项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 1,513 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
基于 HTR 上 1,513 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $500/月 | 联系销售 |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,513 | 0 |
在分析了 1,513 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 支持与培训, 日历和预订管理, 报告与分析,而 hoteliga International sp. z o.o. 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持与培训
▾
|
|
|
+
日历和预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
报告与分析
▾
|
|
|
+
集成与一体化工作流程
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
账单、发票与支付
▾
|
|
|
−
移动应用和远程访问
▾
|
|
|
−
客房服务与运营规划
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 675 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 235 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 51 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 546 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 245 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 145 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 96 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 532 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 166 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 201 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 13 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and hoteliga involves evaluating how each system addresses your hotel's operational needs. Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, integrated platform with a proven track record of user satisfaction, while hoteliga presents a web-based, user-friendly system with a broad feature set. Both aim to streamline hotel management, but their approaches and market presence differ significantly.
Cloudbeds’s extensive review base and recent positive feedback make it the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking a mature, well-supported system. Will your hotel benefit more from Cloudbeds’ broad integrations and proven scalability or from hoteliga’s streamlined, browser-based approach?
Both Cloudbeds and hoteliga aim to simplify hotel operations by combining reservation management, channel distribution, and property management into one platform. Cloudbeds, with over 1,200 reviews and a 4.62/5 overall rating, is highly regarded for its ease of use, support, and feature depth. hoteliga, despite a newer and smaller footprint with no reviews, offers a web-based solution with a strong focus on online booking and multi-language support.
The key divergence lies in market maturity: Cloudbeds’s larger review count and recent feedback demonstrate a stable, trusted platform, whereas hoteliga’s smaller scale indicates a more nascent product. Would your hotel prioritize a tested, award-winning system or a flexible, browser-first experience?
If your hotel needs a robust, all-in-one management system trusted by thousands worldwide, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its feature richness—over 83 exclusive features, including revenue management, integrated CRS, and automated reporting—supports large, diverse properties seeking growth.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes a straightforward, browser-based system with multi-language support and seamless OTA integration, hoteliga could suit your needs better. Its intuitive interface and focus on online visibility make it ideal for smaller hotels or properties looking for quick deployment without extensive setup.
For hotels aiming to scale confidently, Cloudbeds’s proven track record and comprehensive functionality make it the better fit. For those focused on simplicity and versatile online management, hoteliga’s platform offers a compelling, lightweight alternative.
Cloudbeds scores 4.58/5 in ease of use, with many users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Reviewers highlight that even staff with limited tech experience can quickly learn the system, and onboarding averages 4.41/5.
hoteliga, despite lacking detailed review data, emphasizes browser-based access and multi-device compatibility, which suggest ease of access. However, without a significant review base, it's unclear how users rate its overall usability or support.
Edge: Cloudbeds. Its large, recent review volume and high usability scores confirm its reputation for user-friendliness.
Cloudbeds offers an exceptional feature set with over 83 functionalities exclusive to its platform, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, revenue management, automated night audits, integrated CRS, and guest communication tools. Its features are designed for full-scale operations and scalability.
hoteliga provides essential PMS functions such as an interactive calendar, invoicing, housekeeping, meal planning, and OTA integration. It consolidates booking, financial, and operational features into a web-based platform but lacks the extensive, specialized tools found in Cloudbeds.
Edge: Cloudbeds. Its broader, deeper feature pool (totaling 83 unique features) makes it more suitable for properties with complex needs or growth ambitions.
Cloudbeds’s support scores 4.38/5, with many users emphasizing responsive, professional service and quick problem resolution. Review quotes mention "great customer service" and "immediate responses," reinforcing its commitment to client success.
hoteliga has no available review data on support, making it difficult to assess. Its smaller size suggests potentially less extensive support infrastructure, but this remains unverified.
Edge: Cloudbeds. The volume and recency of reviews about their customer support provide a clear advantage.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including major OTAs and systems like SiteMinder, TrustYou, and RateGain, supporting seamless connectivity across platforms. Its channel self-mapping and 2-way real-time integrations reduce manual updates and errors.
hoteliga has 21 verified partners, including key OTAs like Booking.com, Expedia, and Hotelbeds. While sufficient for many properties, its smaller partner network limits integration flexibility.
Edge: Cloudbeds. Its extensive, verified integration ecosystem supports larger, multi-channel operations more effectively.
Cloudbeds’s recent reviews (76 in the last six months) showcase a property management system rated 4.62/5 overall, with a 91% likelihood to recommend and an NPS of 8.94/10. Hoteliers across segments, from boutique to hostels, praise its ease of use and support.
hoteliga, lacking recent reviews and a rating score, cannot be reliably compared. Its absence from review platforms suggests less market validation.
Edge: Cloudbeds. Its large, recent review base and high ratings confirm its higher user satisfaction.
Cloudbeds charges a flat $500 monthly fee, with no free tier, freemium, or trial. Its transparent pricing is straightforward for hotels planning their budgets.
hoteliga does not publicly specify prices, making direct comparison difficult. As a cloud-based platform, its costs are likely similar but require direct inquiry.
Not ideal if: you operate a very small property with minimal management needs or prefer a lightweight, minimal interface.
Not ideal if: your hotel requires deep revenue management features or highly customized automation.
Cloudbeds is a mature, feature-rich platform trusted by thousands worldwide. Its extensive integrations, recent reviews, and high satisfaction scores make it the superior choice for most hoteliers focused on growth and operational efficiency.
hoteliga offers a sleek, web-based alternative suited for smaller properties or those prioritizing simplicity and online visibility. Its limited market footprint and lack of recent review data suggest it’s less proven in scaling or complex management.
Choose Cloudbeds if you value a proven, scalable solution with comprehensive features. Opt for hoteliga if your hotel’s primary focus is a straightforward, browser-based management system with strong OTA integration.
In summary, if your hotel needs a reliable, all-in-one PMS with a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and proven support, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. For properties seeking a lightweight, web-based platform primarily focused on online booking and simple operations, hoteliga may suffice—but keep in mind its smaller market presence and limited review data.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $500/月 | — |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 家政 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用程序 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 家政 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 客房服务手机应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班规划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放式磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 定价情报 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| SOC2投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 全天候在线支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| 销售点 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
支持通常被认为是积极的,许多评价者称赞快速的聊天响应、乐于助人的客服以及简化培训流程的资源,帮助入职更顺利。不过,也有一些用户希望提供电话支持或更快的... 支持通常被认为是积极的,许多评价者称赞快速的聊天响应、乐于助人的客服以及简化培训流程的资源,帮助入职更顺利。不过,也有一些用户希望提供电话支持或更快的人力响应以应对紧急问题,少数用户指出新酒店或复杂设置的培训和跟进可能较慢。
评审者普遍认为 Cloudbeds 的日历是查看可用性、房型、预订状态、拆分预订和客人动态的核心操作界面。它简化了日常预订处理,减少了错误,并帮助前台团队以更少... 评审者普遍认为 Cloudbeds 的日历是查看可用性、房型、预订状态、拆分预订和客人动态的核心操作界面。它简化了日常预订处理,减少了错误,并帮助前台团队以更少的混乱更高效地工作。
许多评测者表示,Cloudbeds 通过各种报告帮助他们监控入住率、收入和运营情况,特别适用于日常管理和业绩评估。主要的反馈是报告下载速度较慢,格式显得陈旧,用... 许多评测者表示,Cloudbeds 通过各种报告帮助他们监控入住率、收入和运营情况,特别适用于日常管理和业绩评估。主要的反馈是报告下载速度较慢,格式显得陈旧,用户希望能拥有更可定制、交互性更强的仪表盘以及更深入的财务分析。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds 以简化入住支付、发票、收据和账单管理而闻名,这帮助员工提高效率并保持账务有序。最大的问题在于支付设置和配置,需要多位审核员协助,有些用户希望... Cloudbeds 以简化入住支付、发票、收据和账单管理而闻名,这帮助员工提高效率并保持账务有序。最大的问题在于支付设置和配置,需要多位审核员协助,有些用户希望增加更多支付方式,并实现与本地支付处理商的更顺畅集成。
用户喜欢能够在办公桌之外访问 Cloudbeds,并随时查看关键信息,尤其是在管理人员远程或待命的酒店中。但移动应用是一个常见的痛点:评论者希望能够创建预订、推... 用户喜欢能够在办公桌之外访问 Cloudbeds,并随时查看关键信息,尤其是在管理人员远程或待命的酒店中。但移动应用是一个常见的痛点:评论者希望能够创建预订、推送通知、提高稳定性,以及提升性能速度。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 Hoteliga 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 200 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hoteliga 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Cloudbeds HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds HMS:否。Hoteliga:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,hoteliga International sp. z o.o. 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐