The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 120 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
CiHMS 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 Resorts 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Housekeeping module.
Mister Booking 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 120 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 120 | 0 |
在分析了 120 条经验证的评价后,CiHMS 用户最看重其 operational efficiency, 高级报告, 任务和资源管理,而 Mister Booking 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Mister Booking |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
高级报告
▾
|
|
|
+
任务和资源管理
▾
|
|
|
+
基于云的可访问性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
高级报告
▾
|
|
|
−
用户培训和入职
▾
|
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Mister Booking |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #45 8 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 31 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 43 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 31 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Mister Booking |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 65 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #10 83 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 40 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #17 15 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Mister Booking |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #65 0 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 | #58 2 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 117 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #24 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between CiHMS by CiHMS and Mister Booking depends heavily on your hotel's specific needs, budget, and operational priorities. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but CiHMS has a proven track record backed by more recent reviews and a broader feature set. Mister Booking, while promising, currently lacks the review volume and feedback needed for a comprehensive evaluation, making CiHMS the safer choice for most hotels.
If your hotel requires a robust, well-rated system with extensive integrations and proven support, CiHMS stands out. Conversely, if you’re exploring a less established platform with potential future features, Mister Booking might be worth watching. But for now, your decision should lean toward the platform with the most recent user validation.
Both CiHMS and Mister Booking are designed to solve core hotel management issues: reservations, operational efficiency, and guest experience. CiHMS offers a comprehensive suite of features including advanced room allocation, multi-channel reservations, and extensive reporting, all reinforced by a strong user base and recent reviews. Mister Booking’s functionality appears to focus on booking management and real-time updates but lacks the depth and user feedback to match CiHMS’s maturity.
Given CiHMS’s 101 reviews and a high NPS score of 9.8/10, it clearly resonates with hoteliers, especially in regions like Asia Pacific and the Middle East. Mister Booking, with no reviews yet, cannot credibly demonstrate its effectiveness or user satisfaction. Is your hotel prepared to rely on a platform with proven support and a large community?
If your hotel operates in regions like Asia Pacific, the Middle East, or Africa, and needs a system with proven regional support, CiHMS is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set—such as integrated CRS, channel management, revenue management, and mobile app—caters to midsize and large hotels seeking operational control and strategic insights.
On the other hand, if your hotel is smaller or less regionally focused, and you’re willing to take a chance on a platform with no reviews or proven track record, Mister Booking might be suitable. However, the absence of user feedback makes it difficult to assess its reliability or support quality. For most hotels, CiHMS’s established reputation outweighs the potential, unproven benefits of Mister Booking.
Ease of use is critical for staff adoption and operational efficiency. CiHMS scores an impressive 4.9/5 in ease of use, with reviews citing an intuitive, lean UI that is easy to learn and stable across platforms. Support and onboarding are also rated highly at 4.92/5 and 4.84/5 respectively, with users praising its straightforward navigation and helpful support team.
Mister Booking, lacking any review data, offers no verified insights into its user interface or onboarding experience. This absence leaves uncertainty about how quickly staff can get up to speed or whether the system is user-friendly. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS boasts an extensive set of 33 exclusive features, including a spa & wellness module, channel manager, revenue management, integrated CRS, booking engine, digital registration, automated night audit, and multi-currency support. These functionalities address most operational needs in larger or complex hotels.
Mister Booking has no listed features, making it impossible to compare on this front. Without confirmed features or user feedback, CiHMS’s feature depth provides a clear advantage. Edge: CiHMS.
Support quality can make or break your experience with a PMS. CiHMS’s customer support scores a near-perfect 4.92/5, with reviews highlighting professional, timely assistance and comprehensive onboarding. Hoteliers have expressed confidence in its ongoing support, which is crucial during system implementation and daily operations.
Mister Booking offers no available support ratings or reviews, leaving hotel managers uncertain about help availability or responsiveness. Given the importance of dependable support, CiHMS’s high scores are a decisive factor. Edge: CiHMS.
Integration capabilities can significantly extend a PMS’s utility. CiHMS has verified integrations with SiteMinder, DerbySoft, and Easyway, totaling three confirmed partners. These integrations facilitate distribution, channel management, and operational workflows.
Mister Booking has no verified integrations listed, which limits its connectivity options. This gap could restrict your hotel’s ability to connect with third-party systems or expand distribution channels. Edge: CiHMS.
Review volume and recency provide insight into user satisfaction. CiHMS’s 101 reviews over the past six months, with a 98% likelihood to recommend and a 9.8/10 NPS, demonstrate strong, current user approval. Hotel segments like resorts and city hotels rate it highly, with some reviews noting operational improvements and enhanced guest experiences.
Mister Booking has no reviews, making it impossible to gauge hotelier satisfaction or segment-specific ratings. Without recent feedback, CiHMS’s ratings clearly establish its credibility. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS is priced at a $900 monthly base fee, with no additional implementation or trial fees. Its pricing model reflects a mid-range investment for comprehensive PMS features.
Mister Booking’s pricing details are unavailable, which complicates cost-benefit analysis. The lack of transparent pricing suggests you should be cautious about potential hidden costs or limited value. For most hotels, CiHMS offers a clear, predictable investment. Edge: CiHMS.
Hotels that should consider CiHMS:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that might consider Mister Booking:
Not ideal if:
In essence, CiHMS and Mister Booking serve different hotel management needs, but CiHMS’s stronger review presence and feature set make it the preferred choice for most hoteliers. CiHMS’s 101 recent reviews, high ratings, and regional support demonstrate its reliability and relevance—especially for mid-sized and larger properties.
Choose CiHMS if you need a mature, well-supported system capable of managing complex operations, multi-channel distribution, and revenue growth. Mister Booking may appeal to smaller, less complex properties willing to take a risk on an untested platform, but without current reviews or proven features, it remains an uncertain choice.
In conclusion, if your hotel values support, stability, and proven effectiveness, CiHMS is the clear winner. For those with minimal needs or a desire to explore unproven solutions, Mister Booking might be worth monitoring but is not recommended as your primary PMS today.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Mister Booking | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,CiHMS 和 Mister Booking 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Mister Booking |
|---|---|---|
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 21 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
该软件因其任务分配功能而备受赞誉,支持客房服务等员工的独立管理。此功能简化了操作流程,并提高了各部门的生产力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
CIHMS 虽然用户友好,但由于系统功能繁多,初始培训和入职培训可能会比较复杂。用户建议使用更全面的培训资源和更详细的指南。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CiHMS 和 Mister Booking 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CiHMS 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mister Booking 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CiHMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CiHMS:否。Mister Booking:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CiHMS 的 HT Score 为 81,Mister Booking 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问