The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 93 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Clock 表现出色 在 ease of use and accessibility 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Payment Requests.
HotelRunner 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Revenue Management Module.
基于 HTR 上 93 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 79 | 14 |
在分析了 93 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, 客户服务与支持,而 HotelRunner 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务与支持
▾
|
|
|
+
集成与连接
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
移动和用户界面
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #21 19 条评价 | #26 7 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 28 条评价 | #25 1 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #17 2 条评价 | #18 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 5 条评价 | #23 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #18 30 条评价 | #20 11 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #18 14 条评价 | #24 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 15 条评价 | #30 0 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 8 条评价 | #30 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 11 条评价 | #27 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 38 条评价 | #22 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #12 4 条评价 | #16 1 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #18 2 条评价 | #2 6 条评价 |
Your hotel management software choice revolves around balancing features, ease of use, support, and value. Both Clock HMS and HotelRunner HMS aim to streamline operations, but their core strengths and customer feedback differ significantly. Clock offers a more feature-rich, mature platform with a larger global presence, while HotelRunner emphasizes simplicity and online visibility. Which platform better aligns with your hotel's priorities?
Both Clock HMS and HotelRunner HMS serve as all-in-one solutions to manage reservations, rates, and guest interactions, but they diverge in scope and depth. Clock’s platform is a comprehensive PMS with extensive features such as automated reminders, guest messaging, and integrated POS, supported by a broad partner network. HotelRunner, by contrast, integrates mainly reservation and online visibility tools, with fewer specialized features. Do you need an all-encompassing management system or a platform focused on online presence?
Clock's large feature set supports complex operations, while HotelRunner’s streamlined interface may appeal if your hotel prefers simplicity. Clock has a more established reputation and more recent reviews, indicating its ongoing development and customer satisfaction. Are your hotel’s needs better served by a feature-heavy system or a more straightforward platform?
If your hotel needs a robust, all-in-one property management system capable of handling reservations, invoicing, housekeeping, guest messaging, and integrations, Clock is the clear choice. Its extensive feature list (37 unique features) and high review count (63 reviews, with 5 in the past 6 months) demonstrate its maturity and continuous improvement.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes online visibility, website development, or basic reservation management, HotelRunner may suffice. Its focus on revenue management and online tools, plus a simpler interface, might better suit boutique or city hotels with less complex operations. Given the recent reviews and a perfect overall rating, Clock’s larger user base and recent activity make it the stronger recommendation.
Clock garners a slightly higher UI/UX rating (4.73/5 vs HotelRunner’s 4.64/5), supported by reviews praising its straightforward navigation and support during onboarding. Users report that Clock’s interface is intuitive, with good support services that help overcome initial setup challenges. HotelRunner’s interface is also user-friendly, especially for small hotels, but users mention that the mobile app needs more functionality.
Given the recent review activity and higher overall rating, Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock features 37 functionalities exclusive to its platform, including digital registration, online check-in/out, guest app, automated reminders, centralized messaging, and integrated ID scanner. HotelRunner offers only 3 unique features, mainly website development, native email marketing, and revenue management modules.
If your hotel needs advanced capabilities like guest profiles, automated tasks, and integrated POS, Clock is the clear winner. Its wide feature set aligns with larger or more operationally complex hotels. Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock’s support ratings (4.78/5) and recent reviews highlight quick, efficient responses and ongoing support improvements, with some users praising the team’s responsiveness. Many reviewers note that Clock’s support staff are attentive during onboarding and system issues, although a few mention occasional lag in resolving more complex queries.
HotelRunner’s support scores (4.5/5) are good, but reviews emphasize room for growth in training quality and responsiveness. Review quotes from HotelRunner users say, “Customer service is always ready for communication,” but with fewer recent reviews, confidence in support is slightly lower. Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock boasts 111 verified partners, including key integrations with OTAs, CRS, and payment systems, with notable exclusive partners like Profitroom and RevControl. HotelRunner has 17 verified partners, focusing on online distribution channels like Airbnb, Expedia, and Agoda, with some integrations in revenue management and website tools.
If your hotel relies on a broad ecosystem of integrations, Clock’s extensive partner network provides more options and flexibility. Its verified integrations with major OTAs and systems make it the better choice. Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock has earned a strong reputation, with a 4.88/5 overall rating based on 63 reviews, and recent feedback confirms continued satisfaction. Hotelier reviews highlight Clock’s ease of use, excellent support, and impact on revenue, especially from boutique and independent hotels.
HotelRunner, with a 5/5 rating from 14 reviews, appeals mainly to boutique hotels and city hotels, but the smaller review volume and less recent data create less confidence. Given the review activity and higher ratings, Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock is priced at a $600 monthly fee, with no freemium options, implementation fees, or trial info. HotelRunner costs $100 per month, also without trial or additional fees.
While Clock’s higher price reflects its extensive feature set, it offers greater control and customization. HotelRunner’s lower price makes it appealing for smaller hotels or those with simpler needs, but fewer advanced features. Consider your operational complexity when evaluating value.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Clock HMS offers a mature, extensive platform tailored for hotels with complex needs, offering 37 exclusive features and a large partner network. Its recent reviews and higher overall rating make it a safe bet for hotels seeking detailed management tools and seamless integrations.
HotelRunner is a solid, less costly option for boutique or city hotels emphasizing online presence, basic reservation management, and cost-efficiency. Its simpler interface and niche focus suit hotels prioritizing marketing and online visibility over extensive operational features.
Choose Clock if your hotel needs a complete, scalable system capable of handling complex operations and integrations. Opt for HotelRunner if your focus is on online visibility, revenue, and straightforward management at a lower price point.
In conclusion, for hotels ready to invest in a proven, feature-rich PMS, Clock HMS is the clear leader. Hotels seeking a more accessible, online-focused platform should consider HotelRunner, but keep in mind its narrower scope and smaller recent review base.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Clock HMS 和 HotelRunner HMS 共享 12 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 28 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导... Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导和复杂功能支持。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分... 尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分用户认为现有报告功能不足,且难以从中获取全面的洞察。
用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态... 用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态运营和营销策略。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Clock HMS 和 HotelRunner HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock HMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HotelRunner HMS 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock HMS:否。HotelRunner HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 79,HotelRunner 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问