The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 328 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Clock 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Passpartout 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 328 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 328 | 0 |
在分析了 328 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 功能丰富, 运营效率, 响应式支持和定期更新,而 Passpartout 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Passpartout |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
功能丰富
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
响应式支持和定期更新
▾
|
|
|
+
易于培训使用
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误消息
▾
|
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Passpartout |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Passpartout |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Passpartout |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #17 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel's operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue growth. Both Clock PMS and Passpartout aim to streamline hotel management, but they serve different needs and markets. Clock PMS offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with a broad user base and recent, positive reviews. Passpartout, by contrast, currently has no reviews or market presence, making it a less reliable choice for hoteliers evaluating PMS options today.
With Clock PMS boasting over 250 recent reviews and a high satisfaction score, it clearly has more recent user validation. Passpartout remains unreviewed, meaning you lack trusted feedback on its performance. So, which product genuinely aligns with your hotel's needs?
Both Clock PMS and Passpartout aim to automate and simplify hotel operations, but Clock provides a full suite of integrated tools that cover reservations, rates, invoicing, guest messaging, and more. Passpartout appears focused on automation and predictive analytics for real estate and hospitality, but without recent reviews or detailed user feedback, its real-world effectiveness remains unproven.
Clock’s strengths lie in its extensive features, proven integrations, and positive hotel operator feedback, especially from boutique, city center, and independent hotels. Passpartout’s lack of review data makes it difficult to assess whether its automation and AI-driven capabilities translate into tangible benefits for your team.
Are you seeking a well-established, user-validated PMS or a new, untested solution? The choice hinges on your need for proven reliability versus emerging technology.
If you need a reliable, scalable PMS with proven performance and extensive features, Clock PMS is the clear choice. It’s ideal for mid-sized to large hotels, boutique properties, and brands that want a full operational toolkit, including booking engine, channel management, revenue management, and guest engagement.
Passpartout may appeal if your hotel or property management team is experimenting with AI-driven automation and predictive analytics, but without reviews, its track record remains uncertain. For hoteliers prioritizing stability, comprehensive support, and proven results, Clock is the safer bet.
If your goal is to improve operational efficiency and guest satisfaction with a trusted platform, Clock offers concrete evidence of success. Passpartout’s lack of data makes it a riskier option for critical hotel functions.
Clock PMS scores a high 4.78/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface, simple onboarding, and quick staff adoption. Reviewers highlight that Clock’s user-friendly design helps new employees learn the system faster, reducing training time.
Passpartout, however, has no publicly available reviews, so its usability and onboarding experience remain unverified. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to confidently assess whether Passpartout’s automation features are accessible to staff or if the platform’s complexity could hinder daily operations.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS offers 58 unique features including booking engine, channel management, revenue management, in-room POS, guest profiles, automated workflows, and integrations with payment terminals. Its features cover every core aspect of hotel management, with regular updates and extensive customization options.
Passpartout, lacking publicly available feature data, appears focused on automation, AI, and analytics but without specific feature counts or detailed descriptions. Given the breadth of Clock’s features and proven integrations, it provides a more complete operational toolkit for your hotel.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS’s support ratings are notably high at 4.75/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness, helpfulness, and proactive service. Hoteliers mention that Clock’s support team provides timely assistance, which is crucial during setup and operational issues.
Passpartout has no available support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to evaluate its customer service quality. In the critical area of support, Clock’s proven track record offers peace of mind.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS integrates with over 111 verified partners, including hotel investor apps, revenue tools, booking channels, and keyless access systems. Its flexible API setup and no connection fees make it adaptable to a wide range of third-party services.
Passpartout, with no verified integrations listed, lacks the demonstrated connectivity that allows seamless operation across multiple systems. For hotels relying on multiple tools, Clock’s extensive integration network is a significant advantage.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS has a solid 4.8/5 overall rating based on 251 recent reviews, with a 95% likelihood to recommend, especially among boutique and independent hotels. Reviewers praise its ease of use, responsiveness, and feature set, with comments like “extremely happy with Clock PMS” and “significant time savings.”
Passpartout has no reviews or user ratings, so no direct hotel feedback supports its effectiveness or satisfaction levels. For proven hotel management, Clock’s high ratings are a decisive factor.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS costs $600 per month with no freemium or trial options. Pricing is transparent, and there are no implementation fees or hidden charges.
Passpartout lacks publicly available pricing information. The absence of clear costs makes it difficult to evaluate its value or compare it directly to Clock.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small and only needs minimal management tools or if you’re experimenting with untested PMS solutions.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a proven, full-featured PMS with extensive support and integration, or if budget transparency and user validation are priorities.
Clock PMS is an established, fully-featured platform with proven success and a strong user base. Its comprehensive suite supports daily operations, revenue management, and guest engagement, backed by high customer satisfaction ratings.
Passpartout remains unreviewed, making it a risky choice for hotels seeking reliability and proven results. Its focus on AI and automation may appeal in the future, but without real-world validation, Clock is the safer, more dependable choice today.
If your hotel needs a trusted, feature-rich PMS with extensive support and integrations, go with Clock PMS. For innovative automation solutions without proven user feedback, Passpartout might be worth watching, but it’s not ready to replace a proven system now.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Passpartout | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Clock PMS 和 Passpartout 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Passpartout |
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 46 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 Passpartout 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Passpartout 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。Passpartout:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84,Passpartout 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问