Cloudbeds PMS vs. ThinkReservations PMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 October 12, 2026  ·  已分析 1,786 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 1,786 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:

Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 易用性和员工培训 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的住宿设施 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Centralized Messaging.

ThinkReservations 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (0.0/5) .

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Cloudbeds PMS 与 ThinkReservations PMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 1,786 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
100
87
推荐可能性
92%
97%
易用性
4.6/5
4.8/5
客户支持
4.4/5
4.8/5
性价比
4.4/5
4.7/5
起始价格 起价 $600/月 起价 $500/月
经验证的评价 1,379 407

Cloudbeds PMS 与 ThinkReservations PMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 1,786 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 易用性和员工培训, pms日历和预订管理, 报告与分析,而 ThinkReservations 用户则强调 支持响应速度和问题解决, 易用性与运营效率, 多酒店管理与扩展性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Cloudbeds Cloudbeds ThinkReservations ThinkReservations
优点
+ 易用性和员工培训 ▾
+ 支持响应速度和问题解决 ▾
+ PMS日历和预订管理 ▾
+ 易用性与运营效率 ▾
+ 报告与分析 ▾
+ 多酒店管理与扩展性 ▾
+ 渠道管理和OTA连接 ▾
+ 价格与可用性管理 ▾
缺点
− 支持响应速度和人工协助 ▾
− 产品改进和功能更新 ▾
− 移动应用和远程访问限制 ▾
− 日历功能与自定义 ▾
− 账单、支付和发票设置 ▾
− 报告和导出限制 ▾

Cloudbeds 对比 ThinkReservations:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds ThinkReservations ThinkReservations
小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ #1 592 条评价 #4 145 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ #4 212 条评价 #9 25 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ #5 42 条评价 #6 3 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #13 4 条评价 #5 1 条评价

按酒店类型

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds ThinkReservations ThinkReservations
精品酒店 ▾ #2 473 条评价 #7 100 条评价
豪华酒店 ▾ #4 228 条评价 #7 70 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ #6 116 条评价 #7 24 条评价
长住酒店 ▾ #2 93 条评价 #11 8 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds ThinkReservations ThinkReservations
北美 ▾ #2 435 条评价 #1 386 条评价
欧洲 ▾ #7 163 条评价 #57 0 条评价
亚太 ▾ #3 226 条评价 #32 0 条评价
中东 ▾ #7 11 条评价 #32 0 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and ThinkReservations PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but Cloudbeds excels with a broader feature set and larger global presence, while ThinkReservations offers a straightforward, user-friendly experience primarily suited for small to medium properties. How do you prioritize scalability versus ease of use?

While Cloudbeds has a significantly larger review base and more recent feedback, ThinkReservations has earned high praise for its simplicity and customer support. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s growth trajectory and operational style?

Is Cloudbeds or ThinkReservations Better for Hotels?

Cloudbeds and ThinkReservations are both designed to simplify hotel operations, but they diverge on scope and depth. Cloudbeds offers a unified platform connecting reservations, revenue, distribution, and guest engagement—an ideal choice for hotels aiming to scale or manage multiple properties. ThinkReservations focuses on core PMS functionalities, providing an intuitive system that handles bookings and guest management efficiently, especially for smaller hotels or B&Bs.

The key difference lies in their market presence: Cloudbeds boasts over 1,000 reviews, with 81 in the last six months, indicating active, ongoing user feedback and innovation. ThinkReservations, with just 356 reviews and only 4 recent ones, may not reflect the latest product developments, but it remains highly rated for customer support and ease of use.

In essence, Cloudbeds is better suited for properties seeking growth, integrations, and advanced features, whereas ThinkReservations is a solid choice if your priority is straightforward operation and personalized support. Are you prepared to scale with a system that offers extensive integrations and versatile tools, or do you prefer a leaner system with excellent support?

Cloudbeds vs ThinkReservations: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a comprehensive, adaptable platform capable of handling complex operations across multiple properties, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its 25 exclusive features—including revenue management, a guest CRM, and integrated ID scanners—make it a versatile solution for hotels looking to expand.

Conversely, if your hotel is a small to mid-sized operation prioritizing ease of use, quick onboarding, and responsive support, ThinkReservations is ideal. Its streamlined interface, 16 verified integrations, and high customer satisfaction ratings—averaging 4.88/5—support efficient management without the fuss of extensive customization.

For properties that want to grow, optimize revenue, and manage operations from a single dashboard, Cloudbeds delivers the most value. If simplicity, support, and quick implementation are your priorities, ThinkReservations is the better fit.

Is Cloudbeds or ThinkReservations Easier to Use?

Cloudbeds’ user-friendly interface scores 4.61/5, with many users praising its intuitive layout and mobile accessibility. Its onboarding process, rated at 4.45/5, is generally smooth, though some users mention setup complexity, especially during integration phases.

ThinkReservations outperforms here, with a 4.82/5 ease-of-use rating and a 4.73/5 onboarding score. Many users describe the system as straightforward and appreciate the quick, accessible support team that makes onboarding seamless.

Edge: ThinkReservations.

Which Has Better Features: Cloudbeds or ThinkReservations?

Cloudbeds offers an expansive suite with 39 shared features and 25 exclusive ones, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, and a guest app. These advanced features support complex operations, automation, and scalability.

ThinkReservations provides core PMS features and 16 verified integrations, focusing on booking, payment, and guest communication. While simpler, its feature set covers essential needs, making it highly effective for small to medium properties.

The significant difference is Cloudbeds’ extensive feature depth, making it preferable for properties with complex needs. Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Cloudbeds or ThinkReservations?

ThinkReservations’ customer support scores a stellar 4.82/5, with many reviews describing their team as knowledgeable, accessible, and quick to respond. Users frequently mention how support has helped them streamline operations and resolve issues efficiently.

Cloudbeds’ support rating is solid at 4.41/5, with some users praising their responsiveness but others citing occasional delays during peak times. While Cloudbeds offers extensive resources and support, ThinkReservations’ support experience appears more consistently positive.

Edge: ThinkReservations.

Which Has More Integrations: Cloudbeds or ThinkReservations?

Cloudbeds impresses with 190 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, and Airbnb, plus exclusive integrations such as Trevo and Umi Digital. Its vast marketplace supports extensive customization and automation.

ThinkReservations has 16 verified partners, including key OTAs and channel managers, but significantly fewer than Cloudbeds. Shared integrations include Booking.com, Expedia, and Airbnb, but the smaller partner network limits advanced automation options.

Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Cloudbeds or ThinkReservations?

Cloudbeds’ overall score of 4.63/5 is strong, but ThinkReservations’ 4.88/5 surpasses it, reflecting higher satisfaction among users. Recent reviews highlight ThinkReservations’ ease of use and excellent support as key drivers.

Cloudbeds’ reviews often mention its extensive features and scalability, but some users note complexity and performance issues during busy periods. ThinkReservations' reviews, especially in the last six months, emphasize satisfaction with support, simplicity, and operational efficiency.

Edge: ThinkReservations.

How Much Do Cloudbeds and ThinkReservations Cost?

Cloudbeds charges a $600 monthly fee with no free trial or implementation fees. Its pricing reflects its extensive feature set and global reach, making it suitable for larger or growing hotels.

ThinkReservations costs $500 monthly, slightly less, offering a more affordable option for small and mid-sized properties. Both have no hidden fees, but the choice depends on whether your hotel needs additional features and integrations.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Cloudbeds?

  • Hotels aiming to scale operations across multiple locations.
  • Properties that need advanced revenue management and analytics.
  • Hotels seeking a unified platform for booking, CRM, and guest engagement.
  • Teams ready to adopt automation and integrations for efficiency.
  • Not ideal if your hotel is small, with minimal staff, and prefers a simple system.

What Type of Hotel Should Use ThinkReservations?

  • Small to medium properties prioritizing ease of use.
  • Bed & Breakfasts, boutique hotels, and small resorts.
  • Teams seeking quick onboarding and dedicated support.
  • Properties without complex operational needs.
  • Not ideal if your hotel plans rapid expansion or needs extensive integrations.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Cloudbeds is a formidable, feature-rich platform designed for scale and complex operations, with a broad global presence and active user community. Its extensive integrations and advanced capabilities make it ideal for growing hotels looking to automate and optimize.

ThinkReservations, on the other hand, offers a streamlined experience with high customer support ratings and a simple interface, perfectly suited for small properties or hotels that prefer quick setup and responsive assistance.

If your hotel is ready to grow, invest in a system that can handle your expanding needs—Cloudbeds is the clear winner. If simplicity and support are your top priorities, ThinkReservations provides a reliable, user-friendly option with proven satisfaction.


This comparison aims to help your team make a confident, informed decision based on your hotel’s size, growth plans, and operational priorities.

Cloudbeds PMS 和 ThinkReservations PMS 的价格是多少?

酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。

Cloudbeds Cloudbeds ThinkReservations ThinkReservations
起始价格 起价 $600/月 起价 $500/月

功能对比:Cloudbeds PMS 与 ThinkReservations PMS

这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。

功能 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds ThinkReservations ThinkReservations
▾ 会计与金融
100%
100%
直接计费
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
多币种
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
自动夜间审计
▾ 营销与电子商务
100%
88%
访客通信(短信)
原生电子邮件营销
客人资料
客户关系管理
礼品卡
频道管理员
预订引擎
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
▾ 管理和配置
75%
75%
集中的用户和角色管理
多种语言
基于云
在前提
▾ 用户管理
100%
75%
访客通信(短信)
客人资料
集中消息传递
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
▾ 前台
92%
67%
移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本)
移动应用
自动夜间审计
日历视图
多种语言
任务管理
自动提醒
客人资料
平板电脑/自助服务终端值机
付款请求
集中消息传递
自动空间优化
▾ 群组管理
100%
50%
组功能
自动空间优化
▾ 宾客体验
100%
45%
集成身份证和护照扫描仪
数字注册
访客应用
网上值机
在线结帐
来宾消息
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
身份证扫描和注册预填
大堂售货亭
▾ 家政
100%
50%
管家模块
家政移动应用程序
实时状态更新
自动分配
实时报告
轮班计划
员工信息
在线结帐
▾ 付款
100%
80%
集成支付终端和读卡器
直接计费
多币种
交付过程
付款请求
▾ 预订管理
100%
67%
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
礼品卡
频道管理员
综合 CRS
拖放磁带图
费率管理
自动空间优化
基于规则的房间分配
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
▾ 收入管理
100%
80%
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
自定义费率
辅助收入跟踪
收益管理模块
基本定价
▾ 税务与合规
100%
75%
符合 PCI 标准
符合 GDPR
SOC2 投诉
税务配置
▾ 支持与培训
100%
100%
在线 24/7 支持
▾ 食品与饮料
100%
100%
EPoS
▾ 温泉
100%
0%
水疗和健康模块

实际成果:Cloudbeds 对比 ThinkReservations(按业务目标)

我们分析了 16 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
Cloudbeds Himmapana Villas 中型
+ Growth in direct bookings: the combination of a strong social media presence and an effective online booking and payment system has led to a significant increase in direct bookings.
+ Operational efficiency: the adoption of a simple yet effective hotel management system has streamlined day-to-day operations, efficiently handling over 2,000 bookings annually, including special guest requests.
+ Remote management flexibility: the use of a cloud-based platform allows for the convenient remote management of the property, enabling operations to be handled effectively both on-site and during travel.

"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."

Thomas K. Petersen
Thomas K. Petersen
Managing Partner
ThinkReservations Blue Tang Inn 中型
+ Blue Tang Inn was able to significantly increase its bottom line after implementing ThinkReservations, with 52% year on year increase during Q1.
+ The property capitalized on upsell opportunities, offering a wide variety of activities (snorkeling, scuba diving, sailing, fishing) as well as F&B packages. Upsell revenue increased 80% in Q1 2023 vs the previous year
+ Blue Tang Inn management was pleased to see the property booked more nights in Q1 2023, at a significant higher rate while the market maintained the previous year's numbers.

"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."

Kristin Fisher
Kristin Fisher
Sales and Marketing Director
提高运营效率
Cloudbeds Flor Parks 小型
+ 17% increase in online reviews
+ 11% of monthly bookings from Google Free Listings
+ Fully integrated booking engine & channel manager

"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."

V
Victor Menor
Operations Manager
ThinkReservations Yara Palm Springs 小型
+ 17.3% of revenue in 2024 came from items and packages, growing their revenue without additional capital investments.
+ Yara Palm Springs consistently has 62% of their bookings through their direct channels, saving thousands of dollars that would otherwise go to OTA commisions.
+ Yara Palm Springs has automated their guest journey and made it easy for guests to enjoy a personalized stay through technology, making it easier for the owners to operate their propertyremotely. "Living in another city from my hotel, working remotely on my hotel, being a mother, trying to have a social life...ThinkReservations makes it so I can still do all those things and be a hotel operator from wherever I am" said Kate.

"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."

改善宾客体验
Cloudbeds The Pad Silverthorne 小型
+ 60% direct bookings in year one
+ 95% guest rating with 1000+ reviews
+ High OTA click-through rates, with lower cancellation rates

"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."

Kevin Bowen
Kevin Bowen
Director of Operations
ThinkReservations Inn on Main 小型
+ Increased Repeat Guests - The inn has seen a notable rise in repeat bookings, including guests who have stayed over 20 times since implementing ThinkReservations.
+ Boosted Upsell Revenue - Upselling opportunities through the booking engine have resulted in a 15% increase in additional revenue from services like late check-ins and special packages.
+ Improved Efficiency - Administrative tasks have been reduced by 30%, allowing staff to dedicate more time to creating memorable guest experiences.

"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"

Chris Kennedy
Chris Kennedy
Co-Owner

Cloudbeds 对比 ThinkReservations:总结

Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds
4.6/5 来自 1,379 条评价

酒店经营者喜爱的方面

易用性和员工培训 88% 正面

一个反复强调的优势是Cloudbeds对非技术背景的酒店员工来说易于学习,这缩短了培训时间,并帮助小型酒店以更少的复杂度运营。评论者常提到教程、视频和简洁的界... 一个反复强调的优势是Cloudbeds对非技术背景的酒店员工来说易于学习,这缩短了培训时间,并帮助小型酒店以更少的复杂度运营。评论者常提到教程、视频和简洁的界面是系统加快采用和日常操作的原因。

PMS日历和预订管理 76% 正面

用户通常将Cloudbeds的日历作为核心的日常工作区,用于查看房态、管理预订和处理入住/退房。他们重视清晰的房态概览、拖放编辑、拆分预订以及更快的前台工作流程... 用户通常将Cloudbeds的日历作为核心的日常工作区,用于查看房态、管理预订和处理入住/退房。他们重视清晰的房态概览、拖放编辑、拆分预订以及更快的前台工作流程,尽管有些用户希望点击次数更少、预订操作更安全。

支持响应速度和人工协助 60% 正面

支持服务是评论中的一个主要差异点,许多用户称赞快速的在线聊天帮助、良好的跟进以及帮助新员工快速上手的培训支持。同时,也有一些评论者批评响应时间慢、聊天... 支持服务是评论中的一个主要差异点,许多用户称赞快速的在线聊天帮助、良好的跟进以及帮助新员工快速上手的培训支持。同时,也有一些评论者批评响应时间慢、聊天机器人操作不顺畅,以及在紧急酒店问题上缺乏电话或真人支持。

酒店经营者提出异议的方面

支持响应速度和人工协助 40% 负面

支持服务是评论中的一个主要差异点,许多用户称赞快速的在线聊天帮助、良好的跟进以及帮助新员工快速上手的培训支持。同时,也有一些评论者批评响应时间慢、聊天... 支持服务是评论中的一个主要差异点,许多用户称赞快速的在线聊天帮助、良好的跟进以及帮助新员工快速上手的培训支持。同时,也有一些评论者批评响应时间慢、聊天机器人操作不顺畅,以及在紧急酒店问题上缺乏电话或真人支持。

移动应用和远程访问限制 78% 负面

Cloudbeds 的云访问功能受到好评,因为管理者可以随时随地工作,但移动应用始终是一个薄弱环节。评测者希望实现真正的随时操作,比如创建预订、接收推送通知、查... Cloudbeds 的云访问功能受到好评,因为管理者可以随时随地工作,但移动应用始终是一个薄弱环节。评测者希望实现真正的随时操作,比如创建预订、接收推送通知、查看房态,以及拥有更稳定的应用体验。

排名更高的方面

中型(25-74 间客房) #4 vs #9
小型(10-24 间客房) #1 vs #4
精品酒店 #2 vs #7
市中心酒店 #3 vs #6

独特功能

PMS 连接性 分析仪表板 库存管理 2路实时集成 多种语言
4.6/5 易用性 4.4/5 客户支持 203 个集成
访问官网
ThinkReservations
ThinkReservations
4.8/5 来自 407 条评价

酒店经营者喜爱的方面

支持响应速度和问题解决 100% 正面

用户一致评价ThinkReservations的支持团队反应迅速、专业且高度响应,常提到有真人协助、全天候服务以及快速解决问题。评论者表示这减少了系统停机时间,避免了... 用户一致评价ThinkReservations的支持团队反应迅速、专业且高度响应,常提到有真人协助、全天候服务以及快速解决问题。评论者表示这减少了系统停机时间,避免了等待电话的时间,并增强了他们对问题能快速、正确解决的信心。

易用性与运营效率 100% 正面

评测者经常表示 ThinkReservations 易于使用,简化日常运营,节省酒店管理日常任务的时间。该平台被描述为直观流畅,帮助员工更高效地管理预订和工作流程,减少... 评测者经常表示 ThinkReservations 易于使用,简化日常运营,节省酒店管理日常任务的时间。该平台被描述为直观流畅,帮助员工更高效地管理预订和工作流程,减少手动操作。

多酒店管理与扩展性 100% 正面

多位评审提到,ThinkReservations 在多家酒店中运行良好,能够支持从单一客栈到其他微型度假村或其他地点的扩展。这使其对需要无需增加复杂性的扩展能力的运营商... 多位评审提到,ThinkReservations 在多家酒店中运行良好,能够支持从单一客栈到其他微型度假村或其他地点的扩展。这使其对需要无需增加复杂性的扩展能力的运营商具有吸引力。

酒店经营者提出异议的方面

产品改进和功能更新 43% 负面

评论者欣赏ThinkReservations不断改进,并经常采纳用户建议,显示出产品与运营商需求同步发展。一些用户也希望有更清晰的应用内通知或新闻通讯,以便更方便地了... 评论者欣赏ThinkReservations不断改进,并经常采纳用户建议,显示出产品与运营商需求同步发展。一些用户也希望有更清晰的应用内通知或新闻通讯,以便更方便地了解新功能并加以利用。

日历功能与自定义 75% 负面

用户喜欢日历,因为它能提供所需的信息,并且可以根据酒店的工作流程进行自定义。然而,一位评论者希望在预订引擎中更突出显示空房日历,建议日历的可见性直接影... 用户喜欢日历,因为它能提供所需的信息,并且可以根据酒店的工作流程进行自定义。然而,一位评论者希望在预订引擎中更突出显示空房日历,建议日历的可见性直接影响客人转化率和预订便利性。

排名更高的方面

超大型(200+ 间客房) #5 vs #13
赌场酒店 #1 vs #4
房车营地与露营地 #3 vs #8
BZ #1 vs #3
4.8/5 易用性 4.8/5 客户支持 16 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

客户支持 ThinkReservations 4.8 vs 4.4 (+0.4)
性价比 ThinkReservations 4.7 vs 4.4 (+0.4)

关于 Cloudbeds PMS 与 ThinkReservations PMS 的常见问题

Cloudbeds PMS 能否替代 ThinkReservations PMS?

这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 203 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ThinkReservations PMS 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。ThinkReservations PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Cloudbeds PMS 或 ThinkReservations PMS 是否提供免费方案?

Cloudbeds PMS:否。ThinkReservations PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Cloudbeds PMS 和 ThinkReservations PMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,ThinkReservations 的为 87。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取您的免费人工智能分析师报告

根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐

Ghostel icon
受到以下企业信赖
footer image 1 footer image 2 footer image 3 footer image 4 footer image 5 footer image 6 footer image 7

让我们查找您的酒店信息