The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,385 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
CiHMS 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 Resorts 类型的物业 (0.0/5) .
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 ease of use and fast staff adoption 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader.
在分析了 1,385 条经验证的评价后,CiHMS 用户最看重其 operational efficiency, 高级报告, 任务和资源管理,而 Cloudbeds 用户则强调 ease of use and fast staff adoption, reporting and analytics, reservations and calendar workflow。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
+
Ease of use and fast staff adoption
▾
|
|
+
高级报告
▾
|
+
Reporting and analytics
▾
|
|
+
任务和资源管理
▾
|
+
Reservations and calendar workflow
▾
|
|
+
基于云的可访问性
▾
|
+
Channel management and OTA synchronization
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
高级报告
▾
|
−
客户支持和真人客服
▾
|
|
−
用户培训和入职
▾
|
−
Payments, billing, and invoicing
▾
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
−
Housekeeping, room status, and operational workflow
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #45 8 条评价 | #1 592 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 31 条评价 | #4 212 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 43 条评价 | #5 42 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 31 条评价 | #13 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 65 条评价 | #2 473 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #10 83 条评价 | #4 228 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 40 条评价 | #6 116 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #17 15 条评价 | #2 93 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #65 0 条评价 | #2 435 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #58 2 条评价 | #7 163 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 117 条评价 | #3 226 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #24 1 条评价 | #7 11 条评价 |
Choosing the right Property Management System (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel’s operations, revenue, and guest experience. Both CiHMS by CiHMS and Cloudbeds PMS aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ in scale, features, and user feedback. Your decision depends on your specific needs—are you seeking a system with more recent reviews and broader adoption, or a solution tailored for certain segments?
Given the comparative data, Cloudbeds PMS’s higher ratings and larger user base suggest it’s the more proven choice for most hoteliers. But is one better suited to your hotel’s size and complexity?
Both CiHMS and Cloudbeds aim to improve hotel management efficiency, but they approach it differently. CiHMS emphasizes advanced room allocation, multi-channel reservation management, and flexible rate configurations, particularly appealing to larger chains and resort properties. In contrast, Cloudbeds offers a unified platform integrating PMS, channel management, booking engine, and guest communication, making it ideal for properties seeking an all-in-one system.
While CiHMS’s reviews highlight its lean, sophisticated UI and deep integration for chain management, its overall rating is considerably lower, with 0/5 from 101 recent reviews. Conversely, Cloudbeds boasts a 4.63/5 rating based on over 1,071 reviews, with 81 submitted in the last six months. Does your hotel prioritize a platform with more recent, consistent feedback?
Are you willing to compromise on some advanced, chain-specific features for a system with broader adoption and proven reliability?
Edge: Cloudbeds PMS.
If your hotel operates multiple brands, chain-wide management, or requires sophisticated rate and package configurations, CiHMS might seem appealing—especially with its focus on complex room allocations and multi-channel distribution. However, its reviews reveal issues like system hangs and limited mobile responsiveness, which could hamper daily operations.
On the other hand, Cloudbeds suits independent hotels, boutique properties, and hostels prioritizing ease of use, fast onboarding, and broad integration. Its extensive marketplace of 190 verified partners supports scalability and customization, making it more adaptable for diverse property types.
If your priority is a system with recent, high-volume reviews and high user satisfaction, Cloudbeds is the safer bet.
Edge: Cloudbeds PMS.
Ease of use is a critical factor in hotel management systems. CiHMS’s UI has been described as “intuitive and easy-to-learn,” with a high ease-of-use rating of 4.9/5. Users praise its stable, accessible platform supporting multi-platform access, but some report that onboarding can be complex due to the system’s breadth.
Cloudbeds scores slightly lower at 4.61/5 but is frequently lauded for its user-friendly, modern interface that simplifies reservations, housekeeping, and front-desk operations. Over 81 recent reviews note the system’s intuitive design, especially appreciated during onboarding.
Which platform’s ease of implementation and staff adoption will align better with your team’s technical proficiency?
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS offers core functionalities like advanced room allocation, multi-channel reservations, and flexible rate configurations—features tailored for chains and resorts. In contrast, Cloudbeds provides 33 shared features with an additional 31 exclusive ones, including integrated payment processing, guest CRM, online check-in, and mobile check-in, all within a single platform.
Cloudbeds’s unique features such as online check-in, guest messaging, automated reminders, shift planning, and a comprehensive analytics dashboard set it apart. It also boasts native email marketing and GDPR compliance, supporting modern guest engagement strategies.
Given the number and variety of features, Cloudbeds’s broader suite offers more tools to optimize daily operations and revenue management.
Edge: Cloudbeds PMS.
Customer support significantly influences your experience with PMS software. CiHMS’s reviews highlight support ratings of 4.92/5, with users describing the support team as “professional and on-time,” although some mention occasional minor bugs.
Cloudbeds scores 4.41/5, with reviews praising its responsive support team and quick assistance. Users often mention the support as “awesome and responsive,” but some report frustration when system setup or customization becomes complex.
If your hotel needs highly responsive, reliable support with fewer reported issues, CiHMS might seem attractive. Yet, Cloudbeds’s extensive support resources and positive recent reviews make it the safer choice for ongoing assistance.
Edge: CiHMS.
Hotel ratings reflect user satisfaction and product reliability. Despite more reviews, CiHMS’s overall rating is 0/5, indicating consistent dissatisfaction or issues among its 101 reviews, with recent feedback being mostly negative. Conversely, Cloudbeds’s 4.63/5 rating from over 1,071 reviews underscores its broad user approval, especially in recent months.
Hotel segments like independent, boutique, and hostels tend to rate Cloudbeds higher, often citing ease of use and functionality. CiHMS’s lower ratings are driven by operational issues and system stability concerns, especially during peak times.
Given the larger, more recent positive feedback, Cloudbeds is the clear winner in user ratings.
Edge: Cloudbeds PMS.
Pricing models are straightforward: CiHMS charges a flat $900 monthly fee, with no free tier or trial. Cloudbeds offers a slightly lower base price of $600 per month, also without a trial, but with more extensive features included.
While both systems lack trial options, Cloudbeds’s lower starting price combined with its richer feature set offers a better value proposition for most hotels, especially those seeking scalability without hefty upfront costs.
Are you willing to pay a premium for a system with less recent positive feedback?
Edge: Cloudbeds PMS.
Hotels that should consider CiHMS include:
Not ideal if:
If your hotel’s focus is on chain management and multi-channel distribution, CiHMS may suit your needs.
Bullets: Large resorts, regional markets (APAC, Middle East, Africa), chain management, complex rate configurations.
Edge: CiHMS.
Hotels that benefit most from Cloudbeds include:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds excels in providing a flexible, scalable platform for diverse hospitality businesses.
Bullets: Independent hotels, hostels, boutique hotels, global expansion, revenue optimization.
Edge: Cloudbeds PMS.
Cloudbeds’s overall higher ratings, broader feature set, and larger recent review count make it the recommended choice for most hotels. Its extensive integrations, user-friendly interface, and global presence support a wide range of property types, from boutique hotels to hostels and small chains.
CiHMS offers advanced room allocation and multi-channel management, appealing mainly to large resorts or chain properties with regional needs. However, its lower recent review scores and limited mobile support suggest it’s less suitable for hotels prioritizing ease, speed, and modern guest engagement.
For properties seeking reliability, growth potential, and positive recent feedback, Cloudbeds remains the clear frontrunner.
Cloudbeds PMS is the more trusted, widely adopted system, with a 4.63/5 rating from over 1,070 reviews, including 81 in the last six months. It offers a comprehensive suite of features designed for hotels of all sizes, especially independent and boutique properties.
CiHMS, with a lower overall rating and fewer recent reviews, may suit large resorts or chains needing specialized room allocation solutions. However, it’s less aligned with modern usability expectations and mobile needs.
If you want a proven, scalable platform with ongoing support and recent strong reviews, go with Cloudbeds.
Selecting a PMS should align with your hotel’s operational complexity, growth plans, and guest engagement strategy. Cloudbeds’s broad adoption, high satisfaction, and extensive features make it a versatile choice for most hoteliers today, particularly those focused on growth and guest experience.
CiHMS remains a solid option for large properties with specific needs, but recent reviews suggest it may lag in stability and user-friendliness.
In the end, your choice hinges on what matters most: scalability and recent support, or specialized chain management features. Based on current data, Cloudbeds’s proven track record and recent review strength make it the recommended option for most hotels.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 10 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
该软件因其任务分配功能而备受赞誉,支持客房服务等员工的独立管理。此功能简化了操作流程,并提高了各部门的生产力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
CIHMS 虽然用户友好,但由于系统功能繁多,初始培训和入职培训可能会比较复杂。用户建议使用更全面的培训资源和更详细的指南。
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Users consistently describe Cloudbeds as intuitive, simple to learn, and easy for front-desk teams to adopt quickly. Several reviews highlight that th... Users consistently describe Cloudbeds as intuitive, simple to learn, and easy for front-desk teams to adopt quickly. Several reviews highlight that the clean layout and low training burden help hotels save time and keep daily operations moving smoothly.
Reviews often mention reporting as a core value, especially for occupancy, revenue, financials, and performance tracking. At the same time, many users... Reviews often mention reporting as a core value, especially for occupancy, revenue, financials, and performance tracking. At the same time, many users want more flexible filters, better customization, and easier export/visualization because the current reports can feel limited or too complex.
A major theme is how Cloudbeds helps teams manage bookings, room assignments, drag-and-drop changes, and availability from the calendar view. Reviewer... A major theme is how Cloudbeds helps teams manage bookings, room assignments, drag-and-drop changes, and availability from the calendar view. Reviewers say this streamlines front-desk work, speeds check-in/check-out, and helps prevent operational mistakes during busy periods.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
客服支持是评论中最具争议的话题之一。许多用户称赞客服快速、专业且响应迅速,而另一些用户则批评工单处理速度慢、聊天机器人体验差,以及在遇到紧急酒店问题时... 客服支持是评论中最具争议的话题之一。许多用户称赞客服快速、专业且响应迅速,而另一些用户则批评工单处理速度慢、聊天机器人体验差,以及在遇到紧急酒店问题时缺乏可靠的电话支持。
Cloudbeds is often credited with simplifying payments, reconciliation, and financial tracking, especially when integrated payments or pay-by-link are... Cloudbeds is often credited with simplifying payments, reconciliation, and financial tracking, especially when integrated payments or pay-by-link are used. However, users also request more gateway options, better invoice support, and smoother handling of local payment methods and long-stay billing.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CiHMS 和 Cloudbeds PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CiHMS 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Cloudbeds PMS 提供 200 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CiHMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CiHMS:否。Cloudbeds PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CiHMS 的 HT Score 为 82,Cloudbeds 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案