Cloudbeds HMS vs. RoomRaccoon HMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 1,986 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 1,986 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 intuitiveness and ease of use 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.

RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest App and Ancillary revenue tracking.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Cloudbeds HMS 与 RoomRaccoon HMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 1,986 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
100
86
推荐可能性
91%
97%
易用性
4.6/5
4.9/5
客户支持
4.4/5
4.7/5
性价比
4.3/5
4.7/5
起始价格 From $500/mo From $1,000/mo
经验证的评价 1,414 572

Cloudbeds HMS 与 RoomRaccoon HMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 1,986 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management,而 RoomRaccoon 用户则强调 易用性, 客户服务, 持续改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Cloudbeds Cloudbeds RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon
优点
+ Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
+ 易用性
+ Automation and Efficiency
+ 客户服务
+ Reservations and Channel Management
+ 持续改进
+ Reporting and Analytics
+ 集成与自动化
缺点
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
关键问题
货币兑换和金融业务
定价问题
移动功能
访客数据库透明度

Cloudbeds 对比 RoomRaccoon:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon
小型(10-24 间客房) #2 675 条评价 #5 214 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #1 235 条评价 #8 50 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #1 51 条评价 #4 18 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #4 5 条评价 #8 2 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon
精品酒店 #1 546 条评价 #3 245 条评价
豪华酒店 #3 245 条评价 #4 149 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #2 145 条评价 #5 70 条评价
长住酒店 #2 96 条评价 #3 72 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon
北美 #2 532 条评价 #14 11 条评价
欧洲 #4 166 条评价 #1 445 条评价
亚太 #3 201 条评价 #8 9 条评价
中东 #3 13 条评价 #17 3 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and RoomRaccoon HMS hinges on your hotel’s size, operational needs, and growth ambitions. Both platforms aim to streamline your operations, but Cloudbeds’s broader industry presence and larger user base suggest a more extensive feature set and support network. Do you prioritize proven scalability and a more established global footprint or a platform tailored with innovative features for smaller, independent hotels?

Cloudbeds’s larger review count and more recent positive feedback make it the more data-backed choice. With 1,219 reviews and a recent surge of 76 reviews in the last six months, it reflects ongoing trust and improvement, compared to RoomRaccoon’s 484 reviews and just 8 recent reviews. Are you ready to rely on the more recent, well-supported solution?

Is Cloudbeds HMS or RoomRaccoon HMS Better for Hotels?

Both Cloudbeds and RoomRaccoon serve as all-in-one hotel management systems, aiming to simplify reservations, operations, and distribution. Cloudbeds offers a unified platform with extensive integrations and automation, making it ideal for hotels seeking to scale efficiently across multiple channels and regions. RoomRaccoon, on the other hand, emphasizes ease of use and automation tailored to small and independent hotels, with standout features in dynamic pricing and guest upselling.

While Cloudbeds excels in connecting various operational areas, RoomRaccoon shines in its simplicity and affordability. Do you need a comprehensive system capable of handling complex multi-property operations or a nimble platform optimized for smaller setups?

Cloudbeds vs RoomRaccoon: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a scalable, globally supported system with extensive integrations, Cloudbeds’s broader partner network and feature set make it the clear choice. Its platform is trusted by properties worldwide and is better suited for larger operations or those planning rapid growth. Conversely, if your hotel is smaller, based in Europe or North America, and values an intuitive, automated system with a strong focus on guest upselling, RoomRaccoon’s higher user ratings and streamlined design are advantageous.

For properties prioritizing sophisticated revenue management, multi-lingual support, and a large ecosystem of integrations, Cloudbeds’s $500 monthly base fee offers long-term value. If your focus is on quick onboarding, guest engagement, and automation at a lower complexity level, RoomRaccoon’s smaller premium and user-friendly approach may be more suitable.

Is Cloudbeds HMS or RoomRaccoon HMS Easier to Use?

Cloudbeds boasts a user rating of 4.58/5 and an onboarding score of 4.41/5, with many users praising its intuitive interface and quick staff training. Reviewers highlight its straightforward navigation and ease of connecting with different systems, though some mention occasional complexity in advanced features. Support is rated 4.38/5, with comments about responsive assistance, but response times during peak times could improve.

RoomRaccoon outperforms in ease of use, scoring 4.87/5 and 4.81/5 for onboarding, with reviewers emphasizing its simplicity and quick learning curve. Users mention that staff can master the platform within days, and setup is smooth, especially for small teams. Support reviews are slightly higher at 4.74/5, with fewer complaints about delays.

Edge: RoomRaccoon.

Which Has Better Features: Cloudbeds or RoomRaccoon?

Cloudbeds offers a significantly larger feature set, with 44 features exclusive to its platform, including advanced revenue management, multi-lingual support, and extensive inventory management. Key features like integrated CRS, automated night audits, and guest messaging tools are notable strengths. RoomRaccoon provides 11 exclusive features, such as AI-powered pricing, guest app, loyalty integration, and ancillary revenue tools, focusing on automation and upselling.

Both systems share 46 features, but Cloudbeds’s broader suite covers complex, large-scale needs, while RoomRaccoon’s tailored features excel in small to mid-sized boutique hotels. If comprehensive, enterprise-level functionality matters, Cloudbeds is ahead. For targeted automation and guest engagement, RoomRaccoon has specialized tools.

Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Cloudbeds or RoomRaccoon?

Cloudbeds’s support ratings stand at 4.38/5, with users appreciating its responsiveness and quick issue resolution. However, some reviews mention slower responses during busy periods, and a few report challenges with advanced troubleshooting. Support times are generally considered good, but there’s room for improvement in handling complex cases swiftly.

RoomRaccoon scores higher at 4.74/5, with users praising its patient, attentive support and proactive onboarding assistance. Many reviews note that the support team goes above expectations, especially during initial setup and training. Support quality appears more consistent and personalized.

Edge: RoomRaccoon.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Cloudbeds or RoomRaccoon?

Cloudbeds’s overall rating is 4.62/5, with a propitious 91% likelihood to recommend, based on 1,219 reviews. It gets high marks across segments, especially boutique hotels and hostels, which rate it around 4.54–4.63/5. Recent reviews emphasize increased efficiency and revenue growth using Cloudbeds.

RoomRaccoon’s 4.95/5 overall rating and 97% recommendation rate come from fewer reviews but reflect strong satisfaction, especially among small hotels and B&Bs. Recent reviews praise its ease of use, automation, and the positive impact on RevPAR, with many highlighting its role in streamlining operations.

Edge: Cloudbeds.

How Much Do Cloudbeds and RoomRaccoon Cost?

Cloudbeds charges a fixed $500 monthly fee, which covers a broad suite of features and integrations, with no trial or freemium options. Its pricing is transparent but may be a larger upfront investment compared to smaller hotels’ budgets.

RoomRaccoon’s base price is $1,000 per month, also without free trials, but it offers a more targeted set of features tailored for small and independent hotels. Its higher cost might be justified by the automation tools and dedicated support, especially for smaller properties seeking simplicity.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Cloudbeds?

  • Hotels seeking a scalable solution with global support.
  • Properties that need extensive integrations with OTAs, POS, and revenue systems.
  • Larger boutique hotels, hostels, or resorts with multiple channels.
  • Teams prioritizing automation, detailed reporting, and multi-lingual support.
  • Hotels planning rapid growth or expansion into new markets.

Not ideal if:

  • You run a very small property with minimal operational complexity.
  • Budget constraints prohibit a $500/month investment.
  • Your focus is on a simple, straightforward booking process without advanced features.

What Type of Hotel Should Use RoomRaccoon?

  • Small, independent hotels, B&Bs, or boutique properties.
  • Hotels based in Europe or North America looking for an intuitive interface.
  • Teams that prioritize automation, guest upselling, and dynamic pricing.
  • Properties seeking a quick setup and fast staff onboarding.
  • Hotels wanting to maximize direct bookings and ancillary revenue.

Not ideal if:

  • You operate a large, multi-property group requiring extensive enterprise features.
  • Your operation relies heavily on complex revenue management or extensive integrations.
  • You need robust multi-language or multi-currency support across diverse regions.

RoomRaccoon vs Cloudbeds: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Cloudbeds stands out as the more established, feature-rich platform, trusted worldwide with a broad partner network and scalable architecture. It is best suited for hotels aiming to grow, diversify, and optimize revenue through comprehensive tools and integrations.

RoomRaccoon excels in simplicity, automation, and guest engagement, making it ideal for small, independent properties focused on ease of use and direct bookings. Its high user satisfaction and recent reviews confirm it as the more reliable choice for boutique and mid-sized hotels.

For properties prioritizing size, growth plans, and advanced features, Cloudbeds offers long-term value. Conversely, if your hotel seeks a user-friendly, automation-focused solution with quick onboarding, RoomRaccoon is the smarter pick.

Cloudbeds HMS 和 RoomRaccoon HMS 的价格是多少?

酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Cloudbeds Cloudbeds RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon
Starting Price From $500/mo From $1,000/mo

Cloudbeds HMS 有哪些 RoomRaccoon HMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds HMS 和 RoomRaccoon HMS 共享 46 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon
2路实时集成
PMS 连接性
关税
分析仪表板
多种语言
婚礼和企业预订模块
库存管理
忠诚度计划整合
特别优惠和折扣
礼品卡
礼品卡
集中的用户和角色管理

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 43 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:Cloudbeds 对比 RoomRaccoon(按业务目标)

我们分析了 16 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
Cloudbeds Himmapana Villas 中型
+ Growth in direct bookings: the combination of a strong social media presence and an effective online booking and payment system has led to a significant increase in direct bookings.
+ Operational efficiency: the adoption of a simple yet effective hotel management system has streamlined day-to-day operations, efficiently handling over 2,000 bookings annually, including special guest requests.
+ Remote management flexibility: the use of a cloud-based platform allows for the convenient remote management of the property, enabling operations to be handled effectively both on-site and during travel.

"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."

Thomas K. Petersen
Thomas K. Petersen
Managing Partner
RoomRaccoon Buff and Fellow 小型
+ 60% increase in RevPAR in a year by implementing RoomRaccoon
+ �s dynamic pricing tools.
+ 781% ROI on RaccoonUpsell subscription - RoomRaccoon

"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."

Frikkie du Toit
Frikkie du Toit
Hotel Owner
提高运营效率
Cloudbeds Flor Parks 小型
+ 17% increase in online reviews
+ 11% of monthly bookings from Google Free Listings
+ Fully integrated booking engine & channel manager

"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."

V
Victor Menor
Operations Manager
RoomRaccoon O'Two Boutique Hotel 小型
+ 307% ROI on Annual RaccoonUpsell subscription just from ancillary revenue
+ 46% direct bookings
+ Reduced human error by automating payments

"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."

Jayson van Noordwyk
Jayson van Noordwyk
General Manager
改善宾客体验
Cloudbeds The Pad Silverthorne 小型
+ 60% direct bookings in year one
+ 95% guest rating with 1000+ reviews
+ High OTA click-through rates, with lower cancellation rates

"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."

Kevin Bowen
Kevin Bowen
Director of Operations
RoomRaccoon Steenhof Suites 小型
+ 1836% ROI on RaccoonUpsell
+ 50% of guests check-in online
+ 127% increase in RevPAR

"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."

Cloudbeds 对比 RoomRaccoon:总结

Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds
4.6/5 来自 1,414 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

Intuitiveness and Ease of Use 94% 正面

Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.

Automation and Efficiency 88% 正面

The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.

Reservations and Channel Management 100% 正面

Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

Reservation Flexibility and Editing 75% 负面

The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.

货币兑换和金融业务 75% 负面

人们注意到货币转换的准确性存在问题,尤其是在多币种交易中。用户反映存在一些差异,影响了对账流程。改进货币转换配置可以简化财务管理。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #1 vs #4
中型(25-74 间客房) #1 vs #8
小型(10-24 间客房) #2 vs #5
超大型(200+ 间客房) #4 vs #8

独特功能

PMS 连接性 分析仪表板 库存管理 2路实时集成 集中的用户和角色管理
4.6/5 易用性 4.4/5 客户支持 189 个集成
访问官网
RoomRaccoon
RoomRaccoon
4.9/5 来自 572 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

易用性 100% 正面

许多用户称赞 RoomRaccoon 具有用户友好的界面和直观的设计,这减少了培训时间,并能顺利融入日常操作,从而提高了整体效率。

客户服务 63% 正面

虽然一些用户称赞支持团队的响应速度和专业水平,但另一些用户则批评售后服务和响应效率不足,这表明客户服务质量存在不一致之处。

持续改进 67% 正面

用户赞赏 RoomRaccoon 的持续发展,包括 AI 的增强,这些都有助于提高销售和运营功能,展现了其对长期适应性的承诺。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

关键问题 100% 负面

多篇评论指出,售后支持不力、技术问题悬而未决等关键问题严重影响了用户满意度和对系统的信任度。

定价问题 100% 负面

一些用户,尤其是那些经营季节性业务的用户,认为该系统的定价过高,这影响了他们的决策,尽管他们认为该系统包含的功能很有价值。

排名更高的方面

BE #1 vs #6
DE #1 vs #6
FR #5 vs #7
IE #1 vs #7

独特功能

特别优惠和折扣 关税 忠诚度计划整合 礼品卡 婚礼和企业预订模块
4.9/5 易用性 4.7/5 客户支持 88 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 RoomRaccoon 5.0 vs 4.6 (+0.3)
客户支持 RoomRaccoon 4.7 vs 4.4 (+0.4)
性价比 RoomRaccoon 4.7 vs 4.3 (+0.4)
入职培训 RoomRaccoon 4.8 vs 4.4 (+0.4)

关于 Cloudbeds HMS 与 RoomRaccoon HMS 的常见问题

Cloudbeds HMS 能否替代 RoomRaccoon HMS?

这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 RoomRaccoon HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomRaccoon HMS 提供 88 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Cloudbeds HMS 或 RoomRaccoon HMS 是否提供免费方案?

Cloudbeds HMS:否。RoomRaccoon HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Cloudbeds HMS 和 RoomRaccoon HMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,RoomRaccoon 的为 86。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息