The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 328 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Clock 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Revenue management module.
KrossBooking 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 328 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 328 | 0 |
在分析了 328 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 功能丰富, 运营效率, 响应式支持和定期更新,而 KrossBooking 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
功能丰富
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
响应式支持和定期更新
▾
|
|
|
+
易于培训使用
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误消息
▾
|
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #17 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Clock PMS and KrossBooking hinges on your hotel’s needs for a comprehensive management system. While both aim to streamline operations, Clock PMS offers a broad suite of features backed by substantial user reviews, whereas KrossBooking remains less documented and lacks recent user feedback. Your decision should focus on whether you prioritize an all-in-one platform with proven reliability or a more nascent system with uncertain support and integrations.
Clock PMS excels in delivering a feature-rich property management system, mainly favored for its ease of use, support, and extensive integrations. KrossBooking, on the other hand, appears to be less established with no recent reviews or verified partners, making it harder to gauge its effectiveness. Do you want a trusted, well-reviewed system or are you willing to explore a less proven option?
Both Clock PMS and KrossBooking are designed to enhance operational efficiency, but Clock PMS’s long-standing presence and 251 reviews provide a clearer picture of performance. Clock offers a wide scope of features—including booking, rates, invoicing, channel management, and guest messaging—integrated into one platform, with positive reviews emphasizing its time-saving capabilities. KrossBooking’s lack of recent reviews and absence of verified integrations make its performance and support less transparent.
While Clock PMS has a 4.8 out of 5 rating and recent feedback from users praising its reliability and customer service, KrossBooking remains unreviewed in recent months, raising questions about ongoing support and development. If your hotel values a system with proven reliability and ongoing updates, Clock PMS is the more dependable choice. Do you prefer a system with ample proven reviews, or are you comfortable exploring a less documented platform?
If your hotel needs a robust, all-in-one PMS that covers reservations, invoicing, channel management, guest engagement, and automation, go with Clock PMS. Its extensive feature set (58 unique features), high user ratings, and recent reviews support a dependable, comprehensive solution. This is especially true if your team values seamless integrations, reliable support, and continuous improvements.
If your hotel is a small operation seeking a simple, quick-to-implement system without extensive integrations or proven customer reviews, KrossBooking might seem appealing. However, the lack of recent reviews, verified partners, and detailed feature comparisons make it a risky choice for hotels wanting assured support and proven functionality. For most hotels, Clock PMS’s established track record outweighs the potential benefits of an untested system.
Clock PMS scores a 4.78 out of 5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding, making it easy for staff to adapt quickly. Its user-friendly design is supported by high ratings and positive feedback about training new employees and daily operations.
KrossBooking’s ease of use remains unverified due to no recent reviews or user feedback. Without data on its interface or onboarding experience, it’s impossible to confidently compare user-friendliness. Based on current evidence, Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS boasts 58 unique features, including payment processing, booking engine, housekeeping, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and integrated POS—all essential for full hotel management. Its features are well-documented and supported by verified integrations with over 111 partners, making it a comprehensive platform.
KrossBooking offers no detailed feature list or verified integrations, making it impossible to compare feature scope directly. Given Clock’s extensive, proven functionalities, the clear edge goes to Clock PMS, especially for hotels needing a full-stack solution.
Clock PMS receives a 4.75 out of 5 for customer support, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Users appreciate timely assistance, with comments like “Clock has proven itself as a responsive, full-featured solution,” and highlight ongoing support and regular updates.
KrossBooking provides no recent reviews or support ratings, leaving its support quality uncertain. Without verified user feedback or support ratings, the advantage clearly favors Clock PMS. Edge: Clock.
Clock PMS integrates with 111 verified partners, including Curacity, Hotel Investor Apps, Profitroom, and RevControl. These integrations span revenue management, marketing, access, and other operational tools, offering flexibility for hotels seeking extensive connectivity.
KrossBooking has no verified integrations listed, which limits its ability to connect with external systems. For hotels prioritizing broad, proven integration ecosystems, Clock PMS is the clear choice. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS enjoys an overall rating of 4.8/5 based on 251 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, support, and feature set. Independent hotels and boutique properties especially rate it highly, with independent hotels averaging 4.83/5 and boutique hotels 4.84/5.
KrossBooking lacks recent reviews and user ratings, making it impossible to determine user sentiment. Given the volume and recency of Clock PMS reviews, the edge goes to Clock.
Clock PMS costs $600 per month, with no free trial, freemium, or additional implementation fees. Its straightforward pricing aligns with its extensive feature set, providing clear value for mid-sized hotels.
KrossBooking’s pricing is not listed, and the platform offers no trial or free options. The lack of transparent pricing and recent user feedback suggests more risk for hotels considering KrossBooking. For clarity and value, Clock PMS offers better pricing transparency.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small and only needs basic booking or management tools, or if you prefer a system with limited features and support.
Not ideal if you require a system with extensive integrations, verified user reviews, or comprehensive operational features. Also, avoid if your hotel needs proven support and ongoing updates.
Clock PMS is an established, feature-rich property management system trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide. Its ability to support complex operations, extensive integrations, and high user satisfaction make it the recommended choice for most hotels seeking reliability and clarity.
KrossBooking, lacking recent reviews and verified integrations, remains a risky, less proven option. Unless your hotel is very small and can accept an untested product, Clock PMS offers the greater assurance of support, features, and proven performance.
In summary, if you want a dependable, well-reviewed PMS with proven capabilities, go with Clock PMS. If you’re exploring a new platform with uncertain support and limited user feedback, consider KrossBooking—but be aware of the potential risks.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
KrossBooking | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Clock PMS 和 KrossBooking 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 46 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 KrossBooking 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 KrossBooking 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。KrossBooking:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84,KrossBooking 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问