Cloudbeds HMS vs. sliQue GRM: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 October 5, 2026  ·  已分析 1,547 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 1,547 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:

Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.

Slique 表现出色 .

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Cloudbeds HMS 与 sliQue GRM 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 1,547 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
100
0
推荐可能性
91%
0%
易用性
4.6/5
0.0/5
客户支持
4.4/5
0.0/5
性价比
4.3/5
0.0/5
起始价格 起价 $500/月 联系销售
经验证的评价 1,547 0

Cloudbeds HMS 与 sliQue GRM 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 1,547 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 支持与培训, 日历和预订管理, 报告与分析,而 Slique 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Slique Slique
优点
+ 支持与培训 ▾
+ 日历和预订管理 ▾
+ 报告与分析 ▾
+ 集成与一体化工作流程 ▾
缺点
− 账单、发票与支付 ▾
− 移动应用和远程访问 ▾
− 客房服务与运营规划 ▾

Cloudbeds 对比 Slique:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Slique Slique
小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ #2 675 条评价 —
中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ #1 235 条评价 —
大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ #1 51 条评价 —
超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ #4 5 条评价 —

按酒店类型

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Slique Slique
精品酒店 ▾ #1 546 条评价 —
豪华酒店 ▾ #3 245 条评价 —
品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ #2 145 条评价 —
长住酒店 ▾ #2 96 条评价 —

按区域

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Slique Slique
北美 ▾ #2 532 条评价 —
欧洲 ▾ #4 166 条评价 —
亚太 ▾ #3 201 条评价 —
中东 ▾ #3 13 条评价 —

The Decision

Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS by Cloudbeds and sliQue GRM by Slique ultimately hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Cloudbeds addresses the core challenges of hotel management—reservation, distribution, and guest experience—within a unified platform, whereas sliQue's DataBarn centers on data-driven insights and automation tailored more toward real estate and property management sectors. How do these different focuses align with your hotel's goals?

If your team seeks an established, feature-rich management system with widespread industry adoption, Cloudbeds is the more proven choice. Conversely, if your hotel requires a highly customizable, automation-driven platform with advanced analytics, sliQue could appeal—though its hotel-specific capabilities are less mature.

Is Cloudbeds or sliQue Better for Hotels?

Cloudbeds is designed specifically for hotels, offering a broad suite of functionalities like reservation management, channel distribution, guest communication, and revenue tools. sliQue’s DataBarn platform is more generalized, integrating robotics, IoT, and data analytics, primarily suited for real estate or property portfolios—not specifically tailored for hotel operations.

Cloudbeds’s extensive feature set—over 85 unique functionalities—supports daily hotel tasks, while sliQue’s focus on automation and analytics, despite its impressive technological scope, lacks dedicated hotel modules. Would your hotel benefit more from an all-in-one PMS built for hospitality or from a flexible, tech-centric platform with a broader industrial focus?

Which Is Easier to Use: Cloudbeds or sliQue?

Cloudbeds boasts a user rating of 4.58/5 for ease of use, with over 1,200 reviews and recent feedback highlighting its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and staff-friendly design. Users frequently mention how even less tech-savvy team members find it accessible, and onboarding averages 4.41/5—indicative of a smooth setup.

sliQue’s DataBarn, however, is a complex platform designed for technical teams managing multiple systems and devices. With only five employees, sliQue’s interface appears less tailored for front-line hotel staff, and its usability for non-technical users remains untested in the hospitality space. Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has Better Features: Cloudbeds or sliQue?

Cloudbeds offers an expansive feature library—85 exclusive hotel features like PMS connectivity, inventory management, multi-currency, integrated CRS, automated night audits, and guest messaging. It also supports unlimited channels and custom rates, making daily operations more efficient.

sliQue’s DataBarn provides advanced IoT integration, real-time data analytics, and automation capabilities, but these are not hotel-specific and lack the breadth of features necessary for hotel management. For hotel-focused functionalities, Cloudbeds’s dedicated modules clearly outperform sliQue’s industrial tech. Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Cloudbeds or sliQue?

Cloudbeds maintains a customer support rating of 4.38/5, with reviews praising its quick, friendly, and professional service. Users appreciate the responsive support team, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, with many citing timely responses and ongoing assistance.

sliQue, with a tiny team of five, offers limited support infrastructure—no publicly available review data or customer testimonials highlight its support quality in the hotel context. Given Cloudbeds’s extensive user base and recent reviews, its support system is more reliable and proven. Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has More Integrations: Cloudbeds or sliQue?

Cloudbeds has established partnerships with over 190 verified technology providers, including major OTAs, POS systems, and revenue management tools, enabling seamless data synchronization. It supports integrations like HotelTime, Sirvoy, HiJiffy, and even Oracle Hospitality, covering most hotel needs.

sliQue’s DataBarn offers IoT and automation integrations, but with only one verified partner—Oracle Hospitality—its ecosystem is limited. For comprehensive, hotel-specific integrations, Cloudbeds’s extensive partner network is far superior. Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Cloudbeds or sliQue?

Cloudbeds’s 4.62/5 overall rating, with recent reviews from over 1,200 users, demonstrates broad satisfaction across hotel segments, especially boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts. Users emphasize its ease of use, reliable support, and effect on revenue growth.

sliQue’s ratings are unavailable due to lack of hotel-specific reviews, making it difficult to evaluate hoteliers’ satisfaction. Given the current data, Cloudbeds’s reputation among hoteliers remains unmatched. Edge: Cloudbeds.

How Much Do Cloudbeds and sliQue Cost?

Cloudbeds’s baseline pricing starts at $500/month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise-grade nature. sliQue’s DataBarn does not publicly list pricing, but given its industrial focus, costs are likely customized based on system complexity and integrations.

Cloudbeds’s transparent pricing allows for better budgeting, while sliQue’s custom quotes require direct contact. For most hotels, Cloudbeds’s predictable fee structure offers clearer value. Edge: Cloudbeds.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Cloudbeds?

  • Hotels seeking an all-in-one platform that centralizes operations, reservations, and revenue management.
  • Boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts aiming to streamline guest experience and distribution.
  • Hotels that prioritize ease of use, quick onboarding, and reliable support.
  • Properties looking for extensive integrations with OTAs, POS, and payment providers.
  • Hotels planning to scale, as Cloudbeds offers scalable modules and multi-property management.

Not ideal if your property relies heavily on custom automation or IoT device integration outside hospitality, as Cloudbeds primarily focuses on hotel management features rather than industrial automation.

What Type of Hotel Should Use sliQue?

  • Hotels with a strong focus on automation, data analytics, and IoT device management.
  • Properties that operate across multiple sectors and want a flexible platform adaptable to various operational workflows.
  • Teams that have a dedicated in-house technical staff capable of leveraging advanced integrations.
  • Hotels looking for insights into operational efficiency and revenue optimization through automation.

Not ideal if your hotel requires a dedicated PMS, reservation engine, or direct guest communication tools—sliQue’s platform is better suited to industrial or property management sectors outside hospitality.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Cloudbeds and sliQue serve fundamentally different needs. Cloudbeds is a proven, hotel-specific platform that simplifies operations, enhances guest experiences, and scales with your property. sliQue’s DataBarn offers powerful automation and analytics, but more suited for industrial applications and real estate management.

If your hotel needs an integrated, easy-to-use management system with proven support, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. For properties seeking advanced automation and data insights—particularly in non-hospitality sectors—sliQue may be more suitable, albeit with less hotel-specific functionality.

Choose Cloudbeds if you want a reliable, feature-rich platform built for hotels, with extensive integrations and a strong reputation. Opt for sliQue if your property management is heavily automation-driven and your team has the technical capacity to implement a broader industrial tech stack.

In conclusion, for the average hotelier, Cloudbeds’s current review count, recent feedback, and comprehensive hotel focus make it the more dependable and scalable choice.

Cloudbeds HMS 和 sliQue GRM 的价格是多少?

酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。

Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Slique Slique
起始价格 起价 $500/月 —

功能对比:Cloudbeds HMS 与 sliQue GRM

这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。

功能 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Slique Slique
▾ 会计与金融
86%
0%
多币种
礼品卡
直接计费
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
自动化夜间审计
付款请求
▾ 营销与电子商务
91%
0%
原生电子邮件营销
团体预订引擎
网站开发
预订引擎
频道管理员
礼品卡
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
宾客沟通(短信)
原生电子邮件营销
宾客资料
客户关系管理
▾ 管理和配置
100%
0%
多种语言
多币种
集中用户和角色管理
▾ 用户管理
84%
0%
原生电子邮件营销
客人反馈管理
礼品卡
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
宾客资料
集中消息传递
▾ 前台
93%
8%
客人反馈管理
家政
物业管理系统
自动化夜间审计
移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本)
移动应用程序
日历视图
任务管理
自动提醒
宾客资料
平板电脑/自助值机
付款请求
集中消息传递
自动空间优化
▾ 群组管理
100%
50%
组功能
自动空间优化
▾ 宾客体验
80%
0%
客人反馈管理
礼品卡
集成身份证和护照扫描仪
数字注册
访客应用程序
网上值机
网上结账
宾客留言
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
平板电脑/自助值机
▾ 家政
89%
56%
家政
自动空间优化
客房服务手机应用程序
实时状态更新
自动分配
实时报告
轮班规划
员工信息
网上结账
▾ 付款
84%
0%
多币种
礼品卡
付款请求
直接计费
自动提醒
集成支付终端和读卡器
▾ 预订管理
92%
17%
评分购物模块
物业管理系统
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
礼品卡
频道管理员
综合 CRS
拖放式磁带图
费率管理
自动空间优化
自动分配
基于规则的房间分配
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
▾ 收入管理
88%
0%
评分购物模块
收益管理模块
定价情报
频道管理员
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
自定义费率
辅助收入跟踪
基本定价
▾ 税务与合规
100%
0%
符合 PCI 标准
符合 GDPR 规定
SOC2投诉
税务配置
▾ 支持与培训
100%
0%
全天候在线支持
▾ 食品与饮料
100%
0%
销售点

实际成果:Cloudbeds 对比 Slique(按业务目标)

我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
Cloudbeds Himmapana Villas 中型
+ Growth in direct bookings: the combination of a strong social media presence and an effective online booking and payment system has led to a significant increase in direct bookings.
+ Operational efficiency: the adoption of a simple yet effective hotel management system has streamlined day-to-day operations, efficiently handling over 2,000 bookings annually, including special guest requests.
+ Remote management flexibility: the use of a cloud-based platform allows for the convenient remote management of the property, enabling operations to be handled effectively both on-site and during travel.

"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."

Thomas K. Petersen
Thomas K. Petersen
Managing Partner
Slique Slique

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

提高运营效率
Cloudbeds Flor Parks 小型
+ 17% increase in online reviews
+ 11% of monthly bookings from Google Free Listings
+ Fully integrated booking engine & channel manager

"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."

V
Victor Menor
Operations Manager
Slique Slique

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

改善宾客体验
Cloudbeds The Pad Silverthorne 小型
+ 60% direct bookings in year one
+ 95% guest rating with 1000+ reviews
+ High OTA click-through rates, with lower cancellation rates

"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."

Kevin Bowen
Kevin Bowen
Director of Operations
Slique Slique

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Cloudbeds 对比 Slique:总结

Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds
4.6/5 来自 1,547 条评价

酒店经营者喜爱的方面

支持与培训 68% 正面

支持通常被认为是积极的,许多评价者称赞快速的聊天响应、乐于助人的客服以及简化培训流程的资源,帮助入职更顺利。不过,也有一些用户希望提供电话支持或更快的... 支持通常被认为是积极的,许多评价者称赞快速的聊天响应、乐于助人的客服以及简化培训流程的资源,帮助入职更顺利。不过,也有一些用户希望提供电话支持或更快的人力响应以应对紧急问题,少数用户指出新酒店或复杂设置的培训和跟进可能较慢。

日历和预订管理 76% 正面

评审者普遍认为 Cloudbeds 的日历是查看可用性、房型、预订状态、拆分预订和客人动态的核心操作界面。它简化了日常预订处理,减少了错误,并帮助前台团队以更少... 评审者普遍认为 Cloudbeds 的日历是查看可用性、房型、预订状态、拆分预订和客人动态的核心操作界面。它简化了日常预订处理,减少了错误,并帮助前台团队以更少的混乱更高效地工作。

报告与分析 63% 正面

许多评测者表示,Cloudbeds 通过各种报告帮助他们监控入住率、收入和运营情况,特别适用于日常管理和业绩评估。主要的反馈是报告下载速度较慢,格式显得陈旧,用... 许多评测者表示,Cloudbeds 通过各种报告帮助他们监控入住率、收入和运营情况,特别适用于日常管理和业绩评估。主要的反馈是报告下载速度较慢,格式显得陈旧,用户希望能拥有更可定制、交互性更强的仪表盘以及更深入的财务分析。

酒店经营者提出异议的方面

账单、发票与支付 47% 负面

Cloudbeds 以简化入住支付、发票、收据和账单管理而闻名,这帮助员工提高效率并保持账务有序。最大的问题在于支付设置和配置,需要多位审核员协助,有些用户希望... Cloudbeds 以简化入住支付、发票、收据和账单管理而闻名,这帮助员工提高效率并保持账务有序。最大的问题在于支付设置和配置,需要多位审核员协助,有些用户希望增加更多支付方式,并实现与本地支付处理商的更顺畅集成。

移动应用和远程访问 72% 负面

用户喜欢能够在办公桌之外访问 Cloudbeds,并随时查看关键信息,尤其是在管理人员远程或待命的酒店中。但移动应用是一个常见的痛点:评论者希望能够创建预订、推... 用户喜欢能够在办公桌之外访问 Cloudbeds,并随时查看关键信息,尤其是在管理人员远程或待命的酒店中。但移动应用是一个常见的痛点:评论者希望能够创建预订、推送通知、提高稳定性,以及提升性能速度。

独特功能

PMS 连接性 分析仪表板 库存管理 2路实时集成 集中的用户和角色管理
4.6/5 易用性 4.4/5 客户支持 203 个集成
访问官网
Slique
Slique
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 1 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Cloudbeds 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
易用性 Cloudbeds 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
客户支持 Cloudbeds 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)
性价比 Cloudbeds 4.3 vs 0.0 (+4.3)
上手体验 Cloudbeds 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)

关于 Cloudbeds HMS 与 sliQue GRM 的常见问题

Cloudbeds HMS 能否替代 sliQue GRM?

这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 sliQue GRM 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 203 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 sliQue GRM 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Cloudbeds HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Cloudbeds HMS 或 sliQue GRM 是否提供免费方案?

Cloudbeds HMS:否。sliQue GRM:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Cloudbeds HMS 和 sliQue GRM?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Slique 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取您的免费人工智能分析师报告

根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐

Ghostel icon
受到以下企业信赖
footer image 1 footer image 2 footer image 3 footer image 4 footer image 5 footer image 6 footer image 7

让我们查找您的酒店信息