The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 1,414 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management,而 Slique 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
|
|
−
货币兑换和金融业务
▾
|
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 675 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 235 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 51 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 546 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 245 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 145 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 96 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 532 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 166 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 201 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 13 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS by Cloudbeds and sliQue GRM by Slique ultimately hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Cloudbeds addresses the core challenges of hotel management—reservation, distribution, and guest experience—within a unified platform, whereas sliQue's DataBarn centers on data-driven insights and automation tailored more toward real estate and property management sectors. How do these different focuses align with your hotel's goals?
If your team seeks an established, feature-rich management system with widespread industry adoption, Cloudbeds is the more proven choice. Conversely, if your hotel requires a highly customizable, automation-driven platform with advanced analytics, sliQue could appeal—though its hotel-specific capabilities are less mature.
Cloudbeds is designed specifically for hotels, offering a broad suite of functionalities like reservation management, channel distribution, guest communication, and revenue tools. sliQue’s DataBarn platform is more generalized, integrating robotics, IoT, and data analytics, primarily suited for real estate or property portfolios—not specifically tailored for hotel operations.
Cloudbeds’s extensive feature set—over 85 unique functionalities—supports daily hotel tasks, while sliQue’s focus on automation and analytics, despite its impressive technological scope, lacks dedicated hotel modules. Would your hotel benefit more from an all-in-one PMS built for hospitality or from a flexible, tech-centric platform with a broader industrial focus?
Cloudbeds boasts a user rating of 4.58/5 for ease of use, with over 1,200 reviews and recent feedback highlighting its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and staff-friendly design. Users frequently mention how even less tech-savvy team members find it accessible, and onboarding averages 4.41/5—indicative of a smooth setup.
sliQue’s DataBarn, however, is a complex platform designed for technical teams managing multiple systems and devices. With only five employees, sliQue’s interface appears less tailored for front-line hotel staff, and its usability for non-technical users remains untested in the hospitality space. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers an expansive feature library—85 exclusive hotel features like PMS connectivity, inventory management, multi-currency, integrated CRS, automated night audits, and guest messaging. It also supports unlimited channels and custom rates, making daily operations more efficient.
sliQue’s DataBarn provides advanced IoT integration, real-time data analytics, and automation capabilities, but these are not hotel-specific and lack the breadth of features necessary for hotel management. For hotel-focused functionalities, Cloudbeds’s dedicated modules clearly outperform sliQue’s industrial tech. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds maintains a customer support rating of 4.38/5, with reviews praising its quick, friendly, and professional service. Users appreciate the responsive support team, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, with many citing timely responses and ongoing assistance.
sliQue, with a tiny team of five, offers limited support infrastructure—no publicly available review data or customer testimonials highlight its support quality in the hotel context. Given Cloudbeds’s extensive user base and recent reviews, its support system is more reliable and proven. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds has established partnerships with over 190 verified technology providers, including major OTAs, POS systems, and revenue management tools, enabling seamless data synchronization. It supports integrations like HotelTime, Sirvoy, HiJiffy, and even Oracle Hospitality, covering most hotel needs.
sliQue’s DataBarn offers IoT and automation integrations, but with only one verified partner—Oracle Hospitality—its ecosystem is limited. For comprehensive, hotel-specific integrations, Cloudbeds’s extensive partner network is far superior. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s 4.62/5 overall rating, with recent reviews from over 1,200 users, demonstrates broad satisfaction across hotel segments, especially boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts. Users emphasize its ease of use, reliable support, and effect on revenue growth.
sliQue’s ratings are unavailable due to lack of hotel-specific reviews, making it difficult to evaluate hoteliers’ satisfaction. Given the current data, Cloudbeds’s reputation among hoteliers remains unmatched. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s baseline pricing starts at $500/month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise-grade nature. sliQue’s DataBarn does not publicly list pricing, but given its industrial focus, costs are likely customized based on system complexity and integrations.
Cloudbeds’s transparent pricing allows for better budgeting, while sliQue’s custom quotes require direct contact. For most hotels, Cloudbeds’s predictable fee structure offers clearer value. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Not ideal if your property relies heavily on custom automation or IoT device integration outside hospitality, as Cloudbeds primarily focuses on hotel management features rather than industrial automation.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a dedicated PMS, reservation engine, or direct guest communication tools—sliQue’s platform is better suited to industrial or property management sectors outside hospitality.
Cloudbeds and sliQue serve fundamentally different needs. Cloudbeds is a proven, hotel-specific platform that simplifies operations, enhances guest experiences, and scales with your property. sliQue’s DataBarn offers powerful automation and analytics, but more suited for industrial applications and real estate management.
If your hotel needs an integrated, easy-to-use management system with proven support, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. For properties seeking advanced automation and data insights—particularly in non-hospitality sectors—sliQue may be more suitable, albeit with less hotel-specific functionality.
Choose Cloudbeds if you want a reliable, feature-rich platform built for hotels, with extensive integrations and a strong reputation. Opt for sliQue if your property management is heavily automation-driven and your team has the technical capacity to implement a broader industrial tech stack.
In conclusion, for the average hotelier, Cloudbeds’s current review count, recent feedback, and comprehensive hotel focus make it the more dependable and scalable choice.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
人们注意到货币转换的准确性存在问题,尤其是在多币种交易中。用户反映存在一些差异,影响了对账流程。改进货币转换配置可以简化财务管理。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 sliQue GRM 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 sliQue GRM 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds HMS:否。sliQue GRM:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Slique 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问