult to assess its real-world performance, whereas Clock’s active user community confirms its reliability.
Are you comfortable relying on a system with no recent validation, or do you prefer a proven platform with a vibrant user base? Based on the latest feedback, Clock PMS clearly dominates in trustworthiness and ongoing support.
If your hotel needs a reliable, multi-functional PMS that can support complex operations, Clock PMS is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set, including integrated booking engine, channel management, revenue tools, and guest apps, suits hotels seeking automation and operational efficiency.
On the other hand, if your hotel’s needs are minimal—perhaps basic reservation management without integrations or advanced automation—Chr365 might suffice, although its lack of recent reviews raises concerns about ongoing development and support. For hotels aiming to grow or improve guest engagement, Clock’s proven capabilities make it the smarter investment.
In short, choose Clock PMS if you value a mature, comprehensive system backed by active users and ongoing updates. Opt for Chr365 only if your hotel’s needs are extremely basic and budget constraints are tight, but be aware of the limited validation.
Clock PMS has a user-friendly, intuitive interface rated nearly 4.78 out of 5, praised for its ease of onboarding and daily operations. Users report that training new staff is straightforward, and the system simplifies routine tasks, saving time and reducing errors.
Chr365, however, provides no recent user feedback or ratings, making its usability uncertain. Its lack of validation suggests it may not be as polished or as easy to adopt as Clock PMS, which has a proven track record with diverse hotel types.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS offers 58 distinct features, including payment processing, booking engine, EPoS, channel management, revenue management, guest CRM, mobile check-in, automated reminders, and more. Many features are designed to automate repetitive tasks, improve guest communication, and optimize revenue.
Chr365, by comparison, has no unique or standout features listed and offers no additional capabilities beyond basic management functions. Its limited feature set makes it less adaptable to hotels needing automation, revenue tools, or integrated marketing.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS receives high praise for its support, with an average rating of 4.75 out of 5, and users often mention quick, helpful responses, and regular updates. Many reviews state, "The support team is responsive and proactive," reflecting consistent customer satisfaction.
Chr365 offers no recent reviews or support ratings, raising questions about its service quality. Without active customer feedback, it’s hard to gauge whether it provides the same level of responsive, knowledgeable support that Clock PMS reliably offers.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS integrates with 111 verified partners, including popular booking channels like Booking.com, OTAs, payment processors, and revenue tools. This extensive network makes it easier to connect and automate various hotel functions.
Chr365 has zero verified partners or integrations listed, indicating limited connectivity. Without integrations, your hotel may need to manage multiple disjointed systems, reducing operational efficiency and increasing manual work.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Since Chr365 has no recent reviews, it cannot be rated by users currently. Conversely, Clock PMS has over 250 reviews, with an overall score of 4.8 out of 5, reflecting strong satisfaction across hotel segments.
Hotels of all types—independent, boutique, city center—rate Clock highly, often citing ease of use, operational efficiency, and excellent support. Its recent reviews reinforce its reputation as a trusted, effective PMS.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Chr365’s pricing details are not publicly available, suggesting it may be custom or less transparent. Clock PMS costs $600 per month, with no implementation or setup fees, making its pricing predictable and straightforward.
Given the absence of transparent pricing for Chr365 and the clear, fixed rate for Clock, the latter offers better financial clarity for your budgeting and planning.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Clock PMS is a comprehensive, well-supported system with over 250 recent reviews and a 4.8-star rating. Its wide range of features, integrations, and proven user satisfaction make it the preferred choice for most hotels looking to modernize operations.
Chr365, lacking recent validation and a broad feature set, is suitable only for very basic management needs. Its absence of recent reviews, integrations, and support ratings suggest it’s less capable of supporting a hotel’s growth or operational complexity.
For hotels seeking reliability, advanced features, and a trusted partner, Clock PMS is the clear winner. If your needs are minimal and budget is limited, Chr365 might suffice, but proceed with caution given its unproven status.
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Chr365 和 Clock PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Chr365 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Clock PMS 提供 111 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Chr365:否。Clock PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Acantech 的 HT Score 为 0,Clock 的为 84。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问