Sorry, this functionality is only available for verified hoteliers
The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Clock HMS vs. RoomRaccoon HMS:
哪个更适合您？
摘要
我们分析了 651 条经验证的酒店从业者评价，比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究，以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项：
Clock 表现出色 在 ease of use and accessibility 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ，拥有独特功能如 Guest Feedback Management and Centralized Messaging.
RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 易用性 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ，拥有独特功能如 Post-stay emails and Pre-stay emails.
Clock HMS 与 RoomRaccoon HMS 相比如何？
基于 HTR 上 651 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $1,000/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 79 | 572 |
Clock HMS 与 RoomRaccoon HMS 的优缺点是什么？
在分析了 651 条经验证的评价后，Clock 用户最看重其 ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, 客户服务与支持，而 RoomRaccoon 用户则强调 易用性, 客户服务, 持续改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
+
易用性
▾
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
+
客户服务与支持
▾
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
|
+
集成与连接
▾
|
+
集成与自动化
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
−
关键问题
▾
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
−
定价问题
▾
|
|
−
移动和用户界面
▾
|
−
访客数据库透明度
▾
|
Clock 对比 RoomRaccoon：按酒店细分市场排名
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型（10-24 间客房） ▾ | #21 19 条评价 | #5 214 条评价 |
| 中型（25-74 间客房） ▾ | #14 28 条评价 | #8 50 条评价 |
| 大型（75-199 间客房） ▾ | #17 2 条评价 | #4 18 条评价 |
| 超大型（200+ 间客房） ▾ | #5 5 条评价 | #8 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #18 30 条评价 | #3 245 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #18 14 条评价 | #4 149 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 15 条评价 | #5 70 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 8 条评价 | #3 72 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 11 条评价 | #14 11 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 38 条评价 | #1 445 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #12 4 条评价 | #8 9 条评价 |
| 中东 | #18 2 条评价 | #17 3 条评价 |
The Decision
Choosing between Clock HMS by Clock and RoomRaccoon HMS by RoomRaccoon hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Both platforms aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in their focus, feature sets, and user experience. While Clock offers a comprehensive, all-in-one solution emphasizing reservations, guest communication, and front desk management, RoomRaccoon leans into automation, guest experience, and scalability for independent hoteliers. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s current and future needs?
Is Clock HMS or RoomRaccoon HMS Better for Hotels?
Both Clock and RoomRaccoon address core hotel management challenges like reservations, guest communication, and revenue management. Clock’s strength lies in its extensive integration capabilities and versatility, supporting a wide range of features from POS to event bookings, all within a single platform. RoomRaccoon, however, excels in automating tasks, optimizing rates through AI, and simplifying guest interactions, especially for small and independent properties. Do you prefer a broad, feature-rich platform or one focused on automation and guest-centered tools?
RoomRaccoon vs Clock: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?
If your hotel is an independent property or a small boutique needing an intuitive system that boosts direct bookings and simplifies operations, RoomRaccoon is the better fit. Its user-friendly interface and automation features have earned it a 4.95/5 rating from 484 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its ease of use and revenue growth. Conversely, if your hotel requires a robust, customizable PMS with extensive integrations and complex operational support, Clock’s 63 reviews and a slightly lower recent rating (4.88/5) suggest it could be more suitable. Which profile matches your hotel’s scale and operational complexity?
Is Clock HMS or RoomRaccoon HMS Easier to Use?
RoomRaccoon’s interface is consistently praised for its simplicity, with a 4.87/5 ease-of-use rating based on nearly 500 reviews, and users highlight how quickly their teams adapt to its automation tools. Clock scores slightly lower at 4.73/5, with some users mentioning initial setup challenges and occasional system lags. While Clock offers detailed features, RoomRaccoon’s intuitive design makes onboarding and daily use easier—especially for smaller teams. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Which Has Better Features: Clock HMS or RoomRaccoon HMS?
Clock offers 12 features unique to its platform, including guest feedback management, tablet check-in, and integrated CRS, appealing to hotels seeking an all-encompassing front desk solution. RoomRaccoon excels with 20 features exclusive to its system, such as AI-powered rate optimization, loyalty program integration, and automated upselling, which directly impact revenue and guest experience. Both platforms share 37 features, but RoomRaccoon’s focus on automation and guest engagement gives it an edge. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Which Has Better Customer Support: Clock HMS or RoomRaccoon HMS?
Both platforms maintain strong support ratings—Clock at 4.78/5 and RoomRaccoon at 4.74/5—yet Clock’s recent reviews highlight its dedicated support team, with hoteliers emphasizing quick and effective assistance. Review quotes for Clock mention "excellent support" and "quick problem resolution," whereas RoomRaccoon’s customer service, while praised, occasionally faces criticism for response times. Given the recent review count and detailed support feedback, Clock’s support is slightly more reliable. Edge: Clock.
Which Has More Integrations: Clock HMS or RoomRaccoon HMS?
Clock boasts 111 verified partners, including many specialized integrations like Hotel Investor Apps and Profitroom, giving it a broader ecosystem for complex hotel operations. RoomRaccoon offers 88 verified partners, with notable integrations like Sage and WuBook, but fewer overall. Both platforms integrate with essential OTAs and payment systems, yet Clock’s larger integration network makes it more adaptable for diverse hotel types. Edge: Clock.
Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Clock HMS or RoomRaccoon HMS?
RoomRaccoon’s impressive 86.7/100 overall rating and 97% likelihood to recommend come from 484 recent reviews, with many small hotel operators praising its simplicity and revenue boosts. Clock, with 63 reviews and a 77.6 score, receives positive feedback but trails in recent ratings. Smaller hotels and independent operators favor RoomRaccoon’s ease and automated features, while larger or more complex properties may appreciate Clock’s extensive integrations. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
How Much Do Clock HMS and RoomRaccoon HMS Cost?
Clock’s pricing starts at $600/month, with no free tier or trial options, emphasizing a straightforward subscription. RoomRaccoon’s base price is $1,000/month, also without a trial, reflecting its premium position with more advanced automation features. Both platforms are positioned as investment solutions, but RoomRaccoon’s higher price aligns with its expanded automation and guest engagement tools.
What Type of Hotel Should Use Clock HMS?
- Hotels that need a comprehensive, feature-rich PMS capable of handling reservations, invoicing, and event bookings.
- Properties with complex operational requirements that benefit from extensive integrations.
- Hotels that value detailed analytics and a centralized platform for operations.
- Teams that prioritize a platform with a broad ecosystem of partners.
- Not ideal if your hotel is small, seeking simplicity, or prefers a more automated, guest-focused system.
What Type of Hotel Should Use RoomRaccoon HMS?
- Independent hotels, B&Bs, boutique properties, and eco-lodges aiming for an intuitive, easy-to-learn platform.
- Hotels looking to increase direct bookings through automated marketing and rate optimization.
- Small to medium properties wanting automation features like upselling, pre/post-stay emails, and guest communication.
- Teams that prioritize quick onboarding and ongoing support.
- Not ideal if your hotel requires highly customizable operations or extensive third-party integrations beyond the core offerings.
RoomRaccoon vs Clock: The Bottom Line for Hotels
Clock offers a broad, detailed management system suitable for properties with complex needs and diverse operational demands. Its strength lies in extensive integrations and detailed control, making it ideal for larger hotels or chains that require customization.
RoomRaccoon, however, shines for small, independent hotels prioritizing ease of use, automation, and revenue growth. Its highly-rated user interface, AI-driven features, and recent positive reviews make it the recommended choice for hoteliers seeking a straightforward, scalable solution.
If your hotel aims for a simple, revenue-enhancing platform that’s quick to adopt, go with RoomRaccoon. For more complex operations needing extensive integrations and customization, Clock remains a strong contender.
Clock HMS 和 RoomRaccoon HMS 的价格是多少？
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $1,000/mo |
Clock HMS 有哪些 RoomRaccoon HMS 没有的功能（反之亦然）？
根据 HTR 的产品数据库，Clock HMS 和 RoomRaccoon HMS 共享 37 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 客房服务手机应用程序 | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 自动报告 | ||
| 集中消息传递 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 20 项功能存在差异。
实际成果：Clock 对比 RoomRaccoon（按业务目标）
我们分析了 10 个经验证的案例研究，比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
Clock 对比 RoomRaccoon：总结
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持，以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评，但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导... Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持，以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评，但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导和复杂功能支持。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求，但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成，以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分... 尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求，但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成，以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分用户认为现有报告功能不足，且难以从中获取全面的洞察。
用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置，以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意，但部分用户指出，他们希望修改报告和界面设置，以便更好地支持动态... 用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置，以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意，但部分用户指出，他们希望修改报告和界面设置，以便更好地支持动态运营和营销策略。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户称赞 RoomRaccoon 具有用户友好的界面和直观的设计，这减少了培训时间，并能顺利融入日常操作，从而提高了整体效率。
虽然一些用户称赞支持团队的响应速度和专业水平，但另一些用户则批评售后服务和响应效率不足，这表明客户服务质量存在不一致之处。
用户赞赏 RoomRaccoon 的持续发展，包括 AI 的增强，这些都有助于提高销售和运营功能，展现了其对长期适应性的承诺。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
多篇评论指出，售后支持不力、技术问题悬而未决等关键问题严重影响了用户满意度和对系统的信任度。
一些用户，尤其是那些经营季节性业务的用户，认为该系统的定价过高，这影响了他们的决策，尽管他们认为该系统包含的功能很有价值。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
关于 Clock HMS 与 RoomRaccoon HMS 的常见问题
Clock HMS 能否替代 RoomRaccoon HMS？
这取决于您的需求。Clock HMS 和 RoomRaccoon HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能，但各有独特的能力。Clock HMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴，而 RoomRaccoon HMS 提供 88 个。在切换之前，请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
哪个更适合小型或独立酒店？
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon HMS 在易用性方面领先，评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价，了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock HMS 或 RoomRaccoon HMS 是否提供免费方案？
Clock HMS：否。RoomRaccoon HMS：否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前，请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HTR 如何评估和排名 Clock HMS 和 RoomRaccoon HMS？
HT Score 是一个综合排名，考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量，帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 79，RoomRaccoon 的为 86。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何？ 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分（推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率）、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性（最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价）以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何？ 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何？ 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集（反馈驱动文化的指标）以及产品资料是否完整，包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛？ 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖（服务的国家和区域）、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标，以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
酒店从业者还在阅读哪些 酒店管理软件 对比？
探索更多基于经验证酒店从业者评价的一对一对比。
获取个性化的产品推荐
产品推荐顾问
