The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Lodgable |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #45 8 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 31 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 43 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 31 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Lodgable |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 65 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #10 83 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 40 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #17 15 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Lodgable |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #65 0 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 | #58 2 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 117 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #24 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both CiHMS by CiHMS and Lodgable aim to streamline property management, but their offerings differ significantly. CiHMS boasts a comprehensive feature set, a strong regional presence, and a large volume of recent reviews. Lodgable, meanwhile, is more niche-focused on vacation rentals with limited review data. How do these differences impact your decision?
Both products aim to improve management workflows—CiHMS with its broad suite of modules, Lodgable with its focus on vacation rental automation. While CiHMS offers extensive functionalities like channel management, revenue tools, and integrated CRS, Lodgable primarily centers on booking automation and multi-platform listing management. Considering the depth of features and user feedback, CiHMS appears more suited for traditional hotels and resorts, whereas Lodgable is tailored to small-scale vacation rentals. Are you seeking a full hotel management solution or a rental listing optimizer?
If your hotel needs a robust, multi-functional PMS capable of handling complex operations across multiple departments, go with CiHMS. Its extensive feature set—33 exclusive modules including channel management, revenue management, and integrated CRS—makes it ideal for larger properties or chains. Conversely, if your focus is managing vacation rentals or small properties with streamlined booking and listing synchronization, Lodgable’s simpler interface and automation tools could suffice, although its limited review data puts its reliability into question. The choice hinges on your hotel’s size and operational complexity.
CiHMS scores 4.9 out of 5 for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface and stable performance. Many users appreciate its straightforward onboarding, though some note that comprehensive training could improve initial adoption. Lodgable, lacking detailed review data, appears to target users with basic management needs, implying a user-friendly experience for small operations. However, without recent reviews, it’s unclear if Lodgable’s interface matches CiHMS’s usability standards. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS offers 33 features exclusive to its platform, including a Spa & Wellness module, integrated revenue management, online booking engine, and mobile app. Its modules support multi-currency, multi-lingual operation, and real-time reporting, making it a versatile choice. Lodgable, in contrast, provides core booking automation and listing management but lacks the extensive modules CiHMS offers. The sheer number of features and integrations in CiHMS give it a decisive edge here. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS boasts a 4.92/5 support rating based on reviews emphasizing its quick, professional assistance and smooth onboarding. Users describe its support team as “responsive and helpful,” which reduces operational downtime. Lodgable does not have recent review data, making it difficult to evaluate support quality but given its smaller user base, support may not be as comprehensive or responsive. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS integrates with three verified partners—SiteMinder, DerbySoft, and Easyway—enhancing its connectivity to broader distribution channels. Lodgable, with zero verified integrations, may limit connectivity to external systems, which could affect your ability to scale or customize workflows. If seamless integration with third-party services is a priority, CiHMS clearly leads. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS’s reviews, totaling 101 with recent activity, reflect high satisfaction—particularly in ease of use, support, and value, with ratings of 4.9/5 and a 98% likelihood to recommend. Its user base includes luxury hotels, resorts, and city center properties, many of which praise its operational efficiency. Lodgable’s review count is zero, so no direct hotel feedback is available. Based on available data, CiHMS’s reputation is superior. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS has a clear base price of $900 per month, with no freemium options or additional implementation fees. Lodgable’s pricing details are unavailable, which makes direct cost comparison impossible. Given CiHMS’s transparent pricing, you can better evaluate its ROI relative to its extensive feature set.
The core difference is that CiHMS offers a comprehensive management ecosystem capable of supporting large, complex properties. If your hotel needs advanced features, integrations, and robust reporting, CiHMS is the clear choice, especially given its recent reviews and strong user ratings.
If your hotel focuses on vacation rentals or small-scale properties and seeks a simple, automated listing management tool, Lodgable may meet your needs. However, the lack of recent reviews and limited feature visibility suggest it’s less proven for larger operations.
For most hotels seeking full-fledged management, CiHMS’s extensive features, high support scores, and strong regional presence make it the superior choice. Lodgable feels more suited for individual hosts or small rental businesses with basic needs. Your decision should align with your property’s size, complexity, and growth ambitions.
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
该软件因其任务分配功能而备受赞誉,支持客房服务等员工的独立管理。此功能简化了操作流程,并提高了各部门的生产力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
CIHMS 虽然用户友好,但由于系统功能繁多,初始培训和入职培训可能会比较复杂。用户建议使用更全面的培训资源和更详细的指南。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CiHMS 和 Lodgable 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CiHMS 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Lodgable 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CiHMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CiHMS:否。Lodgable:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CiHMS 的 HT Score 为 81,Lodgable 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问