The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,550 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Clock 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Tablet/Kiosk Check-in and Guest App.
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 易于使用,快速上手 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
在分析了 1,550 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, 客户服务与支持,而 Cloudbeds 用户则强调 易于使用,快速上手, 客户支持和培训, integrated all-in-one operations。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
+
易于使用,快速上手
▾
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
+
客户支持和培训
▾
|
|
+
客户服务与支持
▾
|
+
Integrated all-in-one operations
▾
|
|
+
集成与连接
▾
|
+
频道管理器和OTA同步
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
−
报告和分析深度
▾
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
−
预订编辑和工作流程灵活性
▾
|
|
−
移动和用户界面
▾
|
−
移动应用和通知
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #21 19 条评价 | #2 675 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 28 条评价 | #1 235 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 2 条评价 | #1 51 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 5 条评价 | #4 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #18 30 条评价 | #1 546 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #18 14 条评价 | #3 245 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 15 条评价 | #2 145 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 8 条评价 | #2 96 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 11 条评价 | #2 532 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 38 条评价 | #4 166 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #12 4 条评价 | #3 201 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #18 2 条评价 | #3 13 条评价 |
Choosing between Clock HMS by Clock and Cloudbeds HMS by Cloudbeds hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and operational needs. While both systems aim to streamline hotel management, they differ significantly in features, scalability, and user feedback, especially given Cloudbeds’ extensive market presence and larger review base. Do you prioritize a more specialized, user-friendly platform or a comprehensive, scalable solution with broader integrations?
Clock HMS offers a more focused, straightforward experience tailored for small to mid-sized hotels seeking simplicity, while Cloudbeds provides an all-in-one platform suited for growing properties with diverse needs. Which aligns better with your hotel’s current and future goals?
Both Clock and Cloudbeds aim to manage reservations, rates, invoicing, and guest communication, but Cloudbeds’ broader feature set and larger user base make it more resilient to evolving hotel needs. Clock emphasizes ease of use and quick onboarding, with a focus on core PMS functions, but has fewer features and integrations.
Cloudbeds boasts over 1,200 reviews and more recent feedback, reinforcing its standing and ongoing innovation, whereas Clock’s smaller review count and fewer recent comments mean less updated data. Are you looking for a system with proven scalability or one that’s simple to implement and operate?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, cloud-based PMS to replace manual operations without complexity, Clock is the better fit. It’s ideal for boutique hotels, hostels, and inns that want an easy-to-navigate system with quick support and essential features.
However, if your property requires a fully integrated platform that consolidates reservations, channel management, revenue, and guest experience—especially if you plan to scale—Cloudbeds is the more strategic choice. Its vast feature catalog and extensive partner network support complex operations and growth. For most hotels aiming for scalability, Cloudbeds’ broader capabilities outweigh Clock’s simplicity.
Clock HMS’s UI scores a 4.73/5, with users praising its straightforward navigation and ease of onboarding, especially for small teams. Reviews highlight that Clock’s support staff is responsive and helps users quickly adapt, making it a good choice for hotels wanting a quick deployment.
Cloudbeds, with a 4.58/5 ease-of-use rating, is also user-friendly but slightly less intuitive than Clock for absolute simplicity. Its interface is designed for scalability, which can introduce a slight learning curve for smaller hotels. Edge: Clock.
Clock offers 41 shared features plus 8 exclusive ones like point of sale, gift vouchers, and integrated ID scanners, focusing on core hotel operations. Cloudbeds, with 49 exclusive features and 41 shared, provides advanced tools including revenue management, multi-lingual support, online support, automated reporting, and a booking engine.
Cloudbeds’ extensive feature set supports more complex workflows and revenue strategies, making it more suitable for properties looking to automate and expand. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Clock’s support scores a 4.78/5, with many reviews mentioning quick, knowledgeable assistance and a responsive team. Users appreciate that support helps mitigate initial setup challenges, with comments like “support is excellent and queries are dealt with quickly.”
Cloudbeds’ ratings are lower at 4.38/5, with some users expressing frustration over slower response times and difficulties with technical support, especially during peak periods. While Cloudbeds offers extensive onboarding, Clock’s support consistently receives higher praise. Edge: Clock.
Clock features 111 verified partners, including notable integrations like hotel investor apps and profitroom, but has fewer overall than Cloudbeds’ 190 verified partners. Both platforms share 58 integrations, including key OTAs and revenue tools.
Cloudbeds’ broader network covers more external systems, POS, and advanced revenue tools, supporting larger or multi-operator properties. Its extensive partner ecosystem helps centralize operations more effectively. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Clock’s reviews are more recent, totaling 63 with a high 4.88/5 rating and 95% likelihood to recommend, primarily from boutique and small hotels. Users praise its simplicity and support, indicating strong satisfaction among small property managers.
Cloudbeds, with 1,219 reviews and a 4.62/5 rating, sees consistent positive feedback but has some noted issues with support responsiveness. Larger hotels and chains tend to favor Cloudbeds’ scalability. Since recent reviews favor Clock, it holds the edge for small properties prioritizing ease.
Clock charges a flat $600 monthly fee without additional implementation or per-room charges, with no free tier or trial. Cloudbeds costs $500 monthly, also without trial, but offers more features and integrations.
While Cloudbeds’ slight price advantage for larger portfolios is clear, the actual value depends on your property’s needs—more features in Cloudbeds justify its price for growing hotels. For small hotels seeking straightforward pricing, Clock’s flat fee might be appealing.
Not ideal if your hotel plans rapid expansion or needs advanced revenue tools, extensive integrations, or multi-property management.
Not ideal if your hotel is small and prefers a minimal, straightforward PMS without the need for extensive features or integrations.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, multi-functional platform with a large user base, making it suitable for hotels seeking to scale and automate operations. Its broad feature set and extensive integrations support complex workflows, but it can be more challenging for very small hotels to fully utilize.
Clock provides a more focused, easier-to-use system for small to medium properties that want core PMS functions with quick setup and excellent support, but it has fewer features and integrations. It’s ideal for boutique hotels, inns, and hostels prioritizing simplicity and rapid deployment.
Choose Clock if your hotel values ease, support, and straightforward functionality, especially if you’re not yet planning significant growth. Opt for Cloudbeds if you anticipate expansion, need automation, and want a truly integrated platform capable of handling multiple operations and property types.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 家政 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用程序 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 家政 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 客房服务手机应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班规划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放式磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 定价情报 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| SOC2投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 全天候在线支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| 销售点 |
我们分析了 10 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导... Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导和复杂功能支持。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分... 尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分用户认为现有报告功能不足,且难以从中获取全面的洞察。
用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态... 用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态运营和营销策略。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 系统因其直观易用、界面简洁、便于员工快速上手而广受好评,这不仅缩短了培训时间,也帮助酒店轻松上手。评论者普遍认为,这种简洁性有助于提高运营的... Cloudbeds 系统因其直观易用、界面简洁、便于员工快速上手而广受好评,这不仅缩短了培训时间,也帮助酒店轻松上手。评论者普遍认为,这种简洁性有助于提高运营的一致性,尤其对于规模较小的团队和多地点运营商而言更是如此。
用户普遍认为客服响应迅速、知识渊博且乐于助人,其中在线聊天和新手引导服务尤为突出。与此同时,也有不少用户希望问题能够更快得到解决,获得更多人工服务,以... 用户普遍认为客服响应迅速、知识渊博且乐于助人,其中在线聊天和新手引导服务尤为突出。与此同时,也有不少用户希望问题能够更快得到解决,获得更多人工服务,以及更完善的产品内培训或针对新房源或复杂房源设置的专门指导。
A central theme is that Cloudbeds replaces multiple disconnected tools by combining PMS, channel management, booking engine, payments, guest data, and... A central theme is that Cloudbeds replaces multiple disconnected tools by combining PMS, channel management, booking engine, payments, guest data, and other workflows in one system. Buyers value this because it cuts manual work, improves coordination, and lets staff spend more time on guests instead of system juggling.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
许多评论者赞赏 Cloudbeds 提供的全面运营和财务报告,这些报告能够支持管理决策、入住率跟踪和收入监管。然而,他们也经常要求提供更多定制化功能、更快的下载... 许多评论者赞赏 Cloudbeds 提供的全面运营和财务报告,这些报告能够支持管理决策、入住率跟踪和收入监管。然而,他们也经常要求提供更多定制化功能、更快的下载速度、更完善的仪表盘和更清晰的财务视图,尤其是在会计核算、多物业管理或多币种需求方面。
用户喜欢拆分预订、更改未来日期、更改房间以及集中式预订管理等功能,但他们也指出,当编辑操作变得复杂或需要点击次数过多时,会造成不便。许多评论都要求改进... 用户喜欢拆分预订、更改未来日期、更改房间以及集中式预订管理等功能,但他们也指出,当编辑操作变得复杂或需要点击次数过多时,会造成不便。许多评论都要求改进拖放操作的安全性、更灵活的拆分预订功能、更完善的账单管理以及更清晰的紧急操作变更控制。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock HMS 和 Cloudbeds HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock HMS 提供 110 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Cloudbeds HMS 提供 200 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock HMS:否。Cloudbeds HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 80,Cloudbeds 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案