The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #45 8 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 31 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 43 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 31 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 65 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #10 83 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 40 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #17 15 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #65 0 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 | #58 2 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 117 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #24 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between CiHMS by CiHMS and Hotel Software by Acigrup hinges on your hotel's specific needs—each offers distinct advantages and limitations. While CiHMS boasts a robust feature set, extensive reviews, and a proven market presence, Acigrup remains unreviewed and less established, making CiHMS the more reliable choice based on current data. Your decision should reflect whether your priority is feature depth, support, and proven user satisfaction or a newer, less tested platform.
Both products aim to streamline hotel management, improve operational efficiency, and enhance guest experiences. However, their approaches differ: CiHMS offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform that integrates multiple modules, whereas Acigrup provides a more limited, less documented solution. Are you prepared to go with the more proven, extensively reviewed system, or are you willing to explore a less tested alternative?
CiHMS’s weight in reviews—101 total with recent activity—makes it the more data-backed choice. Its high ratings in ease of use (4.9/5), support (4.92/5), and value (4.86/5) suggest a mature, well-supported platform that aligns with the needs of hotels seeking reliability and depth.
Acigrup’s lack of reviews and absence of recent feedback make it difficult to assess its suitability or performance. While it may claim to be a comprehensive PMS, without user insights or verified integrations, it’s a gamble compared to the evidence supporting CiHMS. Are you comfortable selecting a system with no peer reviews, or do you prefer a platform backed by user experiences?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich property management system with proven scalability, integration options, and extensive regional presence, CiHMS is the clear choice. Its modules like Revenue Management, Channel Manager, and integrated CRS serve mid to large hotels, especially those in Asia Pacific, the Middle East, and Africa.
On the other hand, if your hotel is small, has very limited operations, or you prioritize a newer, less documented platform that might evolve, Acigrup’s lack of reviews and features makes it less advisable. For now, CiHMS’s extensive user base, proven track record, and comprehensive modules make it the safer bet for most hotels seeking operational stability.
CiHMS scores an impressive 4.9/5 in ease of use, with most reviewers citing its intuitive, lean interface and straightforward navigation. Its onboarding process is rated 4.84/5, indicating most staff can adopt the system quickly, although some users note initial complexity due to its breadth.
Acigrup offers no public ratings or reviews, leaving little to no insight into its user experience or onboarding process. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to compare, but the lack of reviews suggests it may not have the same level of polish or ease of adoption. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS offers 33 exclusive features, including modules for Spa & Wellness, Revenue Management, Integrated CRS, Booking Engine, and Automated Night Audit—capabilities that Acigrup does not publicly provide or document. Its feature set covers a broad spectrum, enabling hotels to customize guest experiences, optimize revenue, and streamline operations.
Acigrup’s feature list is unverified and unpublicized, making it impossible to compare directly. Given CiHMS’s extensive suite and proven functionality, it clearly leads in features. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS’s customer support scores an impressive 4.92/5, with reviews praising its professionalism, timeliness, and support accessibility. Guests highlight the support team’s responsiveness and willingness to resolve issues promptly, essential for hotel operations.
Acigrup has no available reviews or ratings related to support or onboarding, making a definitive comparison impossible. Without user feedback, it’s risky to assume comparable support levels. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS integrates with three verified partners, including SiteMinder, DerbySoft, and Easyway, offering broader connectivity with online distribution and payment platforms. These integrations are crucial for hotels relying on multiple sales and marketing channels.
Acigrup has no listed or verified integrations, limiting its appeal to hotels needing seamless connectivity. For operational flexibility and future expansion, CiHMS’s established integrations are a significant advantage. Edge: CiHMS.
With 101 reviews, CiHMS’s average rating is 0/5, but the high review count and recent activity, including a NPS score of 9.8/5 and 98% likelihood to recommend, demonstrate strong user trust and satisfaction. Hotels across segments, especially resorts and city-center properties, favor its functionality and support.
Acigrup lacks reviews, so no user ratings or satisfaction data exist. Until it garners user feedback, CiHMS’s proven reputation makes it the favored choice. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS is priced at a $900 base fee, with no mention of additional implementation or monthly charges. Its pricing model is straightforward, providing transparency for budget planning.
Acigrup’s pricing is unlisted, which raises concerns about hidden costs or variable charges. Without clear pricing details, CiHMS’s transparent, predictable costs are preferable. Edge: CiHMS.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
CiHMS offers a proven, feature-rich platform with a significant number of reviews, high satisfaction scores, and a regional presence. Its extensive modules, integrations, and support make it well-suited for mid to large hotels, especially those seeking scalable and reliable operations.
Acigrup remains unreviewed and unverified, making it a risky choice for most hotels. Without documented features or user feedback, it’s difficult to recommend over CiHMS, which has demonstrated value through user experiences and proven performance.
When to Choose CiHMS:
If your hotel needs advanced features, proven support, and a reliable platform with extensive integrations, CiHMS is the clear choice. Its high ratings and review volume provide confidence that your team will be supported and your operations optimized.
When to Consider Acigrup:
If your needs are minimal, your hotel is small, or you’re willing to take a risk on an untested platform, Acigrup might be an option. However, without user feedback or documented features, it remains a less secure choice.
Final Verdict:
Based on current data, CiHMS by CiHMS is the more dependable, feature-rich, and well-supported property management system. It suits hotels seeking operational efficiency, scalability, and proven user satisfaction, making it the recommended choice for most hoteliers today.
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
该软件因其任务分配功能而备受赞誉,支持客房服务等员工的独立管理。此功能简化了操作流程,并提高了各部门的生产力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
CIHMS 虽然用户友好,但由于系统功能繁多,初始培训和入职培训可能会比较复杂。用户建议使用更全面的培训资源和更详细的指南。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CiHMS 和 Hotel Software 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CiHMS 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hotel Software 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CiHMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CiHMS:否。Hotel Software:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CiHMS 的 HT Score 为 81,Acigrup 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问