The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,255 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Integrated Payment Processing and Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
Shiji Group 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 1,255 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,255 | 0 |
在分析了 1,255 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 易于使用且设计直观, 实时同步, 一体化平台集成,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且设计直观
▾
|
|
|
+
实时同步
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化平台集成
▾
|
|
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制限制
▾
|
|
|
−
速度和性能问题
▾
|
|
|
−
网站建设者限制
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 572 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 171 条评价 | #35 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 42 条评价 | #32 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #11 4 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 484 条评价 | #37 0 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 213 条评价 | #37 0 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 108 条评价 | #38 0 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 92 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #1 405 条评价 | #23 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 183 条评价 | #34 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 231 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #6 14 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds’ Myallocator and Shiji Horizon Distribution boils down to your hotel's specific needs for channel management. Both promise to streamline distribution, but Cloudbeds has a proven track record backed by extensive recent reviews, while Shiji’s platform remains less reviewed and lacks recent user feedback. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a trusted, highly-rated platform or are considering a broader, potentially more customizable distribution system.
Cloudbeds is the more established and reviewed platform, with over 1,060 recent reviews, a 4.64/5 overall rating, and a 91% likelihood to recommend. In contrast, Shiji Group’s Horizon Distribution has no recent reviews or ratings, which presents a significant gap in current user confidence. Do you want a platform with proven reliability and ongoing support?
Cloudbeds’ Myallocator offers a comprehensive, all-in-one channel management system with 190 verified partners, real-time integrations, and an intuitive user experience. Shiji Horizon, on the other hand, provides an extensive global network of 64 partners, including key Chinese platforms like WeChat and TikTok, but lacks recent user feedback to validate its performance.
Cloudbeds focuses on simplifying multi-channel distribution with features like unlimited channels, multi-currency support, and integrated payment processing. Shiji emphasizes broad global connectivity and automation, but the absence of recent reviews makes it hard to assess its current reliability. Do you prefer a platform with a proven track record or one still gaining traction?
If your hotel needs a user-friendly, highly-rated channel manager with proven support and extensive integrations, go with Cloudbeds. It’s ideal for independent or boutique hotels seeking reliable, real-time synchronization with major OTAs and GDSs, backed by 1,062 recent reviews and a 4.64/5 rating.
If your hotel’s growth strategy involves expanding into Asian markets with WeChat, TikTok, or other Chinese platforms, and you’re comfortable with less recent review data, Shiji Horizon’s broad partner network might be appealing. However, given the lack of current reviews or ratings, Cloudbeds remains the safer choice for most hoteliers prioritizing proven performance and support.
Cloudbeds’ platform scores a 4.6/5 in ease of use, with a straightforward interface and highly rated onboarding experience (4.45/5). Users frequently praise its intuitive design, quick setup, and minimal staff training requirements, making it accessible for hotels of all sizes.
Shiji Horizon provides a robust, enterprise-level platform that’s likely more complex, but with no recent reviews or user feedback available, assessing ease of use is difficult. The lack of recent support reviews suggests it may not match Cloudbeds’ user-friendly reputation. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 10 unique features such as PMS connectivity, two-way real-time integrations, centralized user & role management, unlimited channels, and integrated payment processing. Shiji Horizon provides core distribution features through its extensive partner network but does not list additional features beyond partner access and automation.
Cloudbeds’ focus on automation, multi-currency support, and detailed reporting make it more versatile for hotel operations. Shiji’s strength lies in its broad partner network and coverage, but it lacks the depth of features currently proven through user reviews. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ support scores 4.41/5, with users highlighting responsive customer service and dedicated onboarding. Many reviews cite quick, helpful responses, with testimonials like “I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds.”
Shiji Horizon offers support but has no recent reviews to evaluate its responsiveness or quality. Without updated feedback, Cloudbeds’ established support reputation clearly stands out. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including major OTAs like Booking.com, Expedia, and Airbnb, as well as niche offerings like WebRezPro and Sirvoy. Shiji Horizon has 64 verified partners, sharing some with Cloudbeds but lacking many of the smaller or specialized integrations.
The larger, more diverse integration ecosystem of Cloudbeds provides greater flexibility for hotels seeking tailored solutions. Its extensive partner list and seamless API support make it the more adaptable platform. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ user base, comprising hotels, hostels, and boutique properties, rates it at 4.64/5 based on over 1,060 recent reviews, with a 91% recommendation rate. Hotels of all segments—independent, boutique, hostel, and resort—appreciate its ease of use, reliability, and support.
Shiji Horizon has no current review data available, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Given the strong, recent feedback for Cloudbeds, it’s clear that hoteliers rate it highly. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a flat monthly fee of $200, with no implementation or hidden fees, and offers a straightforward pricing model. Shiji Horizon’s pricing is not publicly available, and no trial or demo information is provided.
The transparent, fixed pricing of Cloudbeds makes it easier for hotels to budget, while the lack of pricing details for Shiji Horizon creates uncertainty. For most hotels, Cloudbeds’ known cost structure is an advantage. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ Myallocator is the more reliable choice for most hoteliers today, thanks to its proven performance, extensive recent reviews, and high user satisfaction. Its robust features, strong integrations, and user-friendly design offer a clear advantage for independent hotels and boutique properties looking to optimize distribution.
Shiji Horizon offers broad global connectivity, especially in Asian markets, but its lack of recent reviews and ratings makes it riskier for hotels seeking dependable, supported solutions. If your hotel is expanding into Asia and has the resources for enterprise systems, it could be worth exploring, but for most, Cloudbeds remains the safer, smarter choice.
In conclusion, if you want a channel manager with verified reliability, a wealth of integrations, and high user satisfaction, go with Cloudbeds. For hotels with specific Asian market needs and enterprise capabilities, Shiji Horizon might be worth consideration, but only once it has proven performance in recent user feedback.
渠道经理 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 和 Shiji Horizon Distribution 共享 7 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 多币种支持 | ||
| 无限频道(无需额外费用) | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds直观的界面受到许多用户的好评,他们认为该界面对各级员工都非常友好。这一优势缩短了培训时间,提高了操作的一致性,但部分用户仍然认为高级功能导航... Cloudbeds直观的界面受到许多用户的好评,他们认为该界面对各级员工都非常友好。这一优势缩短了培训时间,提高了操作的一致性,但部分用户仍然认为高级功能导航方面还有改进空间。
该平台跨渠道的实时同步功能被誉为一项关键特性。这为用户提供了最新的库存信息,显著减少了超额预订的情况。评论者强调了其在保持OTA和直接预订等平台间信息一... 该平台跨渠道的实时同步功能被誉为一项关键特性。这为用户提供了最新的库存信息,显著减少了超额预订的情况。评论者强调了其在保持OTA和直接预订等平台间信息一致性方面的重要性。
许多用户称赞 Cloudbeds 将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎无缝集成,减少了对多个系统的需求,从而简化了操作。这种集成有助于员工集中高效地管理预订... 许多用户称赞 Cloudbeds 将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎无缝集成,减少了对多个系统的需求,从而简化了操作。这种集成有助于员工集中高效地管理预订、房价和宾客互动,提高工作效率并减少错误。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Cloudbeds 支持基本功能,但其在网站设计、消息传递和报告等方面的自定义选项一直备受诟病。用户希望在定制这些功能方面拥有更大的灵活性和控制权,以便更... 虽然 Cloudbeds 支持基本功能,但其在网站设计、消息传递和报告等方面的自定义选项一直备受诟病。用户希望在定制这些功能方面拥有更大的灵活性和控制权,以便更好地满足特定的业务需求并改善宾客体验。
尽管该平台总体运行良好,但部分用户反映在高峰时段偶尔会出现速度瓶颈和延迟,这会影响工作效率。因此,我们希望在高峰时段加快加载速度并提高系统响应速度。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 和 Shiji Horizon Distribution 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Horizon Distribution 提供 64 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator):否。Shiji Horizon Distribution:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 99,Shiji Group 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问