Clock PMS vs Lodgable: 物业管理系统 Comparison (2026)

Clock PMS 与 Lodgable 相比如何？

基于 HTR 上 328 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

	Clock	Lodgable
HTScore	84	0
推荐可能性	95%	0%
易用性	4.8/5	0.0/5
客户支持	4.8/5	0.0/5
性价比	4.7/5	0.0/5

起始价格	From $600/mo	Contact sales
经验证的评价	328	0

Clock PMS 与 Lodgable 的优缺点是什么？

在分析了 328 条经验证的评价后，Clock 用户最看重其功能丰富, 运营效率, 响应式支持和定期更新，而 Lodgable 用户则强调。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Clock	Lodgable
优点
+ 功能丰富 ▾ Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能，有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而，一些用户发现功能繁多，难以管理，建议改进其组织方式。
+ 运营效率 ▾ 该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调，显著提高了运营效率，为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
+ 响应式支持和定期更新 ▾ 用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏，这些更新引入了新功能和改进，确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
+ 易于培训使用 ▾ Clock PMS+ 因其直观易用的界面而备受赞誉，简化了新员工（尤其是接待员）的培训流程。用户评论中经常强调其易用性。
缺点
− 错误消息 ▾ 用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息，这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
− 报告功能 ▾ 报告功能虽然全面，但速度较慢，限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化，以解锁更多强大的功能。

Clock 对比 Lodgable：按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的物业管理系统供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场	Clock	Lodgable
小型（10-24 间客房） ▾	#11 117 条评价	—
Clock 小型酒店表示，Clock 的物业管理系统在 HotelTechReport 的认证评测中名列前茅，其直观的界面、卓越的客户支持以及可简化日常运营的自动化功能备受好评。这些优势对于追求效率和易用性的小型酒店而言尤为重要。 Lodgable 暂无细分市场摘要。
中型（25-74 间客房） ▾	#7 157 条评价	—
Clock 中型酒店表示，Clock 的物业管理系统在 HotelTechReport 的认证评测中名列前茅，这得益于其易用性、响应迅速的客户支持以及节省时间的自动化功能。这些要素始终被认为是中型酒店的关键优势。 Lodgable 暂无细分市场摘要。
大型（75-199 间客房） ▾	#17 9 条评价	—
Clock 大型酒店表示，Clock 的物业管理系统在 HotelTechReport 的认证评测中获得了高度评价，其用户友好的界面、有效的培训和强大的客户支持是其优势所在。这些特性对于大型酒店环境的高效运营和适应至关重要。 Lodgable 暂无细分市场摘要。
超大型（200+ 间客房） ▾	#11 5 条评价	—
Clock 大型酒店表示，Clock 的物业管理系统凭借其无缝集成和直观的界面，显著简化了运营流程，这一点在 HotelTechReport 的认证评论中得到了充分体现。用户赞赏其贴心的客户服务以及与酒店各项职能（例如餐饮和康体服务）的兼容性，从而提升了运营效率。 Lodgable 暂无细分市场摘要。

按物业类型

细分市场	Clock	Lodgable
精品酒店 ▾	#8 165 条评价	—
Clock 精品酒店普遍认为，Clock 的物业管理系统表现卓越，这一点在 HotelTechReport 的认证评测中也得到了印证，其直观的界面、强大的客户支持和省时的自动化功能都令人印象深刻。这些优势与精品酒店的运营需求完美契合。 Lodgable 暂无细分市场摘要。
豪华酒店 ▾	#11 80 条评价	—
Clock 豪华酒店表示，Clock 的物业管理系统受益于 HotelTechReport 的权威评测，评测重点强调了其易用性、云端访问和无缝集成。这些功能简化了运营流程，提升了宾客体验，对于维持豪华酒店的标准至关重要。 Lodgable 暂无细分市场摘要。
品牌/连锁酒店 ▾	#8 62 条评价	—
Clock 品牌酒店表示，Clock 的物业管理系统在 HotelTechReport 的认证评测中名列前茅，这得益于其卓越的客户支持、易用性和实时云端访问功能。这种适应性使品牌酒店能够高效地远程管理运营并简化流程。 Lodgable 暂无细分市场摘要。
长住酒店 ▾	#9 27 条评价	—
Clock 长住型服务式公寓酒店表示，Clock 的物业管理系统因其用户友好的界面、灵活的价格管理以及卓越的客户支持而备受好评。经 HotelTechReport 验证的评论也经常强调这些要素对于该行业的运营效率至关重要。 Lodgable 暂无细分市场摘要。

按区域

细分市场	Clock	Lodgable
北美 ▾	#17 30 条评价	—
Clock 根据 HotelTechReport 的认证评论，Na 酒店表示 Clock 的物业管理系统易于使用，客户支持响应迅速，并且能够与其他系统有效集成。这些优势在 Na 酒店尤为受到重视。 Lodgable 暂无细分市场摘要。
欧洲 ▾	#3 228 条评价	—
Clock 欧洲酒店表示，Clock 的物业管理系统在 HotelTechReport 的认证评论中排名很高，因为它具有用户友好的界面、卓越的客户支持以及反映客户反馈的频繁更新，从而提高了欧洲酒店的运营效率和系统适应性。 Lodgable 暂无细分市场摘要。
亚太 ▾	#11 13 条评价	—
Clock Ap酒店表示，根据HotelTechReport的认证评测，Clock的物业管理系统在易用性、与其他系统的良好集成以及高效的客户支持方面表现出色。这些特性对于Ap酒店的顺利运营和宾客满意度至关重要。 Lodgable 暂无细分市场摘要。
中东	#17 2 条评价	—

Is Clock PMS or Lodgable Better for Hotels?

Clock PMS and Lodgable serve different hotel market segments, with Clock tailored for traditional hotels and Lodgable primarily for vacation rentals. Clock’s rich feature set includes reservations, rates, invoicing, housekeeping, guest messaging, booking engine, channel management, revenue tracking, and more—covering the entire hotel operation. Lodgable provides essential property management tools, focusing on automating bookings, syncing listings across platforms, and simplifying communication, but it does not offer the same depth of features.

Clock’s review count (251 reviews) is significantly higher than Lodgable’s, with recent reviews from the last six months reinforcing its reliability and satisfaction. Clock scores a 4.8/5 overall, with 95% likelihood to recommend, compared to Lodgable’s zero ratings and reviews, indicating a lack of recent user feedback. Would your hotel benefit from a system that’s continuously tested and refined by a large user base?

Clock PMS vs Lodgable: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a comprehensive property management system with automation, channel management, revenue management, and integrated guest engagement, Clock PMS is the clear choice. Its extensive feature count (58 exclusive features) and verified integrations with over 111 partners make it ideal for medium to large hotels seeking operational efficiency.

Lodgable might appeal if your property operates primarily as a vacation rental, focusing on listing management, multiple platform synchronization, and guest communication. If your core priority is simplifying multi-platform bookings and automating basic reservation workflows without extensive operational features, Lodgable could be suitable. For most hotels, especially those considering a robust PMS, Clock’s proven track record and broad feature set make it the more appropriate choice.

Is Clock PMS or Lodgable Easier to Use?

Clock PMS scores 4.78/5 in ease of use, with high marks for onboarding at 4.71/5, and regular positive reviews citing its intuitive interface. Users praise how quickly new staff can be trained and how operational efficiency improves with minimal friction. Some reviewers mention the extensive features can be overwhelming initially, but overall, user satisfaction remains high.

Lodgable has not provided detailed user ratings or reviews for ease of use, but its interface is described as user-friendly and simple for managing listings and reservations. Given the lack of recent reviews and detailed feedback, the evidence suggests Clock PMS’s usability features are better documented and more positively reviewed.

Edge: Clock PMS.

Which Has Better Features: Clock PMS or Lodgable?

Clock PMS offers a robust suite of 58 features exclusive to its platform, including payment processing, booking engine, EPoS, channel management, revenue modules, guest profiles, automated reminders, digital check-in, and more. These features provide a full operational toolkit, enabling hotels to manage every aspect of their property from a single system.

Lodgable’s feature set is limited, focusing on core property management functions like reservations, guest communications, and listing synchronization across platforms. It lacks the extensive automation and integrations available with Clock PMS. If your hotel requires advanced revenue management, channel control, and operational modules, Clock offers a decisive advantage.

Edge: Clock PMS.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Clock PMS or Lodgable?

Clock PMS scores 4.75/5 in customer support, with users frequently praising its responsiveness, proactive assistance, and regular system updates. Hoteliers comment that support is easy to access, and Clock’s team listens to customer feedback, quickly implementing improvements.

Lodgable provides customer support, but no recent reviews or ratings are available to gauge responsiveness or quality. Without concrete recent feedback, it’s challenging to compare support experiences, but given Clock’s established reputation and extensive review base, its support is more reliably documented.

Edge: Clock PMS.

Which Has More Integrations: Clock PMS or Lodgable?

Clock PMS boasts 111 verified partners, including popular integrations like Curacity, Hotel Investor Apps, and Profitroom, enabling a highly connected ecosystem for diverse operational needs. Its open API and extensive partner network facilitate customization and third-party system integrations.

Lodgable has no verified integrations listed, indicating limited or no third-party connection options. For hotels relying on multiple systems or seeking to extend their PMS capabilities, Clock’s integrations are a significant advantage.

Edge: Clock PMS.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Clock PMS or Lodgable?

Clock PMS has a strong review presence, with an overall rating of 4.8/5 from 251 reviews, and recent feedback confirms its reliability. Independent hotels and boutique properties particularly appreciate its ease of use, efficiency, and responsive support.

Lodgable, lacking recent reviews and ratings, offers no clear data on user satisfaction. For hoteliers seeking proven, highly-rated software, Clock’s extensive positive feedback makes it the superior choice.

Edge: Clock PMS.

How Much Do Clock PMS and Lodgable Cost?

Clock PMS has a clear pricing model, costing $600 per month with no implementation fee or free trial. Its pricing reflects its comprehensive feature set and enterprise readiness.

Lodgable’s pricing details are not publicly available, and it appears to lack transparent costs or trial options. Based on the available data, Clock PMS provides predictable pricing aligned with its extensive capabilities.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Clock PMS?

Hotels that require a full suite of operational features, including reservations, invoicing, housekeeping, revenue management, and channel management.
Properties aiming to automate guest interactions and streamline front desk tasks.
Hotels with multiple revenue streams needing integrated point-of-sale and event management.
Larger boutique, city center, or resort properties seeking scalable, customizable solutions.
Teams that value extensive integrations and robust reporting tools.

Not ideal if your hotel operates solely as a vacation rental or has very simple operational needs without the requirement for advanced PMS features.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Lodgable?

Vacation rental owners managing multiple listings across different platforms.
Small property managers seeking straightforward reservation and guest communication tools.
Hosts prioritizing listing synchronization and automation without complex operational modules.
Operators who prefer a lightweight, user-friendly dashboard for daily management.

Not ideal if your property requires a full hotel PMS with revenue management, channel control, or extensive automation beyond bookings and listings.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Clock PMS stands out as the superior solution for hotels seeking a comprehensive, well-supported property management system. Its extensive feature set, proven integrations, and high user ratings make it a reliable choice for properties aiming to streamline operations and enhance guest experiences.

Lodgable, while suitable for vacation rentals and listing management, lacks the depth and recent validation that Clock offers. Unless your operation is narrowly focused on listing automation and basic reservations, Clock’s capabilities are more aligned with larger or more complex hotel needs.

Choose Clock PMS if your goal is to manage a full-scale hotel operation with confidence and support. Opt for Lodgable if your focus is on simplifying vacation rental listings and basic guest communication, with a smaller scope of operational requirements.

Clock PMS 和 Lodgable 的价格是多少？

物业管理系统的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

	Clock	Lodgable
Starting Price	From $600/mo	—

Clock PMS 有哪些 Lodgable 没有的功能（反之亦然）？

根据 HTR 的产品数据库，Clock PMS 和 Lodgable 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能	Clock	Lodgable
EPoS
交付过程
收益管理模块
综合 CRS
预订引擎
频道管理员

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 46 项功能存在差异。

实际成果：Clock 对比 Lodgable（按业务目标）

我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究，比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本

Events Hotels WICC 大型

+ WICC Hotel & Congress Centre implemented Clock to support both hotel stays and conference operations on a single, reliable platform, helping the team run daily operations smoothly with consistent, uninterrupted workflows.

+ �s cloud-based platform, the hotel now has a scalable solution that can adapt to new operational needs and technology developments over time. Clock

+ �s built-in Events Management module is part of its all-in-one platform, allowing WICC to manage both - stays and events within one unified environment.

"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."

Deveny van Laar

Sales & Reserveringen

Lodgable

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

提高运营效率

Elegancia Hotels Paris 中型

+ Centralized Control and Full Portfolio Visibility.

+ Clock provides Elegancia Hotels with a single, unified platform to manage all properties, giving leadership complete visibility across the portfolio. This centralisation improves coordination between teams, supports more informed decision-making, and ensures consistent operational standards across all hotels, while still allowing each property to be monitored effectively at group level.

+ Fully Connected Technology Ecosystem

"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."

Matthieu Abbo

Directeur - Hôtellerie

Lodgable

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

改善宾客体验

Hotel Mitland 小型

+ The team now runs guest communication, service requests, and daily operations through a single all-in-one platform, improving efficiency and consistency across the hotel. Clock acts as a central platform that connects all guest interactions and services across the hotel.

+ Shorter check-in and service response times

+ Fewer interruptions at the front desk

"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"

Remko Engelman

[email protected]

Lodgable

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Clock 对比 Lodgable：总结

Clock

4.8/5 来自 328 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

功能丰富 75% 正面

Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能，有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而，一些用户发现功能繁多，难以管理，建议改进其组织方式。

运营效率 75% 正面

该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调，显著提高了运营效率，为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。

响应式支持和定期更新 100% 正面

用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏，这些更新引入了新功能和改进，确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

错误消息 100% 负面

用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息，这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。

报告功能 100% 负面

报告功能虽然全面，但速度较慢，限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化，以解锁更多强大的功能。

独特功能

交付过程预订引擎 EPoS 频道管理员综合 CRS

4.8/5 易用性 4.8/5 客户支持 111 个集成

访问官网

Lodgable

0.0/5 来自 0 条评价

0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 0 个集成

查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Clock 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)

易用性 Clock 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)

客户支持 Clock 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)

性价比 Clock 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)

入职培训 Clock 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)

关于 Clock PMS 与 Lodgable 的常见问题

Clock PMS 能否替代 Lodgable？

这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 Lodgable 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能，但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴，而 Lodgable 提供 0 个。在切换之前，请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店？

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先，评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价，了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Clock PMS 或 Lodgable 是否提供免费方案？

Clock PMS：否。Lodgable：否。两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前，请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Clock PMS 和 Lodgable？

HT Score 是一个综合排名，考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量，帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84，Lodgable 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组	权重	衡量内容
客户评分与评价		用户对该产品的推荐度如何？评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分（推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率）、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性（最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价）以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。
合作伙伴生态系统		技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何？合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。
以客户为中心		该组织以客户为中心的程度如何？认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集（反馈驱动文化的指标）以及产品资料是否完整，包括功能、截图、定价和特性。
覆盖范围、持久力与资源		该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛？地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖（服务的国家和区域）、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标，以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

Clock PMS vs. Lodgable:
哪个更适合您？

Clock PMS 与 Lodgable 相比如何？

Clock PMS 与 Lodgable 的优缺点是什么？

Clock 对比 Lodgable：按酒店细分市场排名

Is Clock PMS or Lodgable Better for Hotels?

Clock PMS vs Lodgable: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

Is Clock PMS or Lodgable Easier to Use?

Which Has Better Features: Clock PMS or Lodgable?

Which Has Better Customer Support: Clock PMS or Lodgable?

Which Has More Integrations: Clock PMS or Lodgable?

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Clock PMS or Lodgable?

How Much Do Clock PMS and Lodgable Cost?

What Type of Hotel Should Use Clock PMS?

What Type of Hotel Should Use Lodgable?

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Clock PMS 和 Lodgable 的价格是多少？

Clock PMS 有哪些 Lodgable 没有的功能（反之亦然）？

实际成果：Clock 对比 Lodgable（按业务目标）

Clock 对比 Lodgable：总结