The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 79 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Clock 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Guest Feedback Management.
Getabed Suite 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 79 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 79 | 0 |
在分析了 79 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, 客户服务与支持,而 Getabed Suite 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务与支持
▾
|
|
|
+
集成与连接
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
移动和用户界面
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #21 19 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 28 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #17 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #18 30 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #18 14 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 15 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 8 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 11 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 38 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #12 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #18 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Clock HMS by Clock and Getabed Suite can significantly impact your hotel’s operations and revenue. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but Clock offers a broad, feature-rich platform with proven recent user engagement, while Getabed Suite emphasizes increasing direct bookings through a high-conversion booking engine. Your decision should hinge on your hotel’s specific needs—whether operational depth or reservation growth is your priority.
Clock’s extensive feature set and recent growth in user reviews make it a more reliable choice for hotels wanting a comprehensive management system. Conversely, Getabed Suite’s lack of recent reviews and limited market presence suggest it’s less tested in the field.
Both products aim to help your team manage reservations, guest data, and daily hotel operations. Clock provides a full-spectrum property management system (PMS) that includes booking engines, channel management, housekeeping, POS, and analytics, making it suitable for hotels seeking an all-in-one platform. Getabed Suite, on the other hand, centers primarily on increasing direct reservations via its booking engine, with fewer operational modules and no recent user reviews to confirm its broader effectiveness.
Where Clock’s strengths lie in its mature, feature-rich environment, Getabed Suite’s focus remains narrowly on reservation conversion. If your hotel needs a comprehensive PMS, Clock is the more proven choice. If your priority is boosting direct bookings without commission fees, Getabed Suite could be appealing—but its lack of recent reviews limits confidence.
Are you looking for a holistic management platform or just a high-conversion booking engine? This fundamental question guides whether Clock or Getabed Suite better suits your hotel.
If your hotel requires a full suite of management tools—reservations, rates, invoicing, housekeeping, POS, guest messaging, and analytics—Clock is the clear choice. With over 63 recent reviews and a 4.88/5 overall rating, it’s trusted by hotels across multiple segments, especially boutique, city-center, and independent hotels.
If your primary goal is to increase direct bookings via your website, and you’re comfortable with a less comprehensive system, Getabed Suite’s high-conversion booking engine might seem appealing. But with zero reviews and a much smaller presence, it’s difficult to verify its effectiveness or reliability.
For hotels seeking operational depth that’s been battle-tested recently, Clock is the safer, more established option. For those solely focused on reservation growth and willing to accept less proven tools, Getabed Suite might initially seem attractive—yet its absence of recent data makes that riskier.
Clock’s user interface scores a 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting its straightforward navigation and strong support team. Users praise its ease of onboarding and how quickly staff can adapt, even during busy periods, often noting that the system’s ongoing updates improve usability.
Getabed Suite offers no recent reviews or detailed user feedback, making it impossible to assess its ease of use. Its lack of visible user ratings and limited market presence suggest it may not have been tested thoroughly in real-world hotel environments.
Based on available data, Clock offers a proven, user-friendly experience that facilitates staff adoption. Edge: Clock.
Clock boasts an extensive library of 49 unique features, including booking engine, channel management, POS, guest feedback, digital registration, real-time reporting, and more. Its modules support multi-currency, multi-lingual operations, and advanced automation, covering nearly every aspect of hotel management.
Getabed Suite has no documented features beyond its core reservation engine and basic guest management, with no reported additional modules. The platform seems focused on increasing direct reservations, but lacks the broader operational tools Clock offers.
If comprehensive functionality is your goal, Clock’s 49 features provide a significant advantage. Edge: Clock.
Clock’s support ratings are high—4.78/5—with recent reviews praising its responsiveness, support team expertise, and helpful onboarding. Users frequently mention that support staff listen carefully and resolve issues quickly, which is vital for implementing complex systems.
Getabed Suite has no recent reviews or detailed feedback on support, making it impossible to compare. Its limited market exposure suggests support quality is uncertain.
For reliable, well-rated support, Clock stands out. Edge: Clock.
Clock offers integration with 111 verified partners, including OTAs, payment processors, revenue management tools, and other hotel tech solutions. Its open API and extensive partner network facilitate seamless operation and data flow across systems.
Getabed Suite has no verified integrations listed, limiting its ability to connect with existing hotel systems. This could restrict your operational flexibility and data accuracy.
If integration breadth matters, Clock’s extensive partner network is a clear advantage. Edge: Clock.
Clock’s recent reviews—numbering 63—are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.88/5 rating and a 95% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers from boutique, independent, and city-center hotels praise its ease of use, features, and support.
Getabed Suite has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Its market presence is small, and lack of feedback diminishes confidence.
For proven hotelier satisfaction and high ratings, Clock is the clear leader. Edge: Clock.
Clock charges a flat $600/month fee, with no freemium, implementation costs, or additional charges for integrations. Its transparent pricing aligns well with mid-sized hotels needing a comprehensive system.
Getabed Suite’s pricing is not publicly listed, suggesting potential custom quotes and less transparency. This lack of clarity could lead to unexpected costs.
If clear, predictable pricing is critical, Clock offers that advantage. Edge: Clock.
Not ideal if you only need a simple booking engine or are operating at a very small scale without complex management needs.
Not ideal if you require comprehensive operational management or seek proven support and integrations.
Clock HMS by Clock offers a comprehensive, highly-rated system with recent positive reviews and a strong track record. Its extensive feature set, integrations, and support make it suitable for hotels seeking an all-in-one management platform capable of handling complex operations.
Getabed Suite, while focused on increasing direct reservations through its booking engine, lacks recent validation and a broad feature set. Its minimal market presence and absence of recent reviews make it a less reliable choice for hotels looking for proven operational tools.
For hotels prioritizing operational depth and recent user confidence, Clock is the clear winner. If your primary goal is reservation growth and you are willing to accept limited features and support, Getabed Suite might be worth exploring—but proceed cautiously given the limited recent data.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Clock HMS 和 Getabed Suite 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 多币种 | ||
| 定价情报 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 销售点 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 37 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导... Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导和复杂功能支持。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分... 尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分用户认为现有报告功能不足,且难以从中获取全面的洞察。
用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态... 用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态运营和营销策略。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock HMS 和 Getabed Suite 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock HMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Getabed Suite 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock HMS:否。Getabed Suite:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 79,Getabed Suite 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问