The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,415 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 intuitiveness and ease of use 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
Revivo Technologies 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Guest CRM.
基于 HTR 上 1,415 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $500/mo | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,414 | 1 |
在分析了 1,415 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management,而 Revivo Technologies 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
|
|
−
货币兑换和金融业务
▾
|
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 675 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 235 条评价 | #39 1 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 51 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 546 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 245 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 145 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 96 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 532 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 166 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 201 条评价 | #20 1 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 13 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and Hotelx HMS hinges on your hotel's size, operational needs, and growth ambitions. Both platforms aim to streamline management and improve guest experiences, but they diverge significantly in scale, features, and maturity.
Cloudbeds, with its extensive global user base and recent reviews, offers a proven, comprehensive solution for hotels seeking reliability and scalability. Hotelx, as a newer entrant with innovative AI-driven features, targets hotels eager to leverage automation and real-time data but lacks the broad review footprint.
Are you prioritizing a mature, well-supported platform with a vast ecosystem, or are you more interested in a cutting-edge, AI-powered system that promises rapid growth and modernization?
Cloudbeds boasts over 1,200 recent reviews, a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a 91% likelihood to recommend, demonstrating its broad acceptance and proven performance. Hotelx, with only one review and a 0/5 rating, is too nascent to match Cloudbeds' credibility.
While Hotelx touts innovative AI features, Cloudbeds' extensive integrations, ease of use, and global presence make it a safer, more reliable investment for most hoteliers. Its platform supports diverse hotel types, from boutique hotels to resorts, in multiple regions.
Given the data, Cloudbeds stands out as the more mature, trusted choice. Are you ready to capitalize on its proven track record and extensive support network?
Cloudbeds and Hotelx both aim to streamline operations, but Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, all-in-one platform with 56 unique features, compared to Hotelx’s 5. Its interface is rated 4.58/5, slightly below Hotelx’s perfect 5/5, but Cloudbeds’ onboarding and support ratings are notably higher—4.41/5 and 4.38/5—versus Hotelx’s perfect scores but lacking recent reviews.
Cloudbeds’ platform is built for scalability, supporting properties of all sizes and regions, with over 190 verified integrations and a presence in 106 countries. Conversely, Hotelx’s limited regional presence and zero verified integrations suggest it’s better suited for small, tech-savvy hotels in India willing to accept less proven support.
Given the more extensive review data and global reach, Cloudbeds is the more reliable choice for hotels seeking a mature solution with proven results. Is your hotel prepared to adopt a platform with a track record of success?
If your hotel needs a proven, scalable platform with extensive integrations, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. Its broad feature set, dedicated support, and proven track record make it ideal for properties of all sizes, especially those planning to grow.
If your hotel is in India and prioritizes AI-driven insights, rapid automation, and a platform still in early adoption, Hotelx might appeal—though it currently lacks the reviews to confirm its effectiveness. For most hotels, especially those seeking stability and global support, Cloudbeds provides a safer, more comprehensive option.
In summary, choose Cloudbeds if you want reliability, wide adoption, and proven ROI. Opt for Hotelx if you're willing to pioneer new technology with the understanding that its support and results are untested at scale.
Cloudbeds is rated 4.58/5 for ease of use, with many reviews citing its intuitive, user-friendly interface that simplifies onboarding and daily operations. Its onboarding score of 4.41/5 reflects a smooth setup process, and support ratings of 4.38/5 highlight responsive assistance.
Hotelx, rated 5/5 for ease of use, benefits from its modern, AI-driven design, but the limited number of recent reviews makes its real-world usability uncertain. Its user experience may appeal to technically inclined hotels, but without broader feedback, confidence is limited.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 56 features, including PMS connectivity, advanced analytics, inventory management, multi-channel distribution, automation, and integrated revenue management modules—many of which are absent in Hotelx. Its features are designed to support complex operations, scale, and enhanced guest engagement.
Hotelx currently provides only five core features: real-time data integration, all-in-one reporting, and basic automation tools—suitable for minimalistic needs but lacking in depth. Its AI-driven recommendations are promising but not yet proven at scale.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ support is rated 4.38/5, with recent reviews praising its quick, helpful, and professional assistance. Customers often mention that support responds promptly, especially during onboarding, making operations smoother.
Hotelx’s perfect 5/5 rating is based on limited, non-recent reviews, making it difficult to assess current support quality. The absence of verified support interactions or recent customer feedback leaves its support reputation uncertain.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds integrates with over 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment gateways, and property systems, facilitating a unified tech stack. This extensive ecosystem reduces manual work and sync errors, boosting operational efficiency.
Hotelx has zero verified integrations, which limits its ability to connect with external tools and ecosystems. For properties relying on diverse channels and third-party systems, this is a significant drawback.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ recent reviews consistently rate it 4.54/5 for independent hotels, with a 91% recommendation rate, and praise its reliability, ease of use, and support. Larger properties like ITH Hotels also endorse its scalability and automation.
Hotelx’s sole review and a 0/5 rating do not provide sufficient data to gauge hotel satisfaction. Its untested reputation makes it a risky choice for hoteliers who prioritize proven performance.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ pricing starts at $500/month, with no freemium or trial options, offering a transparent, predictable cost structure. Hotelx charges $600/month, but lacks publicly available trial or discount information.
While Cloudbeds provides clear value, Hotelx’s higher price may be offset by its AI capabilities—though the absence of reviews makes it hard to assess ROI at this stage.
Not ideal if you prefer a lightweight, minimal setup or are in a niche segment that doesn’t require extensive automation.
Not ideal if you need a proven, scalable, and well-supported global system or require extensive integrations.
Cloudbeds offers a mature, widely adopted platform that supports diverse hotel types worldwide. Its extensive feature set, integrations, and high customer satisfaction make it a safe investment for properties looking to grow.
Hotelx, while innovative and AI-focused, remains untested at scale with minimal reviews and integrations. It’s best suited for forward-thinking hotels in India willing to take a chance on a newer technology.
If your priority is reliability, support, and proven results, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. For hotels eager to pioneer AI-driven management and operational automation, Hotelx may hold promise—though it currently lacks the robustness needed for most properties.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds HMS 和 Hotelx HMS (by Revivo) 共享 34 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 销售点 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 49 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
人们注意到货币转换的准确性存在问题,尤其是在多币种交易中。用户反映存在一些差异,影响了对账流程。改进货币转换配置可以简化财务管理。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 Hotelx HMS (by Revivo) 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hotelx HMS (by Revivo) 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Hotelx HMS (by Revivo) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds HMS:否。Hotelx HMS (by Revivo):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Revivo Technologies 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问