The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
My vr |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
My vr |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
My vr |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #17 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Clock PMS and My vr hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth plans. While both aim to streamline property management, only Clock PMS provides an extensive, feature-rich platform with proven hospitality focus. Your decision should be based on whether you need a robust, full-service PMS or a simpler system tailored for vacation rentals.
Clock PMS is the more established, reviewed product with recent, positive feedback. My vr’s lack of reviews and market presence makes it difficult to assess its reliability or usability. Do you prioritize proven performance or niche automation?
Both Clock PMS and My vr are designed to optimize property management, but they serve different hotel types. Clock PMS offers a comprehensive suite including reservations, invoicing, channel management, revenue tracking, and guest messaging—covering nearly every operational aspect for hotels seeking an all-in-one system. In contrast, My vr focuses primarily on vacation rentals, providing centralized booking, guest communication, and analytics tailored to short-term rental businesses.
While Clock PMS’s broad feature set caters to mid-size and large hotels, boutique hotels, and certain resorts, My vr’s niche focus limits its utility for hotels with complex operations. Given that Clock PMS has 251 reviews and recent feedback, it’s clear where most hoteliers place their trust. Is your property looking for a generalized hotel management solution, or a specialized vacation rental system?
Edge: Clock PMS.
If your hotel needs a full-featured property management system capable of handling reservations, guest profiles, invoicing, channel management, and revenue optimization, Clock PMS is your go-to. Its extensive features—58 unique modules like integrated CRS, booking engine, housekeeping, and digital check-in—are proven through over 250 recent reviews averaging 4.8/5, with a 95% likelihood to recommend.
If your operation revolves around vacation rentals seeking simple, centralized booking, guest communications, and reporting, My vr might seem appealing. However, with zero verified reviews and no proven track record, it’s a less reliable choice. For most hoteliers, Clock PMS’s comprehensive approach offers tangible operational benefits.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS’s user experience is highly rated, with a 4.78/5 ease of use score based on 251 recent reviews. Users mention its intuitive interface, simple employee training, and quick onboarding. Support is rated 4.75/5, with many reviews highlighting responsive service and ongoing updates.
My vr’s usability is unverified due to a lack of reviews, making it impossible to assess its interface or onboarding experience. Without user feedback, we cannot confirm whether it simplifies hotel management or introduces complexity.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS boasts 58 unique features, including payment processing, booking engine, POS, channel manager, revenue management, guest CRM, automated reminders, and mobile check-in. These cover a hotel’s core operations and extend into ancillary services like gift vouchers, multi-currency support, and advanced reporting.
My vr’s feature set appears limited and primarily suited for vacation rental management, with no detailed feature count or unique modules documented. It lacks the breadth of Clock PMS’s comprehensive capabilities.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS’s support is highly rated at 4.75/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and proactive assistance. Users appreciate ongoing communication, regular updates, and extensive onboarding support.
In contrast, My vr has no available reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to gauge support quality. Poor or unverified support can jeopardize your operational continuity.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS integrates with 111 verified partners, including notable names like Curacity, Hotel Investor Apps, Profitroom, and RevControl. Its open API allows seamless connection with booking channels, payment providers, and other third-party tools—reducing manual work and expanding functionality.
My vr reports zero verified integrations. Lack of integrations severely limits flexibility, especially for hotels relying on multiple systems.
Edge: Clock PMS.
With 251 recent reviews, Clock PMS’s average rating is 4.8/5, and 95% of users recommend it. Hotels across independent, boutique, city center, and resort segments praise its features, usability, and support.
My vr has no reviews, so no hotel segment or user rating data exists. Without proven user feedback, it cannot be considered a trusted solution.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS costs a flat $600/month without a free trial or implementation fees. Its transparent pricing includes all features with no locked modules or extra charges for integrations.
My vr’s pricing model is not disclosed, leaving potential buyers unsure of the total cost or value proposition. Given the lack of market presence, its pricing transparency remains unknown.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Not ideal if you manage a small, single-property rental with straightforward needs or are seeking only a booking website.
Not ideal if you operate a full-service hotel, resort, or require deep integrations and extensive operational features.
Clock PMS is a mature, feature-rich platform trusted by hundreds of hoteliers, with recent reviews confirming its usability, support, and value. Its broad suite of modules ensures your hotel can streamline operations, boost revenue, and improve guest experiences without needing multiple systems.
My vr remains untested by users and has no recent reviews or verified integrations, making it a risky choice for hotels seeking reliability and proven performance. Its focus on vacation rentals limits its appeal for full-service hotels.
Choose Clock PMS if you want a dependable, comprehensive solution backed by extensive user feedback and ongoing development. Consider My vr only if your operation is small, strictly vacation-based, and you can verify its capabilities firsthand.
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 My vr 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 My vr 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。My vr:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84,My vr 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问