The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,293 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Centralized user & role management and Multi-lingual.
roommaster 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 1,293 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $200/mo | From $300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,255 | 38 |
在分析了 1,293 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 易于使用且设计直观, 实时同步, 一体化平台集成,而 roommaster 用户则强调 易于使用。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且设计直观
▾
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
+
实时同步
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化平台集成
▾
|
|
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制限制
▾
|
−
支持响应能力
▾
|
|
−
速度和性能问题
▾
|
−
产品价值与竞争力
▾
|
|
−
网站建设者限制
▾
|
−
客户服务改进
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 572 条评价 | #19 12 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 171 条评价 | #15 17 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 42 条评价 | #21 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #11 4 条评价 | #23 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 484 条评价 | #20 12 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 213 条评价 | #27 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 108 条评价 | #19 9 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 92 条评价 | #24 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #1 405 条评价 | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 183 条评价 | #29 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 231 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #6 14 条评价 | #17 0 条评价 |
When choosing a channel management solution, your hotel needs to streamline distribution, avoid overbookings, and maximize revenue. Cloudbeds’ channel manager (myallocator) and roommaster serve these core functions but diverge significantly in scope, user experience, and recent performance, which impacts your decision. With Cloudbeds holding more recent reviews and a higher user rating, it’s clear which product currently leads the market.
Both products aim to simplify distribution across numerous channels and prevent overbookings. Cloudbeds offers a unified platform that combines PMS, booking engine, and channel management, while roommaster focuses solely on distribution automation across 300+ OTAs and GDS platforms. Cloudbeds’s extensive integrations, AI-powered insights, and intuitive interface make it a versatile choice, but roommaster’s specialized distribution control can be advantageous for properties with complex multi-channel needs.
The key difference lies in their broader system scope. Cloudbeds provides a more holistic hospitality solution with advanced reporting and guest engagement features, whereas roommaster specializes in managing and automating online distribution. Are you looking for an all-in-one platform or a dedicated distribution tool?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, easy-to-use platform that combines PMS, booking engine, and channel management, Cloudbeds is the better fit. It’s especially suitable for independent, boutique, and small chain hotels that want a scalable, intuitive system with strong AI and automation features.
If your primary focus is automating distribution across a vast network of OTAs and GDS, and your team is comfortable with a more technical, distribution-specific solution, roommaster might be appropriate. Its specialization in channel distribution benefits properties with complex multi-channel strategies, but recent reviews suggest support and stability issues could hinder performance. Given Cloudbeds’s higher review count (1062 vs 31) and more recent feedback, Cloudbeds is the clear leader today.
Cloudbeds scores 4.6/5 for ease of use, with most recent reviews praising its intuitive dashboard, simplified setup, and straightforward daily operations. Users highlight the platform’s clean interface, quick onboarding, and helpful training resources, making staff adoption smooth.
Roommaster’s ease of use, rated at 4.35/5, is recognized for its straightforward operation and faster training. However, support responsiveness issues noted in recent reviews could complicate onboarding and daily use, especially during busy periods.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 17 features, including centralized user management, multi-lingual support, and unlimited channels at no extra cost, making it more adaptable. It also provides advanced analytics, automation tools, and direct integrations with popular PMS and booking engines.
Roommaster provides 14 core features focused heavily on distribution automation and rate parity, with no exclusive features beyond its core channel management. Despite its robust distribution network, it lacks some of Cloudbeds’s broader capabilities, like multi-lingual support and centralized user management.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support scores 4.41/5, with many recent reviews emphasizing quick, responsible assistance and a supportive onboarding process. Users frequently mention that Cloudbeds’s customer service is more responsive and helpful compared to past experiences, making it a more reliable partner.
Roommaster’s support scores 3.94/5, with users noting improvements over the years but still citing issues with after-hours responsiveness and technical support delays. Some reviews point out that support can be inconsistent, especially outside regular hours.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds supports 190 verified partners, including integrations with leading booking engines, property management systems, and marketing tools. Shared integrations like SiteMinder, TrustYou, and RateGain provide flexibility for expanding your tech stack.
Roommaster offers 56 verified partners, focusing primarily on channel distribution, GDS, and regional OTAs. While effective for distribution, it lacks the broad marketplace and API support Cloudbeds offers, limiting customization options.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s overall rating is 4.64/5 with 1062 reviews, and recent feedback continues to be highly positive, especially among boutique and small chain hotels. Independent hotels and hostels rate Cloudbeds highly for its usability and comprehensive features.
Roommaster’s rating is 4.14/5, with significantly fewer reviews—only 31—and mixed recent feedback. Larger hotels and chains have expressed appreciation for its distribution capabilities but note support issues.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s base price is $200 per month, with no additional implementation fees or hidden costs, providing predictable budgeting for your hotel. Roommaster’s starting price is $300 per month, with similar no-trial, no-implementation fee policies, but some users find additional costs for integrations or support.
While Cloudbeds’s pricing is slightly more accessible, its value lies in its broader feature set and ease of use, justifying the investment for hotels seeking an all-in-one platform.
Not ideal if your hotel solely needs a distribution tool with limited operational management, or if you require highly specialized or regional OTA integrations.
Not ideal if you need a comprehensive management platform, or if customer support responsiveness is a high priority.
Cloudbeds provides a unified, easy-to-use platform with high ratings, a vast partner network, and AI-powered features that support growth. Its extensive recent reviews underscore its reliability and value, making it ideal for hotels seeking a complete management solution.
Roommaster focuses on distribution automation, offering a robust network of OTAs and GDS but with less recent positive feedback and support responsiveness concerns. It’s better suited for hotels that prioritize distribution and are comfortable managing support challenges on their own.
If you want a reliable, scalable, all-in-one platform, Cloudbeds is the safer choice. For dedicated distribution with a focus on extensive OTA reach, roommaster can still deliver—but weigh its support limitations carefully.
渠道经理 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 和 roommaster channel manager 共享 14 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 无限频道(无需额外费用) | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
我们分析了 11 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"Beginning of each shift, our staff pulls up the dashboard which gives the arrivals, the checkouts, the list of who’s coming in, how many rooms we have as far as dirty, clean, out o..."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds直观的界面受到许多用户的好评,他们认为该界面对各级员工都非常友好。这一优势缩短了培训时间,提高了操作的一致性,但部分用户仍然认为高级功能导航... Cloudbeds直观的界面受到许多用户的好评,他们认为该界面对各级员工都非常友好。这一优势缩短了培训时间,提高了操作的一致性,但部分用户仍然认为高级功能导航方面还有改进空间。
该平台跨渠道的实时同步功能被誉为一项关键特性。这为用户提供了最新的库存信息,显著减少了超额预订的情况。评论者强调了其在保持OTA和直接预订等平台间信息一... 该平台跨渠道的实时同步功能被誉为一项关键特性。这为用户提供了最新的库存信息,显著减少了超额预订的情况。评论者强调了其在保持OTA和直接预订等平台间信息一致性方面的重要性。
许多用户称赞 Cloudbeds 将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎无缝集成,减少了对多个系统的需求,从而简化了操作。这种集成有助于员工集中高效地管理预订... 许多用户称赞 Cloudbeds 将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎无缝集成,减少了对多个系统的需求,从而简化了操作。这种集成有助于员工集中高效地管理预订、房价和宾客互动,提高工作效率并减少错误。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Cloudbeds 支持基本功能,但其在网站设计、消息传递和报告等方面的自定义选项一直备受诟病。用户希望在定制这些功能方面拥有更大的灵活性和控制权,以便更... 虽然 Cloudbeds 支持基本功能,但其在网站设计、消息传递和报告等方面的自定义选项一直备受诟病。用户希望在定制这些功能方面拥有更大的灵活性和控制权,以便更好地满足特定的业务需求并改善宾客体验。
尽管该平台总体运行良好,但部分用户反映在高峰时段偶尔会出现速度瓶颈和延迟,这会影响工作效率。因此,我们希望在高峰时段加快加载速度并提高系统响应速度。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Room Master 因其易学、简单易用而受到称赞,有助于更快地进行员工培训和更顺畅地运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管总体情况有所改善,但非工作时间的支持仍然是一个关键问题。用户反映,非工作时间的消息没有得到回复,这让人很失望。
一些用户认为该软件的价值主张已经降低,因为该公司似乎不再像以前那样对该产品进行投资,从而降低了其与其他解决方案的竞争力。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 和 roommaster channel manager 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster channel manager 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator):否。roommaster channel manager:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 99,roommaster 的为 76。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问