The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 1,362 条经验证的评价后,CiHMS 用户最看重其 operational efficiency, 高级报告, 任务和资源管理,而 Cloudbeds 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
高级报告
▾
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
|
+
任务和资源管理
▾
|
+
一体化生态系统
▾
|
|
+
基于云的可访问性
▾
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
高级报告
▾
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
−
用户培训和入职
▾
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #45 8 条评价 | #1 592 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 31 条评价 | #4 212 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 43 条评价 | #5 42 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 31 条评价 | #13 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 65 条评价 | #2 473 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #10 83 条评价 | #4 228 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 40 条评价 | #6 116 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #17 15 条评价 | #2 93 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #65 0 条评价 | #2 435 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #58 2 条评价 | #7 163 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 117 条评价 | #3 226 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #24 1 条评价 | #7 11 条评价 |
Choosing the right Property Management System (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel’s operations, revenue, and guest experience. Both CiHMS by CiHMS and Cloudbeds PMS aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ in scale, features, and user feedback. Your decision depends on your specific needs—are you seeking a system with more recent reviews and broader adoption, or a solution tailored for certain segments?
Given the comparative data, Cloudbeds PMS’s higher ratings and larger user base suggest it’s the more proven choice for most hoteliers. But is one better suited to your hotel’s size and complexity?
Both CiHMS and Cloudbeds aim to improve hotel management efficiency, but they approach it differently. CiHMS emphasizes advanced room allocation, multi-channel reservation management, and flexible rate configurations, particularly appealing to larger chains and resort properties. In contrast, Cloudbeds offers a unified platform integrating PMS, channel management, booking engine, and guest communication, making it ideal for properties seeking an all-in-one system.
While CiHMS’s reviews highlight its lean, sophisticated UI and deep integration for chain management, its overall rating is considerably lower, with 0/5 from 101 recent reviews. Conversely, Cloudbeds boasts a 4.63/5 rating based on over 1,071 reviews, with 81 submitted in the last six months. Does your hotel prioritize a platform with more recent, consistent feedback?
Are you willing to compromise on some advanced, chain-specific features for a system with broader adoption and proven reliability?
Edge: Cloudbeds PMS.
If your hotel operates multiple brands, chain-wide management, or requires sophisticated rate and package configurations, CiHMS might seem appealing—especially with its focus on complex room allocations and multi-channel distribution. However, its reviews reveal issues like system hangs and limited mobile responsiveness, which could hamper daily operations.
On the other hand, Cloudbeds suits independent hotels, boutique properties, and hostels prioritizing ease of use, fast onboarding, and broad integration. Its extensive marketplace of 190 verified partners supports scalability and customization, making it more adaptable for diverse property types.
If your priority is a system with recent, high-volume reviews and high user satisfaction, Cloudbeds is the safer bet.
Edge: Cloudbeds PMS.
Ease of use is a critical factor in hotel management systems. CiHMS’s UI has been described as “intuitive and easy-to-learn,” with a high ease-of-use rating of 4.9/5. Users praise its stable, accessible platform supporting multi-platform access, but some report that onboarding can be complex due to the system’s breadth.
Cloudbeds scores slightly lower at 4.61/5 but is frequently lauded for its user-friendly, modern interface that simplifies reservations, housekeeping, and front-desk operations. Over 81 recent reviews note the system’s intuitive design, especially appreciated during onboarding.
Which platform’s ease of implementation and staff adoption will align better with your team’s technical proficiency?
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS offers core functionalities like advanced room allocation, multi-channel reservations, and flexible rate configurations—features tailored for chains and resorts. In contrast, Cloudbeds provides 33 shared features with an additional 31 exclusive ones, including integrated payment processing, guest CRM, online check-in, and mobile check-in, all within a single platform.
Cloudbeds’s unique features such as online check-in, guest messaging, automated reminders, shift planning, and a comprehensive analytics dashboard set it apart. It also boasts native email marketing and GDPR compliance, supporting modern guest engagement strategies.
Given the number and variety of features, Cloudbeds’s broader suite offers more tools to optimize daily operations and revenue management.
Edge: Cloudbeds PMS.
Customer support significantly influences your experience with PMS software. CiHMS’s reviews highlight support ratings of 4.92/5, with users describing the support team as “professional and on-time,” although some mention occasional minor bugs.
Cloudbeds scores 4.41/5, with reviews praising its responsive support team and quick assistance. Users often mention the support as “awesome and responsive,” but some report frustration when system setup or customization becomes complex.
If your hotel needs highly responsive, reliable support with fewer reported issues, CiHMS might seem attractive. Yet, Cloudbeds’s extensive support resources and positive recent reviews make it the safer choice for ongoing assistance.
Edge: CiHMS.
Hotel ratings reflect user satisfaction and product reliability. Despite more reviews, CiHMS’s overall rating is 0/5, indicating consistent dissatisfaction or issues among its 101 reviews, with recent feedback being mostly negative. Conversely, Cloudbeds’s 4.63/5 rating from over 1,071 reviews underscores its broad user approval, especially in recent months.
Hotel segments like independent, boutique, and hostels tend to rate Cloudbeds higher, often citing ease of use and functionality. CiHMS’s lower ratings are driven by operational issues and system stability concerns, especially during peak times.
Given the larger, more recent positive feedback, Cloudbeds is the clear winner in user ratings.
Edge: Cloudbeds PMS.
Pricing models are straightforward: CiHMS charges a flat $900 monthly fee, with no free tier or trial. Cloudbeds offers a slightly lower base price of $600 per month, also without a trial, but with more extensive features included.
While both systems lack trial options, Cloudbeds’s lower starting price combined with its richer feature set offers a better value proposition for most hotels, especially those seeking scalability without hefty upfront costs.
Are you willing to pay a premium for a system with less recent positive feedback?
Edge: Cloudbeds PMS.
Hotels that should consider CiHMS include:
Not ideal if:
If your hotel’s focus is on chain management and multi-channel distribution, CiHMS may suit your needs.
Bullets: Large resorts, regional markets (APAC, Middle East, Africa), chain management, complex rate configurations.
Edge: CiHMS.
Hotels that benefit most from Cloudbeds include:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds excels in providing a flexible, scalable platform for diverse hospitality businesses.
Bullets: Independent hotels, hostels, boutique hotels, global expansion, revenue optimization.
Edge: Cloudbeds PMS.
Cloudbeds’s overall higher ratings, broader feature set, and larger recent review count make it the recommended choice for most hotels. Its extensive integrations, user-friendly interface, and global presence support a wide range of property types, from boutique hotels to hostels and small chains.
CiHMS offers advanced room allocation and multi-channel management, appealing mainly to large resorts or chain properties with regional needs. However, its lower recent review scores and limited mobile support suggest it’s less suitable for hotels prioritizing ease, speed, and modern guest engagement.
For properties seeking reliability, growth potential, and positive recent feedback, Cloudbeds remains the clear frontrunner.
Cloudbeds PMS is the more trusted, widely adopted system, with a 4.63/5 rating from over 1,070 reviews, including 81 in the last six months. It offers a comprehensive suite of features designed for hotels of all sizes, especially independent and boutique properties.
CiHMS, with a lower overall rating and fewer recent reviews, may suit large resorts or chains needing specialized room allocation solutions. However, it’s less aligned with modern usability expectations and mobile needs.
If you want a proven, scalable platform with ongoing support and recent strong reviews, go with Cloudbeds.
Selecting a PMS should align with your hotel’s operational complexity, growth plans, and guest engagement strategy. Cloudbeds’s broad adoption, high satisfaction, and extensive features make it a versatile choice for most hoteliers today, particularly those focused on growth and guest experience.
CiHMS remains a solid option for large properties with specific needs, but recent reviews suggest it may lag in stability and user-friendliness.
In the end, your choice hinges on what matters most: scalability and recent support, or specialized chain management features. Based on current data, Cloudbeds’s proven track record and recent review strength make it the recommended option for most hotels.
我们分析了 10 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
该软件因其任务分配功能而备受赞誉,支持客房服务等员工的独立管理。此功能简化了操作流程,并提高了各部门的生产力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
CIHMS 虽然用户友好,但由于系统功能繁多,初始培训和入职培训可能会比较复杂。用户建议使用更全面的培训资源和更详细的指南。
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CiHMS 和 Cloudbeds PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CiHMS 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CiHMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CiHMS:否。Cloudbeds PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CiHMS 的 HT Score 为 81,Cloudbeds 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问