The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #45 8 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 31 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 43 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 31 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 65 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #10 83 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 40 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #17 15 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #65 0 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 | #58 2 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 117 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #24 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between CiHMS by CiHMS and Uplisting hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scope. While both aim to streamline property management, they serve vastly different market segments and feature sets. CiHMS is a full-scale hotel management system with extensive capabilities, whereas Uplisting caters primarily to short-term rental operators. Your decision should align with your property type, scale, and management complexity.
Both products aim to improve operational efficiency, but CiHMS’s broader feature set and recent reviews give it a clearer edge. Does your hotel need a comprehensive PMS or a specialized rental management tool? Let’s explore both options.
CiHMS is designed for full-service hotels, resorts, and branded properties seeking an all-in-one management platform. Its robust feature list—including revenue management, channel management, and integrated CRS—supports complex operations and large portfolios. Recent reviews—101 in the last 6 months—highlight its high user ratings (81.25 HTR Score) and strong customer support (4.92/5), signaling ongoing satisfaction.
Uplisting, on the other hand, is optimized for short-term rental operators managing multiple listings across various channels. Its user base is less clearly defined, with no recent reviews or ratings available. This makes it difficult to assess its current performance or suitability for larger hotels. If your property operates as a traditional hotel, Uplisting’s limited review data and narrow focus suggest CiHMS is the stronger choice.
Conclusion: For hotel properties seeking a comprehensive PMS, CiHMS is the clear leader, especially given its recent review volume and high ratings.
If your hotel needs a full-featured management system that handles reservations, revenue, channel distribution, and on-site operations, go with CiHMS. Its extensive feature set—33 unique features including a booking engine, automated night audit, and guest profiles—addresses complex hotel needs. Its proven track record with resorts, city hotels, and branded properties makes it suitable for mid to large-sized hotels.
If your hotel operates primarily as a short-term rental portfolio or vacation rental business, Uplisting might seem attractive. However, the absence of recent reviews or features comparable to CiHMS suggests it’s not yet proven at scale. Its focus on automation and review summaries is more relevant for property managers with multiple listings rather than full-service hotels.
Verdict: For traditional hotels and resorts, CiHMS is the more proven, feature-rich platform. Uplisting suits small or niche rental operations but lacks the breadth needed for larger hotel management.
CiHMS scores 4.9/5 for ease of use, based on recent reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface and stable performance. Users praise its straightforward navigation and comprehensive onboarding process, with a support rating of 4.92/5. However, some mention the system’s complexity can require initial training to master.
Uplisting, with no recent reviews or user ratings available, lacks publicly documented user experience insights. Its design likely targets easy adoption for short-term rental hosts, but without recent feedback, it’s hard to gauge the learning curve or user satisfaction.
Edge: CiHMS. Its high user ratings and detailed reviews point to a user-friendly experience aligned with hotel management needs.
CiHMS’s feature list is extensive, including a channel manager, revenue management, integrated CRS, booking engine, automated night audit, guest profiles, multi-currency support, and more—totaling 33 exclusive features. These capabilities cater to full-scale hotel operations and complex revenue strategies.
Uplisting appears to lack a comparable feature set, with no unique features listed beyond general property management. Its focus remains on automating guest communication, calendar synchronization, and basic booking tasks, which are essential but less comprehensive.
Edge: CiHMS. Its extensive feature set supports diverse hotel operations and revenue strategies better than Uplisting.
CiHMS’s recent reviews consistently praise its customer support, rating 4.92/5, with comments highlighting professional, prompt assistance. Users note that support helps resolve system issues quickly, ensuring minimal disruption.
Uplisting, lacking recent reviews, offers no available customer support ratings or user feedback. This absence suggests either limited support infrastructure or insufficient recent user engagement.
Edge: CiHMS. Its high support ratings and consistently positive feedback make it the more reliable choice.
CiHMS boasts three verified partner integrations—including SiteMinder, DerbySoft, and Easyway—supporting seamless distribution and onboarding. Its larger set of integrations helps hotel teams connect with existing systems for better operational flow.
Uplisting has two verified integrations—Duve and PriceLabs—focused on automation and dynamic pricing. While useful, their fewer integrations limit flexibility for larger hotel systems.
Edge: CiHMS. Its broader integration network supports more complex, multi-system hotel environments.
Recent reviews clearly favor CiHMS, with a 9.8/5 NPS score and 98% likelihood to recommend. Hotels from different segments—resorts, city hotels, and branded properties—appreciate its robust functionalities and support.
Uplisting offers no recent ratings or user feedback, making it impossible to gauge satisfaction levels or property-specific ratings. This lack of recent data suggests CiHMS’s reviews are more reliable and indicative of current performance.
Conclusion: CiHMS’s high ratings and recent positive reviews make it the preferred choice among hoteliers.
CiHMS is priced at a $900 monthly flat fee, with no trial or freemium options. This cost reflects its extensive feature set and enterprise-level capabilities.
Uplisting’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may offer tiered or custom pricing suited for smaller operations or specific rental portfolios. The absence of transparent pricing makes direct comparison difficult.
Verdict: CiHMS’s clear, upfront pricing aligns with its comprehensive service offering, making it easier to evaluate ROI.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with minimal management needs, or operates solely as a vacation rental.
When Not to Use: Small boutique hotels or single-property operations might find CiHMS’s extensive features unnecessary and costly.
Not ideal if you operate a large hotel, resort, or need advanced revenue management and multi-channel distribution.
When Not to Use: Traditional hotel brands or properties requiring comprehensive management tools should look elsewhere.
CiHMS and Uplisting serve very different markets. CiHMS offers a broad, feature-rich PMS tailored for full-service hotels and resorts needing integrated operations. Uplisting is designed for short-term rental businesses, focusing on automation and ease of management.
If your hotel operates as a full-service property with complex needs, CiHMS’s recent reviews, numerous features, and high ratings make it the clear choice. Its proven support and extensive integrations support growth and operational efficiency at scale.
Conversely, if your focus is on managing multiple rental listings with basic automation, Uplisting might fit—but the lack of recent reviews and detailed features limits its credibility. For now, CiHMS represents the more reliable, proven solution for traditional hotels and resorts.
Final recommendation: For hotel properties seeking a dependable, feature-rich property management system, CiHMS is the stronger choice based on recent reviews, high customer ratings, and comprehensive capabilities.
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
该软件因其任务分配功能而备受赞誉,支持客房服务等员工的独立管理。此功能简化了操作流程,并提高了各部门的生产力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
CIHMS 虽然用户友好,但由于系统功能繁多,初始培训和入职培训可能会比较复杂。用户建议使用更全面的培训资源和更详细的指南。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CiHMS 和 Uplisting 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CiHMS 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Uplisting 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CiHMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CiHMS:否。Uplisting:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CiHMS 的 HT Score 为 81,Uplisting 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问