The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Jazhotel |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Jazhotel |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Jazhotel |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #17 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right Property Management System (PMS) is pivotal for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Clock PMS and Jazhotel aim to streamline your daily tasks, but they diverge significantly in their maturity, feature set, and market presence. While Jazhotel is relatively unknown with no recent reviews or verified integrations, Clock PMS boasts a strong track record, extensive features, and a large, positive review base.
Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a proven, feature-rich system or are still exploring less established options. Do you need a reliable, widely adopted platform, or are you open to trying a newer, less tested alternative?
Clock PMS and Jazhotel both serve the core function of managing hotel operations, but Clock’s comprehensive suite of features and recent reviews give it a distinct advantage. Clock offers reservations, rates, invoicing, front desk, housekeeping, guest messaging, booking engine, and more—everything you need to run a hotel efficiently. Jazhotel, with no verified features or recent reviews, appears to lack the depth and proven capability that Clock provides.
Where Clock’s 251 reviews over recent months and a 4.8/5 overall rating demonstrate solid user confidence, Jazhotel remains unreviewed, making it impossible to gauge real-world performance. Are you willing to risk an untested solution over a proven platform?
If your hotel needs a mature, reliable PMS with extensive integrations, automation, and a track record of customer satisfaction, go with Clock. It’s ideal for hotels seeking an all-in-one solution with proven support, feature depth, and regional coverage across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.
If, however, your hotel is small, experimental, or just starting to explore PMS options without a critical need for proven integrations or large-scale features, Jazhotel might be worth a trial. But keep in mind, the absence of reviews or verified integrations raises risks about its capability and support.
Clock PMS scores a high 4.78/5 in ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process, which simplifies staff training. Its customer support rating of 4.75/5 also indicates strong assistance when needed, helping your team adopt the system smoothly.
In contrast, Jazhotel has no publicly available review data regarding usability, onboarding, or support, leaving its user-friendliness unverified. Based on what we know, the edge clearly goes to Clock.
Clock’s feature set is extensive, with 58 unique functionalities including payment processing, booking engine, channel management, revenue management, guest profiles, integrated CRS, and housekeeping modules. It also offers advanced features like digital registration, guest messaging, real-time reporting, and native mobile apps.
Jazhotel’s feature count is unreported, and it has no verified integrations or unique modules. This absence suggests it may lack the depth necessary for comprehensive hotel management. Therefore, Clock’s feature richness and proven capabilities give it a clear edge here.
Clock PMS’s support scores 4.75/5, with recent reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses and proactive assistance. Users report that Clock’s support team is responsive and committed to resolving issues swiftly, which is crucial when managing hotel operations.
Jazhotel’s customer support and onboarding ratings are unreported, making it impossible to assess its support quality. Given the data, Clock’s support system is definitively stronger.
Clock boasts 111 verified partners, including hotel-specific solutions such as Curacity, Hotel Investor Apps, and Profitroom. These integrations span revenue management, digital marketing, keyless access, and more, allowing your hotel to customize and expand its capabilities.
Jazhotel has no verified integrations or listed partners, limiting its flexibility and potential for future growth. For a hotel that depends on a broad ecosystem, Clock’s integrations provide a significant advantage.
Clock’s recent reviews showcase a 4.8/5 rating with 251 reviews, predominantly from independent, boutique, and city-center hotels. Hoteliers emphasize its ease of use, operational efficiency, and support, with one noting, “Switching from Micros Opera, the workflow is much easier.”
Jazhotel has no reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to assess hotel satisfaction. The clear choice is Clock, backed by recent, positive feedback from real users.
Clock’s pricing starts at $600/month, with no trial, freemium, or hidden fees reported. It’s a flat monthly rate, making costs predictable for your budgeting.
Jazhotel’s pricing details are unavailable, which raises questions about its affordability, value, and whether there are additional charges or hidden fees. Based on available data, Clock offers transparent, predictable pricing.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, just starting out, or not ready to invest in a mature PMS solution. Also, if your hotel primarily operates in regions without Clock’s coverage, this might pose challenges.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on integrations, automation, or proven features to support daily operations. Also, if your hotel needs reliable support and robust reporting, Jazhotel’s unverified status may be a drawback.
Clock PMS is the clear leader, offering a comprehensive, well-supported, and highly rated system with extensive features and integrations. Its 251 recent reviews and high scores demonstrate a track record of customer satisfaction and operational success.
Jazhotel, with no recent reviews or verified integrations, remains unproven. It might suit small, experimental setups but doesn’t match the robustness and reliability of Clock for serious hotel operations.
If your hotel demands proven technology, extensive capabilities, and solid support, Clock PMS is the recommended choice. For hotels willing to explore untested options without critical reliance on integrations or support, Jazhotel could be a trial candidate—but with considerable risk.
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 Jazhotel 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Jazhotel 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。Jazhotel:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84,Jazhotel 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问