The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 1,415 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management,而 Zonal 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
|
|
−
货币兑换和金融业务
▾
|
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 675 条评价 | #42 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 235 条评价 | #48 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 51 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 546 条评价 | #36 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 245 条评价 | #38 1 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 145 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 96 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 532 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 166 条评价 | #29 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 201 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 13 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and Zonal PMS hinges on your hotel’s size, operational needs, and growth ambitions. Both solutions aim to streamline hotel management, but Cloudbeds’ comprehensive features and extensive global presence give it a significant edge, especially given its larger review base and recent user feedback.
Cloudbeds offers an all-in-one platform with robust integrations, automations, and a user-friendly interface, while Zonal’s cloud PMS emphasizes real-time OTA connectivity and operational simplicity. The key question is: which system aligns better with your hotel’s current operations and future plans?
Cloudbeds and Zonal both serve as core management tools, but they approach hotel operations differently. Cloudbeds integrates reservation management, revenue tools, channel management, guest experience, and reporting into a single platform, aiming to reduce manual work and improve efficiency across diverse property types.
Zonal, on the other hand, focuses heavily on real-time OTA connectivity, front desk operations, and operational streamlining, primarily targeting independent hotels and multi-property groups. While Cloudbeds emphasizes automation and guest-centric tools, Zonal’s strength lies in its real-time distribution and simple management interface.
Do you need an all-in-one growth engine, or is a streamlined, OTA-focused system enough for your hotel?
If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich platform that centralizes operations—especially if you operate multiple properties or want to automate revenue management—go with Cloudbeds. Its 1,219 reviews and recent 76 reviews in the last six months reinforce its credibility and ongoing user satisfaction.
If your hotel prioritizes real-time OTA distribution, easy front desk management, and minimal operational complexity—particularly if you’re a smaller independent property—Zonal might seem appealing. However, with only 1 review and limited recent feedback, Zonal’s community and product development appear more limited.
For growth-driven hotels, Cloudbeds’ broader feature set and global presence make it the stronger choice. Smaller hotels seeking straightforward OTA management may find Zonal sufficient, but the limited recent reviews reduce confidence in its current support and innovation.
Cloudbeds currently holds a high ease-of-use rating of 4.58/5, with positive reviews emphasizing its intuitive, user-friendly interface. New users report quick onboarding (average 4.41/5) and minimal training hurdles, with many praising its straightforward navigation.
Zonal scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, reflecting its simple, clean interface tailored for operational efficiency. Support and onboarding are also highly rated, with users appreciating the UK-based support team that facilitates quick setup.
Edge: Zonal.
Cloudbeds vastly outpaces Zonal in features, boasting over 90 unique functionalities—including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, revenue management, multi-lingual and multi-currency support, automation tools, and integrated payment processing. These enable a holistic management environment adaptable to various hotel sizes.
Zonal offers essential features like real-time OTA channel management, a responsive booking engine, mobile check-in/out, digital room keys, and basic operational modules. While effective for streamlining day-to-day tasks, it lacks the extensive automation, detailed analytics, and revenue tools Cloudbeds provides.
Conclusion: Cloudbeds’ feature set is far more comprehensive, supporting scaling and advanced revenue strategies. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds holds a customer support rating of 4.38/5, with reviews citing fast response times and attentive service, although some users report occasional delays during peak periods. Their support team is generally seen as responsive and friendly.
Zonal scores a perfect 5/5, with users praising their dedicated UK-based support, quick issue resolution, and smooth onboarding process. While Zonal’s support appears highly rated, the limited number of recent reviews restricts full comparison.
Edge: Zonal.
Cloudbeds integrates with 190 verified partners, including popular OTAs, payment gateways, revenue management, and POS systems. This extensive network allows for a unified operation environment, reducing manual data entry and errors.
Zonal’s PMS offers just 2 verified integrations, primarily with its own F&B systems and a handful of external partners like OTAs. Its limited integration ecosystem restricts flexibility, especially for hotels seeking a fully connected tech stack.
Conclusion: Cloudbeds’ extensive integrations position it as the more adaptable, future-proof choice. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ overall rating of 4.62/5 is based on 1,219 reviews, with recent positive feedback emphasizing its ease of use, automation, and support. Hotels across various segments, especially boutique and Hostel properties, rate it highly, with an NPS of 8.94/10.
Zonal’s current rating is 0/5, with only 1 review, and no recent feedback available. This lack of community input makes it difficult to assess user satisfaction confidently.
Conclusion: Cloudbeds’ well-established reputation and recent reviews make it the favored system. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a fixed monthly fee of $500, with no additional implementation or trial costs. The pricing reflects its comprehensive feature set and global support infrastructure.
Zonal’s base price is $600 per month, with similar no-trial policies. While slightly higher, Zonal’s pricing may be justified by its focused features for specific markets, but the lack of transparent additional costs limits precise comparison.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds and Zonal serve different hotel management needs. Cloudbeds provides a full-featured, integrated platform with a strong customer base, ongoing innovation, and a global reach, making it ideal for growth-oriented and multi-property hotels.
Zonal delivers a straightforward, reliable solution with excellent support, best suited for independent hotels or properties that prioritize OTA connectivity and operational simplicity.
If your hotel aims to scale, optimize revenue, and benefit from automation, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. If operational simplicity and local support are your priorities, Zonal could suffice, but limited recent community feedback is a concern.
In conclusion, Cloudbeds’ larger review base, recent user satisfaction, and extensive feature set make it the recommended choice for most hotels looking to grow and modernize.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
人们注意到货币转换的准确性存在问题,尤其是在多币种交易中。用户反映存在一些差异,影响了对账流程。改进货币转换配置可以简化财务管理。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 Zonal PMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zonal PMS 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Zonal PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds HMS:否。Zonal PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Zonal 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问