项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 1,384 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的住宿设施 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
RHG Hotels 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 1,384 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $600/月 | 联系销售 |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,384 | 0 |
在分析了 1,384 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 易用性和员工培训, pms日历和预订管理, 报告与分析,而 RHG Hotels 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
RHG Hotels |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易用性和员工培训
▾
|
|
|
+
PMS日历和预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
报告与分析
▾
|
|
|
+
渠道管理和OTA连接
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持响应速度和人工协助
▾
|
|
|
−
移动应用和远程访问限制
▾
|
|
|
−
账单、支付和发票设置
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
RHG Hotels |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
RHG Hotels |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
RHG Hotels |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and EMMA by RHG Hotels hinges on your hotel's core needs. Cloudbeds offers a full-fledged property management system designed to streamline operations, bookings, and revenue, while EMMA is a feedback analysis platform focused on interpreting reviews and enhancing guest satisfaction. If your goal is to improve operational efficiency and revenue management, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. But if understanding and acting on guest feedback is your priority, EMMA might appeal more—though Cloudbeds's recent review volume makes its capabilities more reliable.
Cloudbeds and EMMA serve fundamentally different functions within hospitality management. Cloudbeds provides a comprehensive platform that handles reservations, channel management, housekeeping, billing, and revenue optimization, making it suitable for hotels seeking operational control. EMMA, on the other hand, aggregates reviews from multiple sources, analyzes guest feedback with AI, and offers actionable insights to improve service quality.
Cloudbeds has over 1,071 reviews in the last six months and a 4.63/5 overall rating, indicating widespread recent usage. EMMA, with no reviews or ratings, is less proven in the market, limiting confidence in its effectiveness. Do you want a platform that manages your property or one that improves guest experience through feedback analysis?
Edge: Cloudbeds
If your hotel needs a unified system to automate reservations, manage distribution, streamline operations, and drive revenue, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. It’s trusted by thousands of properties across multiple continents and scores high in ease of use, customer support, and recent reviews, making it ideal for small to medium hotels, hostels, and boutique properties.
If, however, your primary focus is on understanding guest sentiment, responding to reviews, and improving guest satisfaction based on customer feedback, EMMA’s AI-driven review insights might be appealing. But without recent reviews or proven market adoption, it’s a less reliable choice for active hotels looking for tangible operational benefits.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds boasts a 4.61/5 ease of use rating, with 81 recent reviews indicating a highly user-friendly experience. Users praise its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and mobile app, with comments such as, “Cloudbeds is easy to navigate and manage daily tasks,” and “Our staff adopted it quickly, saving us time in daily operations.”
EMMA’s usability is unverified due to the lack of reviews or user feedback. With a small team, you need a platform that your staff can learn rapidly and adopt confidently. Based on available data, Cloudbeds’s ease of use holds a significant edge.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds offers 64 exclusive features, including a channel manager, revenue management module, online check-in, guest messaging, integrated payment processing, automated night audit, and extensive integrations with over 190 verified partners. These features support a fully integrated property operation, reducing manual work and improving efficiency.
EMMA provides review aggregation and sentiment analysis but lacks operational management features. Its capabilities are limited to interpreting feedback, with no broader hotel management tools or integrations. Therefore, Cloudbeds’s robust feature set makes it the better choice for comprehensive property management.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds’s customer support is rated 4.41/5, with recent reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses and excellent onboarding assistance. Hoteliers say, “The support team is responsive and always ready to help,” and “They guided us through setup and are available when needed.”
There are no available reviews or ratings for EMMA’s customer support, making it impossible to evaluate. Given Cloudbeds’s proven, high support ratings, it clearly offers more reliable assistance.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds connects to over 190 verified partners, including booking platforms, payment gateways, CRM tools, and channel managers, enabling a seamless operational ecosystem. Its integrations support real-time updates, automation, and data flow between systems.
EMMA lacks information on integrations or partner connections, indicating limited or no connectivity to external systems. For a hotel seeking a connected, scalable platform, Cloudbeds’s extensive integration network strongly favors it.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds’s recent reviews reflect a 4.63/5 overall and a 91% likelihood to recommend, based on over 1,000 reviews in the past six months. Hoteliers across segments like boutique hotels, hostels, and small independents praise its ease of use, features, and support, with comments like “It’s the backbone of our operations” and “Increased our direct bookings significantly.”
EMMA has no reviews or ratings, so there’s no user feedback to compare. Market evidence clearly favors Cloudbeds’s high-rated user experience.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds’s pricing starts at $600/month with no freemium or free trial, providing a transparent cost for its full property management capabilities. EMMA does not disclose pricing, which might indicate a tailored or premium model, but also makes direct comparison impossible.
Given the detailed feature set and recent review volume, Cloudbeds’s pricing aligns with its market value—offering a clear, predictable investment.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, or you only need feedback analysis without operational management.
Cloudbeds offers a complete property management system with a proven track record, extensive features, and high user satisfaction, making it the preferred choice for most hoteliers. Its recent review volume and high ratings demonstrate its reliability and market adoption, especially for properties looking to optimize operations and revenue.
EMMA’s focus on review analysis could supplement existing systems but lacks the operational breadth needed for active hotel management. Without recent reviews or proven efficacy at scale, it’s a less compelling option for hotels seeking a comprehensive platform.
For hotels demanding operational control, automation, and scalable growth, Cloudbeds is the clear leader. EMMA may serve niche feedback needs but isn’t ready to replace a full PMS for most hoteliers.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
RHG Hotels | |
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $600/月 | — |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
RHG Hotels |
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
一个反复强调的优势是Cloudbeds对非技术背景的酒店员工来说易于学习,这缩短了培训时间,并帮助小型酒店以更少的复杂度运营。评论者常提到教程、视频和简洁的界... 一个反复强调的优势是Cloudbeds对非技术背景的酒店员工来说易于学习,这缩短了培训时间,并帮助小型酒店以更少的复杂度运营。评论者常提到教程、视频和简洁的界面是系统加快采用和日常操作的原因。
用户通常将Cloudbeds的日历作为核心的日常工作区,用于查看房态、管理预订和处理入住/退房。他们重视清晰的房态概览、拖放编辑、拆分预订以及更快的前台工作流程... 用户通常将Cloudbeds的日历作为核心的日常工作区,用于查看房态、管理预订和处理入住/退房。他们重视清晰的房态概览、拖放编辑、拆分预订以及更快的前台工作流程,尽管有些用户希望点击次数更少、预订操作更安全。
支持服务是评论中的一个主要差异点,许多用户称赞快速的在线聊天帮助、良好的跟进以及帮助新员工快速上手的培训支持。同时,也有一些评论者批评响应时间慢、聊天... 支持服务是评论中的一个主要差异点,许多用户称赞快速的在线聊天帮助、良好的跟进以及帮助新员工快速上手的培训支持。同时,也有一些评论者批评响应时间慢、聊天机器人操作不顺畅,以及在紧急酒店问题上缺乏电话或真人支持。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
支持服务是评论中的一个主要差异点,许多用户称赞快速的在线聊天帮助、良好的跟进以及帮助新员工快速上手的培训支持。同时,也有一些评论者批评响应时间慢、聊天... 支持服务是评论中的一个主要差异点,许多用户称赞快速的在线聊天帮助、良好的跟进以及帮助新员工快速上手的培训支持。同时,也有一些评论者批评响应时间慢、聊天机器人操作不顺畅,以及在紧急酒店问题上缺乏电话或真人支持。
Cloudbeds 的云访问功能受到好评,因为管理者可以随时随地工作,但移动应用始终是一个薄弱环节。评测者希望实现真正的随时操作,比如创建预订、接收推送通知、查... Cloudbeds 的云访问功能受到好评,因为管理者可以随时随地工作,但移动应用始终是一个薄弱环节。评测者希望实现真正的随时操作,比如创建预订、接收推送通知、查看房态,以及拥有更稳定的应用体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 EMMA 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 205 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 EMMA 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。EMMA:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,RHG Hotels 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐