The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 79 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, 客户服务与支持,而 Slique 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务与支持
▾
|
|
|
+
集成与连接
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
移动和用户界面
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #21 19 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 28 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #17 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #18 30 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #18 14 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 15 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 8 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 11 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 38 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #12 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #18 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Clock HMS by Clock and sliQue GRM by Slique hinges on your hotel’s operational complexity and technological needs. Both aim to streamline processes, but Clock offers a comprehensive hotel management system with extensive features, while sliQue’s platform leans toward automation and data analytics tailored more for property management beyond hotels. With your priorities in mind, which one aligns better with your operational goals?
Clock provides a unified, feature-rich PMS designed specifically for hotels, while sliQue’s platform integrates robotics, IoT, and data analytics, primarily targeting property managers. Are you seeking an all-in-one hotel system with proven support and integrations, or a future-proof automation hub with advanced insights?
If your hotel needs a robust PMS capable of managing reservations, rates, invoicing, housekeeping, guest messaging, and online check-in, Clock is the superior choice. It is built specifically for hospitality, supports integrations like booking engines and channel managers, and boasts a 4.88/5 overall rating from 63 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its ease of use and support.
In contrast, sliQue’s platform, primarily designed for property and real estate management, has a zero rating from hotel industry users, and no recent hotel-specific reviews. It’s tailored more toward automating real estate workflows than hotel operations, making it less suitable for your team’s immediate hotel management needs.
The key difference: Clock’s hotel-centric features and strong user reviews make it the clear choice for your hotel. Slique’s platform, while innovative, doesn’t currently demonstrate the hotel-specific reliability or industry presence you require.
If your hotel needs a dedicated property management system with extensive features, go with Clock. Its suite of 44 features—including booking engine, multi-currency support, POS, guest feedback, and analytics—is proven to improve operational efficiency and guest experience for boutique, city center, and independent hotels.
However, if your property is more focused on real estate management, tenant operations, or automating building systems, sliQue’s DataBarn platform is better suited. It excels in connecting IoT devices, automating workflows, and providing data analytics for property managers rather than hospitality-specific tasks.
Your hotel’s decision should hinge on your core operational focus: hospitality or property management. Clock’s hotel-specific design and recent, positive reviews make it the safer, more proven choice for hoteliers seeking a comprehensive PMS.
Clock scores highly on ease of use, with a 4.73/5 rating based on 63 reviews. Users frequently praise its straightforward interface, easy navigation, and quick onboarding, with comments like “The usability throughout the company saves us a lot of time” and “The system speeds up operations during busy periods.”
Slique has no hotel-specific reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its user experience within the hotel industry. Its platform is more geared toward property management and automation, which may involve a steeper learning curve for hotel staff unfamiliar with IoT or data analytics.
Edge: Clock, given its high usability score, recent positive reviews, and proven hotel-specific interface.
Clock boasts 44 unique features tailored for hotel operations, including booking engine, multi-currency, channel management, POS, guest feedback, rate shopping, online check-in/out, and integrated payment solutions. These features directly address common hotel needs, facilitating reservations, billing, housekeeping, guest communication, and revenue management.
Slique’s platform, DataBarn, is a broader automation and IoT hub with no hotel-specific features listed. It focuses on robotics, automation, and analytics for real estate and business operations, lacking the specialized hotel functionalities found in Clock.
Edge: Clock, with its extensive suite of hotel management features designed for hospitality professionals.
Clock’s support scores 4.78/5 from users, with recent reviews emphasizing responsive, knowledgeable assistance that helps hotels navigate setup and ongoing issues. Feedback such as “The support team is excellent and resolves queries quickly” underscores its reliability.
Slique provides no publicly available customer support ratings or recent reviews from hotel clients, making it impossible to assess its support quality in this context. Given the critical nature of support in hotel operations, Clock’s proven track record offers more confidence.
Edge: Clock, due to its high support ratings and positive recent reviews from hotel users.
Clock integrates with 111 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment processors, CRM, and revenue management tools. Its open API and extensive partner network enable hotels to connect essential systems without extra fees, streamlining operations and data consistency.
Slique has only one verified integration with Oracle Hospitality, indicating a very limited ecosystem. Its platform is designed more for automation and device control than hotel-specific system integration.
Edge: Clock, with a broad, validated ecosystem that enhances operational flexibility.
Clock’s hotel users consistently rate it 4.88/5, based on 63 reviews, with recent feedback confirming its ease of use, support, and feature set. Hotels of various sizes, especially boutique and city center, appreciate its ability to streamline daily operations and increase revenue.
Slique has no hotel-specific reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction in the hospitality context. Its platform appears more targeted at property management or automation for real estate owners.
Edge: Clock, backed by a larger, recent, and positive review base from hotel clients.
Clock’s pricing starts at $600/month, with no implementation or additional fees, reflecting a straightforward subscription model. Its pricing is transparent and tailored for small to mid-sized hotels seeking a comprehensive PMS.
Slique’s platform pricing is not publicly disclosed, and it is primarily marketed toward businesses with automation and IoT needs outside hospitality. Its value proposition centers on integration and analytics rather than fixed hotel management costs.
Given the available data, Clock offers a clear, predictable pricing structure suitable for hotels.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Clock stands out as the more suitable choice for hotels due to its dedicated, feature-rich PMS and strong industry reputation. It is built for hospitality, with recent reviews confirming its ease of use, support, and operational impact.
Choose Clock if you value a proven, hotel-specific platform that enhances daily operations, revenue, and guest experience. Its extensive integrations, support, and positive user feedback make it the clear leader in hotel management software.
Slique’s platform, while innovative for automation and property management at scale, is better suited for property owners and managers outside the hotel industry. Its limited hotel-specific features and lack of recent reviews from hoteliers make it less reliable for your needs.
In summary, Clock offers the reliability, features, and support your hotel requires to operate efficiently today and adapt to future demands. Slique’s platform is promising but currently better aligned with broader property management or automation projects outside hospitality.
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导... Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导和复杂功能支持。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分... 尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分用户认为现有报告功能不足,且难以从中获取全面的洞察。
用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态... 用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态运营和营销策略。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock HMS 和 sliQue GRM 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock HMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 sliQue GRM 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock HMS:否。sliQue GRM:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 79,Slique 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问