The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #17 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Clock PMS by Clock and GRAND PMS by GRAND hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and your team's priorities. Both products aim to simplify property management, but Clock PMS offers a more comprehensive, feature-rich platform with a larger user base and recent reviews, making it the more data-backed choice. Meanwhile, GRAND positions itself as a modern, AI-driven solution, but with no reviews or customer ratings to validate its claims yet.
Your goal is to find a PMS that integrates smoothly into your workflows, enhances guest experiences, and offers reliable support. Given the current review landscape and feature set, which system best aligns with your hotel’s size, segment, and growth plans?
Clock PMS and GRAND PMS cater to different hotel profiles, with Clock boasting over 250 reviews and a 4.8/5 rating, reflecting widespread adoption and recent positive feedback. GRAND, still relatively new and with no reviews, lacks the validation of real user experiences, making it harder to gauge its reliability or user satisfaction.
Clock offers extensive functionalities, including reservations, rates, invoicing, front desk, housekeeping, guest messaging, and integration with booking channels, all supported by a dedicated support team. GRAND claims to unify bookings, housekeeping, billing, and event management through an AI-powered platform, emphasizing automation and collaboration. While Clock’s strengths lie in proven, feature-rich operations, GRAND markets itself as a forward-thinking, simplified solution—yet without current user data, its actual performance remains an open question.
Are you willing to adopt a system with proven success and a large community or explore a newer platform promising AI-driven innovation?
If your hotel needs a mature, reliable property management system with a proven track record and extensive integrations, go with Clock PMS. It suits hotels of various sizes, especially those looking for a robust, all-in-one platform that handles reservations, invoicing, channel management, and guest engagement, with a strong focus on automating daily operations.
If your team values modern, AI-driven tools that promise to streamline operations and reduce manual work, but you’re okay with limited user feedback so far, GRAND might appeal. It’s targeted at hotels and venues seeking seamless collaboration and automation, especially those planning to innovate quickly.
In summary, choose Clock if stability, proven features, and user support are your priorities. Opt for GRAND if you prefer exploring cutting-edge AI solutions and are comfortable with limited validation.
Clock PMS earns a high ease-of-use rating of 4.78/5, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, simple onboarding, and minimal training time. Users highlight how Clock’s design makes it straightforward for staff to learn and operate daily tasks effectively, even during busy periods.
GRAND, however, has no reviews or user ratings, leaving its usability unverified. Its interface is described as “intuitive,” but without customer feedback, it’s uncertain whether hotel staff will find it as user-friendly as Clock.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS features over 44 exclusive functionalities, including integrated CRS, revenue management, guest profiles, digital registration, mobile app, automated space optimization, and real-time reporting. It also covers payment processing, EPoS, group management, multi-currency, and gift vouchers—features that often come at an extra cost or are unavailable in simpler systems.
GRAND touts AI-powered automation, event management, proposals, and cross-department collaboration, but the platform lacks detailed feature counts or specifics. Its claims for simplifying operations are promising, but without a comparable feature list or user reviews, it’s difficult to judge.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS is rated 4.75/5 for customer support, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness, helpfulness, and proactive communication. Users appreciate the prompt assistance during onboarding and ongoing issues, citing support as a key reason for continued loyalty.
GRAND offers no reviews or support ratings, so its support quality remains unverified. As a new product, it’s unclear whether it can match Clock’s proven, high-quality customer service.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS integrates with 111 verified partners, including leading hotel tech solutions like Curacity, Profitroom, Bookboost, and REVControl, providing extensive connectivity across channels, revenue management, and guest engagement tools. These integrations are a significant advantage for hotels seeking a flexible, connected system.
GRAND, on the other hand, has no verified integrations, which could limit its ability to connect with your existing or future software ecosystem. While the platform may develop more partnerships over time, currently Clock offers a clear edge.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS’s 251 recent reviews average a 4.8/5 rating, with users from varied hotel segments—independent, boutique, city center, hostels—highly praising its usability, support, and features. Hotels report significant time savings and operational improvements, with a 95% likelihood to recommend.
GRAND, lacking reviews and ratings, cannot be compared directly. Its absence of user feedback makes it impossible to determine how hoteliers perceive its value or performance.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS charges a flat base fee of $600 per month, with no hidden costs or additional implementation fees, making it transparent and predictable. There’s no freemium or trial, but the clear pricing aligns with its extensive feature set.
GRAND’s pricing is listed at $900 per month, also without trial or implementation fees. However, without user feedback or detailed feature pricing, it’s hard to assess whether the higher cost provides proportional value.
Not ideal if your hotel is a very small operation with minimal tech needs or if you prefer a lightweight solution.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers proven, extensively tested systems with a large existing user base or if you need immediate, validated support and integrations.
Clock PMS stands out as a mature, proven system with a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and high user satisfaction. Its strong support, ease of use, and recent positive reviews make it a reliable choice for hotels seeking operational stability and growth.
GRAND PMS positions itself as an innovative, AI-focused platform that promises future benefits. However, with no user reviews or proven track record, it remains a riskier investment, more suitable for hotels eager to experiment with new technology and willing to accept the uncertainty.
In conclusion, if your hotel values proven performance, extensive features, and reliable support, Clock PMS is the recommended choice. If you’re seeking to pioneer AI-driven automation and are comfortable with limited validation, GRAND might be worth exploring once reviews and case studies become available.
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 GRAND PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 GRAND PMS 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。GRAND PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84,GRAND 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问