The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 120 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
CiHMS 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 Resorts 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Housekeeping module.
基于 HTR 上 120 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 120 | 0 |
在分析了 120 条经验证的评价后,CiHMS 用户最看重其 operational efficiency, 高级报告, 任务和资源管理,而 Oasis Hospitality Software Ltd 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
高级报告
▾
|
|
|
+
任务和资源管理
▾
|
|
|
+
基于云的可访问性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
高级报告
▾
|
|
|
−
用户培训和入职
▾
|
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #45 8 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 31 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 43 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 31 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 65 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #10 83 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 40 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #17 15 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #65 0 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 | #58 2 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 117 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #24 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is a critical decision for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest experience. While CiHMS by CiHMS is more established with a significant review footprint, Oasis PMS by Oasis Hospitality Software Ltd is less documented but offers comprehensive functionalities. Both products aim to streamline operations, but they diverge in market presence, feature depth, and user feedback. How do these differences impact your hotel’s specific needs?
Both CiHMS and Oasis PMS are designed to improve hotel operations, but they cater to different levels of market maturity and regional focus. CiHMS, with over 100 reviews and a 4.92/5 customer support rating, has proven its reliability, especially in Asia Pacific, Middle East, and Africa. Oasis PMS, lacking recent reviews and customer feedback, has a broader global presence but less proven efficacy in recent times.
For hotels seeking a mature, highly-rated platform with a proven track record, CiHMS stands out. Oasis PMS might appeal if your hotel is in North America or Europe and you're looking for an all-in-one solution, but the absence of recent reviews creates uncertainty about its current capabilities and support.
Are you prioritizing a product with proven performance and strong support, or are you exploring options with less documented user experiences?
If your hotel needs advanced automation, multi-channel integration, and robust reporting capabilities, go with CiHMS. It’s suited for hotels aiming to optimize booking, revenue management, and operational workflows, especially in markets where it already demonstrates a solid presence.
If your hotel requires a straightforward, simple PMS with minimal complexity and a focus on reservations and billing, Oasis PMS might seem appealing. However, given the total lack of recent reviews and features, CiHMS remains the safer, more tested choice for hoteliers seeking reliability and proven results.
For hotels with extensive resort operations or multi-property portfolios in Asia-Pacific or Africa, CiHMS’s regional strength and case studies make it the more aligned solution. Conversely, if your hotel is smaller or in North America, and you’re willing to risk less support, Oasis could be considered—but with caution.
CiHMS boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.9/5, supported by reviews that describe its interface as "intuitive" and "easy-to-learn." Users appreciate its stability, multi-platform support, and straightforward navigation, though some note the onboarding process could benefit from more comprehensive training materials. Its lean UI is praised, but mobile app functionality remains a wish rather than a reality.
Oasis PMS, lacking recent reviews and detailed user feedback, makes it difficult to assess usability. The absence of publicly available ratings suggests that potential users might face a steeper learning curve or inconsistent user experience.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS offers a broad suite of 33 exclusive features, including a Spa & Wellness Module, Channel Manager, Revenue Management, Integrated CRS, Booking Engine, and more. These tools support complex pricing strategies, multi-currency management, automated night audits, and guest profile management, providing a comprehensive toolkit for large hotels and resorts.
Oasis PMS, without detailed feature data, appears to focus on core reservation and billing functions. Its limited publicly available feature set suggests it may lack the extensive customization and automation that CiHMS provides.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS’s support ratings are outstanding, with a 4.92/5 satisfaction score based on user reviews. Customers highlight its "professional and on-time" support team and "online 24/7 support," which are crucial for minimizing operational disruptions.
Oasis PMS offers no recent reviews or detailed support feedback, making it impossible to compare directly. The lack of recent user experiences raises doubts about the current level of support and responsiveness.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS integrates with three verified partners, including SiteMinder and Easyway, and offers unique integrations like a Channel Manager, Revenue Management, and a booking engine. Its integrations enable more flexible distribution and operational automation.
Oasis PMS has seven verified integrations, including major players like D-Edge and Revinate. However, the lack of detailed information about these integrations makes it more difficult to determine how well they serve your hotel’s specific needs.
Edge: Oasis PMS.
CiHMS’s reviews, totaling 101 in the last six months, consistently rate it highly, with an overall satisfaction score of 4.92/5. Hoteliers particularly praise its ease of use, support, and the advanced features that help streamline their operations.
Oasis PMS lacks recent reviews, making it impossible to determine current user sentiment. The absence of recent feedback suggests that CiHMS’s reputation and user satisfaction are stronger in the current market.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS costs $900 per month with no free tier or trial, making it an investment for hotels seeking extensive features and proven support. The pricing details for Oasis PMS are unavailable, which complicates direct comparisons, but the lack of transparency suggests it may be less premium or less established.
Hoteliers should consider whether the investment in CiHMS aligns with their operational needs and budget, especially given its rich feature set and support levels.
CiHMS is a well-established, feature-rich PMS with a strong user base and high satisfaction ratings. Its extensive capabilities and regional expertise make it suitable for larger, complex hotels aiming to improve operational efficiency and guest experience.
Oasis PMS appears to be a less documented solution with a broader geographic footprint but lacks recent user reviews and detailed feature insights. It may suit smaller hotels or properties seeking a simple reservation system, but its current market reputation remains uncertain.
In summary, if your hotel values proven performance, extensive features, and top-rated support, CiHMS is the clear choice. Oasis PMS could be considered if you prioritize broad integrations and cost transparency, but proceed with caution due to the limited recent data.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,CiHMS 和 Oasis PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 21 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
该软件因其任务分配功能而备受赞誉,支持客房服务等员工的独立管理。此功能简化了操作流程,并提高了各部门的生产力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
CIHMS 虽然用户友好,但由于系统功能繁多,初始培训和入职培训可能会比较复杂。用户建议使用更全面的培训资源和更详细的指南。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CiHMS 和 Oasis PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CiHMS 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Oasis PMS 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CiHMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CiHMS:否。Oasis PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CiHMS 的 HT Score 为 81,Oasis Hospitality Software Ltd 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问