The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 80 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Clock 表现出色 在 ease of use and accessibility 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Tablet/Kiosk Check-in and Guest App.
Revivo Technologies 表现出色 在 ROI and onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
基于 HTR 上 80 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 79 | 1 |
在分析了 80 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, 客户服务与支持,而 Revivo Technologies 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务与支持
▾
|
|
|
+
集成与连接
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
移动和用户界面
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #21 19 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 28 条评价 | #39 1 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #17 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #18 30 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #18 14 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 15 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 8 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 11 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 38 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #12 4 条评价 | #20 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | #18 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Clock HMS by Clock and Hotelx HMS by Revivo Technologies hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, regional focus, and growth ambitions. Both platforms aim to streamline hotel management, but they approach the challenge differently. Clock’s more established presence and extensive feature set make it a solid choice for hotels needing proven reliability and integrations. Conversely, Revivo’s newer, AI-driven platform offers innovative insights but has fewer reviews and integrations. How do these differences impact your decision?
Clock HMS and Hotelx HMS are both hotel management systems designed to improve operational efficiency and guest experiences. Clock’s platform emphasizes comprehensive features like reservations, rates, invoicing, and restaurant POS, all integrated into one system with a global presence. Hotelx, in contrast, focuses heavily on real-time data synchronization and AI-based insights, primarily targeting growth and automation. While Clock has a more mature ecosystem with over 111 integrations and 63 reviews, Hotelx’s recent launch means it has limited user feedback and fewer integrations.
Clock’s reviews highlight its ease of use, support, and extensive feature set, making it suitable for hotels seeking a reliable, all-in-one management tool. Hotelx is appealing if your hotel prioritizes data-driven decision-making and innovative automation, especially if you're open to newer platforms. Given the recent reviews and broader adoption, Clock is currently the more dependable choice for most hotels. Do you need proven stability and vast integration options, or are you exploring cutting-edge automation?
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich system with proven reliability, go with Clock HMS. Its 63 reviews in the last six months and high overall rating of 4.88/5 demonstrate consistent positive experiences, especially regarding ease of use and support. Hotels seeking extensive integrations—over 111 verified partners—will benefit from Clock’s broad ecosystem, including OTAs, CRM, and revenue management tools.
On the other hand, if your hotel is in a growth phase, especially in India or regions where AI-driven insights are valued, Hotelx HMS could be a fit. Its focus on real-time data synchronization and automation features might help scale operations quickly. However, with only one review and no verified integrations, Hotelx’s offering remains less tested.
For most hotels, especially those that value proven performance, Clock’s more established reputation makes it the preferred option. Are you looking for a tried-and-true platform or willing to explore a newer, AI-enabled system?
Clock HMS’s UI has a solid 4.73/5 rating, praised for its straightforward navigation and ease of use. The onboarding process is well-rated at 4.71/5, and users describe the system as intuitive despite initial setup complexity. Support responsiveness and functionality are frequently highlighted as strengths, with reviews mentioning that the interface supports staff adoption across the hotel.
Hotelx HMS scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, emphasizing its user experience and simplified data management. However, with fewer reviews, it’s harder to gauge real-world onboarding and staff adaptation. Given Clock’s more extensive user feedback and consistent ratings, it edges out Hotelx for ease of use at this stage.
Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock offers a broader set of features, with 32 shared features and an additional 17 exclusive to it. Unique capabilities include RevPaR & ADR reports, multi-lingual support, tablet check-in, integrated ID scanners, guest app, housekeeping mobile app, shift planning, automated assignments, ancillary revenue tracking, and compliance certifications like PCI and GDPR.
Hotelx provides key features such as real-time data integration and all-in-one reporting but lacks the extensive suite of operational tools Clock offers. It is focused more on automation and data insights rather than the comprehensive operational modules Clock provides.
Given the feature count and maturity, Clock’s extensive capabilities give it an edge for hotels needing a full management suite. Do you prioritize a wide range of operational features, or are you focusing on growth and automation?
Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock’s support score is 4.78/5, with many reviewers citing quick, knowledgeable assistance. Comments include appreciation for the support team’s responsiveness and ongoing updates that improve usability over time.
Hotelx scores a perfect 5/5, but with only one review, its support reputation is less established. The limited feedback prevents a definitive comparison, but the absence of broader user insights makes Clock’s support more reliably verified.
Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock boasts 111 verified integration partners, including OTAs, revenue management, CRM, and keyless access providers like Curacity, Bookboost, and HQ Revenue. Its extensive ecosystem allows seamless connections that streamline daily operations and guest management.
Hotelx currently has no verified integrations, which limits its interoperability with other systems. For hotels relying on a broad array of third-party tools, Clock’s integration strength is a significant advantage.
Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with a 4.88/5 rating based on 63 reviews. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and feature set across various hotel types, especially boutique hotels and independents, with an average rating of 4.83/5 from 41 reviews.
Hotelx, lacking reviews and only rated by one hotel, does not have enough data to compare. The recent, high ratings for Clock make it the more trusted choice among hoteliers.
Edge: Clock HMS.
Both products are priced at a base of $600 per month, with no freemium, implementation fees, or per-room charges. Pricing is straightforward, but additional costs for add-ons or integrations may vary depending on your setup.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Clock HMS is a well-established, feature-rich platform with a proven track record, extensive integrations, and high user ratings. Its broad ecosystem and support make it the safer choice for most hotels seeking reliability and operational depth.
Hotelx offers innovative AI-driven insights and real-time data synchronization, making it appealing for forward-looking hotels, especially in growth markets. However, limited reviews and integrations mean it is less tested in real-world operations.
For most hotels, especially those prioritizing proven stability, Clock is the clear choice. If your hotel is in a growth phase with a focus on automation and data insights, Hotelx might be worth exploring, but be prepared for a less mature ecosystem.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Clock HMS 和 Hotelx HMS (by Revivo) 共享 32 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 访客应用程序 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 12 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导... Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导和复杂功能支持。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分... 尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分用户认为现有报告功能不足,且难以从中获取全面的洞察。
用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态... 用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态运营和营销策略。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock HMS 和 Hotelx HMS (by Revivo) 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock HMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hotelx HMS (by Revivo) 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Hotelx HMS (by Revivo) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock HMS:否。Hotelx HMS (by Revivo):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 79,Revivo Technologies 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问