The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,493 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Clock 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Tablet/Kiosk Check-in and Guest App.
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 intuitiveness and ease of use 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
在分析了 1,493 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, 客户服务与支持,而 Cloudbeds 用户则强调 intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
+
客户服务与支持
▾
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
|
+
集成与连接
▾
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
−
货币兑换和金融业务
▾
|
|
−
移动和用户界面
▾
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #21 19 条评价 | #2 675 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 28 条评价 | #1 235 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 2 条评价 | #1 51 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 5 条评价 | #4 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #18 30 条评价 | #1 546 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #18 14 条评价 | #3 245 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 15 条评价 | #2 145 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 8 条评价 | #2 96 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 11 条评价 | #2 532 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 38 条评价 | #4 166 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #12 4 条评价 | #3 201 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #18 2 条评价 | #3 13 条评价 |
Choosing between Clock HMS by Clock and Cloudbeds HMS by Cloudbeds hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and operational needs. While both systems aim to streamline hotel management, they differ significantly in features, scalability, and user feedback, especially given Cloudbeds’ extensive market presence and larger review base. Do you prioritize a more specialized, user-friendly platform or a comprehensive, scalable solution with broader integrations?
Clock HMS offers a more focused, straightforward experience tailored for small to mid-sized hotels seeking simplicity, while Cloudbeds provides an all-in-one platform suited for growing properties with diverse needs. Which aligns better with your hotel’s current and future goals?
Both Clock and Cloudbeds aim to manage reservations, rates, invoicing, and guest communication, but Cloudbeds’ broader feature set and larger user base make it more resilient to evolving hotel needs. Clock emphasizes ease of use and quick onboarding, with a focus on core PMS functions, but has fewer features and integrations.
Cloudbeds boasts over 1,200 reviews and more recent feedback, reinforcing its standing and ongoing innovation, whereas Clock’s smaller review count and fewer recent comments mean less updated data. Are you looking for a system with proven scalability or one that’s simple to implement and operate?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, cloud-based PMS to replace manual operations without complexity, Clock is the better fit. It’s ideal for boutique hotels, hostels, and inns that want an easy-to-navigate system with quick support and essential features.
However, if your property requires a fully integrated platform that consolidates reservations, channel management, revenue, and guest experience—especially if you plan to scale—Cloudbeds is the more strategic choice. Its vast feature catalog and extensive partner network support complex operations and growth. For most hotels aiming for scalability, Cloudbeds’ broader capabilities outweigh Clock’s simplicity.
Clock HMS’s UI scores a 4.73/5, with users praising its straightforward navigation and ease of onboarding, especially for small teams. Reviews highlight that Clock’s support staff is responsive and helps users quickly adapt, making it a good choice for hotels wanting a quick deployment.
Cloudbeds, with a 4.58/5 ease-of-use rating, is also user-friendly but slightly less intuitive than Clock for absolute simplicity. Its interface is designed for scalability, which can introduce a slight learning curve for smaller hotels. Edge: Clock.
Clock offers 41 shared features plus 8 exclusive ones like point of sale, gift vouchers, and integrated ID scanners, focusing on core hotel operations. Cloudbeds, with 49 exclusive features and 41 shared, provides advanced tools including revenue management, multi-lingual support, online support, automated reporting, and a booking engine.
Cloudbeds’ extensive feature set supports more complex workflows and revenue strategies, making it more suitable for properties looking to automate and expand. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Clock’s support scores a 4.78/5, with many reviews mentioning quick, knowledgeable assistance and a responsive team. Users appreciate that support helps mitigate initial setup challenges, with comments like “support is excellent and queries are dealt with quickly.”
Cloudbeds’ ratings are lower at 4.38/5, with some users expressing frustration over slower response times and difficulties with technical support, especially during peak periods. While Cloudbeds offers extensive onboarding, Clock’s support consistently receives higher praise. Edge: Clock.
Clock features 111 verified partners, including notable integrations like hotel investor apps and profitroom, but has fewer overall than Cloudbeds’ 190 verified partners. Both platforms share 58 integrations, including key OTAs and revenue tools.
Cloudbeds’ broader network covers more external systems, POS, and advanced revenue tools, supporting larger or multi-operator properties. Its extensive partner ecosystem helps centralize operations more effectively. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Clock’s reviews are more recent, totaling 63 with a high 4.88/5 rating and 95% likelihood to recommend, primarily from boutique and small hotels. Users praise its simplicity and support, indicating strong satisfaction among small property managers.
Cloudbeds, with 1,219 reviews and a 4.62/5 rating, sees consistent positive feedback but has some noted issues with support responsiveness. Larger hotels and chains tend to favor Cloudbeds’ scalability. Since recent reviews favor Clock, it holds the edge for small properties prioritizing ease.
Clock charges a flat $600 monthly fee without additional implementation or per-room charges, with no free tier or trial. Cloudbeds costs $500 monthly, also without trial, but offers more features and integrations.
While Cloudbeds’ slight price advantage for larger portfolios is clear, the actual value depends on your property’s needs—more features in Cloudbeds justify its price for growing hotels. For small hotels seeking straightforward pricing, Clock’s flat fee might be appealing.
Not ideal if your hotel plans rapid expansion or needs advanced revenue tools, extensive integrations, or multi-property management.
Not ideal if your hotel is small and prefers a minimal, straightforward PMS without the need for extensive features or integrations.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, multi-functional platform with a large user base, making it suitable for hotels seeking to scale and automate operations. Its broad feature set and extensive integrations support complex workflows, but it can be more challenging for very small hotels to fully utilize.
Clock provides a more focused, easier-to-use system for small to medium properties that want core PMS functions with quick setup and excellent support, but it has fewer features and integrations. It’s ideal for boutique hotels, inns, and hostels prioritizing simplicity and rapid deployment.
Choose Clock if your hotel values ease, support, and straightforward functionality, especially if you’re not yet planning significant growth. Opt for Cloudbeds if you anticipate expansion, need automation, and want a truly integrated platform capable of handling multiple operations and property types.
我们分析了 10 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导... Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导和复杂功能支持。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分... 尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分用户认为现有报告功能不足,且难以从中获取全面的洞察。
用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态... 用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态运营和营销策略。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
人们注意到货币转换的准确性存在问题,尤其是在多币种交易中。用户反映存在一些差异,影响了对账流程。改进货币转换配置可以简化财务管理。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock HMS 和 Cloudbeds HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock HMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Cloudbeds HMS 提供 189 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock HMS:否。Cloudbeds HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 79,Cloudbeds 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问