The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,986 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 intuitiveness and ease of use 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest App and Ancillary revenue tracking.
基于 HTR 上 1,986 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $500/mo | From $1,000/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,414 | 572 |
在分析了 1,986 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management,而 RoomRaccoon 用户则强调 易用性, 客户服务, 持续改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
+
易用性
▾
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
+
集成与自动化
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
−
关键问题
▾
|
|
−
货币兑换和金融业务
▾
|
−
定价问题
▾
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
−
访客数据库透明度
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 675 条评价 | #5 214 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 235 条评价 | #8 50 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 51 条评价 | #4 18 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | #8 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 546 条评价 | #3 245 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 245 条评价 | #4 149 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 145 条评价 | #5 70 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 96 条评价 | #3 72 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 532 条评价 | #14 11 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 166 条评价 | #1 445 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 201 条评价 | #8 9 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 13 条评价 | #17 3 条评价 |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and RoomRaccoon HMS hinges on your hotel’s size, operational needs, and growth ambitions. Both platforms aim to streamline your operations, but Cloudbeds’s broader industry presence and larger user base suggest a more extensive feature set and support network. Do you prioritize proven scalability and a more established global footprint or a platform tailored with innovative features for smaller, independent hotels?
Cloudbeds’s larger review count and more recent positive feedback make it the more data-backed choice. With 1,219 reviews and a recent surge of 76 reviews in the last six months, it reflects ongoing trust and improvement, compared to RoomRaccoon’s 484 reviews and just 8 recent reviews. Are you ready to rely on the more recent, well-supported solution?
Both Cloudbeds and RoomRaccoon serve as all-in-one hotel management systems, aiming to simplify reservations, operations, and distribution. Cloudbeds offers a unified platform with extensive integrations and automation, making it ideal for hotels seeking to scale efficiently across multiple channels and regions. RoomRaccoon, on the other hand, emphasizes ease of use and automation tailored to small and independent hotels, with standout features in dynamic pricing and guest upselling.
While Cloudbeds excels in connecting various operational areas, RoomRaccoon shines in its simplicity and affordability. Do you need a comprehensive system capable of handling complex multi-property operations or a nimble platform optimized for smaller setups?
If your hotel needs a scalable, globally supported system with extensive integrations, Cloudbeds’s broader partner network and feature set make it the clear choice. Its platform is trusted by properties worldwide and is better suited for larger operations or those planning rapid growth. Conversely, if your hotel is smaller, based in Europe or North America, and values an intuitive, automated system with a strong focus on guest upselling, RoomRaccoon’s higher user ratings and streamlined design are advantageous.
For properties prioritizing sophisticated revenue management, multi-lingual support, and a large ecosystem of integrations, Cloudbeds’s $500 monthly base fee offers long-term value. If your focus is on quick onboarding, guest engagement, and automation at a lower complexity level, RoomRaccoon’s smaller premium and user-friendly approach may be more suitable.
Cloudbeds boasts a user rating of 4.58/5 and an onboarding score of 4.41/5, with many users praising its intuitive interface and quick staff training. Reviewers highlight its straightforward navigation and ease of connecting with different systems, though some mention occasional complexity in advanced features. Support is rated 4.38/5, with comments about responsive assistance, but response times during peak times could improve.
RoomRaccoon outperforms in ease of use, scoring 4.87/5 and 4.81/5 for onboarding, with reviewers emphasizing its simplicity and quick learning curve. Users mention that staff can master the platform within days, and setup is smooth, especially for small teams. Support reviews are slightly higher at 4.74/5, with fewer complaints about delays.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Cloudbeds offers a significantly larger feature set, with 44 features exclusive to its platform, including advanced revenue management, multi-lingual support, and extensive inventory management. Key features like integrated CRS, automated night audits, and guest messaging tools are notable strengths. RoomRaccoon provides 11 exclusive features, such as AI-powered pricing, guest app, loyalty integration, and ancillary revenue tools, focusing on automation and upselling.
Both systems share 46 features, but Cloudbeds’s broader suite covers complex, large-scale needs, while RoomRaccoon’s tailored features excel in small to mid-sized boutique hotels. If comprehensive, enterprise-level functionality matters, Cloudbeds is ahead. For targeted automation and guest engagement, RoomRaccoon has specialized tools.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support ratings stand at 4.38/5, with users appreciating its responsiveness and quick issue resolution. However, some reviews mention slower responses during busy periods, and a few report challenges with advanced troubleshooting. Support times are generally considered good, but there’s room for improvement in handling complex cases swiftly.
RoomRaccoon scores higher at 4.74/5, with users praising its patient, attentive support and proactive onboarding assistance. Many reviews note that the support team goes above expectations, especially during initial setup and training. Support quality appears more consistent and personalized.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Cloudbeds’s overall rating is 4.62/5, with a propitious 91% likelihood to recommend, based on 1,219 reviews. It gets high marks across segments, especially boutique hotels and hostels, which rate it around 4.54–4.63/5. Recent reviews emphasize increased efficiency and revenue growth using Cloudbeds.
RoomRaccoon’s 4.95/5 overall rating and 97% recommendation rate come from fewer reviews but reflect strong satisfaction, especially among small hotels and B&Bs. Recent reviews praise its ease of use, automation, and the positive impact on RevPAR, with many highlighting its role in streamlining operations.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a fixed $500 monthly fee, which covers a broad suite of features and integrations, with no trial or freemium options. Its pricing is transparent but may be a larger upfront investment compared to smaller hotels’ budgets.
RoomRaccoon’s base price is $1,000 per month, also without free trials, but it offers a more targeted set of features tailored for small and independent hotels. Its higher cost might be justified by the automation tools and dedicated support, especially for smaller properties seeking simplicity.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds stands out as the more established, feature-rich platform, trusted worldwide with a broad partner network and scalable architecture. It is best suited for hotels aiming to grow, diversify, and optimize revenue through comprehensive tools and integrations.
RoomRaccoon excels in simplicity, automation, and guest engagement, making it ideal for small, independent properties focused on ease of use and direct bookings. Its high user satisfaction and recent reviews confirm it as the more reliable choice for boutique and mid-sized hotels.
For properties prioritizing size, growth plans, and advanced features, Cloudbeds offers long-term value. Conversely, if your hotel seeks a user-friendly, automation-focused solution with quick onboarding, RoomRaccoon is the smarter pick.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $1,000/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds HMS 和 RoomRaccoon HMS 共享 46 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 43 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 16 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
人们注意到货币转换的准确性存在问题,尤其是在多币种交易中。用户反映存在一些差异,影响了对账流程。改进货币转换配置可以简化财务管理。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户称赞 RoomRaccoon 具有用户友好的界面和直观的设计,这减少了培训时间,并能顺利融入日常操作,从而提高了整体效率。
虽然一些用户称赞支持团队的响应速度和专业水平,但另一些用户则批评售后服务和响应效率不足,这表明客户服务质量存在不一致之处。
用户赞赏 RoomRaccoon 的持续发展,包括 AI 的增强,这些都有助于提高销售和运营功能,展现了其对长期适应性的承诺。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
多篇评论指出,售后支持不力、技术问题悬而未决等关键问题严重影响了用户满意度和对系统的信任度。
一些用户,尤其是那些经营季节性业务的用户,认为该系统的定价过高,这影响了他们的决策,尽管他们认为该系统包含的功能很有价值。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 RoomRaccoon HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomRaccoon HMS 提供 88 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds HMS:否。RoomRaccoon HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,RoomRaccoon 的为 86。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问