The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 371 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Ciaobooking 表现出色 .
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
基于 HTR 上 371 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 371 |
在分析了 371 条经验证的评价后,Ciaobooking 用户最看重其 ,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 3 条评价 |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is crucial for streamlining hotel operations, enhancing guest experiences, and maximizing revenue. You’re evaluating Ciaobooking by Ciaobooking and Stayntouch by Stayntouch, both designed to improve efficiency but differing significantly in capabilities and market presence. While Ciaobooking claims to offer a broad suite of tools, it lacks recent reviews, user ratings, and integrations, which are essential for confident decision-making.
Stayntouch, on the other hand, boasts over 300 reviews, a high current rating, and extensive integrations, making it stand out in this comparison. Your decision ultimately hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and your need for features versus ease of implementation.
Both products aim to simplify daily hotel operations, but their strengths and limitations diverge sharply. Ciaobooking positions itself as a broad solution for property management, promising automation and analytics, yet it has zero reviews or recent user feedback. Its lack of integrations and regional presence suggests it’s less proven in today’s dynamic market.
Stayntouch, with over 317 reviews and a recent score of 91, remains the clear leader. It’s praised for its ease of use, robust features, and cloud-based flexibility, with recent reviews emphasizing its stability and support. Are you willing to rely on a system with no verifiable user feedback, or do proven, current customer experiences guide your choice?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, budget-friendly solution with minimal complexity, Ciaobooking might seem appealing — but its lack of reviews and real-world validation make it a risky choice.
Stayntouch suits hotels seeking a trusted, scalable platform capable of managing multiple properties, offering extensive features including revenue management, guest profiles, and contactless check-in. For hotels aiming to improve operational consistency and guest satisfaction with a proven solution, Stayntouch is the safer option.
If your hotel relies heavily on integrations, mobile functionality, or multi-property oversight, Stayntouch’s extensive partner network and user-friendly design clearly outperform Ciaobooking. Which features matter most for your property’s growth and guest experience?
Stayntouch receives a 4.7/5 ease of use rating based on 26 recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive screens, quick onboarding, and mobile app. Many reviewers highlight that staff learn the system rapidly and that its interface reduces operational friction.
In contrast, Ciaobooking’s lack of reviews makes it difficult to assess usability, but its marketing claims and absence of user feedback suggest it’s untested in real hotel environments. Based on current data, Stayntouch’s user-friendly design and proven onboarding process give it the edge.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch offers a comprehensive suite with 49 features, including revenue management, online check-in, group handling, mobile apps, and integrated payment solutions — all of which are absent in Ciaobooking.
Ciaobooking’s feature set appears limited, with no unique features highlighted or verified in recent reviews, suggesting it might lack the depth necessary for larger or more complex properties. Stayntouch’s extensive feature list, combined with its high satisfaction ratings, makes it the more capable platform for diverse hotel needs.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s support ratings of 4.68/5, with recent reviews describing its team as friendly, thorough, and proactive, indicate strong customer service. Users mention efficient onboarding and quick resolution times, emphasizing ongoing support.
Ciaobooking’s support quality cannot be assessed due to the absence of reviews, making it impossible to verify its responsiveness or effectiveness. Given current data, Stayntouch’s support quality is a clear advantage.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch integrates with 188 verified third-party systems, including popular tools like RoomPriceGenie and STAAH, facilitating comprehensive solutions. These integrations enable seamless connections for revenue management, channel distribution, and other operational needs.
Ciaobooking reports no verified integrations or partners, raising questions about its ability to connect with existing systems. For hotels relying on multiple tools, Stayntouch’s extensive integration network is a critical benefit.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s recent reviews overwhelmingly praise its ease of use, reliability, and support, resulting in a 9.35/10 NPS score and a 94% likelihood to recommend. Properties across segments, from boutique to branded hotels, report high satisfaction.
In contrast, Ciaobooking has no recent reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to determine how hoteliers perceive its performance or support. Based on available data, Stayntouch’s high ratings clearly favor it.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Ciaobooking’s pricing is unavailable, with no mention of trial periods, monthly fees, or implementation costs — raising transparency concerns.
Stayntouch charges a flat monthly fee of $800, with no implementation fees or trial information provided. Although higher, this fee reflects its extensive features and proven reliability. For your budget planning, the transparency and proven value of Stayntouch make it a more predictable choice.
Not ideal if your hotel needs proven reliability, extensive features, or multi-property oversight, given the lack of recent reviews.
Not ideal if your hotel operates on a very tight budget and requires a simple, low-cost system without extensive features.
The core difference lies in proven performance and feature depth. Stayntouch, with its extensive recent reviews, high ratings, and integrations, is well-suited for hotels that demand reliability and scalability.
If your hotel needs a trusted, feature-rich platform with strong support and integrations, stay with Stayntouch. Its current user satisfaction and proven capabilities make it the clear choice.
Ciaobooking remains a questionable option due to its lack of verified user feedback and features. It may serve very small or budget-constrained properties, but without recent validation, it’s a risky investment for growth-oriented hotels.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming for operational clarity and guest satisfaction, Stayntouch stands out as the safer, more validated choice.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Ciaobooking |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Ciaobooking 和 Stayntouch 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 37 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Ciaobooking 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Ciaobooking 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 187 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Stayntouch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Ciaobooking:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Ciaobooking 的 HT Score 为 0,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问