The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Citadel |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #26 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #46 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #32 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #31 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Citadel |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #31 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #44 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #43 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #32 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Citadel |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #25 8 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #20 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #16 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #11 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system is crucial for streamlining your hotel's operations, enhancing guest experiences, and improving revenue management. Both Citadel by Citadel and Counter by Counter aim to address these needs, but they differ significantly in scope, user feedback, and market presence. Citadel’s lack of recent reviews and very low ratings raise questions about its viability, while Counter’s active, recent reviews, and high satisfaction scores suggest it’s a more reliable choice.
Are you looking for a fully integrated PMS with extensive features and proven support, or a lightweight, hostel-focused system that’s still evolving? Let's compare these two options to see which better fits your hotel.
Citadel, with its zero reviews and a 0/5 overall rating, appears to be an unproven and inactive product. It boasts a broad cybersecurity profile rather than hotel-specific functionalities, making it unsuitable for your property management needs. Counter, however, has accumulated 54 recent reviews in the past six months and holds a 4.73/5 rating, reflecting active development, user satisfaction, and ongoing support.
Given the lack of current data on Citadel, your team cannot rely on its performance or customer feedback. Counter’s recent reviews and high NPS score of 9.02/10 demonstrate consistent user trust and positive experiences.
Edge: Counter
If your hotel needs a dedicated property management platform with features like channel management, booking engine, and integrated payments, Counter is the clear choice. Its user base is predominantly hostels, but it also serves boutique and city hotels, making it versatile for small to medium-sized properties.
Conversely, Citadel’s focus on cybersecurity and absence of hotel-specific functionalities suggest it’s not intended as a PMS. If you were considering Citadel for property management, it’s better to look elsewhere — Counter offers purpose-built tools that streamline reservations, guest management, and operations.
Edge: Counter
Citadel offers no recent user reviews or ratings, so assessing its ease of use is impossible. Counter, with a 4.6/5 ease of use rating from 54 reviews, is widely praised for its intuitive interface, rapid onboarding, and user-friendly mobile app. Users highlight how quickly staff can learn the system and how it reduces manual tasks.
Counter’s interface is described as clean, simple, and accessible across devices, helping your team adopt it swiftly. Citadel’s usability remains uncertain, but based on available data, Counter clearly leads in user-friendliness.
Edge: Counter
Citadel provides no documented features tailored for hotel operations, indicating it lacks core PMS functionalities. Counter, on the other hand, offers 19 specific features, including channel management, booking engine, online support, POS integration, guest CRM, multi-currency, and group bookings.
Counter’s feature set is comprehensive for hostel and small hotel management, allowing central control of reservations, revenue, and guest data. Citadel’s features are not publicly outlined or proven to meet hotel operational needs.
Edge: Counter
Citadel’s support ratings are unavailable, making it impossible to evaluate their responsiveness or helpfulness. Counter, with a 4.96/5 customer support rating from 54 recent reviews, is highly praised for its quick, professional, and attentive service. Users share quotes like, “Support is always there to help,” and “Evelyn and Max are very responsive and professional.”
This consistency in high support ratings indicates your team will receive timely assistance with Counter. The lack of recent Citadel reviews leaves its support quality in question.
Edge: Counter
Citadel offers no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other platforms or tools. Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Stripe, Cloudbeds, SiteMinder, Goki, and GDS systems, covering payments, channel management, and access control.
Counter’s integrations allow your property to streamline finances, distribution, and guest services, while Citadel’s absence of integrations suggests it’s not designed for operational connectivity.
Edge: Counter
Citadel’s ratings are nonexistent, so it cannot be rated by hoteliers. Counter, however, has a 4.73/5 rating based on 54 recent reviews, with users across hostel, boutique, and city hotel segments giving positive feedback.
Hoteliers highlight Counter’s ease of use, support, and feature set, with reviews like “This system simplifies our daily tasks” and “Responsive support makes a difference.”
Edge: Counter
Citadel’s pricing details are unavailable, and it appears to be inactive or not publicly marketed as a PMS. Counter is also free, making it attractive for small hostels and budget-conscious properties, though some users mention that advanced features could benefit from clearer pricing options.
Since both lack transparent pricing, your team should inquire directly for customized quotes, but Counter’s free tier makes it easier to trial without upfront investment.
Edge: Counter (due to transparency and no-cost entry)
Citadel is not suitable for any hotel type, given its lack of hotel-specific features, recent reviews, or proven support. Its cybersecurity focus indicates it’s aimed at businesses needing digital asset protection, not property management.
Teams considering Citadel should be aware it’s not a PMS, making it a poor choice for any hotel looking for operational software.
Not ideal if…
Counter is designed for hostels, with 83% of users in that segment, but it also suits boutique and city hotels. It’s ideal if your property:
Not ideal if…
Counter stands out as a proven, actively supported PMS with a broad feature set tailored for small to medium properties, especially hostels. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive integrations make it a reliable choice for hoteliers seeking efficiency and support.
Citadel, on the other hand, offers no recent or verified hotel management features, with its focus seemingly on cybersecurity. Unless your hotel requires cybersecurity solutions for digital assets, Citadel isn’t a viable option.
If you need a modern, user-friendly, and well-supported PMS with ongoing development, go with Counter. For unfamiliar or specialized cybersecurity needs, consider Citadel—but not as your primary property management tool.
Final note: For practical hotel management, Counter’s recent active reviews and high user ratings make it the safer, more effective choice.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Citadel 和 Counter 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Citadel 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Counter 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Citadel:否。Counter:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Citadel 的 HT Score 为 0,Counter 的为 17。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问